Baicalin ameliorates DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in mice
To understand whether the administration of BA is able to attenuate the onset and severity of UC, we established a DSS-induced UC model. A well-established medicine for UC treatment, SASP was used as a positive control. In UC models, the colon length and pathological are closely related to the severity of the disease(Wirtz et al., 2017). After 14 days, the length of the colon was measured. As expected, DSS induction reduced the length of mice from 7.2 cm to 6.1 cm (Fig 1A-1B). The treatment of both high-dose and low-dose BA is able to recover the colon length almost back to normal, which was as effective as SASP treatment (Fig 1A-1B).
We measured daily the percentage of weight change to baseline for 14 days. As shown in Figure 1C, control mice displayed a dramatic and consistent bodyweight reduction from day 2 to day 7 after the model was established. After 7 days, the speed of body weight loss was reduced, but they still not recover to the baseline after 2 weeks (Fig 1C). With either BA or SASP treatment, the mice still experienced body weight loss in the first week. However, in the second week of treatment, the body weight started to recover, and after 14 days, the body weight in the three treatment groups was almost back to normal.
DSS-induced administration results in 50% of mice death after 14 days (Fig 1D). Treatment with SASP, as a standard treatment, would entirely rescue the UC mice. The low-dose BA enhanced the survival rate of UC mice to about 60% while high-dose BA treatment further improved the survival of mice to over 80% after 2 weeks (Fig 1D).
Epithelial barrier disruption was characterized as an early event in all chemical-induced colitis models [1]. We then checked the epithelial damage in our DSS-induced UC model. Compared with the control group, a clear disruption of the epithelial layer was observed (Fig 1E). Low-dose BA treatment partly fixed the injured epithelial pathology while high-dose BA and SASP treatment fully rescued the epithelial barrier damage in UC mice (Fig 1E). Taken together, our data showed BA administration is an effective treatment method in the DSS-induced UC model, a high dose of BA was as potent as the standard treatment medicine SASP.
Baicalin restored the disrupted microbiotas in the DSS-induced mice model
The onset and development of colitis were closely regulated by the microbiota yield in the colon microenvironment [19]. To analyze the microbiota group in the UC model and after BA treatment, we collected the bacterial DNA from the fecal samples of the 5 groups, and the microbial community was sequenced. In control mice, the predominant bacterial genus is Muribaculum, which was more than 20% in the overall microbiota pool (Fig 2A, 2C). Also, over 30% of all bacteria were unknown or unnamed genera (Fig 2A, 2C). On the contrary, the DSS induction halves the persistence of bacteria in Muribaculum genus, while the unknown bacterial yield increased by more than 10% (Fig 2A, 2C). The three treatment groups, including low and high-dose BA and SASP, display very similar functions. All three treatments brought the percentage of Muribaculum back to 20% and reduced the unknown bacterial (Fig 2A, 2C).
Similar to the genus study, species analysis was performed as well. The major microbiota species is Muribaculum_intestinale, which was over 20% (Fig 2B, 2D). DSS-induced model suppresses the persistence of Muribaculum_intestinale and increases the unknown or unnamed bacterial genus (Fig 2B, 2D). The treatment with both BA and SASP attenuated the bacterial genus back to the hierarchy in the control group (Fig 2B, 2D). Together, these data indicate DSS administration disrupted the distribution of microbiota species in the intestinal tract, while treatment with BA and SASP brings the microbiota hierarchy back to normal.
Cluster analysis displays the different microbiota patterns in groups
UPGMA analysis was used to check the cluster relationships between bacterial community datasets. Although there are some variations in the control group, the control group mainly clusters together with the three treatment groups. On the contrary, DDS induces UC mice to have a long distance from all other groups (Fig 3A). PCA analysis and heatmap confirmed the same relationship between each group (Fig 3B and 3C). We also performed UPGMA analysis with the bacterial genus. The DSS-induced UC mice display different clusters with control and all treatment groups (Fig 3D).
The LEfSe study was carried out to further enrich the different phylotypes between different groups. As shown in the biological clade graph, each group's microbiota distributions were diverse (Fig 4A). The major different genus control group is Escherichia (Fig 4A and 4B). In the DDS model, consistent with the previous data, the major difference was found in Bacteroids and Muribaculum (Fig 4A and 4B). Interestingly, low-dose BA treatment results in a highly overlapped cluster compared with the DDS model. High-dose BA treatment and SASP treatment lead to a shift in microbiota yield in the mice (Fig 4A and 4B).
ANOVA analysis was used to further define the significantly modified microbiota species among different treatments. We found after DDS induction, the amount of Prevotella, Bacteroides, Paraeggerthella, Enterococcus, and Alloprevotella were highly increased, and the administration of high- and low-dose BA, as well as SASP, suppressed the growth of those bacterial genera (Fig 4C). Notably, the administration of DDS could reduce the number of Ileibacterium, which was recovered by treatment with BA and SASP (Fig 4C). As the two major phylotypes that are modified model and treatment are Bacteroides_sartorii and Prevotellaceae_bacterium. We looked into these two phylotypes respectively. DDS induction gave rise to the elevation of both genera compared to the control group (Fig4D). Treatment with SASP and a high dose of BA significantly reduced these two phylotypes, while low dose treatment of BA is potent in reducing Bacteroides_sartorii but functions mildly in Prevotellaceae_bacterium (Fig4D). Taken together, DDS induced model display distinguished distribution of microbiota groups. Treatment with BA and SASP is able to turn the microbiota back to the control level.
Baicalin treatment reverses the disturbed tissue transcriptome induced in the DDS model
To evaluate the verification of gene expression patterns in the intestinal tissue caused by DDS induction and local microbiota dysregulation, transcriptome analysis was performed in tissue from control, DDS model and BA-treated mice. Compared with control mice, a huge difference was found in gene transcription levels after DDS administration (Fig 5A). Of these, the most dramatic changes were observed in genes. (Fig 5A). Compared with control, DDS induced upregulation of 658 genes and downregulation of 778 genes. A high dose of BA treatment leads to 601 up genes and 770 down genes compare with the DDS model. Interestingly, a low dose of BA treatment gave rise to more differentially expressed genes than the high dose treatment. 250 genes were highly expressed in low-dose BA-treated mice compared with the DDS model while the expression of 273 genes was reduced (Fig 5C). Among all groups, 66 upregulation genes and 25 downregulation genes were detected in control or BA-treated groups compared with the DDS model. Those genes and involved pathways may be critical in the development and treatment of UC (Fig 5B-5C).
We then performed the pathway analysis for the overlapped different expression genes. We found a robust elevation of metabolic pathways in the DDS model, which suggests the irregular microbiota triggered the hypermetabolic status in tissue (Fig 5H and I). Of all the molecular pathways, we found the Hif1a signal and inflammatory response signaling pathway were enhanced in the DDS model and downregulated in the High dose, Low dose, and SPAS treatment group, which indicates a disruption in cellular homeostatic may happen after DDS induction (Fig 5D and E). What's more, we found that STAT3, RELA, TP53, and other transcription factors were significantly activated in the DDS model and inhibited regulated in High dose, Low dose and SPAS treatment groups, where XBP1 was inhibited in the DDS model and up-activated in the High dose, Low dose and SPAS treatment group which indicates a significant change in transcriptional regulation after DDS induction (Fig 5F and G). Together, DDS-induced UC is associated with reprogramming tissue transcriptomes. Treatment with high and low doses of BA helps to revise the gene transcription profile caused by DDS and related microbiota.