2.1- Materials
Vegetable lignocellulosic residues were kindly donated by an independent farmer from Córdoba, Spain. The reagents used for cellulose nanofibers production were: Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH, ≥ 97%), Sodium Chlorite (ClNaO2, > 80%), Acetone, Acetic Acid (ACS reagent, ≥ 99.7%); 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO, free radical, 98%) from Sigma Aldrich; Sodium Bromide (NaBr, 99%) and Sodium Hypochlorite (NaClO, 80%) supplied from Honeywell, Fluka™. Furthermore, the reagents used for aerogels preparation and characterization were: L-CH and H-CH supplied by Sigma-Aldrich; Soybean Oil supplied by Guinama S.L.U.; Sodium Chloride (NaCl, > 99.8%) from Labbox; Mueller-Hilton Agar was supplied by Oxoid Ltd; Methanol (> 99,9%) from PanReac AppliChem ITW Reagents and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) supplied by Sigma-Aldrich.
2.2- Methods
Scheme 1 shows the workflow followed during the present study. Briefly, cellulose nanofibers have been obtained from vegetable lignocellulosic residues and used for the formulation of aerogeles together with chitosan. The detailed methodology for these procedures as well as the characterization performed for all the fractions are described in this section.
<Please Insert Scheme 1 >
2.2.1- Nanocellulose preparation and characterization
Cellulose nanofibers were isolated from cellulose pulp obtained from a mixture of eggplant, tomato and bell pepper pruning in identical proportions (33%). The pruning mixture was subjected to an environmentally friendly alkaline process using a 15 L rotary reactor (Metrotec S.A.) under the following conditions: 7% NaOH on dry matter, 100°C, 150 min and a liquid/solid ratio of 10/1. Once chemically treated, the pruning mixture was passed through a disintegrator (Metrotec S.A.) and subsequently processed in a Sprout-Bauer defibrillator (Combustion Engineering) to achieve the fibers fibrillation. The resulting suspension was sieved using a 0.14 mm mesh to obtain cellulose pulp (Eduardo Espinosa et al. 2019).
The cellulose pulp was bleached by successive treatments with chlorine dioxide produced from sodium chlorite and concentrated acetic acid. Three bleaching treatments were carried out by adding 15 g of sodium chlorite and 5 mL of concentrated acetic acid to a suspension of 50 g of dry pulp in 1600 mL of water. This mixture was kept at 75–80°C in a water bath. This specific treatment was applied every hour until the bleached pulp was obtained.
Regarding the chemical characterization of the raw materials on their ethanol extractables, ash, holocellulose, lignin, and α-cellulose, it was done according to TAPPI standardization standards T-204, T-211, T-222, T-203os61 and T-9m54, respectively.
CNF were obtained using an oxidation pretreatment with TEMPO catalyst by adding as oxidizing agent 5 mmol/g of NaClO at 10% maintaining a medium pH = 10.2. Once the addition of the oxidant was finished, 0.5 M NaOH was added to maintain the pH constant until the end of the process. To stop the reaction, 100 mL of ethanol was added and then washed with distilled water (Besbes et al. 2011). The suspension obtained at a concentration of 1% was subjected to a high-pressure homogenization process in a homogenizer (Panda GEA 2K Niro). This process was carried out in 4 cycles at 300 bar, 3 cycles at 600 bar and 3 cycles at 900 bar pressure (Eduardo Espinosa et al. 2019).
For the characterization of CNF, several tests described in the literature were performed. The nanofibrillation yield was determined by centrifuging a 0.1% CNF suspension at 10,000 rpm for 20 min (Eduardo Espinosa et al. 2019). The optical transmittance was measured from 400 to 800 nm at 0.1% suspension on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV spectrometer. Cationic demand (CD) was determined following the methodology described in the literature using a Particle Charge Detector (Mütek PCD 05) (Carrasco et al. 1998). The carboxyl content (CC) was measured by conductimetric titration according to the methodology proposed by Besbes et. al (Besbes et al. 2011). The intrinsic viscosity (ηs) of the CNF was determined according to ISO 5351:2010. The intrinsic viscosity value is related to the degree of polymerization (DP) of the CNF based on the following equation (Eq. 1) (Marx-Figini 1987):
\(DP \left(<950\right):DP=\frac{{{\eta }}_{s}}{\text{0,42}}\) (Eq. 1)
Then, the DP is related to the length of the nanofibers according to the equation described by Shinoda et. al (Eq. 2) (Shinoda et al. 2012):
\(Length \left(nm\right)=4.286·DP-757\) (Eq. 2)
The calculation of the theoretical specific surface area (\({\sigma }_{CNF})\) was obtained from the known surface area of the cation used in the determination of the cation demand, polydiallyldimethy- lammonium chloride (Poly-DADMAC) by employing the Eq. 3 (E. Espinosa et al. 2016). For this purpose, the net cationic demand of the nanofiber (CD - CC) was determined, and assuming the monolayer interaction of the poly-DADMAC on the fiber surface, the specific surface area of the nanofiber was determined.
