This study was approved by the Biosecurity and Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation – Project number 5914171120/2021.
Animals And Location
A total of 50 New Zealand White rabbits, males and females, weaned at 35 days of age and weighing on average ± 614g, were randomly assigned to one of the five experimental groups (ten rabbits/group), the animals were allotted into individual cages, which measured 50x50x40cm, with ceramic feeders and drinkers.
The bioassay was carried out in Cuniculture Laboratory – Department of Animal Production, unit at the main campus of the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria, RS, Brazil – located at 29°41’S latitude, 53°48’W longitude. The animals were kept in a closed room with no control of temperature and humidity. No artificial light schedule was applied.
Experimental Diets And Feeding Management
The banana peels (BP) were obtained free of charge at the University Restaurant (RU – UFSM), where ± 45kg are produced weekly, and sweet potato vines (SPV) were obtained from a farm which focuses on biodiesel production. The BP and SPV used in the diets – of the Nanica and BRS-Cuia variety, respectively – were previously dried in forced-air circulation at 55°C-60ºC for 72h. Diets were formulated to contain a similar crude protein and fiber content (Table 1) and to comprise with growth requirements for growing rabbits (AEC, 1987).
Rabbits were offered ad libitum one of the five experimental diets non-peletized, until the end of the experiment at 84 days of age. Fresh water was always available. During the experimental period, body mass and feed consumption were registered weekly, in accordance with the guidelines for applied nutrition in rabbits (Fernandez-Carmona et al., 2005).
Five mash diets were formulated. The control diet (0) without BP and SPV; (25) experimental diet with 25% BP and SPV as maize and alfalfa hay substitute; (50) experimental diet with 50% BP and SPV as maize and alfalfa hay substitute; (75) experimental diet with 75% BP and SPV as maize and alfalfa hay substitute; and (100) experimental diet with 100% BP and SPV as maize and alfalfa hay substitute. No antibiotics and no synthetic amino acids for supplementation were added to diets or to the water.
Table 1
Ingredients and chemical composition of ration with banana peels and sweet potato vines in replacement to maize and alfalfa hay for rabbits.
| Experimental diets |
Ingredients (g) | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
Maize | 18.00 | 13.50 | 9.00 | 4.50 | - |
Banana peels | - | 4.50 | 9.00 | 13.50 | 18.00 |
Alfalfa hay | 30.00 | 22.50 | 15.00 | 7.50 | - |
Sweet potato vines | - | 7.50 | 15.00 | 22.50 | 30.00 |
Wheat meal | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 |
Soy-bean meal | 17.00 | 17.50 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.05 |
Soy-bean oil | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
Rice hull | 5.75 | 5.25 | 4.75 | 4.75 | 4.25 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
Calcitic limestone | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Salt | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
Premix* | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Chemical composition of feed mixtures (%) |
Dry Matter | 87.50 | 87.40 | 87.20 | 87.90 | 87.45 |
Crude Protein | 17.71 | 17.54 | 17.52 | 17.35 | 17.27 |
Ash | 9.52 | 9.60 | 9.85 | 9.90 | 9.95 |
Crude Fiber | 15.16 | 15.28 | 15.47 | 15.61 | 15.83 |
Neutral detergent fiber | 37.35 | 37.08 | 36.86 | 36.30 | 35.71 |
Acid detergent fiber | 16.58 | 16.87 | 17.30 | 17.58 | 18.15 |
0: Diet without banana peels and sweet potato vines; 25, 50, 75, 100: Diets with 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% of replacement of maize and alfalfa hay for banana peels and sweet potato vines, respectively. *Premix Composition (per diet kilogram): Vitamin A 600,000 IU; Vitamin D 100,000 IU; Vitamin E 8,000; Vitamin K3 200 mg; Vitamin B1 400 mg; Vitamin B2 600 mg; Vitamin B6 200,00 mg; Vitamin B12 2,000 mg; Pantothenic acid 2,000 mg; Choline 70,000 mg; Fe 8,000 mg; Cu 1,200 mg; Co 200 mg; Mn 8,600 mg; Zn 12,000 mg; I 65 mg; Se 16 mg.
