Sedimentary facies interpretation
The EMMA revealed tri- to bimodal GSD curves for EM3 reflecting Facies 1. Despite thorough continuous H2O2 treatment over several days, small amounts of organic matter may have remained in the sediment, explaining the third mode in the fine silt category at about 4 µm. The high organic-matter content originated either from autochthonous algal productivity or terrestrial run-off from peaty soils of the lakeshore (Biguenet et al., 2021). The latter may indicate heavier precipitation and/or greater snow melting (McIlvenny et al., 2013).
Facies 1 was rich in Br, Ca and S. Although Br was used as marine indicator in other studies from Scotland (Orme et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2017), Br, Ca and S are very mobile in the sediment (Cuven, 2013; Kylander et al., 2020), better preserved in fine-grained organic matter (Chagué, 2020; Biguenet et al., 2021), and thus indicate organic-rich, peaty layers in the current study.
Since Ca is often associated with carbonates, it could either indicate biogenic production in the lake (Davies et al., 2015) or originated from marine shell fragments introduced from the beach and shallow subtidal (Kelley et al., 2018). However, neither shell remains nor any other carbonates were found in the modern intertidal environment (samples FLUG-M1 and FLUG-M2), nor do carbonates form in an acidic, peaty environment such as Loch Flugarth. Kylander et al. (2020) found high Ca concentrations in peat-bog samples in southern Scotland and related them to the underlying metagabbro that also occurs around Loch Flugarth (Mykura et al., 1976). The calcareous fixed dune on top of the sand-and-gravel barrier (Dargie, 1998) could be another source for Ca introduced by wind or surface runoff during heavy precipitation.
Facies 2 was very silty whereas Facies 3 was poorly-sorted and had no clear elemental signal, likely representing a mixture of different sediment types. Both Facies 2 and 3 could be assigned to the mixed cluster 2 in the HCPC. In contrast to Facies 1–3, Facies 4 was better sorted and showed a unimodal GSD, best explained by EM1 in the EMMA peaking in the sand category. Additionally, EM1 was nearly identical to the GSD type for the modern samples FLUG-M1 and FLUG-M2, pointing to an unequivocal sand source at the beach and the shallowest part of Sand Voe bay. The lowermost sand layers L41 and L42 deviated from EM1; their GSD is explained to a larger percentage by EM2. This discrepancy and the formation of L41 and L42 are discussed in detail elsewhere.
Facies 4 was represented by cluster 3 in the HCPC, dominated by the ratios Si/Ti and K/Ti. In Facies 4, K and Si were the principal elements in quartz and K-feldspars, which are typically found in beach sand (Pouzet and Maanan, 2020). These ratios were used to differentiate between coastal beaches and river sand populations (Goslin et al., 2018) and as storminess indicators in peat bogs (Kylander et al., 2020). The overall high Fe content in all sediments of the core could be attributed to the humus-iron podzols surrounding Loch Flugarth (Soil Survey of Scotland, 1982).
Both aeolian transport and marine overwash may be responsible for the deposition of thin sand layers in the lake since both processes generate well-sorted GSD curves (Dawson et al., 2004 b; Morton et al., 2007; Moskalewicz et al., 2020). In a study on coastal sand movements in the Scottish Outer Hebrides, well-sorted sediments with unimodal curves and a mean grain-size of about 200 µm, very similar to Facies 4, were linked to aeolian processes, because marine indicators such as shells or other marine microfossils were absent (Dawson et al., 2004 b). However, the sharp, possibly erosional lower contact of some sand layers (Moskalewicz et al., 2020), e.g., L3, L5, or L12, and the pebbles and wood fragments directly found above or below a sand layer are typical features of storm overwash. In addition, there is no large sand supply around Loch Flugarth, which makes wind-blown sand transport unlikely. NA cyclones are associated with high rainfall. The sand around the beach becomes too wet to be transported (Arens, 1996; McIlvenny et al., 2013) which also speaks for overwash.