\({\sigma }_{CNF}=\left(CD-CC\right)· {\sigma }_{Poly-DADMAC}\) (Eq. 3)
where \({\sigma }_{Poly-DADMAC}\) corresponds to the surface area of a single poly-DADMAC molecule.
Finally, TEMPO oxidized CNF were also prepared from unbleached pulp (L-CNF) to compare the obtained results and to better study the prepared materials.
2.2.2- Bio-aerogels preparation
Firstly, two different CH 0.5 wt% solutions were prepared: one employing the high Mw reactant whereas the other one contained the low Mw polymeric material, both being dissolved in acetic acid 1 v/v %. Then, an aqueous suspension of CNF (0.5 wt%) was also prepared. For each bio-aerogel, equal mass quantities of a CH solution and the CNF suspension were mixed during 3 minutes at 10,000 RPM in an ultraturrax homogenizer (IKA T18 digital Ultra Turrax). After this, 5, 10 and 15 g of each suspension were poured into Petri dishes in order to finally have different bio-aerogel thickness values. Then, to determine if the aging time influences the biopolymers possible spatial rearrangement and the further formation of intra/inter PEC complexes, one half of the Petri dishes were directly freeze and lyophilized, whereas the other half was left at room temperature during 24h before this final freeze-drying treatment. Thus, 12 different bio-aerogel materials were developed (Table 1). Additionally, blank CNF and CH bio-aerogel materials were prepared using 10 g of each corresponding solution/ suspension, following an analogous procedure.
Table 1
Bio-aerogel formulations prepared.
Number
|
Chitosan
|
Mass (g)
|
Aging (h)
|
Sample
|
Thickness (mm)
|
1
|
Low Mw
|
5
|
0
|
L-5g-0
|
0.650 ± 0.066
|
2
|
24
|
L-5g-24
|
0.819 ± 0.080
|
3
|
10
|
0
|
L-10g-0
|
2.218 ± 0.066
|
4
|
24
|
L-10g-24
|
1.83 ± 0.296
|
5
|
15
|
0
|
L-15g-0
|
3.807 ± 0.327
|
6
|
24
|
L-15g-24
|
3.069 ± 0.902
|
7
|
High Mw
|
5
|
0
|
H-5g-0
|
0.858 ± 0.202
|
8
|
24
|
H-5g-24
|
0.777 ± 0.136
|
9
|
10
|
0
|
H-10g-0
|
2.189 ± 0.382
|
10
|
24
|
H-10g-24
|
2.168 ± 0.381
|
11
|
15
|
0
|
H-15g-0
|
3.890 ± 0.341
|
12
|
24
|
H-15g-24
|
3.681 ± 0.186
|
The pH of the bio-aerogel-forming solutions and suspensions were all determined in triplicate. The zeta potential of these same suspensions was measured using a Zetasizer (ZSP, Malvern Instrument) at 25°C. A concentration of 10− 3 g/mL was prepared for all measured samples using distilled water as solvent and an inert electrolyte. Previously, the suspensions were homogenized using the ultraturrax homogenizer for a period of 60 s. The analysis was realized by triplicate and the corresponding average values and standard deviation were calculated.
2.2.3- Bio-aerogels characterization
The obtained biomaterials were characterized through the employment of different techniques. The aerogels thickness was measured on triplicate using a Digital Micrometer IP65 0–1” (Digimatic, Mitutoyo). The Swelling Degree (SD, %) of each aerogel (square samples with a surface area of 4 cm2) at t time in both distilled water and soybean oil at 25°C was obtained by using the following equation (Eq. 4):
\(\text{S}\text{D} \left(\text{%}\right)=\frac{{\text{W}}_{\text{t}}-{\text{W}}_{\text{i}}}{{\text{W}}_{\text{i}}} \times 100\) (Eq. 4)
where Wi is the weight of the samples before immersion, and Wt is the weight of the sample at t time. The water/oil retention at 120 minutes is also expressed as mass of fluid (g) per gram of material. Measurements were run on triplicate.
After analyzing the swelling results, the following characterizations were conducted by using some selected samples. The chemical interactions between the CNF and the CH were explored through Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy analysis (FTIR). Thus, the FTIR Spectra of the aerogels were recorded on a FTIR-ATR Perkin-Elmer Spectrum Two equipment, in the range of 400–4000 cm− 1 and employing a resolution of 4 cm− 1 (40 scans for each sample).
