Early Bronchodilator Reversibility Testing in a Morbidly Obese Population: Fluticasone/Salmeterol Efficacy Versus Salbutamol Bronchodilator

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2600270/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Early Bronchodilator Reversibility Testing in a Morbidly Obese Population: Fluticasone/Salmeterol Efficacy Versus Salbutamol Bronchodilator

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2600270/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 09 Oct, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Pulmonary Medicine →

You are reading this latest preprint version

A positive response in reversibility testing is widely used to diagnose patients with airway limitations. However, despite its simple procedure, it doesn't accurately reflect the exact airway irreversibility. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of early bronchodilation test using salbutamol and fluticasone/salmeterol combination in obese subjects.

The study included patients without a history of obstructive lung disease or bronchodilators. Sub-classification of patients based on body mass index (BMI) was carried out into normal (<24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25-29.9kg/m²), and obese (BMI≥30). Spirometry measurements were performed before and after salbutamol or fluticasone/salmeterol administration.

The study included 415 (49.9% male) patients with a mean age of 40.92±10.86 years. Obese subjects showed a high prevalence of restrictive patterns (23.4%), with non-significant lower spirometric values compared to normal and overweight subjects (p>0.05). The magnitude of bronchodilation, as identified by spirometry, following fluticasone/salmeterol was higher in all participants, with a significant increase in obese subjects with a p-value of 0.013, 0.002, and 0.035 for FEV₁, FEV₁% predicted and FEV₁/FVC, respectively.

Fluticasone/salmeterol combination increases FEV₁, FEV₁% of predicted and FEV₁/FVC ratio than the conventional test using salbutamol inhaler, and it can be a potential candidate for assessment of airway obstruction using reversibility test, especially among the obese population.

Obese

fluticasone/salmeterol

salbutamol

bronchodilators

spirometry

reversibility test.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are complex chronic diseases with high prevalence across the globe. Asthma is an inflammatory disease characterized by airway hyper-responsiveness, mostly reversible, while COPD is an irreversible, progressive airway obstruction [1].A diagnosis of obstructive lung disease usually depends on symptomatic features. Then airflow expiration tests are needed to confirm the suspected diagnosis, thereby influencing the pattern of medical care and drug preferences [2]. Spirometry is pivotal in assessing bronchodilator reversibility. It is considered the standard gold test for diagnosing diseases with obstructive airways in general practice. Reversibility testing measures the airflow expiration response after inhaling a bronchodilator. A positive test is defined as an increase in FEV1 of more than 12% from baseline or a 200 ml increase, according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS). In comparison, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommended a change of more than 9% of the predicted FEV1 as a hallmark for asthma confirmation [1].

Simple bronchodilator reversibility testing is safe with relevantly few clinical risks and can be carried out promptly. However, its results have limited reproducibility and accuracy. Since it depends on several factors, such as the patient's maximal effort and the bronchodilator used [3].

In addition, the defined cut-offs of the positive reversibility test may fail to detect those with low FEV1 at baseline or those with preserved lung function or large lung volumes[4].

Obesity is associated with a decline in lung function. It can also worsen the manifestations of airway obstruction and severity and decrease the response to conventional therapies among patients with asthma and COPD [5, 6]. Many studies have described the misdiagnosis of obstructive airways in morbidly obese populations [7]. explained that the increase in body mass index (BMI) might be associated with diagnostic uncertainty and misclassification potential of asthma diagnosis. The response to asthma medications and conventional bronchodilators has been reported to be negatively affected by the increase in BMI and, consequently, limited asthma control among the obese population. Therefore, combination medications may be required to achieve considerable airway response. We hypothesize that the obese population may show limited response to short-acting bronchodilators in early reversibility tests, contributing to the misdiagnosis of obstructive airway disease. Inevitably, an incorrect asthma diagnosis may cause inappropriate treatment, with a higher potential of side effects and cost burden [7]. Few studies investigated the efficacy of different bronchodilator combinations in early reversibility testing, such as LABAs/inhaled corticosteroids, levosalbutamol/ipratropium, or Glycopyrronium bromide and salbutamol combination [8–10]. However, none of these studies investigated the effect of these combinations in early reversibility tests amongst the obese population.

