Screening of species of the Sargassum genus with the potential to accumulate fucoxanthin
The screening experiment of nine seaweed species of the genus Sargassum rich in fucoxanthin collected at different locations in Thua Thien Hue, Khanh Hoa, and Ninh Thuan, Vietnam at different times (2021-2022) is presented in Table 1.As results shown in Table 3, various species of Sargassum can accumulate fucoxanthin ranging from 3.82 to 2927.98 mg g-1 on a dry weight basis. S. oligocystum harvested from Khanh Hoa during 15-17 Jan 2022 had the highest fucoxanthin accumulation capacity of 2927.98 mg g-1 dry cell weight (DCW). Therefore, this seaweed species was selected to extract fucoxanthin for further studies.
Sargassum grows well generally from October to June each year. The harvest season of Sargassum species in Vietnam is from March to April and September to October each year. The results in Table 3 showed that the fucoxanthin content in Sargassum genus varied greatly by species, geographical location and harvest time. There were two species of S. oligocystum and S. mucclurei which gave high fucoxanthin content of 2927.98 and 1650.03 µg g-1 dry weight, respectively. Therefore, we investigated fluctuations of fucoxathin content of these two species of Sargassum according to season of the year (Table 4).
The results in Table 4 showed that the fucoxanthin content of S. oligocystum was much higher than that of S. mucclurei. For both S. olygocystum and S. mucclurei the harvest time of December and January recorded highest fucoxanthin content. In addition, both species have large reserves in Vietnam and they can be used as a good source of raw materials for fucoxanthin extraction. However, the fucoxanthin content of S. olygocystum species was much higher than that of S. mucclurei. This prompted us to extract a large amount of fucoxanthin from this S. olygocystum biomass for further studies.
Purification and quantification of fucoxanthin by column chromatography and thin layer chromatography
Crude fucoxanthin extracted from the biomass of S. oligocystum was purified by column chromatography and thin layer chromatography (TLC). The results in Figure 1 showed that the fucoxanthin extracted from S. oligocystum species has a similar band (wells 2, 3, 4) with the standard fucoxanthin (well 1). The silicagel containing these bands was further used for HPLC analysis. Through HPLC analysis, fucoxanthin content was analyzed qualitatively, reaching 2927.78 ± 241.21 µg g-1 DCW. An illustration for the chromatography (HPLC) of fucoxanthin is shown in Figure 2C.
Determine the structure of the isolated compound
Compound 1 was isolated as red needles. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of 1 showed the signals assignable to polyene possessing acetyl, conjugated ketone, two quaternary geminal dimethyls, two quaternary geminal methyls of oxygen, four olefinic methyls, and allene functionalities. These data suggested that 1 was a carotenoid with one hydroxyl group acetylated (Figure 2).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δH ppm: 0.96 (3H, s, H3-16), 1.03 (3H, s, H3-17), 1.07 (3H, s, H3-17¢), 1.22 (3H, s, H3-18), 1.35 (1H, m, H-2ax), 1.36 (3H, s, H3-16¢), 1.38 (3H, s, H3-18¢), 1.42 (1H, m, H-2¢ax), 1.49 (1H, t, J = 12.5 Hz, H-2eq), 1.50 (1H, m, H-4¢ax), 1.78 (1H, m, H-4ax), 1.81 (3H, s, H3-19¢), 1.94 (3H, s, H3-19), 1.99 (3H, s, H3-20), 1.99 (3H, s, H3-20¢), 1.99 (1H, m, H-2¢eq), 2.03 (3H, s, H3-22¢), 2.28 (1H, m, H-4¢eq), 2.32 (1H, m, H-4eq), 3.63 (1H, s, H-7a); 3.66 (1H, s, H-7b), 3.82 (1H, m, H-3), 5.38 (1H, m, H-3¢), 6.05 (1H, s, H-8¢), 6.13 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, H-10¢), 6.27 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, H-14¢), 6.35 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-12¢), 6.40 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, H-14), 6.57 (1H, m, H-11), 6.59 (1H, m, H-11¢), 6.63 (1H, m, H-15¢), 6.65 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-12), 6.76 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-15), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, H-10).
13C NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δC ppm: 11.82 (C-19), 12.75 (C-20), 12.90 (C-20¢), 14.00 (C-19¢), 21.15 (C-22¢), 21.39 (C-18), 25.05 (C-17), 28.13 (C-16), 29.20 (C-18¢), 31.25 (C-16¢), 32.08 (C-17¢), 35.16 (C-1), 35.77 (C-1¢), 40.81 (C-7), 41.64 (C-4), 45.26 (C-4¢), 45.45 (C-2¢), 47.07 (C-2), 64.32 (C-3), 66.17 (C-5), 67.14 (C-6), 68.07 (C-3¢), 72.69 (C-5¢), 103.39 (C-8¢), 117.52 (C-6¢), 123.38 (C-11), 125.69 (C-11¢), 128.54 (C-10¢), 129.42 (C-15), 129.42 (C-14¢), 132.51 (C-9¢), 132.51 (C-15¢), 134.54 (C-9), 135.42 (C-13), 136.63 (C-14), 137.11 (C-12¢), 138.07 (C-13¢), 139.10 (C-10), 145.04 (C-12), 170.49 (C-21¢), 197.89 (C-8), 202.37 (C-7¢).
Antioxidant properties of fucoxanthin isolated from S. olygocystum
In this study, fucoxanthin isolated from S. olygocystum (FS) displayed significant antioxidant activities (Table 5). The percentages of radical scavenging activities in the DPPH assay of FS at a concentration of 2 mg/mL were 31.80 ± 0.84% (Table 5).
