Precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) is an abundant element on earth that can be produced experimentally by applying the precipitation method while having a higher control on its purity and specifications (i.e., mean particle size, particle size distribution, morphology, and surface) [1]. As shown in Table 1, PCC has three polymorphs that they are calcite, aragonite, and vaterite.
Table 1
Various Polymorphs of Calcium Carbonate at 25°C.
Polymorph | Crystal structure | Stability | Density, g/cm3 | Ksp [M2] |
Calcite [2] | Hexagonal | Stable | 2.8 | 1.3×10–9 |
Aragonite [2] | Orthorhombic | Metastable | 2.9 | 1.7×10–9 |
Vaterite [2] | Hexagonal | Unstable | 2.7 | 1.2×10–8 |
The reactive precipitation consists of nucleation, growth, and agglomeration stages that affect mean particle size (MPS), and morphology of synthesized PCC [3], and these three steps can be affected by the extent of supersaturation [4–6].
Mixing can change the specification of synthesized PCC due to the relatively short reaction time (i.e., in order of microsecond) that can be applied using different methods such as mechanical starrier, micro-mixers, ultrasound, etc. [7–13]. Different micromixing systems are applied for nano-materials synthesis including two-impinging-jets reactors [14], confined impinging-jet reactors [15], spatially impinging-jets [16, 17], and double spinning disks reactors (DSDR) [18].
SDRs were applied for the production a of a wide range of nanomaterials such as barium sulfate, and it is reported that they have 1000 times lower energy consumption compared to T-mixers [19]. In addition, increasing the rotational speed of the disk can reduce the residence time of ions in the reactor and result in smaller particle size [20]. Bagheri Farahani et al. [18] reported by employing double rotating disks more uniform barium sulfate particles can be synthesized.
In this work, an SDR reactor was applied to examine the effect of operating and design parameters including disk rotating speed, feed entrance radius, and supersaturation, on MPS and polymorph of PCC nanoparticles. The main objective of the present work is the production of PCC nanoparticles with the smallest possible MPS and with high selectivity for the production of a certain polymorph, i.e., aragonite or calcite. Table 2 shows the effectiveness of SDR for synthesizing precipitated calcium carbonate.
Table 2
Different Techniques for Production of Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles
Author | Method | MPS, nm |
Naka et al.[21] | Double-jet reactor by permeation supply method | ~ 2000 |
Vacassy et al.[22] | Segmented flow tubular reactor | ~ 5000 |
Hu et al.[23] | Two-membrane method | ~ 70–200 |
Nishida.[24] | Ultrasonic irradiation method | ~ 1000 |
This work | Spinning disk reactor | ~ 600 |
The reaction that takes place in the present work is as follows:
$${\text{N}\text{a}}_{2}{\text{C}\text{O}}_{3\left(\text{a}\text{q}\right)}+\text{C}\text{a}\text{C}{\text{l}}_{2\left(\text{a}\text{q}\right)}\to \text{C}\text{a}\text{C}{\text{O}}_{3}\downarrow +2\text{N}\text{a}\text{C}\text{l}$$
1
Calcium carbonate synthesis follows three main steps including nucleation, growth, and agglomeration, and each stage has a significant effect on the properties of the final product [21, 27, 28]. Different models were proposed to explain crystal growth. For instance, according to Kossel’s theory crystals in the solution tend to form on the sites with minimum energy [3]. Nucleation and growth stages are significantly dependent on supersaturation [29]. Supersaturation can be calculated as follow:
$$S={{\sqrt{\frac{{a}_{{{\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}}^{+}}{a}_{{\text{C}\text{O}}_{3}^{2-}}}{{K}_{sp}}}=\gamma }_{\pm }\left[\frac{\left({C}_{{\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}}\right)\left({C}_{{{\text{C}\text{O}}_{3}}^{2-}}\right)}{{K}_{sp}}\right]}^{\frac{1}{2}}$$
2
where \({a}_{{\text{C}\text{a}}^{+2}}\), \({a}_{{\text{C}\text{O}}_{3}^{-2}}\), \({K}_{\text{s}\text{p}}\), \({\gamma }_{\pm }\), \({C}_{{\text{C}\text{a}}^{2+}}\), and \({C}_{{{\text{C}\text{O}}_{3}}^{2-}}\) are the activity of calcium ions, the activity of carbonate ions, solubility, the activity coefficient, the molar concentrations of calcium ions, and the molar concentration of carbonate ions, respectively.
The specific energy dissipation (\(ϵ\)) on a rotating disk can be calculated as follows [30]:
$$ϵ=\frac{\left({u}_{2}-{u}_{1}\right)}{4\left({r}_{2}-{r}_{1}\right)}\left({\omega }^{2}\left({r}_{2}^{2}-{r}_{1}^{2}\right)+\left({u}_{2}^{2}-{u}_{1}^{2}\right)\right)$$
3
where \(ϵ\) is the specific energy dissipation, \({r}_{1}\) and \({r}_{2}\) are the entrance radius of feedstocks in the disk, \(\omega\) is the rotational speed of disk, and \(u\) is the average velocity of liquid on the disk.