Hence, our study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fluticasone/salmeterol relative to salbutamol in early reversibility testing among a population with different body mass indexes.

2.1. Study population

This observational study was conducted at Fayoum university hospital, Fayoum, Egypt, from October 2021 to January 2022. Symptomatic patients with cough, dyspnea and/or wheezing were screened at the first visit for recruitment. Eligibility criteria were a) age above 18 years old; b) patients who never received short or long-acting bronchodilators before or within the past 12 hours before the reversibility test. We excluded patients who were current smokers or ex-smokers. Oral corticosteroid users were also excluded. The study protocol was conducted according to ethical guidelines and approved by Fayoum University's ethical committee. All subjects were instructed about the study procedure, and informed consent was fulfilled.

2.2. Study design

Eligible participants were randomized to receive salbutamol (Ventolin®, two puffs of 200 µg/ two puffs; total dose 400 µg or fluticasone/ salmeterol (Seretide Evohaler®, 125/25µg/ two puffs; total dose 250/50µg dose) bronchodilators combination using a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with a spacer with subgroup categorization of each group according to body mass index (BMI) into normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m²) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). A comprehensive clinical assessment, including complete medical history recording, physical examination, and PFT, was performed for all the study participants.

Initially, participants underwent pre-bronchodilator spirometry using the Spirodoc S/N instrument (MIR Spirodoc, Spiro + Oxi, Roma, Italy) according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards. The basal forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV₁/FVC was measured in the seated position, and the best value of three successful maneuvers was recorded. Then, subjects were allocated to inhaled bronchodilators with the specified doses, and spirometry was repeated 15 minutes later. Reversibility was considered positive in patients whose FEV₁ showed at least 12% improvement from basal value and at least ≥ 200 mL increase after bronchodilator administration ¹². The normal and percent predicted values were estimated from the reference values of the Global Lung Initiative (GLI).

2.3. Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted with SPSS 16.0 (Inc., Chicago, IL). The changes in spirometric outcomes by each bronchodilator regimen were determined by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A student t-test was used to investigate the differences in demographic characteristics and per-bronchodilator spirometric outcomes in salbutamol and fluticasone/salmeterol groups. A Chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of patients achieving post-bronchodilator improvement in spirometric variables in the study groups. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD, while categorical data were expressed as case frequencies (n) and percentages.

3.1. Study sample characteristics

In total, 426 patients were initially screened. Only 415 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate in the study. The difference in baseline characteristics of the study groups was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). The distribution of demographic variables and baseline lung functions on initial spirometry are listed in Table 1. The recruited subjects' ages ranged from 19 to 78 years, with a mean value of 40.92 ± 10.86 years. There were 207 males (49.9%) and 208 females (50.1%) participants in the study. The difference in body mass index between the normal, overweight, and obese was statistically significant (P < 0.001) with an average of 22.06 ± 2.2, 27.81 ± 1.37, and 35.67 ± 4.58, respectively, for the salbutamol group and 23.2 ± 5.83, 28.46 ± 1.8, and 36.2 ± 6.3, respectively for salmeterol/fluticasone group.

