Amylose Content
The amylose content after HMT modification was increased in the following order of HAO > MW > AL > native EFYS and noted in Table 1. The significant difference (p < 0.05) in amylose content was observed in HAO (28.48%) and MW (26.98%) treated EFYS from native and AL treated EFYS. However, non-significant deviation in amylose content among AL treated EFYS was detected from native EFYS. HMT modification promotes the local breaking of α-(1,6)-glycosidic bond, hence leads to the increase in amylose content [4]. HAO and MW treatments were more effective in local breaking of α-(1,6)-glycosidic bonds as compared to AL treatment. The increase in amylose content after HMT modification of rice starches was also reported [6]. The local breaking of α-(1,6)-glycosidic bond was also confirmed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) measurements which was reported in our previous publication [3]. The increase in amylose content after HMT modification plays significant role in network formation which has been described in the following physical experiments (swelling properties, pasting behavior, and large amplitude oscillatory shear study).
Table 1
Amylose content, molecular weight of the amylopectin under different heat treatments and water holding capacity of native and modified EFYS
Starch type
|
Amylose (%)
|
Molecular weight
(107 g/mol)
|
F1(%)
> 106 g/mol
|
F2 (%)
< 106 g/mol
|
WHC (g/g)
|
|
|
|
30°C 90°C
|
Native EFYS
|
18.01 ± 1.16 a
|
6.39 ± 0.17a (0.7%)
|
76.1 ± 0.7 b
|
23.9 ± 0.7 b
|
4.51 ± 0.14 a
|
5.36 ± 0.05 a
|
HAO EFYS
|
28.48 ± 0.50 b
|
4.51 ± 0.22b (0.7%)
|
65.25 ± 0.35a
|
34.75 ± 0.35a
|
2.78 ± 0.14 b
|
3.69 ± 0.14 b
|
AL EFYS
|
22.61 ± 0.66 a
|
5.37 ± 0.19c (0.7%)
|
74.8 ± 0.6b
|
25.2 ± 0.6b
|
4.21 ± 0.02 c
|
4.92 ± 0.02 c
|
MW EFYS
|
26.98 ± 0.59 b
|
4.71 ± 0.14b (0.7%)
|
69.25 ± 0.55c
|
30.75 ± 0.55c
|
3.13 ± 0.11 d
|
4.04 ± 0.05 d
|
F1: long amylopectin chain (higher molar mass); F2: short amylopectin chain (lower molar mass); The data are presented as means ± SD (triplicate analysis). Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test.
Functional properties
The changes in swelling power (SP), and solubility (SL) of native and HMT EFYS as a function of temperature from 50–90°C is addressed in Fig. 1a and b. The SP and SL of native EFYS was higher at each temperature and decreased in modified EFYS in the order of HAO < MW < AL < native EFYS. However, with increasing temperature from 50–90°C, SP and SL were substantially increased for all samples. The increase in temperature can promote the disruption of intermolecular hydrogen bonds that allowed enhancement of water absorption. Furthermore, the highest reduction in SP was observed in HAO treated EFYS and correlated with the highest increase in amylose content. Upon increasing the temperature from 50°C to 90°C the higher amount of natively present amylose leaches out from granules and forms temporary transient network among themselves and with the cleaved amylopectin after local breaking of branches. This further leads to the restrictions of water uptake and swelling in HAO treated EFYS followed by MW and AL treated EFYS. The reduction in swelling properties after HMT modification also results in decreased peak viscosity which is discussed in the following section. However, our previous study reported the formation of starch particle clusters or aggregates after treatments [6]. The reduction in solubility can also be attributed to the presence of higher particle aggregates after HMT which further restricts water uptake.
The water holding capacity (WHC) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) after HMT modification at 30 and 90 ºC in the order of HAO < MW < AL < native EFYS (Table 1). However, the increase in WHC was detected upon increasing the temperature from 30 to 90 ºC which is due to the starch gelatinization as a result of heat treatment. So, the swelling of starch associated with the gelatinization process resulted in the increase of WHC at higher temperature (90°C). Furthermore, the decrease in WHC in HMT modified EFYS entails the formation of strong amylose-amylose and amylose-amylopectin network structure that further restricts the up taking of water molecules. The result is in accordance with the increase in amylose content and decrease in swelling properties of modified EFYS in the order of HAO < MW < AL < native EFYS. Furthermore, the reduction in WHC delayed the pasting temperature in modified EFYS which is clearly visible in the following experiments of pasting properties.
