Patient background
The patient demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The median age of patients was 69 years. Although patients were predominantly male, neither age nor sex affected the prognosis. None of the patients were treated with preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time after surgery was 61 months (range: 4–94 months). In total, 21 patients died at the end of the follow-up period. Among them, 14 patients died from cancer-unrelated diseases, and 11 patients experienced tumor relapse. The median time to relapse was 17 months (range: 6–29 months). Twenty-four patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (Table 1).
Table 1
Patient demographic and clinical characteristics.
Factors
|
Number or period
|
All cases
|
82
|
Median follow-up time
|
61 months (4–94)
|
Tumor relapse
|
11 (12.6%)
|
Median time to relapse
|
17 months (6–29)
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy
|
24 (27.5%)
|
Age < 69
|
40 (48.7%)
|
(median; 69, 31–89) ≧ 69
|
42 (51.2%)
|
Gender Male
|
63 (76.8%)
|
Female
|
19 (23.1%)
|
Depth of invasion T1a
|
26 (31.7%)
|
T1b
|
29 (35.4%)
|
T2
|
6 (7.3%)
|
T3
|
7 (8.5%)
|
T4a
|
14 (17.1%)
|
LN metastasis N0
|
56 (68.3%)
|
N1
|
8 (9.8%)
|
N2
|
6 (7.3%)
|
N3
|
12 (14.6%)
|
Staging Ⅰ
|
54 (65.9%)
|
Ⅱ
|
12 (14.6%)
|
Ⅲ
|
16 (19.5%)
|
Histological grade differentiated
|
39 (47.6%)
|
undifferentiated
|
43 (52.4%)
|
Lymphatic invasion ly0
|
32 (39.0%)
|
ly1
|
23 (28.0%)
|
ly2
|
8 (9.8%)
|
ly3
|
19 (23.2%)
|
Venous invasion v0
|
41 (50.0%)
|
v1
|
15 (18.3%)
|
v2
|
10 (12.2%)
|
v3
|
16 (19.5%)
|
CEA (ng/ml) < 5.0
|
67 (89.3%)
|
≧5.0
|
8 (10.7%)
|
CA19-9 (U/ml) < 37.0
|
68 (91.9%)
|
≧37.0
|
6 (8.1%)
|
ALB (g/dl) < 3.8
|
32 (39.0%)
|
≧3.8
|
50 (61.0%)
|
LN, lymph node; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9; ALB, albumin.
Gastric Cancer Tissue With High Intratumoral Cd15-positive Cells Has A Worse Prognosis
Figure 1a shows representative cases with high and low CD15-positive and CD8-positive cells. The median number of CD15-positive and CD8-positive cells per field of view were 11 (range: 0–209) and 16 (range: 1–88), respectively. The median intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio was 0.8 (range: 0–18.2). According to ROC curve analysis, the cutoff values for the CD15 positive and CD8 positive cells were 18 and 15, respectively, based on an RFS of 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: one group with high CD15- and CD8-positive cells and the other with low CD15- and CD8-positive cells (Fig. 1b, c). Patients with high intratumoral CD15-positive cells in gastric cancer tissue had worse RFS than those with low intratumoral CD15-positive cells. However, the quantity of intratumoral CD8-positive cells did not affect the prognosis.
High Intratumoral Cd15/cd8 Ratio Worsen Prognosis
ROC curve analysis revealed that the cutoff value for the CD15/CD8 ratio was 2.25 based on an RFS of 5 years, as depicted in Fig. 2a. Patients were divided into two groups: one group included patients with a high CD15/CD8 ratio, and the other included patients with a low CD15/CD8 ratio. Patients with a high intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio had worse RFS and OS than those with a low intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio. The five-year RFS in the low and high CD15/CD8 groups were 93.9% and 56.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The hazard ratio (HR) for RFS was 10.8 (HR:3.2–37.2, P < 0.0001). The five-year OS in the low and high CD15/CD8 groups were 77.3% and 43.8% (P = 0.003), respectively. The HR for OS was 3.3 (HR: 1.4–7.6, P = 0.005).
A high intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio is associated with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion in gastric cancer tissue
The demographic characteristics of each patient group are presented in Table 2. Patients with a higher intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.019) and lymphatic invasion (P = 0.005).
In contrast, the incidence of the depth of invasion (P = 0.024), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), staging (P = 0.013), and lymphatic invasion (P < 0.001) was considerably elevated in patients with a higher NLR.
Table 2
Correlation between intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio and clinicopathological factors.
