Oral squamous cell carcinomas unusually show distant metastasis to the lung after primary treatment, which can be difficult to differentiate from primary squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. While the location and number of tumor nodules is helpful in diagnosing cases, differential diagnosis may be difficult even with histopathological examination. Therefore, we attempted to identify molecules that can facilitate accurate differential diagnosis. First, we performed a comprehensive gene expression analysis using microarray data for OSCC-LM and LSCC, and searched for genes showing significantly different expression levels. We then identified KRT13, UPK1B, and nuclear receptor subfamily 0, group B, member 1 (NR0B1) as genes that were significantly upregulated in LSCC and quantified the expression levels of these genes by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The expression of KRT13 and UPK1B proteins were then examined by immunohistochemical staining. While OSCC-LM showed no KRT13 and UPK1B expression, some tumor cells of LSCC showed KRT13 and UPK1B expression in 10 of 12 cases (83.3%). All LSCC cases were positive for at least one of these markers. Thus, KRT13 and UPK1B might contribute in differentiating OSCC-LM from LSCC.
Article
Possible contribution of cytokeratin 13 and uroplakin 1B as novel markers for differential diagnosis between metastatic lung carcinoma from oral squamous cell carcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2745240/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
Journal Publication
published 18 Dec, 2023
You are reading this latest preprint version
uroplakin 1B
cytokeratin 13
oral squamous cell carcinoma
lung squamous cell carcinoma
biomarkers
Globally, an estimated 354,864 new cases and 177,384 deaths occurred from oral cavity cancer in 20181. The prognosis for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma is determined by multiple factors, like primary tumor size, the presence of lymph nodes, distant metastases, and histopathological grade2,3. Control of distant metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma is an important determinant of an improved prognosis. Distant metastasis is observed only in about 4% of oral squamous cell carcinomas, of which approximately 90% are lung metastases4. Moreover, recent advancements in high-precision CT imaging have increased the frequency of identification of lung mass shadows and early detection of lung and metastatic lung cancer5. In patients with a history of oral squamous cell carcinoma, the differentiation between lung tumors metastasized from oral cancer and those originated from primary lung cancer is important. However, in most cases, these tumors are very difficult to differentiate clinically and pathologically. The morphologic features of lung metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC-LM) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) appear to be similar. The management and prognosis for OSCC-LM and LSCC are completely different, so distinguishing the two scenarios is important. However, no efficient marker to distinguish these two conditions has been proposed to date. Thus, in this study, we tried to investigate the identification of a novel effective marker being essential to facilitate a definite diagnosis.
Samples from patients
OSCC-LM and LSCC tissues were obtained from patients at the Ehime University Hospital between June 2004 and June 2014. The study was approved by the Ehime University Hospital Ethics Committee (no.1106009), which confirms that all research was conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The pathological and imaging diagnosis was confirmed by two senior specialists. The radiologist diagnosed the patient with LSCC and no other neoplastic lesions following a systemic search and with imaging findings characteristic of primary lung cancer, including spinous process and pleural intrusion. The radiologist diagnosed OSCC-LM based on a history of OSCC, and when the imaging findings generally showed a round or oval nodular shadow with relatively clear margins of the tumor shadow.
Total RNA extraction
For microarray and quantitative RT-PCR assays, total RNA was extracted from fresh sample tissues homogenized in 0.5 mL of ISOGEN (NipponGene, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions using TissueLyser (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA integrity was confirmed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Microarray analysis
The Applied Biosystems Chemiluminescent RTIVT Labeling Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was used to convert total RNA to digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled cRNA. Double-stranded cDNA was generated using 1 µg of total RNA, transcribed using DIG-labeled nucleotides (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), fragmented, and hybridized for Human Genome Survey Arrays (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing each array, the signal was developed using a chemiluminescent detection kit (Life Technologies). Processed arrays were scanned on a 1700 chemiluminescent microarray analyzer (Life Technologies), and the results were analyzed using GeneSpring GX 13.0 (Agilent Technologies).