Table 1

baseline demographic and lung functions on initial spirometry
Variables	Salbutamol group (n = 209)				Fluticasone/Salmeterol group (n = 206)				¹P-value
Variables	Normal	overweight	Obese	P-value	Normal	overweight	obese	P-value
Number of participants (%)	70 (33.49)	69 (33.01)	70 (33.49)		68 (33.01)	68 (33.01)	70 (33.98)
Age (years)	37.93 ± 12.4	38.49 ± 14.5	42.95 ± 13.8	0.059	39.14 ± 8.1	41.85 ± 9.3	45.14 ± 11.9	0.036	NS
Gender (M/F)	46/24	33/36	26/44	0.094	33/35	38/30	31/39	0.174	NS
BMI (kg/m²)	22.96 ± 2.21	27.81 ± 1.37	35.67 ± 4.58	< 0.001*	23.2 ± 5.83	28.06 ± 1.8	35.2 ± 6.3	< 0.001*	NS
FEV₁ (L)	3.15 ± 1.2	2.93 ± 0.81	2.79 ± 1.03	0.115	3.72 ± 1.46	3.29 ± 1.28	3.24 ± 1.17	0.064	NS
FEV₁% of predicted	76.2 ± 12.6	74.5 ± 16.4	72.41 ± 18.3	0.372	78.28 ± 12.5	77.05 ± 11.3	76.56 ± 12.9	0.699	NS
FVC (L)	3.45 ± 1.14	3.41 ± 0.78	3.34 ± 0.97	0.796	4.16 ± 1.41	3.92 ± 1.36	3.64 ± 1.27	0.079	NS
FVC% of predicted	89.78 ± 10.8	87.15 ± 12.37	86.63 ± 14.52	0.281	90.18 ± 12.8	87.22 ± 10.41	85.34 ± 13.62	0.068	NS
FEV₁/FVC	73.88 ± 17.61	73.15 ± 19.28	70.94 ± 18.13	0.615	76.83 ± 15.8	74.52 ± 14.7	71.24 ± 16.51	0.112	NS
M/F: male/Female; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: Forced vital capacity
¹The p-value difference between the salbutamol and Fluticasone/salmeterol groups
*Statistically significant difference within groups

3.2. Pre-bronchodilator spirometry

Spirometric values of obese were lower when compared to normal and overweight subjects. However, the difference was non-statistically significant (p > 0.05). Also, restrictive abnormal pattern of lung function tests was highly prevalent among the obese participants (23.4%). Obstructive and mixed patterns frequencies were 2.14% and 1.43%, respectively, in obese subjects.

3.3. Reversibility rest outcomes

Following baseline spirometry, the reversibility test was performed using salbutamol and salmeterol/fluticasone combination in two randomized groups with subgroup categorization into normal, overweight, and obese. Comparisons between post-bronchodilator spirometric results in salbutamol versus fluticasone/salmeterol combination are illustrated in Table 2. The values of FEV₁ and FEV₁/FVC were higher in the salmeterol/fluticasone group compared to salbutamol only in the three subgroups included however, the difference was statistically non-significant among overweight and normal subjects. In contrast, obese subjects showed significant improvement in spirometric results with a p-value of 0.013, 0.002, and 0.035 for FEV₁, FEV₁% predicted, and FEV₁/FVC, respectively. The changes in FEV₁% of predicted and FEV₁ (L) across the study groups were statistically significant; p-value < 0.001 and 0.0014, respectively (Fig. 1). Also, the reversibility test was positive in (17%) of the salbutamol group compared to 32% in the fluticasone/salmeterol group, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.018).

Table 2

Post-bronchodilator spirometry test results in salbutamol and Fluticasone/salmeterol groups
Variables	Salbutamol (n = 209)	Fluticasone/Salmeterol (n = 206)	P-value
FEV₁ (L) Normal Overweight Obese	3.27 ± 1.71 3.04 ± 0.97 2.89 ± 1.12	3.85 ± 1.75 3.41 ± 1.22 3.37 ± 1.14	0.051 0.148 0.013*
FEV₁% of predicted Normal Overweight Obese	95.28 ± 12.7 91.65 ± 14.7 89.93 ± 12.61	97.86 ± 11.9 95.32 ± 12.3 96.42 ± 11.34	0.221 0.116 0.002*
FEV₁/FVC (%) Normal Overweight Obese	79.23 ± 17.2 78.64 ± 12.9 74.31 ± 15.3	83.32 ± 16.4 82.7 ± 14.9 79.6 ± 14.2	0.156 0.093 0.0354*
Positive Reversibility test n (%)	17 (8.1)	32 (15.6)	0.018*
FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: Forced vital capacity

There is little concordance between guidelines regarding the bronchodilator reversibility test assessment standards [11, 12]. Few studies were designed to determine the optimum bronchodilator drug for the reversibility test [8, 9]. The present study takes precedence in comparing the effect of salbutamol versus fluticasone/salmeterol combination on early reversibility test and identifies the impact of body mass index on the spirometric outcomes.

