Descriptive Statistics
Table 1 denotes the summary statistics of the socio-economic and mental health staus variables with their definitions of the adult population. Although the number of small families is increasing day by day due to urbanization, the nature of job, and globalization, still about 20% of the families are joint in Bangladesh. The size of an average household is about 4.45, which is slightly higher than the national average10. Around 96% of the families have an excellent relationship among their members, as the mean value of the 'understanding and relationship among the members' indicator is 0.96. Since the mean valu is 0.96, it implies that a very good relationship exists in the family. Average age of the surveyd adult population is about 40 years having about six years of education. The National Mental Health Survey of Bangladesh also ensured parity in gender and geographical location (Table 1). 88% of the adult population are Muslim, supporting the national lavel10.
Table 1
Descriptive Statistics and mental health status
Variables (with definition) | Observation | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
Household Size (Number of household members) | 7320 | 4.45 | 1.84 | 1 | 20 |
Wealth index (value of the index) | 8928 | 11530.99 | 15392.43 | 0 | 261512 |
Age (in years) | 7270 | 40.82 | 14.54 | 18 | 99 |
Age Squared (Square of age) | 7270 | 1877.48 | 1361.09 | 324 | 9801 |
Gender (= 1 if male, = 0 if female) | 8928 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 |
Residential Status (= 1 if respondent in urban area, = 0 if from rural area | 8910 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 |
Marital status (= 1 if married, = 0 if otherwise | 7270 | 0.90 | 0.31 | 0 | 1 |
Religion (= 1 if Islam, = 0 if otherwise) | 7270 | 0.88 | 0.33 | 0 | 1 |
Education (years of schooling) | 7270 | 5.98 | 4.43 | 0 | 20 |
Type of family (= 1 if joint family, = 0 if otherwise) | 7270 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0 | 1 |
Understanding and relationships among the members (= 1 if understanding 'very good', and 'good' =0 if 'average', 'bad' and 'very bad') | 7270 | 0.96 | 0.21 | 0 | 1 |
Mental health prevalence among the adults (= 1 if mentally disorder,=0 if not’) | 7238 | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0 | 1 |
Status of Mental Health treatment seeking (= 1 if desires health services, = 0 if not) | 1233 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0 | 1 |
Mental patients in the family (= 1 if there is another mental patient in the family, = 0 if not) | 7270 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0 | 1 |
Source: Authors' calculation from the National Mental Health Survey Data 2019
The above table also shows that about 19% of the adult population in the country have mental disorders, and among them, only 10% of the adults with mental disorders seekt mental healthcare services from the different mental service-providing sources. This implies that there is a large gap in mental health disorder patients and their treatment-receiving behavior. The above table also portrays that only 6% of the families have other mentally disordered patients without the respondents.
Table 2 shows the prevalence of mental health disorders disaggregated by age and sex. It portrays that about 19% of the adult population exhibits symptoms of mental disorders. The oldest people in the country (60 years and above) have the greatest proportion (28.10%) of mental illness. It also shows that 25.1% of men and 31.40% of women aged 60 years and above suffer from mental illness. The adults aged 18–29 are relatively less vulnerable to mentall illness disease compared to the(Table 2).
Table 2
Prevalence of Mental Health Disorder by age (Adult)
Age | Prevalence of mental Health Disorder by age (Adult) |
Both Sexes (%) | Men (%) | Women (%) |
Overall (18–99) | 18.70 | 15.70 | 21.50 |
18–29 | 14.60 | 12.80 | 16.00 |
30–39 | 20.00 | 15.10 | 23.90 |
40–49 | 17.20 | 12.60 | 22.00 |
50–59 | 22.10 | 19.40 | 25.00 |
60 and above | 28.10 | 25.10 | 31.40 |
Source: National Mental Health Survey of Bangladesh 20192
Mental Health Service Coverage And The Source Of Service Coverage In Bangladesh
The following bar graph portrays the treatment gap of mental health care services in Bangladesh. The red bar indicates that the individuals do not seek treatment for their mental diseases or the treatment gap, whereas the green bar represents the proportion of people with mental health disorders who take healthcare services. Every category of the disease shows a large treatment gap (Fig. 1). Fiure 1 presents that addictive disorder has the largest treatment gap (around 95%), while bipolar-related disorders have the lowest treatment gap (66%). Among the most severe treatments gap, addictive, depressive, personality, anxiety, somatic symptoms disorders, and neurocognitive disorders experienced a higher treatment gap among the major mental disorders in Bangladesh. The treatment gap for the above mental disorders exceeds 90% (Fig. 1). The higher treatment gap for these disorders may reveal that these mental illnesses have a less severe impact on mental health. Therefore, patients remain reluctant to receive treatment for mental health problems.
