Nitrogen (N) is an important nutrient limiting factor for maintaining primary productivity in lake and reservoir ecosystems (Wiegand et al., 2020; Pei et al., 2022). However, recent human interference, such as synthetic fertilizer, animal manure and human waste inputs, have added excessive N discharges into reservoirs, promoting environmental problems, such as eutrophication, and also impacting drinking water supply (Poikane et al., 2022). The terrestrial N cycle, from which derives the external contributions, three phases stand out encompassing different N transportation pathways: (i) upward - plant uptake and gaseous losses, (ii) downward - leaching to groundwater, and (iii) lateral - via surface and subsurface flow to surface waters (Gerling et al., 2016).
The N cycle from the catchment to the reservoir is complex. However, in order to assess the nitrogen impact in a reservoir ecosystem, estimate and predict nitrogen concentration and also evaluate management scenarios, simplified models that can be applicable at the catchment scale are required. Moreover, performing such improvements for water quality management despite detailed data insufficiency is an additional challenge. In this context, simple models have been developed, for instance, the Spatially Referenced Regression on Watershed Attributes (SPARROW). This model accounts for TN removal in a first-order framework using a net loss rate or apparent settling velocity, which has also been a simplified hypothesis adopted by many other models (Hellström, 1996; Ruan et al., 2014). More recent empirical models have also been developed (Steingruber, 2020).
The N concentration in the reservoir depends on several factors: input rates (e.g. catchment contribution, atmospheric deposition, fixation); removal rates (e.g. lake outflow, burial in sediments, microbial removal via denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation), and the internal dynamics (e.g. uptake by phytoplankton and mineralization by heterotrophs (de Andrade et al., 2020). Additional characteristics of the reservoir, such as trophic state, water temperature, size and depth, also impact on these processes (Zhu et al., 2021). For instance, in large reservoirs the nitrogen removal efficiency depends on lake trophic status (Small et al., 2014) as well as reservoirs with warmer waters, such as those in tropical semiarid regions, present denitrification processes enhanced by temperature (Hellstr\(\ddot{\text{o}}\)m, 1996).
Different forms of nitrogen in the water can also be considered. This includes Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen (DIN), which is the sum of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate, Dissolved Organic Nitrogen (DON), Particle Organic Nitrogen (PON) and also N in biotic compartments (e.g., phytoplankton and bacteria) (Zhong et al., 2021). Meantime, in face of such a complex speciation, measurements of total nitrogen (TN) concentration, which is the sum of ammoniacal and organic nitrogen, plus the concentrations of nitrite and nitrate, are more widely available in the literature. Then, a complete mass balance may be performed separately for each N speciation in the different compartments (e.g. sediment and water column) or as a total budget (Müller et al., 2021). The N fractions to be considered depends on data availability, level of detailing required in the results, time horizon, and the utilization purpose of the achieved information (Molot and Dillon, 1993).
Regardless of the approach to be adopted for the N budget, N losses are of ultimate importance but of difficult quantification. The amount of N removal from reservoirs depends on the input load and the removal efficiency. Overall, N losses within a system occurs mainly in the sediments via denitrification and accumulation. Losses through ammonia volatilization may also affect the budget as well as the resuspension of accumulated N in lake-bed material. However, as the content of N in old inorganic sediments is small, over many years the N loss is dominated by denitrification (Hellström, 1996). In simplified terms, the N removal mechanisms are controlled by the hydrologic load and the uptake velocity of N removal processes (vf) (Jiao et al., 2014; Li et al., 2021). The parameter vf may be considered the biogeochemical metrics of N elimination. It provides reference on N removal efficiency and magnitude in lakes and reservoirs easily through space and time (Harrison et al., 2009).
The parameter vf may be computed for each loss process separately or aggregating all processes as a total N loss in the system. However, to the authors’ knowledge, the quantification of the magnitude of TN loss for tropical semiarid reservoirs, either by each removal mechanism or as a total loss, is still lacking in the literature. Thus, the objectives of this study are: (1) to propose and validate a simplified mass balance model for TN catchment contribution for several reservoirs located in the Brazilian semiarid region; (2) to quantify the magnitude and efficiency of lake TN removal; (3) to estimate the total vf for the studied reservoirs. It is expected that the ground basic approaches and simplified tools proposed in the present study will improve the assessment and management of water quality for drinking water supply reservoirs in tropical semiarid regions.