Tephrochronological potential of the site
Multiple cryptotephra occurences identified at Loch Flugarth were tentatively correlated with specific Icelandic eruptions based on their major-element geochemistry and age estimates according to the age-depth model of the FLUG 3 record. These included Askja eruption BTD-48 (c. 870s CE; Pilcher et al., 2005), Veidivötn-Bárdarbunga eruption SV‐L1 (c. 1100s CE; Watson et al., 2016), silicic Katla eruptions GB4-50 (c. 1250 CE; Hall and Pilcher, 2002) and BTD-15 (c. 1650–1750 CE; Pilcher et al., 2005) and possibly basaltic Katla eruptions in c. 1357 CE (Larsen et al., 2014) and 1755 CE (Thorarinsson, 1981), Torfajökull eruption GB4-45b (c. 1300 CE; Plunkett and Pilcher, 2018), and Öræfajökull eruption in 1362 CE (Ö-1362; Larsen et al., 1999) (see detailed discussion in Supplementary Note 2). Higher‐resolution cryptotephra analysis (e.g., in 1-cm increments) would allow refinement of these correlations, but the FLUG 3 record already provided new evidence for the occurrence of several more tephra isochrons on Shetland, where so far only three early to middle Holocene Icelandic eruptions had been identified, i.e., Saksunarvatn Ash, Hekla 4 (H4) and Hekla-Selsund (HS) (Bennett et al., 1992; Dugmore et al., 1995; Swindles et al., 2013). In contrast, our study demonstrated the potential to extend the current tephrostratigraphy of Shetland to the late Holocene and specifically to the past 1500 years, which is essential for independent testing and refinement of site chronologies spanning this time interval. Many of the tephra isochrons identified at Loch Flugarth, most notably Ö-1362, have so far not been known from Scotland.
It is noteworthy that although the extraction of basaltic glass shards from core FLUG 3 was not conducted in this study, a few basaltic shards were detected alongside silicic glasses at three different depths (populations P1 and P2; Fig. 7). This suggests that Loch Flugarth sediments likely preserved abundant basaltic cryptotephra layers and once again highlights the importance of a targeted search for basaltic glass shards (e.g., by examining the > 2.5 g cm− 3 density fraction) for generating complete tephrostratigraphies for northern Europe (e.g., Vakhrameeva et al., 2020).
In addition to primary cryptotephra layers, a considerable number of secondary glass shards were identified in core FLUG 3 (Supplementary Note 2). These included (i) material that was vertically displaced, both up- and down-core, from primary cryptotephra deposits occurring in the FLUG 3 core, e.g., Ö-1362, and (ii) material that represented eruptions older than the studied record (c. 590 CE) such as Hekla eruptions H4 (c. 2400–2280 BCE; Pilcher et al., 1995) and HS (c. 1800–1750 BCE; Wastegård et al., 2008), the Microlite tephra from an undefined source beneath the Vatnajökull ice cap in Iceland (c. 700 BCE; Plunkett et al., 2004), and the Glen Garry tephra from Askja (c. 230 BCE; Barber et al., 2008).
HS and H4 were previously reported from the Shetland Islands as cryptotephra layers (Bennett et al., 1992; Dugmore et al., 1995; Swindles et al., 2013), whereas Glen Garry and Microlite tephras were traced to northern Scotland (e.g., Langdon and Barber, 2001). Thus, their occurrence in the lower part of the sedimentary sequence of Loch Flugarth and/or on its catchment is very likely. Considering the substantial time gaps between the ages of these tephra isochrons and their re-deposited correlatives from core FLUG 3, it is more plausible that the tephra re-deposition was due to erosion and remobilisation of tephra shards from terrestrial sediments and soils around the lake margins and/or from the beach and dunes due to storm overwash. Re-distribution of primary tephra material in peatlands and lake sediments, both natural and through human activities, is a commonly encountered problem in tephrochronology, which was previously reported from Shetland (Swindles et al., 2013, and references therein). Our results illustrated the importance of identifying the primary fallout deposits in sedimentary sequences.
Phases of higher storminess in Shetland
The presence of Facies 4 in combination with the age-depth model indicated five phases of higher storminess: approx. 980–1050, 1150–1300, 1450–1550, 1820–1900, and 1950–2000 cal. a CE. Increased storminess could be associated with the late 12th century and the 13th century, which belong to the MWP (L26–36), the onset of the LIA (L18–21), the Dalton Minimum ending around 1830–1840, and the 20th century (L1–L14). The period of lower storminess around 1910–1950 (c. 8–11 cm b.s.) was consistent with pre-existing regional geological (Hansom and Hall, 2009) and historical (Lamb, 1991) data.
A higher storminess from 1100 to 1300 cal. a CE could be corroborated by a proxy record from northern Scotland with a strong presence of sand layers within background peat for the MWP, which was interpreted as a wetter and stormier period (Stewart et al., 2017). Our findings are also in line with data from northwest France, where high storminess was dated to 1050–1085 and 1250–1350 cal. a CE (Pouzet and Maanan, 2020). Orme et al. (2016) provided evidence for higher storminess in two ombrotrophic peat bogs on the Outer Hebrides dated to approx. 1150 and 1550 cal. a CE, which might correlate with L30–33 and L18–21 in the Flugarth record, respectively. The 14th, 17th, and 18th centuries were predominantly calmer periods reflected by fewer and thinner sand layers. The conspicuous sediment facies change at c. 40 cm b.s. coincides with the period 1400–1420 cal. a CE, which has been described as a strong NA climate change by Dawson et al. (2007).