On the other hand, sleep-wake, obsessive-compulsive, disruptive, schizophrenia spectrum, sexual dysfunction, and bipolar were found to have comparatively higher coverage rates. The greatest four coverage rates (17%, 19%, 32%, and 34%, respectively) were found for disruptive and impulse, schizophrenia spectrum, sexual dysfunctions, and bipolar disorders (Fig. 1). The lower treatment gap (hence, the larger coverage rates) indicates that patients have to seek treatment for these mental health disorders as these disorders have a severe impact on their mental health.
Table 3 portrays the sources of receiving treatment for mental health disorders. It shows that public hospitals and doctors' chambers are the primary sources of mental health treatment for patients. Public hospitals, specialized doctor's chambers, and general doctor's chambers are the sources for 2.21%, 2.49%, and 2.64% of mental health disorders patients to receive mental healthcare services, respectively. On the other hand, other sources like the private hospital, specialized hospitals, homeopathic doctors, and other sources have provided mental healthcare services for below less than 1% of the patients. The findings also portray an exciting picture of mental healthcare-seeking behavior in Bangladesh. The results show that only about 2.8% of the mental disorder patients visit specialized hospitals and doctors for treatment, and about 7% of the patients receive treatment from sources without specialization.
Table 3
Health care-seeking behavior of patients with mental illness (%)
Treatment Sources | Contribution of Sources |
No Treatment | 90.16 |
Public Hospital | 2.21 |
Private Hospital | 0.43 |
Specialized Mental Hospital | 0.29 |
Chamber of Specialized Doctors of Mental Diseases | 2.49 |
Chamber of Other Doctors | 2.64 |
Homeopathic, and others | 0.86 |
Others | 0.86 |
Unknown | 0.07 |
Total | 100.00 |
Source: Authors' calculation from the National Mental Health Survey of Bangladesh 2019
Table 4 presents the sources of treatment-seeking for each mental disorder. Public hospitals and chambers of specialized doctors or general doctors play a vital role in providing mental healthcare treatment for different types of diseases. Most patients with sleep-awake, neurocognitive and bipolar disorders sought treatment from public hospitals, and approximately 19% of bipolar patients and around 8% of personalit disorder patients sought treatment from the chambers of specialized doctors of mental diseases (Table 4).
Table 4
Mental health care-seeking behavior by type of mental health disorders (percent)
Sources of Mental Helath Services | Anxiety disorders | Depressive disorders | Sexual dysfunctions | Neurocognitive disorders | Obsessive-compulsive and related disorder | Bipolar and related disorder | Sleep-awake disorders | Personality disorders | Somatic symptoms and related disorders | Substance-related and addictive disorder | Schizophrenia Spectrum disorder | Disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders |
No Treatment | 91.30 | 93.25 | 68.42 | 91.3 | 84.21 | 65.63 | 88.89 | 92.31 | 91.16 | 95.24 | 80.8 | 83.33 |
Public Hospital | 2.03 | 1.88 | - | 4.35 | 1.75 | 6.25 | 4.17 | - | 2.21 | - | 2.56 | - |
Private Hospital | - | 0.38 | - | 2.17 | 1.75 | - | - | - | 0.55 | - | 1.28 | - |
Specialized Mental Hospital | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.39 | - | - | - | 3.85 | - |
Chamber of Specialized Doctors of Mental Diseases | 1.45 | 1.88 | - | - | 3.51 | 18.75 | - | 7.69 | 1.66 | - | 10.3 | - |
Chamber of Other Doctors | 3.48 | 1.88 | 15.79 | - | 7.02 | 3.13 | 2.78 | - | 2.21 | 4.76 | - | - |
Homeopathic, and others | 0.29 | 0.19 | 10.53 | - | - | 6.25 | 1.39 | - | 2.21 | - | - | 16.67 |
Others | 1.16 | 0.56 | 5.26 | 2.17 | 1.75 | - | 1.39 | - | - | - | 1.28 | - |
Unknown | 0.29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Source: Authors' calculation from the National Mental Health Survey of Bangladesh 2019
Figure 2 presents the types of healthcare providers for providing healthcare services to mental health patients seeking treatment. More than half of the patients with mental disorders got health care services from the chambers of specialized (25%) and non-specialized (27%) doctors. At the same time, public hospitals provided treatment services for about one-fourth of mentally disordered patients. Homeopathic and other treatments offered mental health care services for about 17%.