Viscosity-temperature profile
The non-isothermal heating of the viscosity-temperature profile of EFYS varies significantly when the starch is subjected to various HMT modification (Fig. 2). The native starch had the lowest apparent viscosity (η) and the treated starch samples showed a higher η in the order of HAO > AL > MW > native EFYS. Except for the HAO sample, which showed a gradual improvement in the η value, the starch slurries did not show any increase in η while heating the sample from 25 to 85 °C. By breaking starch crystallites, the η of native EFYS and AL EFYS dispersions began to increase at 90.6 and 92.3 °C, respectively, and continued until it reached the peak value at 95 °C. The initiation temperatures of the MW and HAO treated samples were 94.5 and 96.0 °C, respectively. Isothermal heating of starch dispersions at 95 °C for 15 min resulted in the apparent viscosity reaching a plateau. The viscosity η continued to increase when the temperature of starch dispersions decreased from 95 to 25 °C and equilibrated thereafter during holding at 25 °C. The pasting properties of the native and modified starch samples are presented in Table 2. It can be seen that the pasting temperature (PT) of the native starch (90.6 °C) was increased significantly (p < 0.05) with the treatment, and the HAO treated EFYS had the maximum value of PT (96.0 °C). The increase in the PT for HMT modified EFYS can be correlated with the increase in gelatinization temperature which was reported in our previous studies3.It implies that HMT modified EFYS forms more stable structures and melts at a greater temperature and thus shows higher PT values (Fig. 3). The pasting parameters, namely the peak viscosity (PV), trough viscosity (TV), final viscosity (FV), breakdown viscosity (BV), and setback viscosity (SV) are reported in Table 1. The PV reduced significantly after the treatment from 1114 cP to 1044 cP. The decrease in PV of EFYS could be plausibly attributed to the restricted swelling ability of granules which is also confirmed from the present study. The decrease in PV occurred with the reduction in swelling properties in the following order: HAO < MS < AL < native EFYS (Fig. 1). The BV of all treated EFYS decreased significantly (p < 0.05) as compared to the native EFYS. The decrement in BD indicates an increase in the stability of starch during higher heating and shearing food processing operations [1]. Similar results were reported in HMT modified horse chestnut starch [20]. An increase in SV and FV was observed in HMT EFYS and the highest was reported in HAO modified EFYS as compared to other treatments. The increase in the FV signifies the capability of the starch to produce a viscous paste. Since the amylose in the starch paste retrogrades while cooling, the starch molecules start realigning. Upon cooling, partial recrystallization of amylopectin occurs followed by formation of amylose helical structures [21]. The presence of more amylose from local breaking of amylopectin branches in HAO and MW treatments was reported by our previous study [3]. It contributes to the presence of more amylose double helical structures and ordered crystalline phase after cooling that leads to the increase in the final viscosity during cooling in HAO and MW EFYS.
Table 2
Pasting properties of native and HMT modified EFYS
Starch type
|
Pasting properties
|
PT (°C)
|
PV (cP)
|
TV (cP)
|
BV (cP)
|
SV (cP)
|
FV (cP)
|
Native EFYS
|
90.6 ± 0.62 a
|
1114 ± 6.83a
|
582 ± 1.42 a
|
533 ± 5.40 a
|
1374 ± 1.62 a
|
1955± 3.05 a
|
HAO EFYS
|
96.0 ± 0.50 b
|
1045± 2.94 b
|
877 ± 8.44 b
|
169 ± 0.78 b
|
1883 ± 15.47 b
|
2760 ± 7.33 b
|
AL EFYS
|
92.3 ± 0.48 c
|
1059 ± 1.14 c
|
564 ± 3.46 c
|
495 ± 2.20 c
|
1304 ± 1.87 c
|
1867± 1.80 c
|
MW EFYS
|
94.5 ± 0.33 d
|
1098 ± 1.00 d
|
704 ± 0.94 d
|
393 ± 1.78 d
|
1412 ± 1.39 d
|
2117 ± 1.10 d
|
PV, TV, BV, BD, SV, FV and PT indicate peak viscosity, trough viscosity, breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity final viscosity, and pasting temperature respectively. The data are presented as means ± SD (triplicate analysis). Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan's multiple range test.
