1. Analysis of experimental results
(1) Chemical composition analysis
Table 3 and Fig. 4 show the results of the chemical composition analysis of the wood components. Where P is the chemical composition of modern hardwood pine. The heterocellulose and alpha cellulose of all wood component samples were reduced compared to modern healthy lumber, and this difference arose due to the degradation of the main chemical components (lignin and heterocellulose) in the old wood components. The lignin of D1 and D2 was higher than that of healthy wood, probably because lignin is more solid and less prone to degradation, and the wood quality is better retained at this sampling location. From the comparison at different locations of old wood, the heterocellulose and cellulose of A1, D1 and G1 were higher than the values of A2, D2 and G2. The main reason for this is that the specimens in the A2, D2, and G2 are in direct contact with the atmosphere in the outer layer, which can be affected by environmental factors such as visible light, temperature, and moisture, resulting in the degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose. As for the lignin, the A1, D1 and G1 are lower than the values of A2, D2 and G2. It indicates that partial degradation of lignin occurred at the outer. The most obvious of the lignin degradation is the oxidation reaction and the opening of the aromatic ring, and these changes will have corresponding characteristic peaks in the IR spectra.
Table 3
table of chemical composition content of wood components
Number
|
Heterocellulose
|
α-cellulose
|
Lignin
|
Ash
|
P
|
68.37%
|
46.36%
|
27.76%
|
-
|
A1
|
42.06%
|
27.56%
|
21.16%
|
0.29%
|
A2
|
44.69%
|
31.62%
|
23.74%
|
0.34%
|
D1
|
25.64%
|
21.87%
|
30.29%
|
0.43%
|
D2
|
23.62%
|
19.21%
|
32.68%
|
0.77%
|
G1
|
43.49%
|
30.72%
|
21.08%
|
1.55%
|
G2
|
40.23%
|
25.83%
|
22.50%
|
1.12%
|
(2) Infrared spectral analysis
Figure 5 shows the IR spectra of the six samples. Figure 6 shows the infrared spectra of the six samples in the region of the fingerprint region from 800 to 1800 cm− 1 of the infrared spectrum. The absorption peak located near 1730 cm− 1 came from the C = O stretching vibration on the acetyl group, and this peak position is the characteristic absorption peak of hemicellulose distinguishing it from other components. Comparing the spectra of six samples, the peak could be detected, indicating that hemicellulose was not degraded. However, the absorption peaks near 1600 cm− 1 and 1500 cm− 1 are lignin benzene ring skeleton stretching vibration absorption peaks, especially the absorption peak near 1500 cm− 1, which is attributed to the pure absorption band of lignin benzene ring skeleton stretching vibration. An absorption peak near 1500 cm− 1 was detected in all six samples, indicating that the lignin in this old wood component was not completely degraded. The absorption peak near 1260 cm− 1 was attributed to the C-O stretching vibration in lignin, which was detected in all of the old wood components, indicating that lignin had not undergone complete degradation. Absorption peaks generated by C-O-C deformation vibrations in cellulose and hemicellulose near 1158 cm− 1 are detectable at positions A1 and D1, and not detected at other positions. 895 cm− 1 was the characteristic absorption peak of cellulose, and there were no other strong absorption peaks nearby, which were less influenced by other components, but the peak was not detected in any of the six samples, indicating that the degradation of cellulose occurred in the old wood components. The results of infrared spectroscopy were consistent with the results of the main chemical composition analysis, further demonstrating that the degradation of heterocellulose in this old wood component was more significant, while the lignin was better retained.
(3) Sample appearance and degree of decay
Figure 7 shows the appearance of the specimens. Through the appearance of observation, it is found that the outermost wood has become flimsy and can be easily peeled off by hand. Some feel soft and will produce indentation when gently pressed by hand. Some have even cotton wool-like and lost the shape of the wood itself. However, there are some positions where the wood basically remains intact, only the color has changed, and the wood is still hard and firm.
(4) Macrostructure identification
Upon observation of the sample sections, the microscopic anatomical structure characteristics of the wood obtained were all the same, and the specific macroscopic characteristics of the samples were as follows, as shown in Fig. 8.
(1) The microstructure is characterized by obvious growth whorl, uniform width, dark color of latewood band between whorls, width of latewood band accounts for 1/4 ~ 1/2 of the width of growth whorl, yellowish brown wood, no special odor, straight grain, fine structure.
