Current conceptual frameworks assign the influence of Ca on SOC persistence solely to physico-chemical mechanisms such as sorption, co-precipitation, and occlusion of organic matter 2,6,32. Our findings show that Ca addition exerted an immediate and prolonged influence on microbial community structure and litter metabolism, revealing upstream Ca effects on the biological properties of SOC cycling. We observed that Ca addition decreased soil respiration and increased the efficiency of litter C assimilation and subsequent transfer of highly processed litter C and N into the MAOM fraction. Our results support the hypothesis that Ca affects microbial community structure, altering microbial products derived from litter, and promoting enhanced stabilization of these products through Ca driven organo-mineral interactions. Here, we discuss the potential mechanisms underlying the changes in litter C cycling caused by Ca additions.
We observed two major trends in the effects of Ca on the bacterial community. First, Ca had a disproportionately large negative effect on ASVs favored by litter addition (Fig. 2C). This observation suggests that Ca treatment had a strong impact on decomposer communities, and that reduced net respiration resulted to some extent from a change in decomposer populations. However, we cannot test this relationship directly, as we lack information about changes in the absolute abundance of these populations. Second, Ca treatment enhanced the relative abundance of surface-colonizing bacterial taxa, including actinobacteria that form mycelia such as Nocardioides, Rhodococcus, Leifsonia, Streptomyces, Cellulomonas, Agromyces, and Pseudonocardia33–36, and surface motile or surface-adhering populations such as Devosia, Hyphomicrobium, Haliangium, Sorangium, members of Fibrobacterota, Asticcacaulis, Luteimonas, and Adhaeribacter37–44 (Supplementary Figs. 7, 8). Many of the same taxa were also similarly favored in a study of forest soil amended with calcitic lime, especially Nocardioides, Devosia, Haliangium, and Hyphomicrobium26, suggesting that the observed shift in surface-colonizing bacteria is associated with Ca-driven processes.
The selection for surface-adhering bacterial populations can be explained by the fact that Ca is a critical co-factor in many modes of bacterial attachment (see Supplementary Information for more details) and biofilm production20–23. We anticipate that surface-attached populations will exhibit differences in metabolism from those bacteria better adapted for growth in pore water, favoring slower growth rates, higher CUE, and an increase in microbial products that facilitate surface interactions (e.g., adhesive proteins and extracellular polymeric substances).
The Ca-induced shift in microbial processing of litter had a cascading effect on the C and N occurring as MAOM. In the Ca-treated soils, a larger fraction of MBC was derived from litter-C than in control soils, indicating that more litter was cycled through microbial biomass. This result was supported by the observation that MAOM consisted of compounds that were more microbially processed (lower C:N) in Ca-treated than control soil (Fig. 2F). Our data also show that Ca plays a direct role in the transfer of litter-derived decomposition products into the MAOM fraction – forming new organo-mineral associations. When Ca was added, we observed higher co-localization between clay minerals and organic compounds, greater organic loading, and increased clay mineral particle aggregation at sub-micron scales (Fig. 4). This is consistent with other studies who have shown that Ca can play an important role in mediating organo-mineral interactions5,7,45. Furthermore, we found that the amount and co-localization of carboxylic-C and aromatic-C with clay minerals in Ca-treated soils increased with incubation time. This result indicates that organic matter accumulated in spatially constrained hotspots (Fig. 4), as suggested by recent studies46,47, which may reflect the activity of microbial surface colonies which produce and deposit metabolic by-products on mineral surfaces. This observation is consistent with NanoSIMS measurements which showed increased Ca and litter-derived 15N co-localization on mineral surfaces (Fig. 5F).
Reduced C bioavailability due to Ca-driven sorption or precipitation of DOC did not appear to be the direct cause of lower mineralization rates since DOC concentrations were comparable in Ca-treated and control soils (Supplementary Fig. 6). Preliminary observations ruled out the effects of transient increase in soil salinity on mineralization with a KCl control (Supplementary Fig. 1), supporting our conclusion that Ca was solely responsible for the changes to mineralization, bacterial community composition, and C metabolism. Furthermore, if lower bioavailability of DOC or saline conditions were limiting factors, litter transformation in Ca-treated soils would also be reduced, which was not the case (Fig. 1D, Fig. 3).
Taken together, our results support our hypotheses that Ca additions affect microbial community structure, altering microbial products derived from litter, and promoting enhanced stabilization of these products through Ca-driven organo-mineral interactions. The Ca addition increased an already high exchangeable-Ca content (from 85–92% of the soil’s cation exchange capacity - CEC) (Supplementary Table 1) but did not change Ca speciation (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3), which raises the question: how did a minor increase in exchangeable Ca bring about a major change in both microbial processing and MAOM formation?
Based on our findings we conclude that the most likely mechanism (Fig. 6) was that Ca addition displaced other exchangeable cations, providing pristine sites for microbial attachments and adsorption of litter transformation products. Additionally, the elevated concentration of soluble Ca ions likely caused changes in microbial cell regulation which triggered a switch to surface colonization, as previously reported48–51. Subsequently, surface-attached microbial cells, microbial by-products and necromass may have been deposited at greater loadings on mineral surfaces52,53. Ca-driven organo-mineral associations of highly processed organic molecules likely reduced microbial access, increasing their persistence in soil. The latter explanation indicates that the biotic effect of Ca on microbial C cycling preceded the abiotic effect. Regardless, both scenarios suggest that even small changes in the concentration of soluble Ca can influence SOC cycling and persistence, whether through cation exchange processes on mineral surfaces or biochemical regulation of surface-attaching behavior.
Our study revealed the influence of Ca on previously overlooked biological mechanisms that affect MAOM formation. While the extent that Ca drives biotic controls over SOC cycling will be soil dependent, our findings suggest that amendments which raise soluble Ca content can increase the conversion of organic inputs to MAOM, a more persistent form of SOC. These observations raise the possibility that Ca additions may be used to manage SOC in agroecosystems. For example, Ca-containing soil amendments, like gypsum and lime, are commonly added to manage soil fertility, while basalt rock (calcium silicate) is applied to sequester inorganic C through enhanced rock weathering. These amendments may concomitantly impact SOC due to effects on microbial C cycling, especially when coupled with organic matter amendments. Understanding the nature of the soil Ca pools responsible for coupling biotic-abiotic SOC cycling processes will help optimize the management of Ca amendments and SOC stocks for more climate-smart soils.