Animals
All experiments were performed on C57BL/6 mice (obtained from Chengdu Dossy Experimental Animal Co., Chengdu, China); mice were 7 weeks old at the beginning of the experimental protocol, which lasted 7 weeks (Fig. 1A). All mice were adapted to the standard laboratory conditions (24 ± 2°C room temperature and 65 ± 5% humidity on 12/12 h light-dark cycles) with drinking water and food available ad libitum. The experimental procedures were made in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(protocol code, AM3520, 8 May 2019).
Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress (Cums) Regimen
Mice were exposed to the random sequence of stressors during each 24-h period for 4 weeks, as previously described 33, 78. These stressors included water and food deprivation (12 h), cage tilt 45° (12 h), group housing (12 h), swimming in 4°C water (5 min), foot shock(1mA, 5 min), noise (120 dB for 3 h), tail suspension (5 min), damp bedding (12 h), cage shaking (40/min for 5 min), and restraint (1h).
Experimental Groups And Treatments
We established 8 experimental animal groups: (i) control group; which did not receive any interventions; (ii) CUMS groups – animals exposed to CUMS only; (iii) CUMS + fluoxetine group – animals exposed to CUMS and weekly injections (for all period of CUMS treatment) of fluoxetine at 10 mg/kg; (iv) CUMS + PBS group, animals exposed to CUMS and daily injections of PBS (0.2 ml); (v) EA group animals exposed to EA daily and (vi-vii) sham EA1 and EA2 groups exposed to sham acupuncture daily.
EA was administered at roughly the same time of the day (10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.) to awake animals, immobilised by two Velcro brand hooks and loop fasteners as well as additional tapes fixed to a wooden block for the duration of EA 79. EA was delivered to the therapeutically relevant Zusanli acupoint (ST36; located at the knee, about 2 mm for mice below the fibular head). An electrical current of 0.5 mA and a frequency of 2 Hz was delivered for 30 min, by an acupoint nerve electrostimulator (HANS-200, Nanjing Jisheng Medical Technology Co., Jiangsu, China). EA was applied through stainless steel needles (2.5 cm long, 0.25 mm diameter; Hwato-Med. Co., Jiangsu, China), introduced 2–3 mm deep below the skin at ST36 unilaterally. Sham treatments were as follows. In the EA1 sham groups the needle was inserted but the electrical stimulation was not applied. In the EA2 sham groups the needle was positions at the non-acupoint at the tail 80.
Behavioural Tests
Sucrose preference test
The sucrose preference test is a reward-based test and a measure of anhedonia, as previously described 81. The mice were singly caged for 3 days and given two 50 mL bottles containing water or water-based 1% sucrose solution (wt/vol), respectively. The bottle positions were switched daily to avoid a side bias. Following a 24 h period of water and food deprivation, the preference for sucrose or water was determined overnight. Sucrose preference (%) was quantified as (vol sucrose/(vol sucrose + vol water)) × 100%.
Tail Suspension Test
The tail suspension test is a behavioural despair-based test assessing the duration of immobility of mice subjected to inexorable conditions, as previously described 82. Each mouse was suspended by its tail at a height of 20–25 cm by using a piece of adhesive tape wrapped around the tail 1 cm from the tip. Behaviour was recorded for 6 min. The duration of immobility was calculated by an observer blinded to the treatment groups. The mice were considered to be immobile only when they remained completely motionless; mice that climbed along their tails were not included.
Forced Swimming Test
The FST was performed as previously described 81, in a clear glass cylinder filled with water (temperature, 23–25 oC); cylinder’s dimensions were: height, 30 cm; diameter, 20 cm; water level, 15 cm. Mice were gently placed in the tanks. The duration of immobility within the 6 min of observation was determined. The movement of the animals was video recorded and analysed later. Following the swimming session, the mice were removed from the water by their tails, gently dried with towels, and kept warm under a lamp in their home cages. They were considered to be immobile whenever they stopped swimming and remained floating passively, still keeping their heads above the surface of the water.