The materials morphology was studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in a ZEISS DSM 960A instrument. All the samples had been previously swollen in a water medium, frozen, lyophilized, cryo-fractured after their immersion in liquid N2, and sputtered with a thin gold layer. The Image J Software was employed to measure the samples pores diameters.
Regarding the thermal properties of the bio-aerogels, they were explored by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The measurements were conducted in Netzsch TG 209F3 equipment from room temperature to 900°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min, and under nitrogen atmosphere. Additionally, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) determinations were carried out in a Bruker D8 Discover Instrument for 2θ values from 10 to 65 degrees (rate of 2°/min), employing monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation.
Finally, to explore and obtain information about the soluble fraction characteristics of the bio-aerogel materials, a fixed mass of them was immersed into distilled water at 25°C for a time period of 4 days. Then, each sample was removed from distilled water, and dried until constant weight was reached. Therefore, the corresponding Soluble Fraction (SF %) values were calculated as follows (Eq. 5):
\(\text{S}\text{F} \left(\text{%}\right)=\frac{{\text{W}}_{\text{i}}-{\text{W}}_{\text{f}}}{{\text{W}}_{\text{i}}} \times 100\) (Eq. 5)
where Wi and Wf are the weights of the dried bio-aerogels before and after immersion, respectively. Measurements were run on triplicate.
2.2.4- Bio-aerogels performance as food absorbent pads
To determine the capability of the selected bio-aerogels to act as food absorbent pads, three different specific tests were conducted. The first set was the material’s capacity to absorb a simulated exudate fluid, while the second and third ones were oriented to better know their antimicrobial and antioxidant capacity, respectively.
The exudates absorption capability was tested on triplicate in accordance to a bibliographic methodology (Costa et al. 2021b). Briefly, previously weighted discs of aerogels (5.6 cm of diameter) were immersed in NaCl 0.9 wt% (pH 5) and submitted to 80 g of pressure for 2 minutes. After this, the samples were weighted again. The results were processed by using an equation analogous to Eq. 5, and they were finally expressed in percentage relative to the initial aerogel mass.
The antimicrobial activity of the different bio-aerogels was performed by using the immersion method. Two different pathogenic bacteria commonly found in meat products were assayed, the Gram-negative bacteria Salmonella typhimurium (CECT 704) and the Gram-positive bacteria Listeria monocytogenes (CECT 4032). Concisely, bacterial inoculate were prepared by taking an aliquot of a fresh culture to saline solution (0.85% w/v) until an absorbance between 0.08–0.1 at 625 nm (approximately 108 cfu/mL) was reached. A 20-fold dilution was made to obtain 5 x 106 cfu/mL in the test tube. The different materials were weighted and immersed in the respective tubes. These were incubated for 24 h at 37 ± 1°C, taking samples at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 24 hours, determining the number of CFU by plating serial dilutions. Control samples were also performed for both bacteria. The antimicrobial activity of the aerogels was expressed as a logarithmic reduction calculated according to Eq. 6, where R stands for the logarithmic reduction, Ct0 is the mean number of viable cells of bacteria in the test tube at the moment of contact with the material, Ctn is the mean number of viable cells of bacteria in the test tube at a given time and W the weight of the aerogel in milligrams.
\(\text{R}=\frac{\text{log}\frac{\text{C}\text{t}0}{\text{C}\text{t}\text{n}}}{W}\) (Eq. 6)
Finally, the antioxidant activity of the prepared materials was evaluated according to the free radical 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methodology, following the protocol proposed by de Oliveira et al. (Brand-Williams et al. 1995; Marcucci et al. 2020). Briefly, 1 mg of aerogel samples were mixed with 3.9 mL of previously prepared 0.02 mM DPPH solution in methanol. The samples were allowed to stand out from the light during 2h 30min and the absorbance was measured at 517 nm in a Perkin Elmer UV/Vis spectrometer Lambda 25. The ability to sequester the radical, expressed as a percentage, was calculated following the Eq. 7:
\(\text{I}\text{n}\text{h}\text{i}\text{b}\text{i}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n} \left(\text{%}\right)=\frac{{\text{A}\text{B}\text{S}}_{\text{c}\text{o}\text{n}\text{t}\text{r}\text{o}\text{l}}-{\text{A}\text{B}\text{S}}_{\text{s}\text{a}\text{m}\text{p}\text{l}\text{e}}}{{\text{A}\text{B}\text{S}}_{\text{c}\text{o}\text{n}\text{t}\text{r}\text{o}\text{l}}}\text{x} 100\) (Eq. 7)