Quantitative RT-PCR
To analyze target mRNA expression, cDNA was synthesized using a miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen), and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). The PCR amplification was conducted in a 10 µL final reaction volume containing 5 µL of 2× QuantiTect SYBR Green Master Mix, 1 µL of 10× miScript Universal Primer, 1 µL of 10× miScript Primer Assay, 2 µL of RNase-free water, and 1 µL of cDNA. The thermal-cycling conditions were as follows: PCR initial activation step at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 s and 55°C for 30 s. To analyze mRNA expression, the One Step SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit II (Takara) was utilized. PCR amplification was performed in a 10 µL final reaction mixture containing 5 µL of 2× One Step SYBR RT-PCR Buffer 4, 0.4 µL of PrimeScript One Step Enzyme Mix 2, 0.4 µL of forward primer (10 µmol/L), 0.4 µL of reverse primer (10 µmol/L), and 100 ng of total RNA. Reverse transcription was performed at 42°C for 5 min, followed by 95°C for 10 s. The PCR amplification step comprised 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 min and 60°C for 10 s. The relative expression was calculated using ΔCt (cycle threshold) method and normalized to the control using the Eq. 2 − ΔΔCt. RNU6B and hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS) were used as internal controls. SYBR Green 1 was detected using ViiA 7 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The primer sequences used in this study were as follows: uroplakin 1b (UPK1b) forward, 5′- TGT TCG TTG CTT CCA GGG CCT GC -3′ and reverse, 5′- AGT AGA ACA TGG TAC CCA GGA GAA CC -3′, cytokeratin 13 (KRT13) forward, 5′- TTG AAA ACA ACC GGG TCA TC -3′ and reverse, 5′- GCT CTT CAT TCA GGC TCT CG -3′, nuclear receptor subfamily 0, group B, member 1 (NR0B1) forward, 5′- CCT CTC ACA GGC AGA ATG AAA T -3′ and reverse, 5′- TAT ACC AGC TGA TAC AGA ATC ATT − 3′and HMBS forward, 5′-CAT GCA GGC TAC CAT CCA TGT C-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTT ACG AGC AGT GAT GCC TAC CAA-3′.
Immunohistochemistry
The surgically resected specimens were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin, and a series of tissue sections (thickness, 4 µm) were prepared from each sample. Immunohistochemical staining was performed by the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized, pretreated with 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) in an autoclave at 121˚C for 5 min, and incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in distilled water for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. After blocking with 3% horse serum in PBS, the sections were then incubated overnight at 4˚C with specific antibodies to human uroplakin 1b (polyclonal: diluted 1:500, Novus Biologicals, CO, USA) and human KRT13 (monoclonal: diluted 1:500, Leica BIOSYSTEMS, Newcastle, UK). After washing, the sections were incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse/rabbit antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) at room temperature for 30 min and washed in PBS, followed by labeling with streptavidin-peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories). The peroxidase reaction was developed with 393-diaminobenzidine as a chromogen. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated with ethanol, treated with xylene, and enclosed in synthetic resin. Quantitative studies of the immunohistochemically stained sections were performed by pathologists in a blinded fashion by evaluating three randomly chosen fields in each sample. Negative controls were set without the primary antibody incubation. Semiquantitative studies of the immunohistochemically stained sections were performed in a blind fashion by evaluating three randomly chosen fields in each sample. These samples were scored on the basis of immunoreactivity scoring system (IRS)6. The IRS was calculated by the product of the percentage of positive cells (4, > 80%; 3, 51–80%; 2, 10–50%; 1, < 10%; 0, 0%) and the intensity of the staining (3, strong; 2, moderate; 1, mild; and 0, no staining), which resulted in IRS scores between 0 (no staining) and 7 (maximum staining). The cancer cells stained with anti-KRT13 and anti-UPK1B antibodies in cytoplasm were counted. In this study, positive cases were defined as the total IRS scores of KRT13 and UPK1B at 3.5 or higher.
Statistical analysis
RT-PCR experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated thrice. Student's t-test was used to determine the significance of differences between the groups, with values of P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using the GraphPad Prism software, version 5.04 (GraphPad Software).
Identification of overexpressed genes in LSCC by microarray analysis
Using microarray analysis, we compared the expression profiles in three patients with LSCC and three patients with OSCC-LM. We found three genes that were overexpressed more than 10-fold in all LSCCs in comparison with OSCC-LMs: KRT13, UPK1B, and NR0B1 (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
| Gene symbol | Gene title | Fold change | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRT13 | Keratin13 | -75.7 | 0.000243 |
| UPK1B | Uroplakin 1B | -39.8 | 0.000248 |
| NR0B1 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 0, group B, member 1 | -17.6 | 0.0000788 |
Overexpression of KRT13 and UPK1B in LSCC by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
We were able to design RT-PCR primers for KRT13, UPK1B, and NR0B1. The expressions of these three genes were examined by qRT-PCR in seven cases of OSCC-LM and eight cases of LSCC. Among the three genes, KRT13 and UPK1B were significantly overexpressed in LSCCs (Fig. 2).