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity
FS showed AChE inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 130.12 ± 6.65 μg mL-1 (Table 6). Galantamine, a positive control, showed higher AChE inhibition with IC50 value of 1.78 ± 0.13 μg mL-1 when compared to FS (Table 6). The percentage of AchE inhibition of fucoxanthin extracted from brown seaweed at the tested concentration of 100 μg/mL reaching 46.28 ± 1.05% indicated that the extracts were moderate AChE inhibitors (with IC50 value of 130.12 ± 6.65 µg/mL). AchE inhibition percentage of the positive control galantamine at a concentration of 10 μg/mL reached 87. 39 ± 2. 84% (with an IC50 value of 1.78±0,13 μg mL-1).
Cytotoxicity effect of fucoxanthin extracted from S. olygocystum on C6 cells
Before evaluating the neuroprotective activities of FS by the cells, its cytotoxicities was examined to exclude secondary effects of the toxicity on its bioactivities. The obtained results showed that the cell viability of C6 cells after incubation with FS at concentrations of 1, 10, and 100 μM in 24 h was over 95%, suggesting that FS was nontoxic at the tested concentrations (Figure 3).
Neuroprotective effects of fucoxanthin extracted from S. olygocystum against damages caused by oxidative stress induced by H2O2 on C6 cell lines
In this study, treatment with 10 mM H2O2 significantly decreased cell viability by 74% while this rate reached 100% when the cells were cultured in the medium without H2O2 supplement (in the ethanol (EtOH) group) (Figure 4). Pre-incubating the cells with ascorbic acid before adding H2O2 supplement significantly inhibited H2O2 damaging effect on C6 cells. Similarly, pretreatment with FS at concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 μg mL-1 protected C6 cells against H2O2-induced cell damage. The percentage of viability in cells pretreated with the FS at concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/mL increased to 97.69% and 91.23%, respectively, compared to cells only treated with H2O2 (Figure 4). Therefore, FS extracted from S. olygocystum with concentrations of 50 and 100 µg mL-1 was selected for the next experiment.
Fucoxanthin protects C6 cell lines against Aβ25-35 - induced cytotoxicity
Treatment of Aβ25-35 led to a decrease in the cell viability from 100% in the control group to 59% in Aβ25-35 treated group. However, pretreated C6 cells with FS or galantamine (0.1 μg mL-1) before the addition of Aβ25-35 significantly attenuated Aβ25-35-induced cell death (Figure 5). At a concentration of 50 and 100 μg mL-1 of FS, the cell survival rate significantly increased from 59.01% to 81.02% and 80.98%, respectively. The results indicate that fucoxanthin has neuroprotective effects on C6 cells treated with Aβ25–35.
Cytoprotective effects of FS on C6 cell lines against damages by oxidative stress induced by H2O2
Results in Figure 6 showed that ascorbic acid (concentration of 20 µg mL-1) treated cells significantly induced the activity of SOD, CAT, and GPx by 107.47%, 51.22% and 51.27% respectively. FS significantly increased the activities of CAT and GPx and slightly induce the activity of SOD. FS at a concentration of 50 and 100 μg mL-1 increased GPx’activities by 57.51% and 105.81%, respectively, compared with cells treated with H2O2 only. At concentration of 50 μg/mL, FS stimulation in C6 cels induced the activity of CAT by 31.98%.
Neuroprotective effects of fucoxanthin by regulating genes participating in multiple metabolisms of C6 cell lines
The mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and GPx in C6 cell lines were observed, found that mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes, CAT and GPx increased in FS incubated cells when compared to Aβ25-35 treated group, The results were observed similar trend with enzyme activities (Figure 7A).
In this study, we found that pre-treatment with FS significantly reversed the decrease of GSK3β induced by Aβ25-35, suggesting that fucoxanthin may protected against Aβ25-35-induced neuronal death via reversing the inhibition of PI3-K/Akt cascade (Figure 7B). However, in this study we did not detect increased expression levels of PI3K and Akt in all tested samples (Galantamine and FS) compared to H2O2 treated group (Figure 7B). Further, the protective effect of FS against Aβ25–35-induced apoptosis and ER stress in C6 cell lines were investigated. Morever, we observated that FS significantly reduced expression levels of gene encording apoptotic protein like caspase -3 and Bax (Figure 7C). These results are completely consistent with the previous results of other authors (Dhami et al. 2021; Nisa et al. 2020; Sodik et al. 2022).
Additionally, we also found that Aβ25-35 treated cells significantly suppressed mRNA levels of both ChAT and VAChT compared to the control sample. However, the values significantly improved when cells were treated with galatamine and FS (Figure 7D). Amyloid peptide (Aβ), generated by proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), plays an important role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Lin et al. (2008) reported that curmin reversed metal ion - induced AD in PC-12 cells by inhibiting excessive expressions of APP and BACE1. In our study, FS did not inhibited expression level of APP compared to the Aβ25-35 treated group (Figure 7E).
We found that galantamine significantly inhibited the mRNA level of S6K1, while FS had an inverted effect (Figure 7F). This means that the neuroprotective effect of FS was not via modulating protein translation. Here, we observed low mRNA level of p62 and a higher level of ATG5 (autophagy related 5) in FS group compared to Aβ25-35 treated group (Figure 7G). Above all, these results showed FS may exert a neuroprotective role in AD process by stimulating autophagy and autophagic flux.