To sustain our progress in utilizing Humic acid as a catalyst for green synthetic methodology, we initiated our studies using benzaldehyde, pyrolodine, and sulfur as a model reaction. During optimization, we discovered that reaction time and temperature have a significant impact. The effect of temperature was evaluated at ambient, 80°C, and 100°C (Table 1). Although no yield of the desired product was observed at room temperature (Table 1, entry 7), a gradual increase in temperature up to 100°C (Table 1, entry 9) led to a notable increase in yield. We tested various solvents and a solvent-free condition. Both ethanol (Table 1, entry 1) and methanol (Table 1, entry 2) failed to produce any yield of the desired product even under reflux conditions, while water (Table 1, entry 3) and ethylene glycol (Table 1, entry 4) resulted in trace amounts of the desired product under reflux conditions and at 100°C, respectively. Under the solvent-free condition, an excellent yield of the 3-amino indole derivative was obtained within 60 minutes at 100°C (Table 1, entry 9), however, a decrease in temperature led to a reduction in the isolated yield of the product (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). As a result, none of the solvents appear to be more advantageous than the solvent-free condition, and hence, the best conditions for our Humic acid-catalyzed reaction were determined to be 100°C and solvent-free (as indicated in Table 1).
Table 1
aOptimization of time, temperature and solvent for synthesis of thioamide.
Entry
|
Solvent
|
Temperature (oC)
|
Time (min)
|
Yield [%]b
|
1
|
Ethanol
|
Reflux
|
180
|
-
|
2
|
Methanol
|
Reflux
|
180
|
-
|
3
|
Water
|
Reflux
|
180
|
Trace
|
4
|
Ethylene glycol
|
100
|
180
|
Trace
|
5
|
Solvent-free
|
100
|
180
|
93
|
6
|
Solvent-free
|
80
|
180
|
72
|
7
|
Solvent-free
|
RT
|
180
|
46
|
8
|
Solvent-free
|
100
|
120
|
92
|
9
|
Solvent-free
|
100
|
60
|
91
|
The bold signifies most optimized condition.
a Reaction of Reaction of Benzaldehyde (1 mmol), pyrolidine (1 mmol) and sulphur (1.25 mmol) in presence of Humic acid catalyst.
b Isolated yield
Subsequently, to optimize the amount of sulfur, we commenced with a starting amount of 0.25mmol (Table 2, entry 1). However, this did not result in the desired yield. Upon increasing the amount of sulfur to 1.25mmol (Table 2, entry 4) and 1.50mmol (Table 2, entry 5), the yield of the desired thioamide also increased, though both amounts resulted in almost the same yield. Additionally, the optimal amount of catalyst loading was determined through optimization, and 15mg (Table 2, entry 7) was found to be the most suitable for our methodology (as indicated in Table 2).
Table 2
aOptimization of amount of catalyst and amount of sulfur for synthesis of thioamide
Entry
|
Catalyst Loading (mg)
|
Sulfur (mmol)
|
Yield [%]b
|
1
|
50
|
0.25
|
52
|
2
|
50
|
0.50
|
68
|
3
|
50
|
1.00
|
83
|
4
|
50
|
1.25
|
91
|
5
|
50
|
1.50
|
93
|
6
|
25
|
1.25
|
92
|
7
|
15
|
1.25
|
91
|
The bold signifies most optimized condition.
a Reaction of Reaction of Benzaldehyde (1 mmol), pyrolidine (1 mmol) and sulphur (1.25 mmol) in presence of humic acid catalyst for 60 minutes.
b Isolated yield
Later on, the efficacy of the reagents was evaluated under the optimized reaction conditions for the condensation of pyrrolidine with a diverse range of aldehydes to synthesize the target products. The reaction was found to be effective for benzaldehyde derivatives featuring a phenyl group and substituents that exhibit either electron withdrawing properties, such as nitro (Table 3, entry 3c), chloro (Table 3, entry 3d), and fluoro (Table 3, entry 3e) groups, or electron donating properties, such as methoxy (Table 3, entry 3b), hydroxy (Table 3, entry 3f), and methyl (Table 3, entry 3g) groups. Aldehydes possessing aliphatic (Table 3, entry 3k) and heterocyclic (Table 3, entry 3h, entry 3i) structures also generated moderate to high yields under the optimized reaction conditions. Furthermore, the versatility of the protocol was investigated across a wide range of amines, including those featuring pyridine (Table 3, entry 3n), benzyl (Table 3, entry 3m), alicyclic (Table 3, entry 3a to 3k), and aromatic (Table 3, entry 3o) motifs, which successfully yielded the corresponding thioamides in good yields (Table 3).
Catalyst Recovery
Subsequently, the catalyst recovery and reusability were evaluated by conducting four cycles of the reaction to synthesize phenyl(pyrrolidin-1-yl)methanethione (Table 3, entry 3a). The reaction involved the use of 1 mmol of aldehyde, 1 mmol of pyrolidine, 1.25 mmol of sulfur, and 15 mg of Humic acid in solvent-free conditions at 100°C for 60 minutes. After each run, the catalyst was easily recovered from the reaction mixture through simple filtration, followed by washing with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL) and drying. Although there was a slight loss in catalyst recovery and yield up to the fourth cycle, the results showed that the catalyst was almost quantitatively recovered. However, a notable decrease in both the yield and recovery of the catalyst was observed during the fifth cycle.