Study population:
This retrospective cohort study was performed at the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICU and PICU) of Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. From the medical records database, all infants that had been admitted with a diagnosis of CHD between January 2010 to December 2018 and had been monitored with cEEG were identified. In our hospital, cEEG is a routine procedure in all critically ill infants with CHD prior to and after cardiac surgery. The surgical management of CHD did not change during this period. Infants with any type of CHD who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB from birth until 44 weeks gestational age (GA) were included in the study. Neonates with gestational age less than 36 weeks, confirmed genetic disorders, multiple congenital anomalies or known underlying neurological abnormalities were excluded from the study. Infants that were transferred to another facility prior to critical care service discontinuation and infants who underwent cardiac transplantation within 30 months of cardiac surgery were also excluded. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Pediatric Institute Research Committee at Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Continuous EEG (cEEG):
A 19-channel continuous cEEG recording was performed prior to and for at least 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Post-operative cEEG was started after the patient was transferred to the ICU and hemodynamic stability was achieved. Only infants with pre-operative and post-operative cEEG recordings were included in this study. Twenty electrodes were placed according to the international 10–20 montage system (modified for neonates) with collodion adhesive. 9 The cEEG service includes acquisition and review software, network infrastructure, trained and licensed EEG technologists and physicians. The Cleveland Clinic EEG laboratory is accredited by ABRET. cEEG was performed using the Nihon-Koden digital video EEG system with a portable EEG acquisition machine networked to the main server allowing EEG review at the bedside and also, remotely in the central monitoring unit.
cEEG variables such as background patterns, inter-burst interval (IBI) – amplitude and duration, symmetry, synchrony, presence of sleep wake cycles, grapho-elements and seizure activity were assessed. The cEEGs were classified as normal or abnormal based on background patterns. Normal EEG background was defined as normal continuity and discontinuity (IBI < 4 seconds in quiet sleep), IBI Amplitude 25–50 µV in awake or active sleep, symmetry and synchrony, spontaneous cycling among wake, active and quiet sleep and normal grapho-elements. Furthermore, severity of encephalopathy was graded as mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe, severe encephalopathy according to classification of neonatal EEGs by Shellhaas et al based on EEG background features including presence or lack of continuity or discontinuity, synchrony, symmetry, IBI amplitude and duration and grapho-elements seen during most part of the EEG recording. 15,26 Sleep wake cycle was graded as normal or absent. Epileptic activity was classified as single seizure, multiple seizures or status epilepticus. Ictal discharges were characterized for timing, multifocality, lateralization and anti-seizure medication. Immediate post-operative EEG was obtained as bedside cEEG monitoring for initial 60 minutes post-surgery. All neonatal EEGS were interpreted by the pediatric epileptologist team for clinical purposes. For the study, cEEG recordings were assessed independently by two investigators, one a neonatologist with experience in cEEG interpretation and second, a senior EEG technician. If any discrepancies in findings were noted, final decisions were made by a pediatric epileptologist. cEEG findings were described for the entire length of available recording for each neonate.
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – 3rd edition (BSID-III):
The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III; Bayley, 1993, 2006) is an individually administered instrument designed to assess the developmental functioning of infants, toddlers, and young children aged between 1 and 42 months. The Bayley-III provides coverage of the following five domains: cognitive, language, motor, adaptive, and social-emotional development. For this study, we used the three main domains – cognitive scale, language scale (includes receptive and expressive communication) and motor scale (includes gross and fine motor skills). A mean composite score of 100 was considered within normal limit, with a standard deviation of 15. A score between 70–85 was considered as mild delay, scores between 55–70 as moderate delay and scores below 55 was classified as profound delay.
Clinical Parameters:
Baseline characteristics that were recorded included demographics, birth history (gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, cord pH, mode of delivery), type of CHD and details pertaining to the surgery including age at surgery, pre-operative and discharge oxygen saturation, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) score, type of surgical repair, time to first chest closure, days till first extubation, extra-corporeal support days, CPB time, cross clamp time, regional cerebral perfusion time, cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute kidney injury, intensive care length of stay, total length of stay, use of steroids and sedatives started in 24–48 hours post operatively were also noted. Neonates were classified as Class 1 (Two ventricles with no aortic arch obstruction), Class 2 (Two ventricles with aortic arch obstruction), Class 3 (One ventricle without arch obstruction), and Class 4 (One ventricle with arch obstruction) based on the American Heart Association (AHA) anatomic classification of CHD.
Data Collection:
Data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), a web based electronic application through Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital.
Statistical Analysis:
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All analyses were performed on a complete-case basis and all tests were two-tailed and performed at a significance level of 0.05. Data were described using medians and ranges for continuous variables and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Associations of cEEG findings were assessed using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests for categorical variables and Spearman rank correlations for continuous and ordinal findings. P- values of < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.