Morphology Of Starch Paste
The morphology of native and modified EFYS paste observed through scanning electron microscopy is shown in Fig. 3. Native EFYS paste (Fig. 3a) revealed disruption in the granular structures with the occurrence of higher granular disorderness, surface irregularities, and the formation of dents, scratches, and pitting. However, different modification treatments have transformed the starch granules differently, which is evident from Fig. 3b-d as compared to its native counterpart. The degree of structural disorder was found to be prominent in native EFYS followed by AL-treated EFYS (Fig. 3c) and MW-treated EFYS (Fig. 3b). The changes in the morphology of the modified starch pastes was due to the different gelatinization degrees, as confirmed by the different pasting temperatures (Table 2). On the other hand, HAO EFYS paste exhibited the presence of spherical starch granules with minimal surface degradation (see red arrows in Fig. 3b). When starch suspensions are heated, the starch granules absorb water, causing structural breakdown which further leads to the increase in viscosity. As mentioned earlier, due to lower swelling properties (Fig. 1), HAO EFYS uptakes less water causing less structural breakdown and shows lower peak viscosity. However, because of the highest increase in amylose (Table 1), HAO EFYS shows quick retrogradation upon cooling, leading to the increase in the final viscosity. Similarly, the presence of some intact granular structures in HAO EFYS confirms the less swelling capability of starch granules. Therefore, HAO EFYS paste shows higher stability as compared to its native counterpart. The development of stable structures further supports the highest increase in the pasting temperature of HAO EFYS paste.
Effect Of Isothermal Heating On Steady Shear Flow Behavior
In order to understand the flow properties of gelatinized and non-gelatinized EFYS samples in their native and modified states, a steady shear flow study was conducted at two isothermal heating conditions of 80 and 95°C signifying non-gelatinized and gelatinized conditions, respectively. Isothermal heating of both native and HMT modified starch slurries at 80 and 95°C illustrates that the apparent viscosity (η) of all samples increased systematically as the temperature increased from 80 to 95°C (Fig. 4). It confirms the significant increase in viscosity η for all samples after gelatinization. Furthermore, HAO and MW-treated EFYS showed the maximum increase in η, whereas AL-treated EFYS had a similar viscosity profile before and after gelatinization with native EFYS. The formation of these network structures in modified EFYS paste increases the viscosity η. One schematic model for the formation of transient network structures between natively present amylose and less branched linear part of amylopectin during gelatinization was reported earlier, which occurs due to the local breaking of amylopectin branches during modification [3]. In the order of native, AL, MW, and HAO-treated EFYS, the current study also shows a positive significant physical correlation with increases in amylose and increasing viscosity during steady shear flow. Furthermore, the highest increased viscosity was observed in HAO treated EFYS, which can be correlated with the following rheological experiment (LAOS).
Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Behavior
The large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) measurements were conducted with increasing the oscillation strain. Lissajous curves provide the information of visual difference in the nonlinear stress response following the distortion of the elliptical shape of the curves [22]. Consequently, in the present study the changes in viscoelastic properties of native and modified starches with the increase in applied strain amplitude was observed and reported in Fig. 5b. Native EFYS showed that at low strain amplitude the elastic Lissajous loops are ellipsoidal (up to 76% of strain), exhibiting that the response of the starch dispersions is dominated by elasticity (Fig. 5b (i)). The changes in the structural information from elastic to viscous behavior are perceived when the Lissajous-Bowditch plot shapes shift from an elliptical to a rounded parallelogram indicating a transition from elastic-dominated to viscous-dominated behavior. With increasing strain amplitudes into the nonlinear viscoelastic regime, the elastic Lissajous loops (elliptical) shift to rectangular shapes for all the samples. Native and AL treated EFYS showed elastic behavior until 76% and 46%, respectively, whereas, distortion of the elliptical shapes was noticed quite early at 29% for HAO and MW treated EFYS indicating the advanced alternation in to viscous nature. In the nonlinear viscoelastic region under higher oscillation strain and following the destruction and restructuration of the starch, the linear amylose chains and branched chains of amylopectin were unraveled under shearing and transformed from random coils to an oriented state [14].
The results of the experiments can be interpreted with simple physical ideas, which provide general insight into the basic processes, which might take place during heat treatment. It has been shown earlier that different heat treatment methods have an impact on the molecular composition of EFYS [3]. The molecular weight decreases and the concentration of “short chain amylose” increases. Consequently, the structure changes on the molecular level. These structural changes have impact on the shear behavior and determine the LVE as well as the shift and height of the hump in Fig. 4a. Obviously, the deformation values for the hump maximum and its height gets systematically lower with the reduction of the effective amylopectin molecular weight reproduced in Table 1. The hump if \(G’\) and \(G’’\) in starch paste preparations was previously addressed to the special structure of the gelatinized amylopectin, because the individual branched polymers cannot largely interpenetrate each other due to their large connectivity [23–24]. Also, linear polymer chains, such as amylose are not able to penetrate branched amylose, for entropic and energetic reasons, the excluded volume interactions end up with a logarithmic repulsion by decreasing the distance [25]. However, at high shear deformations the gelatinized amylopectin is forced to come closer, the shear force needs to increase until the outer amyloses become highly deformed and the large, branched amylopectin can pass each other.