Several studies attributed individual sand layers to specific historical storm events during the last 300 years (Sabatier et al., 2008; Moskalewicz et al., 2020; Biguenet et al., 2021). The correlation with historical data, however, is challenging due to the high number of severe storms around the Shetland Islands. For instance, more than 21 severe storms occurred between 1950 and 1990 (Lamb, 1991), but only seven sand layers were identified in the sediment core for the same period. This discrepancy is quite common as only the most intense storms tend to be preserved in sediment records (e.g., Liu, 2004; Dezileau et al., 2011; May et al., 2013; Moskalewicz et al., 2020). Furthermore, two storms of identical intensity and characteristics may not necessarily cause the same marine flooding and sediment pattern. Changing boundary conditions such as tides, fetch, season etc. additionally influence the occurrence of overwash (Liu, 2004; Liu and Fearn, 2000; Moskalewicz et al., 2020). Any estimation of the number of storm events from individual sand layers should therefore be treated with caution (Biguenet et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the high abundance of sand layers within the Flugarth records implied a high temporal resolution especially when compared to other studies (Sabatier et al., 2008; Pouzet and Maanan, 2020; Biguenet et al., 2021).
Layer L1 most probably corresponds to a storm in the late 1980s or 1990s, possibly the severe storms in 1992 or 1993, where boulders at Eshaness at the northwest coast of Mainland close to the study site were shifted on top of the > 40 m-high cliffs by waves (Hall et al., 2006; Hansom and Hall, 2009). Layer L2 might represent the severe storm of December 1986, while L3 could either be correlated with a storm in 1983 or 1981 as the 137Cs peak of 1986 lay in between these layers. The historical North Sea storm in 1953, that caused a 0.5–3.0 cm thick sandy layer in coastal peats in eastern England (Swindles et al., 2018), was also described as severe for the Shetland Islands and is likely represented by one of the sand layers L5–7.
The pronounced sand layers L11–12 might reflect the severe storms in the middle of the 19th century, e.g., the storms in 1839 or 1855 (Lamb, 1991). The relatively thick layer L12 at 16 cm b.s. dated to 1735–1901 (median: 1831) cal. a CE might have been caused by a massive storm reconstructed in North Scotland (McIlvenny et al., 2013). Although large sand movements with accumulation of several decimetres were reported in the 1690s in Scotland and the southernmost part of Shetland e.g., the Udal storm or the Culbin Sands Disaster (Lamb, 1991; Orme et al., 2016; Bampton et al., 2017), no large sand layer was found in all FLUG sediment cores during this period. Only the sand layers L16 and L17 dated to about 1706 and 1650 (1531–1745) cal. a CE, respectively, might coincide with this period. The high sand accumulation of L19–21 of 1367–1614 (median: 1506) cal. a CE might be linked to large sand movements in the Shetlands dated to 1492 and 1500 by Sommerville et al. (2003).
Atmospheric and oceanic drivers of storminess
Periods of higher storminess in the Loch Flugarth sediment core occurred during the MWP until c. 1300 and 1450–1550 and since the second half of the 19th century with a lower storminess during the first half of the 20th century (Fig. 11h–i). The NA water inflow based on coccolith populations was considered to have a major climatic impact on the Loch Flugarth study area due to the proximity of the Shelf Edge Current to the northwest coast of Shetland. The increased warm water inflow from the tropics correlated with higher storminess in Shetland, particularly in the last 150 years (Giraudeau et al., 2010) (Fig. 11d). Moreover, phases of higher storminess in the Flugarth record also corresponded to a prevailing positive NAO (NAO+) mode (Fig. 11a,h,i), although the phase of high storminess during the MWP in the Flugarth record was shorter than the NAO + phase presented by Trouet et al. (2009).
A proxy of annually laminated stalagmites from a Scottish cave based on lamina counting and U-Th dating (Fig. 11c) reflected the transition from the warm MWP into the colder LIA around 1400 and supported the persistent NAO + mode during the MWP and the NAO– mode with several smaller positive excursions during the LIA (Baker et al., 2015). The NAO– mode during the LIA could be explained by high-pressure systems that formed over the northeast Atlantic due to colder surface waters weakening the Icelandic deep pressure system. This was attributed to stationary high-pressure systems which would hinder the development of cyclones in the NA and thus reduce storminess during winter (Orme et al., 2016). However, this finding is in disagreement with the GISP2 ice core record from Greenland, where storminess was inferred from Na+ concentrations introduced by long-distance sea spray (Meeker and Mayewski, 2002) (Fig. 11b). The GISP2 ice core record clearly indicated a higher (lower) storminess during the LIA (MWP). Other regional studies from Scotland and the Shetland Islands also showed higher storminess consistent with the GISP2 ice core particularly during the coldest phase, i.e., the Maunder Minimum (1645–1715) (e.g., Dawson et al., 2004 a, b, 2007; Hansom and Hall, 2009).