Source: Authors' calculation from the National Mental Health Survey of Bangladesh 2019
Probit Results Of Health Care Seeking Behavior And Estimating Marginal Effects
In order to delineate the probability of taking mental health care services, we have subsumed gender identity, level of education, religious status, age, residential status, number of family members, marital status, and the existence of other mental patients in the family as independent variables. The results of the probit model show how these socioeconomic factors affect the probability of mental healthcare service seeking, although the magnitudes of the coefficients of probit model are not meaningful. The following Table 5 portrays the estimated results from the Probit regression models, and Table 6 depicts the marginal effects of the aforementioned socio-economic variables at their mean value. To show how changing gender identity affects the probability of seeking mental healthcare services, we have also estimated the regressions for male and female sample separately under Model-II and Model-III in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. On the other hand, Model-I captures the entire sample of the study.
As the descriptive statistics show that only 10% of mentally ill persons have sought health care treatment, the estimated results from the Probit regression model depict a very similar picture. Model-I of Table 5 shows that only the coefficient of the existence of other mentally ill patients in the family is statistically significant. According to Table 5, already having the presence of a mentally ill person in the family positively influences the decision of the other mentally sick person to receive mental health treatment at a 1% level of significance. It implies that a family thatalready has a person with a mental health disorder will seek treatment for another mentally sick person. It happens because the victim's family may anticipate the consequence of the existence of a mental health disorder patients.. However, the remaining variables-gender identity, level of education, religious status, age, residential status, number of family members, and marital status are statistically insignificant. Although the male identity of gender, additional year of education, being Muslim, and being married positively influence the decision to seek mental health treatment, they are not statistically significant. Therefore, it implies that these socio-economic variables do not impact on mental healthcare-seeking behavior in Bangladesh. On the other hand, older people, people in urban residential areas, and more family members demotivate thos with mental health conditions to take mental healthcare services. However, they are also not statistically significant.
Table 5
Estimated Probit Regression Results (Dependent Variable: Probability of Mental Health Care Seeking Behavior)
Model and explanatory variables | Model-I (Total Sample) | Model-II (Women) | Model-III (Men) |
Coefficient Estimate | 95% CI | Coefficient Estimate | 95% CI | Coefficient Estimate | 95% CI |
Gender identity | 0.01 (0.10) | -0.19 to 0.22 | - | - | - | - |
Level of education | 0.01 (0.01) | -0.01 to 0.04 | 0.03 (0.02) | -0.01 to 0.06 | -0.01 (0.02) | -0.05 to 0.03 |
Religion | 0.31 (0.20) | -0.08 to 0.70 | 0.14 (0.25) | -0.35 to 0.63 | 0.55 (0.34) | -0.12 to 1.22 |
Age | -0.00 (0.00) | -0.01 to 0.00 | 0.00 (0.01) | -0.01 to 0.01 | -0.00 (0.01) | -0.01 to 0.01 |
Residential status | -0.01 (0.10) | -0.21 to 0.20 | -0.07 (0.14) | -0.33 to 0.20 | 0.05 (0.16) | -0.26 to 0.37 |
Number of family members | -0.04 (0.03) | -0.09 to 0.02 | 0.01 (0.04) | -0.06 to 0.08 | -0.10 (0.05)** | -0.19 to -0.01 |
Existence of other mentally disordered family members | 0.35 (0.13)*** | 0.10 to 0.61 | 0.40 (0.17)** | 0.07 to 0.74 | 0.31 (0.22) | -0.12 to 0.73 |
Marital status | 0.15 (0.15) | -0.15 to 0.45 | 0.33 (0.21)* | -0.07 to 0.74 | 0.26 (0.27) | -0.79 to 0.27 |
Constant | -1.45 (0.32)*** | -2.08 to -0.82 | -1.91 (0.46)*** | -2.82 to -1.00 | -0.94 (0.52) | -1.95 to 0.07 |
Number of observations | 1233 | - | 717 | | 516 | - |
Chi-square | 14.89 | - | 11.84 | | 13.10 | - |
Prob > chi2 | 0.06 | - | 0.10 | | 0.07 | - |
Pseudo R2 | 0.02 | | 0.03 | | 0.04 | - |
Note: ***, **, * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively. Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses. |
Model-II of Table 5 presents the estimated results for female sample, Model-III represents the results for the male sample. The obtained results from the female sample reveal that the estimated coefficient of marital status is positive and statistically significant in addition to the existence of another mentally disordered member in the family. It implies that a married woman is more likely to seek mental healthcare services than an unmarried woman. However, the other socioeconomic variables again remained statistically insignificant, like Model-I. On the other hand, all the socio-economic variables but family size are statistically insignificant in the Model-III. Only the family size variable significantly influences the men's mental healthcare-seeking behavior. However, a greater number of family members negatively govern the men's decision to seek mental health care services. Many family members may limit the financial relaxation to spend money on the men's mental health treatment.
