HIV testing is crucial in eradicating the AIDS epidemic by 2030 through identifying influential associated factors. These influencing factors vary in a population of different age groups and geographical regions. Here, we document the socio-demographic factors associated with HIV testing among young women aged 15–24 in Malawi using DHS data. Nearly seventy per cent (69.5%) of young women know their status, similar to men [17]. However, almost three-quarters of people living with HIV in SSA are young women aged 15–24 years who acquired it a decade ago [18].
Moreover, adolescents and young women perceived themselves at a lower risk of acquiring HIV, including those at the highest risk. Therefore, it is significant to study this age group since their trend prevalence of HIV better reflects a country’s overall trend of HIV incidence and risk behavior. Here we employed multivariate regression analysis to evaluate the influencers of HIV testing. Our study suggests that age influences HIV testing among young women in Malawi.
Specifically, young women aged 20–24 were more likely to be tested for HIV than those aged 15–19 years. This finding confirms several studies demonstrating that the young age population (15–19 years) have lower odds of HIV testing irrespective of gender [17, 19, 20]. This discrepancy could be attributed to the several barriers, including physical and legal limitations adolescents face in accessing HIV testing in most countries.[21]. Furthermore, Malawi HIV testing guidelines limit young people below 18, requiring a guardian's permission or important reason/or order to test people below 18 years [8]. Additionally, adolescents engaging in premarital sex may be shy to access HIV testing services. However, adolescents and young women must be significantly considered in HIV testing programs as a study showed age 15 years to be the defining threshold for early sexual debut [22]. In a recent study, the age was even lower with first sexual activity for boys at age 11.5 years and girls at age 13 [23]. Adolescents are faced with a lot of peer pressure and are easily influenced by their opposite counterparts. Hence, targeting the young aged and leveraging the HIV testing guidelines in Malawi will significantly harness UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets to end the Aids pandemic by 2030.
In agreement with other studies, our findings exhibit rural-urban discrepancy in terms of HIV testing. The result indicates that young women in rural residents were less likely to do HIV testing than urban residents. Similar studies have also found lower odds of HIV testing among rural dwellers compared to urban residents regardless of gender [17, 24, 25]. The lower odds of HIV testing among rural residents could be attributed to lesser and distant health facilities. Generally, there are fewer health facilities in rural areas than in urban areas, explaining this finding. Additionally, stigmatization [26] might decrease HIV testing among rural residents since healthcare workers usually know community members or clients. Another reason could be the higher exposure of urban residents to various media [19] in which they are easily informed.
A visit to a health facility was a significant influencer of HIV testing in our model. Young women who had visited a health facility in the past 12 months had higher odds of HIV testing than those who did not. A similar study in Ethiopia also finds that young women who visited health care facilities had higher odds of being tested for HIV [24]. Furthermore, antenatal care services provided in health facilities, including free HIV testing, could account for the high proportion of HIV testing among young women visiting these health facilities. For example, a study in Mozambique revealed that 75.4% of pregnant women received HIV tests during ANC visits [27]. Young women should, therefore, be encouraged to visit health facilities to improve HIV testing service uptake.
Media exposure such as the frequency of reading newspapers or magazines and listening to radio significantly influenced HIV testing among young women. The frequency of reading a newspaper or magazine for at least less than a week was more likely to influence HIV testing. This conforms to other studies that showed increased HIV test uptake with the frequency of reading newspapers or magazines [28] or being able to read compared to those that cannot [29]. The influence of reading on HIV testing can be explained in terms of educational attainment as the educated can better comprehend health and other information with reasonable deduction. Our study also showed the frequency of listening to a radio at least once a week is positively associated with increased HIV testing in concordance with other studies [28]. This positive association could be due to the dissemination of health knowledge through media like radio and television. A study in Uganda evidenced a significant association between mass media exposure with HIV related knowledge [30]. Although there was a significant association between the frequency of listening to a radio and HIV testing, other media such as owning a phone was only marginally significant at the multivariable level.
Young women in the rich wealth index were more likely to do an HIV test, agreeing with earlier studies [25, 31]. Several studies have also confirmed that rich people [32] are more likely to accept HIV VCT than the poor. These differences could be explained in terms of the greater exposure of the rich to social amenities such as diverse media and better health facilities.
Husband educational level was significantly associated with HIV testing among young women. Husband's educational level influenced young women HIV testing from primary, secondary and higher academic levels. Many studies have found educational status to influence HIV testing [33]; however, we found an indirect association through husbands/partners. Studies have shown that men were more knowledgeable in HIV and influenced HIV testing decisions. Data showed that husbands are primary confidants for HIV testing among married women [34, 35]. Our study did not directly associate HIV testing and educational level among young women, which might be due to fear of stigma and other unknown factors.
This study showed that preventive pregnancy measures significantly influenced HIV testing among young women. Sexually active young women using contraceptives and condoms were more likely to do HIV tests than those not using those preventive methods. Our finding was consistent with other studies that associated condoms usage to increase HIV testing in partners [36]. In another study investigating the relationship between contraceptives and HIV uptake in four SSA countries among women, Mozambique women using modern forms of contraception were more likely to do HIV tests, while Congo, Nigeria and Uganda women did not demonstrate such positive association [37]. Another study has suggested that consistent condom use reduces the likelihood of getting an HIV test [20]. However, that study did not provide much information to the existing literature.
Our study showed that young women's employment was positively associated with HIV testing. This is consistent with a review that showed employment to be positively associated with HIV testing, management and medication adherence in Western Europe, the United States, and Canada [38]. Similar studies conducted in Africa also showed that employment positively contributes to HIV testing. However, some studies conducted in Africa and Asia showed that employed women had a lower chance of being tested for HIV/AIDS than unemployed women [39]. Differences in results may be due to the type of occupation.
Strengths And Limitations
Like all other survey data, it is imperative to acknowledge a set of study limitations. Firstly, our study variables were limited to those collected by MDHS. Therefore, cultural and traditional beliefs that would better inform the differences in HIV testing and other social factors were not captured. However, the variables collected by MDHS are very significant in determining HIV testing factors. Secondly, since data was obtained from the participants by self-reporting, it is substantive to be report bias. However, our results tallied with several cross-sectional data of such nature, making our estimates unlikely to be subjected to bias error. Thirdly, the factors influencing HIV testing cannot draw a causal inference since MDHS data are cross-sectional. Finally, not all households and young women were interviewed. However, the MDHS sample design is representative of the national population of Malawi.
Additionally, there was a more than 90% response rate of women, including young women. Further studies are needed to establish cultural, traditional beliefs and other associated factors. Despite the limitation, our findings of HIV testing among young women aged 15–24 years can be generalized to the entire country