One of the deleterious consequences of obesity is respiratory function impairment. However, the effect of BMI on spirometry was controversial in many clinical trials. The results of the present study showed lower spirometric values with the increase in BMI. In agreement with our results, many studies reported a consistent decrease in FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC ratio with increased BMI [13, 14]. Contradictory to our results, a positive correlation of BMI with FVC values was reported amongst obese individuals in other studies, contributing to this correlation to muscularity effect with age and height dependence [15, 16]. However, this effect was marked in group II and III obesity. This variability from our results can be attributed to dealing with obese subjects as a group without sub-categorization.

Overweight and obese subjects are more prone to misdiagnose asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [17, 18]. The bronchodilator reversibility test is one of the lung laboratory's most common diagnostic tools. Since the extent of response can be affected by several parameters such as the bronchodilator type and dose, the administration technique, and the elapsed duration till the assessment of bronchodilator response, the method applied for the assessment of reversibility may be fundamental. However, there are no evidence-based standards regarding bronchodilator selection or the timing of post-bronchodilator response estimation [12, 19].

Short-acting- β2 agonists such as salbutamol or anticholinergics are commonly bronchodilators used for early reversibility testing in patients with suspected obstructive pulmonary disease. Long acting β2 agonists have also been reported to exhibit a short-term action, and they can be applied for early reversibility tests. Using LABAs/ inhaled corticosteroids in early reversibility testing results in more remarkable improvement in FEV₁ in patients with obstructive lung diseases [9]. In concordance with our results which revealed that fluticasone and salmeterol combination was associated with more remarkable improvement in FEV_1, FEV₁% of predicted and FEV₁/FVC compared to salbutamol only in all subjects. However, these outcomes were only statistically significant in obese subjects.

Moreover, the percentage of patients with a positive reversibility test was higher in the salmeterol/fluticasone group. The difference in the extent of the bronchodilation effect between the study groups may be explained by the combination of bronchodilators that can help in bronchial dilation with different mechanisms and hence, enhance the airway response.

However, in normal/overweight subjects, salbutamol inhaler can sufficiently achieve bronchodilation response which is not significantly lower than that achieved by LABA/ corticosteroids combination in early reversibility test, in contrast to obese subjects which need a combination of bronchodilator medications to increase the extent of bronchial airways dilation [20, 21] due to the mechanical effect of obesity on the respiratory airways [5]. It is worth noting that obesity was associated with lower responsiveness to different types of inhaled corticosteroids, including beclomethasone and budesonide, in obese asthmatic patients [22, 23]. Unlike fluticasone propionate, which showed significant efficacy in FEV₁ improvement regardless of the body weight [24].

Therefore, we suggest that salmeterol/fluticasone inhalation can be used in early reversibility testing instead of salbutamol to improve spirometry values and more reliable outcomes, especially in obese subjects.

Although the present study takes precedence in assessing the effect of fluticasone/salmeterol inhalation in early reversibility testing compared with the conventional approach of using salbutamol among obese participants, the study has several limitations.

Firstly, only drug choice was investigated in this study with a limitation of the measurement timing to 15 minutes after bronchodilator administration, which may be inadequate for accurately determining the maximal bronchodilation response. Secondly, the study was designed as a parallel-group study rather than a cross-over design, which may result in bias due to inter-individual variability and lack of reproducibility due to the implications of many factors such as the maneuver of inhaler use and measurement timing. Thirdly, the study lacks follow-up to ensure the sensitivity and accuracy of this modified approach to the bronchodilator reversibility test. Further extensive randomized studies with cross-over design and follow-up are warranted to validate the outcomes of this combination in obese patients.