Immunohistochemical staining profile of the top genes
To confirm the significance of the upregulated genes, we performed immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for verification of protein expression and to determine the top two upregulated genes (KRT13 and UPK1B) in LSCCs. To investigate the consistency of KRT13 and UPK1B expression between OSCC-LMs and LSCCs, we analyzed 5 cases of OSCC-LMs and 12 cases of LSCC. KRT13 and UPK1B staining in OSCC-LM tissue were both 0%, and the corresponding values in LSCC tissue were both 83.3%, when IRS ≥ 3.5 was evaluated as positive. Notably, all LSCC cases showed positive results for at least one of the markers (Fig. 3 and Table 2).
Table 2. The expression of KRT13 and UPK1B in OSCC-LMs and LSCCs
Head and neck cancers, including oral cancers often show double or secondary tumors in the lung at the rate of 30–40%7,8. In such cases, both cancers are often squamous cell carcinomas, and the difficulty in distingushing between metastasis and primary lung cancer is problematic because both entities require different treatment strategies and show differences in prognosis. In previous reports, patients with T1 or T2 head and neck cancer without local recurrence were considered to have primary lung cancer, while those with neck lymph node metastasis were considered to have metastatic lung cancer7. Lefor et al. reviewed 55 cases of head and neck cancer combined with lung lesions and found that in cases where histological discrimination was difficult, a single lung lesion and negative cervical lymph node enlargement were the criteria for primary lung cancer. They also reported that 11 of the 40 cases occurred within 6 months, and the short duration does not necessarily mean that the lung lesion represents metastasis9. There is little scientific evidence for either of these conclusions, and no method has been established to strictly differentiate between the two forms of lung tumors. Since the commencement of human genome projects, molecular analysis has become much easier. Now we can monitor expression of most genes simultaneously and comprehensively using microarray technologies. We have previously reported the results of our analysis of oral squamous cell 10–12. Methods to identify the primary tumor site using genetic information of tumor tissues by microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing have been reported recently13–15. Microarray analysis has been suggested to be useful for accurately identifying the primary tumor site in 80% of solid tumors with a confirmed primary tumor site by evaluation of gene expression13,14. The Tissue of Origin test has been approved for use in the United States. In a prospective study of the Tissue of Origin test using 157 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples with known primary sites, the microarray method was as diagnostic as immunostaining, and the microarray method was particularly useful in the diagnosis of poorly differentiated or undifferentiated cancers16. However, diagnosis by these genetic analyses is complex and expensive.
In this study, we identified KRT13 and UPK1B as candidate molecular markers for differentiating OSCC-LM from LSCC. The keratins are intermediate filament proteins responsible for the structural integrity of epithelial cells. KRT13 is a member of the keratin family, which plays a role in cytoskeleton remodeling. KRT13 has been reported to be less expressed in cancerous tissues than in normal tissues in the oral mucosa17,18. Actually, according to a microarray data from the GEO profiles database (NCBI GEO database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/tools/profileGraph.cgi?ID=GDS1584:207935_s_at, 2022-12-26), 4.5-fold downregulation of KRT13 in OSCC tissues were observed in compared with that in normal oral mucosa. On the other hands, Bloor and colleagues19 demonstrated that expression of KRT13 in the well-differentiated primary OSCC was predominantly detected than that in moderately-differentiated OSCC. In contrast, expression of both mRNA and protein expression of KRT13 was not detected in the poorly differentiated OSCC, which generally shows more aggressive and highly metastatic potentials. Thus, downregulation of KRT13 is suggested to be used as a marker for malignant potential and differentiation of stratified squamous epithelium19,20. In the present study, KRT13 gene expression was predominantly down-regulated in OSCC-LM in comparison with LSCC, and no KRT13 protein expression was observed in OSCC-LM. These findings might support that more malignant cancer cells without KRT13 expression in the primary sites predominantly metastasize to the lung, resulted in the loss of KRT13 expression in the OSCC-LM.