Clinicopathological factors
|
CD15/CD8 ratio
Low (< 2.25) High ( ≧ 2.25)
|
P-value
|
NLR
Low (< 3.07) High ( ≧ 3.07)
|
P-value
|
All cases 82
|
66
|
16
|
|
63
|
19
|
|
Age ༜69
|
31
|
6
|
0.495
|
31
|
6
|
0.176
|
(median; 69, 3189) ≧69
|
35
|
10
|
32
|
13
|
Gender male
|
49
|
14
|
0.259
|
47
|
16
|
0.539
|
female
|
17
|
2
|
16
|
3
|
Depth of invasion T1a
|
23
|
3
|
0.214
|
24
|
2
|
0.024*
|
T1b–T4
|
43
|
13
|
39
|
17
|
LN metastasis N0
|
49
|
7
|
0.019*
|
51
|
5
|
< 0.001*
|
N1–N3
|
17
|
9
|
12
|
14
|
Staging Ⅰ
|
45
|
9
|
0.367
|
46
|
8
|
0.013*
|
Ⅱ–Ⅲ
|
21
|
7
|
17
|
11
|
Histological grade differentiated
|
31
|
8
|
0.828
|
32
|
7
|
0.286
|
undifferentiated
|
35
|
8
|
31
|
12
|
lymphatic invasion ly0, ly1
|
49
|
6
|
0.005*
|
50
|
5
|
< 0.001*
|
ly2, ly3
|
17
|
10
|
13
|
14
|
venous invasion v0, v1
|
47
|
9
|
0.249
|
45
|
11
|
0.266
|
v2, v3
|
19
|
7
|
18
|
8
|
CEA (ng/ml) < 5.0
|
55
|
12
|
1.000
|
54
|
13
|
0.356
|
≧5.0
|
7
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
CA19-9 (U/ml) < 37.0
|
55
|
13
|
0.583
|
55
|
13
|
0.111
|
≧37.0
|
6
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
ALB (g/dl) < 3.8
|
23
|
9
|
0.115
|
21
|
11
|
0.054
|
≧3.8
|
43
|
7
|
42
|
8
|
P-values were estimated using chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test * P < 0.05.
CD, cluster of differentiation; LN, lymph node; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9; ALB, albumin.
Nlr And Cd15/cd8 Ratios Are Independent Of Each Other
NLR was determined using preoperative peripheral blood data. NLR had a median value of 2.29 (range: 0.83–9.67). According to the ROC curve, based on the 5-year RFS, the optimal NLR cut-off value was 3.07. Patients with a high NLR had a worse RFS (Fig. 2b). There was no relationship between the intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio and NLR (Fig. 2c).
Relapses occurred in 9 of the 29 patients with a high NLR or CD15/CD8 ratio, at a relapse rate of 31.0%. In contrast, recurrence occurred in 2 of 53 patients with low NLR or CD15/CD8 ratio, at a recurrence rate of 3.8%.
A High Intratumoral Cd15/cd8 Ratio Is An Independent Prognostic Factor Of Gastric Cancer
The RFS-related factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. These analyses also included albumin (ALB), a component of prognostic scores, such as the Prognostic Nutritional Index and Glasgow Prognostic Score. Univariate analysis revealed a significant difference in intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio, NLR, and venous invasion. Multivariate analysis, which included the intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio, NLR, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and ALB, revealed that the intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio was independently associated with RFS (Table 3).
Table 3
Univariate and Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of clinicopathological factors for relapse-free survival.
Clinicopathological factors
|
Univariate analysis
|
Multivariate analysis
|
|
Hazard ratio
|
P
|
Hazard ratio
|
P
|
Depth of invasion (T1a or T1b–T4)
|
37.6 (0.2, > 1000)
|
0.179
|
|
|
Lymph node metastasis (N0 or N1–N3)
|
284.3 (0.5, > 1000)
|
0.077**
|
8.0E + 3 (< 0.001, > 1000)
|
0.919
|
Histological grade (differentiated or undifferentiated)
|
2.4 (0.6, 8.9)
|
0.204
|
|
|
lymphatic invasion (ly0,ly1 or ly2,ly3)
|
273.0 (0.6, > 1000)
|
0.076**
|
2.1E + 4 (< 0.001, > 1000)
|
0.914
|
venous invasion (v0,v1 or v2,v3)
|
4.1 (1.2, 14.0)
|
0.025*
|
2.0 (0.4, 8.6)
|
0.377
|
Intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio (< 2.25 or ≧ 2.25)
|
10.8 (3.2, 37.2)
|
< 0.001*
|
7.8 (1.8, 33.5)
|
0.005*
|
NLR (< 3.07 or ≧ 3.07)
|
4.7 (1.4, 15.3)
|
0.011*
|
2.1 (0.4, 9.5)
|
0.354
|
CEA (< 5.0 or ≧ 5.0) (ng/ml)
|
0.04 (< 0.001, 297.2)
|
0.481
|
|
|
CA19-9 (< 37 or ≧ 37) (U/ml)
|
1.3 (0.2, 10.6)
|
0.794
|
|
|
ALB (< 3.8 or ≧ 3.8) (g/dl)
|
0.3 (0.1, 1.1)
|
0.066**
|
1.2 (0.3, 4.8)
|
0.798
|
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.1 |
CD, cluster of differentiation; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9; ALB, albumin
The intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio predicts the recurrence of gastric cancer in patients with stage II and III tumors
Only Stage II and III cancer patients who were candidates for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. The RFS of patients with a high intratumoral CD15/CD8 ratio was significantly worse than that of patients with a low CD15/CD8 ratio (Fig. 3). The five-year RFS in the low and high CD15/CD8 groups were 81.0% and 14.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The HR for RFS was 9.3 (HR: 2.5–34.8, P = 0.001). The five-year RFS in the low and high NLR groups were 70.6% and 54.5%, respectively (P = 0.241). HR for OS was 2.1 (HR: 0.6–7.2, P = 0.255).