In conclusion, dual bronchodilators (fluticasone/salmeterol) use with variability in the mode of action resulted in a higher increase in FEV₁, FEV₁% of predicted, and FEV₁/FVC ratio than the conventional test using salbutamol inhaler with significant improvement in spirometry results in obese patients. This study raises the potential of using inhaled fluticasone/salmeterol combination for reversibility testing instead of salbutamol alone, especially among obese subjects. Further studies are needed to assess the overall modified approach.

Ethical approval and consent to participate.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by Fayoum University's ethical committee. All subjects were instructed about the study procedure, and informed consent was fulfilled.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Authors’ contributions

Mona Ibrahim Ahmed (M.I.A.), Randa Ibrahim Ahmed (R.I.A.), Hasnaa Osama (H.O.), Amira Karam Khalifa (A.K.K.), Abdullah Ali Alshehri (A.A.A.), Gaber El-Saber Batiha(G.E.B.), Walaa A Negm(W.A.N.), Marwa Kamal (M.K.)

Conceptualization, M.I.A., R.I.A. and M.K..; methodology, A.K.K., A.A.A., and G.E.B..; software, W.A.N., H.O.; validation, M.I.A., M.K. and R.I.A.; formal analysis, M.I.A., A.A.A. and G.E.B.; investigation, M.I.A., H.O., A.K.K., W.A.N. and M.K..; resources, A.K.K., R.I.A., M.I.A. and G.E.B..; data curation, W.A.N., A.A.A. and H.O..; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.A., R.I.A., H.O., and A.K.K. writing—review and editing, A.A.A., A.K.K., G/E.B.,M.K..; visualization, W.A.N., H.O. and M.K..; supervision, W.A.N., and M.K..; project administration, M.I.A. and R.I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients contributing to the study.