Open field test
The open field test was performed as previously described 81. The apparatus consisted of a rectangular chamber (50 × 50 × 50 cm) made of white, high density, non-porous plastic. Mice were gently placed in the centre of the chamber and their motility was recorded for 10 min. The total running distance, and the time spent in the centre versus the periphery of the open field chamber were recorded by a camera connected to a computer using an automated video tracking program (EthoVision XT 9.0; Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands). The chamber was thoroughly cleaned with 95% ethanol, and dried prior to use and before subsequent tests, to remove any scent clues left by the previous subject.
Aavs Microinjections
Viral injections were performed at the end of week 3 of CUMS treatment as indicted in Fig. 1 by using a stereotaxic apparatus (RWD, Shenzhen, China) to guide the placement of a Hamilton syringe fixed with bevelled glass pipettes (Sutter Instrument, 1.0-mm outer diameter) into the PFC 83. The injection site was located at half of the distance along a line defined between each eye and the lambda intersection of the skull. The needle was held perpendicular to the skull surface during insertion to a depth of approximately 0.2 mm. A total of 0.7 µl of AAV5-gfaABC1D-mCherry (1× 1012 gc/mL; Taitool Bioscience, Shanghai, China), was slowly injected into right sides of the PFC. Glass pipettes were left in place for at least 5 min. After injection, animals were allowed to completely recover under a warming blanket and then returned to the home cage.
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were perfused in the morning with cold paraformaldehyde (PFA, 4% w/v in phosphate buffer saline (PBS)) under deep isoflurane (2%, 5 min) and pentobarbitone (1%, 50 mg/kg) anaesthesia. Brains were collected, postfixed and cryoprotected in 30% (w/v) sucrose solution. Brains were cut using a cryostat in 45 um thick sections; slices were immediately transferred into storing solution (30% w/v sucrose and 30% ethylene glycol in PBS) and kept at 80°C until use. Free floating sections were incubated 1 h in saturation solution (6% foetal calf serum in PBS). The sections were then incubated overnight in the same solution complemented with the primary antibody (rabbit anti-Ezrin 1:100 CellSignalling, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA). After washing in PBS three times, slices were incubated 1 h at 37℃ in saturation solution containing the relevant secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). After washing in PBS 3 three times, labelling nucleus with DAPI, the coverslips were mounted on slides using anti-fade solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Confocal microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or normal fluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) were used to obtain images.
Sholl Analysis
Sholl analysis is a commonly used methods to quantify astrocyte processes complexity 42, 53. All processing steps were performed using image analysis software ImageJ [https://imagej.net/imagej-wiki-static/Sholl_Analysis]. In brief, Z-stacks corresponding to the emission spectrum (565–610 nm) of mCherry-labelling (resolution was 512 × 512 pixels (0.2 µm/px) on XY axis with a step on Z-axis 1 µm/frame were re-sampled to the same lateral resolution of 0.25µm/px.
3d Reconstructions
The confocal imaging stacks were collected with a Z-step size of 0.25 µm under a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Three-dimensional reconstructions were processed offline using Imaris 7.4.2 (Bitplane, South Windsor, CT) as reported previously 84. In brief, the astrocyte soma and processes were measured and reconstructed according to its own parameter. Processes diameter was measured as one-tenth of astrocyte soma. In addition, Ezrin was measured as 1 mm in every group. The surface-surface colocalisation was calculated by a specific plugin of Imaris Zhou, 2019 #37}.
Statistics
All statistical analyses were performed by Graphpad prism 8. All data were expressed as means ± SEM of n observations, where n means the number of animals in behavioural tests, or astrocyte cell from at least three animals. Data with more than two groups were tested for significance using one-way ANOVA test followed by the Holm–Sidak test. Multiple comparisons between the data were performed in case of their non-normal distribution, using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks, followed by the Tukey’s test. A two-way ANOVA followed by the Dunn’s test was performed to compare data obtained in Fig. 2I, Fig. 3B, Fig. 6B. Significance was defined as P < 0.05.