(2) Axial tubercles are characterized by rectangular, hexagonal or irregular polygons in cross-sectional earlywood tubercles, single row and rarely two rows of rimmed pores in the diameter wall, and round and oval rimmed pores; oval and polygonal in cross-sectional latewood tubercles. The transition from earlywood to latewood is sharp, and the width of the latewood band accounts for 1/4 ~ 1/2 of the growth whorl width.
(3) The wood rays are characterized by fusiform wood rays and homogeneous monoclinic wood rays, with transverse resin channels visible in the middle of the fusiform wood rays; homogeneous monoclinic wood rays consist of ray thin-walled cells and ray tube cells, 3 ~ 15 cells high; ray tube cells are located within 1 ~ 3 cell widths of the upper and lower edges of the rays, with deep serrations on the inner wall and marginal striations resembling the striations on the wall of the tube cells. The type of cross-field striae is window pane type, 1 ~ 3.
(4) The resin tracts are characterized by axial resin tracts distributed in the latewood zone and radial resin tracts present in the fusiform wood rays.
Based on the above microscopic anatomical features, and after comparing with the wood classification features recorded in the "Chinese Wood Journal", it is known that the wood member is hardwood pine.
(5) SEM analysis
The results of the SEM analysis of the three sections are shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9(a) shows the scanning electron microscopy results of the new material of Pinus sylvestris. As seen in the cross section, the canal cells are round and oval, the threaded fissures on the canal cell wall are obvious, and more cell gaps are seen at the corner of the canal cells, and the cells are arranged slightly neatly between each other. As seen in the diameter section, the inner wall of the tubular cell is smooth, with rimmed pores in a single row, rarely in two rows, cross-field pores are windowpane, and serrated thickening in the ray tubular cell is obvious. From the chordal section, it can be seen that the resin tract structure is relatively complete, the intercellular bonding is tight, a few ray canal cells are permeable, a large number of rimmed pores exist on the canal wall, and the structure is relatively complete.
Figure 9(b) and Fig. 9(c) show the results of three sections of the wood at locations A and D of the old wood members. As seen in the cross-sections, the cell wall structures are all present, but the internal structure has been destroyed, and some of the S2 and S1 layers are separated, and the deformation of the cell wall is obvious, and the cell wall shrinks and becomes thinner, indicating that the degradation of the cell wall of the old wood members has occurred. From the diameter section, most of the grain holes and nearby structures were intact, a few had signs of cracking and unidentified material appeared around them, indicating that slight degradation had occurred. From the chordal section, most of the wood ray skeleton structure, ray tube cells and thin-walled tissues were intact, while some tube cells of the skeleton structure had been crushed, and the cell wall had been twisted and squeezed, indicating that the cell wall had been damaged.
(6) X-ray diffraction analysis
Figure 10 shows the XRD plots of the six specimens, and Fig. 11 and Table 4 show the relative crystallinity of the six specimens. As can be seen from the figure, the crystalline diffraction peaks appearing near 17°, 22.5° and 35° of the X-ray diffraction angle (2θ) represent the crystalline diffraction intensity of the wood cellulose (101), (002) and (040) surfaces, respectively. Where 2θ is 22.5°, reflecting the crystallographic diffraction peak on the cellulose (002) face. The positions of the cellulose diffraction peaks of the six samples remained consistent, indicating that the crystalline structure did not change in the wood component samples. The highest absorption intensity of cellulose crystalline diffraction peak was found in A1 sample, and the lowest absorption intensity was found in D2 crystalline diffraction peak. The difference between the values of A and G at the two ends of the wood member was not significant, and the value of D at the middle position was lower, indicating that the relative crystalline content of the cellulose crystalline region at the middle position of the wood member was greatly reduced. The intensity of the diffraction peaks at A and G was significantly reduced, indicating that, in addition to the degradation of lignin, the hemicellulose and cellulose amorphous regions decreased much more than that at D, resulting in stronger diffraction peaks and higher relative crystallinity of cellulose. While the intensity of the diffraction peaks at D was significantly reduced, indicating that the degradation of lignin in wood components at D was accompanied by partial crystallization of cellulose crystalline regions under the long-term influence of light and ambient humidity (moisture), which led to the transformation of some crystalline regions into amorphous states and the decrease of relative crystallinity. It can also be seen from the figure that the trough, which appears near 2θ of 18°, is the scattered intensity of the diffraction from the amorphous region in the wood fiber. The lower intensity of sample D indicates that the degradation of the amorphous region in sample D is obvious. Similarly, the diffraction intensity of the A2 amorphous region was the lowest among the six samples, indicating that the degradation of the amorphous region also occurred during the transition from the cellulose crystalline region to the amorphous region in the badly decayed wood components, which led to a decrease in the diffraction intensity of the amorphous region along with a significant decrease in the relative crystallinity in their wood components. In addition, by calculating the relative crystallinity in the wood, it was found that the relative crystallinity of A2 was the highest, reaching 35.1%, and the decrease in the amorphous region in hemicellulose or cellulose led to an increase in the proportion of cellulose crystalline region in the wood as a whole, and the D2 sample decreased to 19.34%, and the chemical composition analysis results showed that the cellulose content in D2 was lower than that in A2 and G2, indicating that its cellulose and hemicellulose were more seriously degraded, and the The reason may be due to the degradation of hemicellulose to remove the acetyl group to generate acetic acid, which destroyed the structure of cellulose and made the crystallinity of cellulose reduced.
