Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of CanPatrolTM technology for detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Background : The early diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer is of great significance to the prognosis of patients. However, traditional histopathology and imaging screening have certain limitations. Therefore, new diagnostical methods are urgently needed for the current clinical diagnosis.
Objectives: To evaluate of sensitivity and specificity of CanPatrol TM technology for detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: CTCs in the peripheral blood of 98 patients with NSCLC and 38 patients with benign pulmonary diseases were collected by the latest typing of CanPatrol TM detection technology. A 3-year follow-up was preformed to observe their recurrence and metastasis. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare multiple groups of data, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare data between the two groups, and ROC curve analysis was used to obtain the critical value. The COX risk regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed in the 63 NSCLC patients who were effectively followed up.
Results: The epithelial, epithelial-mesenchymal and total CTCs were significantly higher in NSCLC patients than that in patients with benign lung disease (P < 0.001). The mesenchymal CTCs of NSCLC patients was slightly higher than that of benign lung diseases (P = 0.013). The AUC of the ROC curve of the total CTCs was 0.837 (95% CI: 0.76-0.914), and the cut-off value corresponding to the most approximate index was 0.5 CTCs/5 ml, at which point the sensitivity was 81.6% and the specificity was 86.8%. COX regression analysis revealed that clinical stage was correlation with patient survival (P = 0.006), while gender, age and smoking were not (P > 0.05). After excluding the confounders of staging, surgery, and chemotherapy, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in stage IIIA with CTCs ≥ 0.5 had significantly lower DFS than those with CTCs < 0.5 (P = 0.022).
Conclusion : CTC positive can well predict the recurrence of NSCLC patients. CanPatrol TM technology has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting CTCs in peripheral blood of NSCLC patients, and has certain value for clinical prognosis evaluation.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
On 02 Oct, 2020
On 01 Oct, 2020
On 01 Oct, 2020
On 24 Sep, 2020
On 23 Sep, 2020
On 23 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 10 Sep, 2020
On 09 Sep, 2020
Received 09 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 06 Sep, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
On 30 Aug, 2020
On 30 Aug, 2020
Posted 10 Jul, 2020
On 12 Aug, 2020
Received 10 Aug, 2020
On 27 Jul, 2020
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 12 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
On 10 Jul, 2020
On 09 Jul, 2020
On 09 Jul, 2020
On 05 Jun, 2020
Received 01 Jun, 2020
Received 22 May, 2020
On 18 May, 2020
On 18 May, 2020
On 10 May, 2020
Invitations sent on 09 May, 2020
On 04 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of CanPatrolTM technology for detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
On 02 Oct, 2020
On 01 Oct, 2020
On 01 Oct, 2020
On 24 Sep, 2020
On 23 Sep, 2020
On 23 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 10 Sep, 2020
On 09 Sep, 2020
Received 09 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 06 Sep, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
On 30 Aug, 2020
On 30 Aug, 2020
Posted 10 Jul, 2020
On 12 Aug, 2020
Received 10 Aug, 2020
On 27 Jul, 2020
Received 27 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 12 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
On 10 Jul, 2020
On 09 Jul, 2020
On 09 Jul, 2020
On 05 Jun, 2020
Received 01 Jun, 2020
Received 22 May, 2020
On 18 May, 2020
On 18 May, 2020
On 10 May, 2020
Invitations sent on 09 May, 2020
On 04 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
On 03 May, 2020
Background : The early diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer is of great significance to the prognosis of patients. However, traditional histopathology and imaging screening have certain limitations. Therefore, new diagnostical methods are urgently needed for the current clinical diagnosis.
Objectives: To evaluate of sensitivity and specificity of CanPatrol TM technology for detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: CTCs in the peripheral blood of 98 patients with NSCLC and 38 patients with benign pulmonary diseases were collected by the latest typing of CanPatrol TM detection technology. A 3-year follow-up was preformed to observe their recurrence and metastasis. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare multiple groups of data, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare data between the two groups, and ROC curve analysis was used to obtain the critical value. The COX risk regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed in the 63 NSCLC patients who were effectively followed up.
Results: The epithelial, epithelial-mesenchymal and total CTCs were significantly higher in NSCLC patients than that in patients with benign lung disease (P < 0.001). The mesenchymal CTCs of NSCLC patients was slightly higher than that of benign lung diseases (P = 0.013). The AUC of the ROC curve of the total CTCs was 0.837 (95% CI: 0.76-0.914), and the cut-off value corresponding to the most approximate index was 0.5 CTCs/5 ml, at which point the sensitivity was 81.6% and the specificity was 86.8%. COX regression analysis revealed that clinical stage was correlation with patient survival (P = 0.006), while gender, age and smoking were not (P > 0.05). After excluding the confounders of staging, surgery, and chemotherapy, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in stage IIIA with CTCs ≥ 0.5 had significantly lower DFS than those with CTCs < 0.5 (P = 0.022).
Conclusion : CTC positive can well predict the recurrence of NSCLC patients. CanPatrol TM technology has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting CTCs in peripheral blood of NSCLC patients, and has certain value for clinical prognosis evaluation.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3