Laboratory analyses
After formulated, feed samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 55°C for 72. Then all samples were ground with a Wiley mill, to pass a 1mm screen. Dry matter was determined by oven-drying at 105°C for 24 h according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 1995). The crude protein content, ash and fiber in the samples of feed, according to AOAC (1995) and crude fat (BLIGH; DYER, 1959) at the Fish Farming Laboratory, Department of Animal Science of UFSM (Table 2).
Table 2
Composition of dry banana peel (BP) and sweet potato vines (SPV).
Composition (%) | BP | SPV |
Crude protein | 6.70 | 14 |
Crude fiber | 12 | 20 |
Fat | 6.44 | 3 |
Ashes | 15 | 11 |
On the 49th day of the bioassay, animals were stunned and slaughtered by jugular bleeding. The carcasses were submitted to chemical analyses to verify the contents of dry matter, crude protein and ashes at the Fish Farming Laboratory, Department of Animal Science of UFSM, according to the methods described by AOAC (1995).
Performance evaluation
For animal performance, four weighing were performed: at 35 days, 49 days, 63 days and 84 days. On the same day of weighing, the amount of feed consumed was evaluated. At the beginning of each period, a known amount of feed was provided, and at the end the leftovers were quantified. Animal and feed weights provided data to calculate the parameters of daily feed intake, daily weight gain and feed conversion.
Meat and color calculations
The carcass yield (CY) was calculated on the basis of carcass mass (CM) and animal body mass (BM) with 84 days of age, in the following equation:
$$CY\left(\text{%}\right)=\frac{CM}{BM}x100$$
Color was determined through an FRU® WF-WR10QC colorimeter, with aperture size of 8 mm, illuminant D65. Fur color analysis in the meat, six measurements were taken at different points of the sample, in which the parameters of L*, a* and b* were recorded. Hue (H*) and chroma (C*) indexes were calculated on L*, a* and b* parameters (CIE, 1976). Color differences between samples (ΔE) were calculated in the following equation:
$${\varDelta E}_{1-2}= \sqrt{{\left({a}_{1}^{*}-{a}_{2}^{*}\right)}^{2}+{\left({b}_{1}^{*}-{b}_{2}^{*}\right)}^{2}+({L}_{1}-{L}_{2})²}$$
in which L1, a1*, b1*, and L2, a2*, b2* are the values of two different experimental groups. A variation in color (ΔE) of 2.3 units corresponds to a just noticeable difference (JND) for the human eye; higher variation is considered discernible (Mancini et al., 2019). It was operated in the CIELAB system, which uses three coordinates: the space L* indicates the luminosity, varying from white (+ L) to black (- L); chromatic coordinates a* and b*, in which a* goes from green (+ a) to red (- a), and b * varies from blue (+ b) to yellow (- b), according to CIE (1976).
Economic Analyses
The economics index of the diets was evaluated according to the prices of the ingredients of the year crop (IEA, 2021). In this case, the cost per kilo of the diets, and their respective economies, were calculated in comparison to the control diet (Table 3).
Table 3
Cost of the experimental diets
Cost per ingredient needed to produce one Kg of feed (R$) |
Ingredients | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
Maize | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.09 | - |
Banana peels | - | - | - | - | - |
Alfalfa hay | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
Sweet potato vines | - | - | - | - | - |
Wheat meal | 0.48 | 0. 48 | 0. 48 | 0. 48 | 0. 48 |
Soy-bean meal | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 |
Soy-bean oil | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Rice hull | - | - | - | - | - |
Dicalcium phosphate | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
Calcitic limestone | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 |
Salt | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Premix | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
0: Diet without banana peels and sweet potato vines; 25, 50, 75, 100: Diets with 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% replacement of maize and alfalfa hay for banana peels and sweet potato vines, respectively. Amounts calculated based on price of 2022 crop in Brazil.
Statistical analysis
Data were conducted in a completely randomized design and each animal was considered an experimental unit. The means were compared through analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test (P < 0.05), with SAS statistical software (SAS, 2009).