Table 4
crystallinity of samples at different positions
Samples
|
A1
|
A2
|
D1
|
D2
|
G1
|
G2
|
Crystallinity
|
34.23%
|
35.10%
|
28.20%
|
19.34%
|
30.57%
|
27.54%
|
2. Correlation of wood properties with chemical composition and microstructure of wood components
(1) Correlation with chemical composition
The experimentally measured heterocellulose, alpha cellulose and lignin were correlated with the density and modulus of elasticity of the wood members. As shown in Fig. 12 to Fig. 14 and Table 5. The results showed that the correlation coefficients R2 of heterocellulose and α-cellulose with density and elastic modulus were greater than 0.6, and the correlations were good. The correlation coefficients R2 of lignin with density and elastic modulus were all less than 0.6, and the correlations were average. From the above analysis, it can be seen that heterocellulose, α-cellulose and lignin all have some correlation with the density and modulus of elasticity of wood members, and the order of their correlation is α-cellulose > heterocellulose > lignin. The joint equation established for heterocellulose, α-cellulose and lignin with density and modulus of elasticity has a higher correlation coefficient as seen from the established equations.
Table 5
the relationship between the density and MOE of hemicellulose, α-cellulose and lignin
Name
|
Relationship formula
|
R2
|
hemicellulose y与density x
|
y = 0.7053x + 0.1546
|
0.6588
|
hemicellulose y与Ed x
|
y = 13.122x + 0.6012
|
0.742
|
hemicellulose z与densityx和Ed y
|
z = 8.72x + 5.192y + 4.949
|
0.7429
|
α-cellulose y与density x
|
y = 1.4329x + 0.0384
|
0.7301
|
α-cellulose y与Ed x
|
y = 26.615x-1.5488
|
0.8196
|
α-cellulose z与densityx和Ed y
|
z = 5.421x + 2.792y + 8.8010
|
0.8207
|
lignin y与density x
|
y=-1.2362x + 0.7249
|
0.567
|
lignin y与Ed x
|
y=-20.773x + 10.65
|
0.5209
|
lignin z与densityx和Ed y
|
z=-36.97x-0.5456y + 43.46
|
0.5703
|
(2) Correlation with microstructure
a. relationship between density and crystallinity
As seen in Fig. 15 and Table 6 from the test results of the wood components, the density of wood and crystallinity are positively correlated. The density of wood increases with the increase of crystallinity. In wood with higher crystallinity, the areas where cellulose molecular chains are densely arranged are larger and the areas where they are disordered are less, and more solid material is gathered per unit volume, thus increasing the density of the wood.
Table 6
ensity and crystallinity of wood
Name
|
A1
|
A2
|
D1
|
D2
|
G1
|
G2
|
Crystallinity(%)
|
34.23
|
35.10
|
25.54
|
19.34
|
30.47
|
28.20
|
Density (g/cm3)
|
0.4989
|
0.5011
|
0.3806
|
0.29
|
0.4353
|
0.3712
|
b. Relationship between Ed and crystallinity
From the test results of the wood components, Fig. 16 and Table 7 show that the Ed and crystallinity of wood are positively correlated. This is because the cellulose molecular chains in the crystalline region are neatly arranged and connected by glycosidic bonds with higher forces. The smaller the strain under the same stress, the greater the Ed (Ding et al. 2012; Fan et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2019).
Table 7
Ed and crystallinity of wood
Name
|
A1
|
A2
|
D1
|
D2
|
G1
|
G2
|
Crystallinity(%)
|
34.23
|
35.10
|
25.54
|
19.34
|
30.47
|
28.20
|
Ed (GPa)
|
6.2
|
7.62
|
4.41
|
3.49
|
5.6
|
5.12
|