Richter DC, Joubert JR, Nell H, Schuurmans MM, Irusen EM. Diagnostic value of post-bronchodilator pulmonary function testing to distinguish between stable, moderate to severe COPD and asthma. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2008;3(4):693.
Levy ML, Quanjer PH, Rachel B, Cooper BG, Holmes S, Small IR. Diagnostic Spirometry in Primary Care: Proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations. Prim Care Respiratory J. 2009;18(3):130–47.
Nurulrahman M, Damailia R, Achmad S. Pengaruh Penggunaan Masker terhadap Gangguan Fungsi Paru dengan Mengukur FEV1, FVC dan Rasio FEV1/FVC pada Pekerja Industri Pupuk NPK di Cikampek.Prosiding Pendidikan Dokter2020:210–215.
Ioachimescu OC, Ramos JA, Hoffman M, McCarthy K, Stoller JK. Assessing bronchodilator response by changes in per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second. J Investig Med. 2021;69(5):1027–34.
Carpaij OA, van den Berge M. The asthma–obesity relationship: underlying mechanisms and treatment implications. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24(1):42–9.
Fuller-Thomson E, Howden KE, Fuller-Thomson LR, Agbeyaka S. A strong graded relationship between level of obesity and COPD: findings from a national population-based study of lifelong nonsmokers. Journal of Obesity 2018, 2018.
Scott S, Currie J, Albert P, Calverley P, Wilding JP. Risk of misdiagnosis, health-related quality of life, and BMI in patients who are overweight with doctor-diagnosed asthma. Chest. 2012;141(3):616–24.
Iyigun O, Uzar T, Karaman I, Dirican A, Ozkaya S.Efficacy of Levosalbutamol/Ipratropium Combination in Early Bronchodilator Reversibility.
Ozkaya S, Dirican A, Tuna T. The effects of long-acting β2-agonists plus inhaled corticosteroids for early reversibility in patients with airway obstruction. J Thorac Disease. 2013;5(4):461.
Grishaev S, Sharova N. Modified test to identify the reversibility of bronchial obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In.: Eur Respiratory Soc; 2018.
Holt NR, Thompson BR, Miller B, Borg BM. Substantial variation exists in spirometry interpretation practices for airflow obstruction in accredited lung function laboratories across Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J. 2019;49(1):41–7.
Cavallazzi RS, Polivka BJ, Beatty BL, Antimisiaris DE, Gopalraj RK, Vickers-Smith RA, Folz RJ. Current bronchodilator responsiveness criteria underestimate asthma in older adults. Respir Care. 2020;65(8):1104–11.
Porhomayon J, Papadakos P, Singh A, Nader N. Alteration in respiratory physiology in obesity for anesthesia-critical care physician. HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia 2011, 3(2):109.
Banerjee J, Roy A, Singhamahapatra A, Dey PK, Ghosal A, Das A. Association of body mass index (BMI) with lung function parameters in non-asthmatics identified by spirometric protocols. J Clin Diagn research: JCDR. 2014;8(2):12.
Ferreira MS, Mendes RT, Marson FA, Zambon MP, Antonio MA, Paschoal IA, Toro AA, Severino SD, Ribeiro MA, Ribeiro JD. Spirometry and volumetric capnography in lung function assessment of obese and normal-weight individuals without asthma☆. Jornal de pediatria. 2017;93:398–405.
Peters U, Subramanian M, Chapman DG, Kaminsky DA, Irvin CG, Wise RA, Skloot GS, Bates JH, Dixon AE. BMI but not central obesity predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction. Respirology. 2019;24(6):543–50.
Hangaard S, Helle T, Nielsen C, Hejlesen OK. Causes of misdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic scoping review. Respir Med. 2017;129:63–84.
MacNeil J, Loves RH, Aaron SD. Addressing the misdiagnosis of asthma in adults: where does it go wrong? Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(11):1187–98.
El Ghoul J, Abouda M, Triki M, Ghourabi A, Charfi R. Determining the optimal time to assess the reversibility of airway obstruction. Lung India: Official Organ of Indian Chest Society. 2019;36(2):123.
Black MH, Smith N, Porter AH, Jacobsen SJ, Koebnick C. Higher prevalence of obesity among children with asthma. Obesity. 2012;20(5):1041–7.
Thompson CA, Eslick SR, Berthon BS, Wood LG. Asthma medication use in obese and healthy weight asthma: systematic review/meta-analysis.European Respiratory Journal2021, 57(3).
Peters-Golden M, Swern A, Bird SS, Hustad CM, Grant E, Edelman JM. Influence of body mass index on the response to asthma controller agents. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:495–503.
Anderson WJ, Lipworth BJ. Does body mass index influence responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids in persistent asthma? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(4):237–42.
Sutherland ER, Camargo CA Jr, Busse WW, Meltzer EO, Ortega HG, Yancey SW, Emmett AH, Stempel DA. Comparative effect of body mass index on response to asthma controller therapy. In: Allergy and Asthma Proceedings: 2010: OceanSide Publications; 2010: 20.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 09 Oct, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Pulmonary Medicine →

Editorial decision: Major revision
28 Aug, 2023
Reviews received at journal
07 Aug, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
12 Jul, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
12 Jun, 2023
Reviews received at journal
07 Jun, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
05 Jun, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
02 Jun, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
22 May, 2023
Editor invited by journal
09 Mar, 2023
Submission checks completed at journal
09 Mar, 2023
First submitted to journal
17 Feb, 2023

You are reading this latest preprint version

Early Bronchodilator Reversibility Testing in a Morbidly Obese Population: Fluticasone/Salmeterol Efficacy Versus Salbutamol Bronchodilator

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Method

2.1. Study population

2.2. Study design

2.3. Statistical analysis

Results

3.1. Study sample characteristics

3.2. Pre-bronchodilator spirometry

3.3. Reversibility rest outcomes

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1