HMT of starches suggests structural changes as natively drawn in Fig. 6 in an oversimplified cartoon. Semi crystalline, branched amylopectin of native starch shows in blocklets arranged bundles consisting of double helices of amylose arms (blue and black). Native linear long chain amylose is also present as helix (red). Under sufficient presence of water, the crystalline structure melts under heat, but the molecules preserve their connectivity. Amylopectin binds most of the water, the branched molecules become highly swollen. Linear long chains amylose chains separate from the branched structures under minimizing the free energy.
During HMT some of the amylose (α-1,4) glycosylic bonds break apart (as shown exaggerated in Fig. 6), and blocklets get released from the amylopectin backbone. Depending on local water concentrations, the blocklets may rearrange to nano crystals or, alternatively, their helices unwind and contribute to the short chain amylose content under gelatinization. The other consequence of random breaking of bonds creates smaller amylopectin clusters, but with similar topology as the original bundle. Some of them might resemble to a “star-like” polymer, depending on the intensity of the HMT, which is indicated indirectly by the change of the molecular weight and the corresponding increase of short chain amylose concentrations (as described in Table 1). Indeed, the structure and molecular weight of branched amylopectin remnants also decide about the stability of the nano crystals. These branched molecules show high water binding so that the local concentrations around the crystals become lower. Consequently, the nano crystals will not melt, as the melting temperature of starch crystals depends strongly on the water activity (see Vilgis (2015) for a summary) [21]. Thus, the paste of HMT starch contains a broad distribution of branched amylopectin type molecules, a blend of long and short chain amylose, and temperature resistant (reformed) blocklet crystals, as shown in Fig. 7. Dissolved linear amylose forms a concentrated polymer solution, where long chains are, in contrast to short chain amylose, able to entangle. Those form a transient polymer network aside the gelatinized branched chains. The embedded nano crystal may not find a sufficient local water concentration, remain stable, and contribute to the resistant starch fraction. The differences in the molecular structure of the starches manifests themselves in the shear experiments shown in Fig. 5a and 5b. Whereas linear amylose chains behave a concentrated, partly entangled polymer solution with some molecular weight distribution [26], non-interpenetrating branched chains need more attention. Especially at high shear deformations, when interacting under strong forces. The steric interaction between two nearest neighbor branched amylopectin molecules is governed by high exclusion volume interactions. The branches of different amylopectin molecules cannot entangle, even slight interpenetrations cost high energy, yielding to repulsion between the branched molecules as indicated by the red interaction zones in Fig. 8. Native starch amylopectin shows high repulsion, interpenetration is due to high branching impossible. After the HMT induced debranching, loosely parts of smaller and polydisperse molecular weight reduce the steric interactions. The polydisperse amylopectin remnants interact weaker, as shown in Fig. 8. The hump becomes less pronounced with increase of debranching due to different kinds of HMT, as can be seen clearly in Fig. 5a.
Additionally, swollen amylose in gelatinized pastes find themselves confined in a “cage”, defined by surrounding molecules, which opens only at high external shear and deformation of the outer arms of the branched molecules. Especially native amylopectin shows thus a pronounced hump in \(G’\) and \(G’’\). The debranching by HMT introduces more components and polydispersity into the system. The cage becomes less tight for the polydisperse amylopectin, the short chain amylose changes the local molecular mobility and acts as molecular lubricant between the branched polymers. In addition, debranching of chains enhances the degrees of freedom of the outer branches in the remnants. It seems that HAO treatment debranches amylopectin sufficiently that the hump consequently disappears, in contrast the other HMT. It is worthwhile to note that the shift of the hump corresponds well to the change of the molecular weight in \(G’\) and \(G’’\). The intensity of the hump systematically follows the results measured by GPC, which consistently supports the model hypothesis shown in Figs. 7 and 8.
Further confirmation is provided by the Lissajouis representation shown in Fig. 5b. The HAO-treatment shows the highest debranching leading to the significant shape change in the Lissajous-plot starts already at low deformations (29%). MW-treatment induces also a more pronounce effect, whereas AL-treatments does not seem to be most effective for debranching amylose. The details of the different shapes between the Lissajous plots come from the ratios of the concentrations of short chain amylose, long chain amylose, nano crystals etc. and need more analytics of the HMT induced components, beyond of the scope of this study.