This discrepancy in records may be resolved by considering seasonality patterns (Trouet et al., 2012). Since the NAO is driven by winter weather patterns, the higher storminess during NAO– mode (i.e., LIA) may be explained by severe cyclones predominantly occurring in spring and autumn (Lamb, 1991; Trouet et al., 2012). Additional evidence for this hypothesis is provided by Wheeler et al. (2010), who inferred severe storms during spring and autumn between 1685 and 1699 from Royal Navy logbooks. This is in line with the increased storminess observed in the historical evaluation of storminess per century in spring and autumn during the 17th to 19th century (Lamb, 1991). However, this seasonal shift does not explain why these storms were not recorded in the Loch Flugarth record.
One hypothesis could be the southward extension of the Arctic sea ice during the LIA (Dawson et al., 2002, 2010). This extension may have cooled the air and the sea surface in the northeast Atlantic. Consequently, the storm tracks were shifted further south (Dawson et al., 2002, 2010; Giraudeau et al., 2010; Orme et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2017). Biguenet et al. (2021) emphasised that only storm tracks which ran very close on the seaward side of the coast could be captured in the sedimentary archive of a small coastal lake. Thus, even a slight shifting of the storm tracks could determine whether or not a storm was preserved in the lake record. Since the site only recorded storms with tracks north of 60°N, Jutland-type cyclones moving from southwest to northeast were therefore unlikely to be captured by the Flugarth record (Fig. 1a). The hypothesis of a larger-scale southward shift of storm tracks is supported by comparisons of studies in the Mediterranean, which found a clear link between cold phases of the Holocene (e.g., around 1550–1990) and higher storminess, whereas storminess was low during the MWP (Sabatier et al., 2008, 2012; Costas et al., 2012).
Due to its northern opening, Sand Voe bay captured storms from northerly or northwesterly directions. Based on model simulations, Bampton et al. (2017) stated that present wind fields are similar to the wind conditions of storms observed during the LIA. However, historical documents indicated more easterly and northeasterly winds during the LIA (Lamb, 1991), which would likely produce less overwash at Flugarth. In addition, the lake sediment layers with high Ca content were dated to the LIA. Northeasterly winds during the LIA could have transported Ca from the calcareous dune immediately northeast of Loch Flugarth (Dargie, 1998), which under a colder and drier climatic regime (Stewart et al., 2017) might have been less vegetated, into the lake. The high peat content in the sediment core during the late LIA was possibly introduced by increased surface discharge associated with precipitation maxima in summer or by shoreline soil erosion during the 18th and 19th centuries (Dawson et al., 2004 a).
The regional CTSD studies (Fig. 11e) showed a continuously high storminess during the LIA (Gilbertson et al., 1999; Hansom and Hall, 2009). CTSDs were found at 15–60 m asl in Shetland, and dated to 700–1050, 1300–1900, and post-1950 cal. a CE, supporting the Na+ proxy of GISP2 (Hansom and Hall, 2009). Due to the proximity of the CTSD site to Loch Flugarth and a similar orientation of the cliffs, the high storminess between 1300 and 1900 should be also visible in the Flugarth record. However, Hansom and Hall (2009) acknowledged that the dating precision of the CTSD is relatively low due to indirect dating of adjacent sand or peat underneath the boulders. Thus, the CTSD record during the LIA might also relate to a low number of high-intensity events instead of a generally higher storm frequency (Trouet et al., 2012; Orme et al., 2016; Stewart et al., 2017). The higher intensity might be explained by the generally steepened thermal gradient between the cold polar waters and the warm subtropics during colder periods (Dawson et al., 2007; Sabatier et al., 2012). Thus, it could be inferred that the storm frequency was relatively low during the LIA (Orme et al., 2016), resulting in a lower number of events coinciding with high tides and a lower probability of overwash at Flugarth.
Further arguments for a moderate storminess during the LIA are that aeolian sand drift does not only depend on wind strength, but also on sand availability, vegetation cover, anthropogenic impact, and drier conditions (Bampton et al., 2017). The coldest stages of the LIA were associated with a reduced winter storm frequency over the NA due to the expansion of the polar anticyclone, providing a NAO– mode and stable conditions during winter (Dawson et al., 2004 b). These high-pressure systems could have created drier conditions during the LIA (Stewart et al., 2017) and, hence, reduced vegetation cover. Together with anthropogenic landscape changes, i.e., overgrazing, sand dunes might have been less stable (Bampton et al., 2017). The recent decline in aeolian sand transport observed in Scotland over the past 200 years could be attributed to anthropogenic adaptation activities on dune systems (Orme et al., 2016).