On the other hand, Table 6 provides the marginal effects at their mean values. The marginal impact helps us comprehend the extent of change in the binary dependent variable due to changes in the explanatory variables. The following Table 6 summarizes the marginal effect of our considered independent variables. As the marginal probabilities have been derived from the above (Table 5) normal cumulative distribution function (CDF), the sign and level of significance of the marginal effects should be approximately identical to the Probit model (Table 5). Therefore, the existence of mentally disordered family members is also statistically significant in estimating its marginal effect on the dependent variable, mental health treatment-seeking behavior (Model-I of Table 6). Table 6 portrays that the probability of seeking mental healthcare services with another mentally ill person in the family is 6% higher than the family with no other mentally sick people. This implies that having previous experiences dealing with mentally ill patients may make wary the family members about the mental ailment and positively influence them to take mentalhealthcare services for mental disorders. However, the other variables under Model-I are not statistically significant in line with the Probit regression results.
Table 6
Estimating Marginal Effects on Mental Healthcare-Seeking Behavior
Model and Explanatory Variables | Model-I (Total Sample) | Model-II (Women) | Model-III (Women) |
Mean | The marginal effect at Means (Delta-method Std. Err.) | Mean | The marginal effect at Mean (Delta-method Std. Err.) | Mean | The marginal effect at Mean (Delta-method Std. Err.) |
Gender identity | 0.42 | 0.00 (0.02) | - | - | - | - |
Level of education | 4.82 | 0.00 (0.00) | 4.43 | 0.00 (0.00) | 5.36 | -0.00 (0.00) |
Religion | 0.91 | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.91 | 0.02 (0.04) | 0.90 | 0.09 (0.05)* |
Age | 44.52 | -0.00 (0.00) | 41.87 | 0.00 (0.00) | 48.20 | -0.00 (0.00) |
Residential status | 0.47 | -0.00 (0.02) | 0.47 | -0.01 (0.02) | 0.47 | 0.01 (0.03) |
Number of family members | 4.51 | -0.01 (0.00) | 4.36 | 0.00 (0.01) | 4.71 | -0.02 (0.01)** |
Existence of mentally disordered family members | 0.14 | 0.06 (0.02)*** | 0.14 | 0.07 (0.03)** | 0.13 | 0.05 (0.03) |
Marital status | 0.86 | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.82 | 0.06 (0.03)* | 0.92 | -0.04 (0.04) |
Number of observations | 1233 | | 717 | | 516 | |
Note: ***, **, * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses. |
Model-II of Table 6 depicts the marginal probability of the healthcare-seeking behavior for women due to the changes in considered socio-economic variables. Similar to the findings of the Probit model, the estimation of the marginal effect shows that existence of a mentally sick person in the family and marital status have a significant impact on female treatment-seeking behavior. According to the Model-II, a woman has 7% higher probability of receiving mental healthcare services than a family without a mentally sick person. In addition, a married woman has a 6%greater probability of going for mental healthcare services compared unmarried woman. No other catalysts can cause a woman to seek health care services except the aforementioned two independent variables. On the other hand, having an additional member in the family reduces the chances of seeking healthcare services by a 2% probability for men (Model-III of Table 6). The remaining variables have remained statistically insignificant in influencing the men's mental healthcare-seeking behavior.
Post-estimation of all the regression models shows that all the models fit the data very well, as the value of the chi-squared statistic is highly statistically significant. The probability values of the chi-squared distribution under every specification of Table 5 have varied between 5–10% statistical level of significance, indicating that the models behaved well statistically.