This study presents a safe, effective, and reproducible method for creating large-volume iliocaval DVTs in an adult pig that is clinically representative of human acute DVT. Thrombus was successfully formed in the sequestered venous segment in all 11 pigs tested within 60 minutes without incidence of hemodynamic instability or major complications. All animals survived the DVT formation procedure until euthanization. The DVT formation process did not cause trauma or damage to the vena cava or its surrounding tissue, further demonstrating the safety, stability, and reproducibility of the model. Histologic assessment of the IVC wall demonstrated minimal microtrauma. Thrombi were also found to contain a significant fraction of platelets consistent with acute DVT formation.
Current acute DVT treatment includes anticoagulation with or without adjunct endovascular venous recanalization techniques. While current CHEST guidelines only contain a weak recommendation for interventional therapy in patients with very severe, limb-threatening DVT, endovascular interventions are being performed with increased frequency in patients with extensive iliocaval DVT to reduce the rates of PTS [27]. To reduce the DVT-associated risk of PE and PTS, various endovascular techniques have been developed to facilitate dissolving, fragmenting, debulking, and suctioning of intraluminal acute large-volume DVTs [28–35]. Recently, a variety of endovascular devices have arrived on the market to facilitate these treatment strategies [10, 14, 21, 22, 28, 36]. Unfortunately, several recent studies have demonstrated endovascular treatment of acute DVT is associated with non-negligible risks such as bleeding, hemoglobinuria, venous wall trauma, recurrent DVT formation, thrombus distal embolization, intraprocedural PE, and death [37–39]. For example, the CaVenT study randomized 209 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT to anticoagulation or catheter directed thrombolysis, and observed significant bleeding complications in 20 of the enrolled patients [40]. A recent meta-analysis comparing thrombolysis versus mechanical thrombectomy revealed similar rates of thrombus removal (95% vs. 96%, respectively) but thrombolysis alone was thrombectomy was associated with higher DVT recurrence at 6 months and major bleeding complications [41]. The RAPID registry and CLOUT registry, which are industry-sponsored prospective clinical trials evaluating different thrombectomy devices (AngioVac suction thrombectomy device manufactured by AngioDynamics, Inc, and ClotTriever mechanical thrombectomy device manufactured by Inari Medical, Inc.) similarly reported complications related to distal thrombus embolization, and intraoperative blood loss [37, 42, 43].
Recent thrombectomy devices have reached the market based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device [44, 45]. However, in vivo animal testing has not been a routine requirement in the regulatory approval process, since no standardized and widely applied DVT models have been applied in commercial research and development efforts [46]. Therefore, there is a critical need for a simple and reproducible large animal DVT model to facilitate in vivo testing for next generation thrombectomy devices. A porcine model is ideal due to clinical relevance and similarities to the human vascular anatomy. The porcine host also has a similar coagulation cascade, therefore serving as a good model for acute thrombosis [47, 48]. However, prior porcine DVT have demonstrated several shortcomings. Some models simulate DVT by using stents to create an in-stent thrombosis in the desired vessel [49, 50], which limits its correlation to human pathology and limits post-mortem tissue histologic analysis. Another model, described an IVC stasis and thrombosis model via implantation of an intraluminal suture netting [51]. This model yields a relatively slow forming thrombus over 7 to 14 days, and is associated with notable technical challenges and a high level of expertise for implantation of the netting. Finally, other models have employed distal intravascular infusion of thrombin with a proximally occlusive balloon catheter or proximal and distal occlusion with surgical ligatures [52–55]. However, these processes involve utilization of expensive reagents that may be relatively difficult to source on a routine basis.
The advantages of our described model include its simplicity, efficiency, and reproducibility. This method employs relatively simple endovascular techniques that can be performed without extensive surgical training or sophisticated endovascular expertise. Ethanol is an attractive primary thrombus stimulant, as it is an inexpensive and readily available laboratory reagent. Ethanol has been used clinically as a sclerosant in the treatment of peripheral venous malformations for decades [56]. Absolute ethanol induces thrombosis by denaturing blood proteins, denuding endothelial cells and precipitating their protoplasm, and segmentally fracturing the vascular wall to the level of the elastic lamina [57]. We hypothesized that a short-course exposure to 25% ethanol solution would efficiently and effectively incite thrombosis in a sequestered segment of the porcine iliocaval system. This method is also highly reproducible, with all procedures performed in this study yielding successful thrombus without significant changes in hemodynamics or major complications (Table 2). Further, this model does not involve placement of retained foreign material and forms thrombus relatively quickly. This important advantage allows for subsequent evaluation of therapeutic interventions within the same operative setting.
Our study demonstrates that our acute IVC model is also grossly and histologically tolerated by the porcine host. We observed no gross and very minimal microscopic trauma to the IVC wall. On average, the thrombus composition was also consistent with other acute models with > 10% platelet content (Fig. 4). Alkarithi et al. found that STEMI thrombi are on average 11% platelets by composition [58]. The platelet and fibrin content are expected to rise in subacute model, with DVT thrombi removed by suction thrombectomy after 1 to 3 days displaying an average composition of 18.5% platelets and 28.3% fibrin [59].
Previous reports indicate that intravascular infusion of ethanol can be caustic to vascular tissue and lead to severe hemodynamic perturbations. A rat model for endovascular treatment of venous malformations revealed that intravascular injection of 50% and 75% ethanol damaged vessel walls. However, no damage to the vessel wall was observed with injection of 25% ethanol [60]. In our study, we did not observe any hemodynamic changes with infusion of a small volume of 25% ethanol in the sequestered IVC. We also observed no gross or histologic changes to the IVC that can be attributed to the ethanol infusion. Perhaps the combination of robust sequestration and venous stasis within the IVC helped prevent systemic dispersal of the ethanol solution, thereby circumventing any hemodynamic complications. It is also unknown whether the porcine host would develop be at risk of hemodynamic instability if a higher concertation of larger volumes of ethanol were used during the infusion process.
We acknowledge that our model has some limitations. First, the model is only representative of acute DVT, and not sub-acute or chronic DVT processes. Notably, the longer-term effects of the ethanol on the vessel wall are unknown at this time. Nevertheless, under the defined procedural parameters, our model provides a potentially highly useful and reproducible model for assessment of endovascular devices in the setting of DVT. Second, the stasis model suggests that upon removal of the balloon occlusion catheters, the intraluminal thrombus may quickly embolize. Therefore, testing procedures of future thrombectomy devices may need to consider maintaining distal balloon occlusion to prevent immediate loss of intraluminal IVC thrombus.
In conclusion, the proposed in vivo porcine model utilizes venous stasis and 25% ethanol solution to create acute iliocaval DVT in a safe and reproducible manner. This clinically relevant large animal model may be used for future verification and validation testing of next generation endovascular thrombectomy devices.