The aim of this report is two-fold: first, to present a case of Xen45 Gel Stent for the treatment of refractory glaucoma; and second, to propose a new solution to successfully recanalize the Xen45 Gel Stent using 10 − 0 nylon sutures.
There are few studies on Xen45 Gel Stent on individuals with refractory glaucoma who have had failed glaucoma filtration procedures13. In our case, the patient suffered from uncontrolled IOP despite maximum tolerated antiglaucoma drug treatment and previous multiple unsuccessful antiglaucoma surgeries (GATT and trabeculectomy). The safety of Xen Gel Stent implantation in terms of complications appears to be better than conventional glaucoma surgery14. Moreover, a least invasive surgical method should be adopted as much as possible so that other procedures may be performed later even if the surgery fails. The Xen Gel Stent is implanted through an ab-interno ‘closed conjunctiva’ method and drains aqueous fluid to the subconjunctival region without the use of an extraocular reservoir, if Xen implantation fails, it is almost always possible to place a glaucoma drainage device15,16.
In the meta-analysis by Xz et al.11, the common postoperative complications after Xen implantation were transient hypotony(9.59%), hyphema (5.53), transient IOP spikes ≥ 30 mmHg (2.11% on average), while implant occlusion (0.93%), implant malposition (0.88%), and implant exposure(0.57%) were relatively uncommon. Fellman et al.17 reported six patients with intraluminal cellular debris after Xen45 surgery were successfully treated with low energy Nd:YAG laser shockwave therapy aimed just the intracameral tip of the gel stent through a gonioscopy lens. Seo et al.18 used the Nd: YAG laser (0.8mJ, 2 shots) to successfully recanalize an Xen45 Gel Stent occlusion with cortical material.
In our case, the probable materials were fibrin plugs or cellular debris, which could not be clearly diagnosed histologically. The failure of laser treatment was most likely due to the blocking of the distal end of the Xen45 Gel Stent, such as the scleral or conjunctival section, and the laser energy was insufficient to disperse the obstruction. This is the first time we tried Nd: YAG laser treatment for Xen45 Gel Stent occlusion. The choice of laser energy level is still in the exploratory stage. More evidence is needed to verify whether a higher laser energy level will damage the tube or be able to disperse the more distal occlusion.
Pinto Ferriera et al.19 used a 23-G inner limiting membrane forceps to remove the blood clot over the ostium. Tatti et al20 reported a case in which a 25 G vitreous scissors were used to trim ab interno of Xen45 Gel Stent occluded by the high adhesiveness of the fibrin clot after a failed Nd: YAG laser treatment. In our case, a 10 − 0 nylon suture was utilized to recanalize the Xen45 Gel Stent occlusion by intraluminal cellular debris or fibrin. The interior of the lumen was not damaged by 10 − 0 nylon suture and the IOP was well controlled at the 11 months follow-up after surgery without the need for antiglaucoma drugs or a further second Xen device. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of recanalization of Xen45 Gel Stent occlusion using the 10 − 0 nylon suture therapy.
The inner diameters of Xen45 Gel Stent were designed considering the total implant length, viscosity of aqueous humor, and typical aqueous production rates of the human eye21. The Xen45, with the smallest inner lumen (45µm), can maximize long-term outflow and maintain IOP around 6–8 mmHg to prevent hypotony22, but it also has a risk of occlusion. The exact causes of occlusion are still unknown, but postoperative anterior chamber bleed resulting in the occlusion of red blood cells or their by-products is one possibility23. Another potential cause is fibrin formation due to chronic intraocular inflammation24. Cortical material can also contribute to occlusion after combined phacoemulsification and Xen implantation18.
Xen45 Gel Stent implant is a novel MIGS that has demonstrated both efficacy and safety, despite having relatively high rates of needling and reoperations25. However, due to its recent introduction, there is a limited amount of experience in performing the surgical procedure and managing any potential complications that may arise. Our case highlights the importance of controlling inflammation both preoperatively and postoperatively, as well as preventing bleeding during surgery, in order to reduce the risk of occlusion of Xen45 Gel Stent.
If postoperative occlusion arises after Xen45 Gel Stent implantation, Nd: YAG laser shockwave should be tried first due to its minimal invasiveness, and if that fails, surgery with 10 − 0 nylon suture to recanalize Xen45 gel stent should be considered as a relatively safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative that does not require removal or trimming of Xen45 Gel Stent. These strategies can help increase the success rate of Xen45 Gel Stent implantation.