Although there were no direct comparative reports of KRT13 expression in comparison between OSCC-LM and LSCC, expression of KRT13 in LSCC showed a very high signal value than that in normal lung and lung adenocarcinoma (LAdC) from the GEO profiles database (NCBI GEO database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/tools/profileGraph.cgi?ID=GDS1312:207935_s_at, 2022-12-26, NCBI GEO database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/tools/profileGraph.cgi?ID=GDS3627:207935_s_at, 2022-12-26). Moreover, Zhan and colleagues also reported that expression of KRT13 in LSCC was greatly elevated that in LAdC at the fold change of 83.76 from the 490 each samples of LSCC and LAdC by analyzing TCGA database21. These data are indicating the specificity of KRT13 expression in LSCC among non-small cell lung cancers.
UPK families play an important role in maintaining uroepithelium function, and five of these proteins have been identified to date: UPK1A, UPK1B, UPK2, UPK3A and UPK3B. UPK1A and UPK1B are tetraspanin proteins and possess four transmembrane domains, whereas UPK2 and UPK3 have single transmembrane domains22–27. UPK1B has been reported to be closely associated with tumor development, progression, and chemotherapy resistance in bladder, gastric and colorectal cancers. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of UPK1B in tumors have not been fully elucidated28–32. Large-scale tissue microarray analyses by Reiswich et al. showed that positive expression of UPK1B was detectable at the rate of 39% in LSCC, but was only 18% in OSCC arised in oral floor33. They also described that UPK1B positivity rates varied markedly between SCC of different organs, and recommended the limited utility in case of SCC metastases from unknown primary tumors. Their opinion might support our results for the use of metastatic marker on OSCC, although the interpretation of the result for UPK1B need to be cautious. Further studies for UPK1B expression on the primary sites in OSCC (e.g., tongue, gingiva etc.) might be clarified the mechanism of its regulation.
In the present study, the positive rate of both markers in LSCC was relatively high at the rate of approximately 80%. Similar to our findings, upregulation of KRT13 mRNA and UPK1B mRNA in LSCC were frequently detectable at the positive rate of 77.8% and 61.1%, respectively, in the GEO profiles database using microarray analysis (NCBI GEO database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/tools/profileGraph.cgi?ID=GDS3627:207935_s_at, 2022-12-26, NCBI GEO database, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/tools/profileGraph.cgi?ID=GDS3627:210064_s_at, 2022-12-26). In contrast, large scale tissue microarray analysis in LSCC using IHC showed that expression of KRT13 and UPK1B protein were detected only in 63% and 39%, respectively34. Although the reason on the different positive rate of these molecules is unclear, the difference of the antibody (monoclonal vs polyclonal) might lead the distinct results. The polyclonal antibody used in the present study might bind to multiple epitopes on the target protein, resulted in a higher signal.
In the present study, none of KRT13 and UPK1B staining in OSCC-LM tissue were detectable, and all LSCC cases showed positive results for at least one of the markers. Although acquired data of OSCC-LM was limited because of the rare entity and difficulty of sample collection, our data suggesting that a combination of KRT13 and URK1B may be helpful to differentiate OSCC-LMs from LSCCs.
While further studies are needed, our data suggest that staining for KRT13 or UPK1B might contribute to differentiate OSCC-LMs from LSCCs, which would help determine the appropriate treatment rapidly and cost-effectively and may contribute to patient prognosis.
Author Contributions: Author Contributions: Conceptualization, H.G., K.N., S.H., N.K., and D.U.; funding acquisition, K.N.; investigation, H.G., and T.A.; methodology, H.G., K.N., Y.S., T.A., N.T., N.K., S.H., and D.U.; supervision, N.K., and D.U.; visualization, H.G., T.A., N.K., and S.H.; writing—original draft, H.G.; writing—review and editing, H.G., K.N., Y.S., T.A., N.T., N.K., S.H. and D.U.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This study did not receive any specific funding support; all financial resources were from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ehime University School of Medicine.
Institutional Review Board Statement: The Institutional Review Board at Ehime University Hospital approved this study (no.1106009).
Informed Consent Statement: Appropriate written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Limitations: The number of samples in the present study was small because of the rare entity of OSCC-LM. Moreover, the cases capable to harvest the materials are also rare, because lung metastasis in OSCC means terminal stage. We consider that the results will be of value for clinicians working on these tumors as well as other similar tumors that are difficult to distinguish. Expanding the sample size and conducting a multicenter study in the future could be effective in balancing out the biases and increasing the credibility of our study.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
- Kreppel, M., Eich, H. T., Kübler, A., Zöller, J. E. & Scheer, M. Prognostic value of the sixth edition of the UICC’s TNM classification and stage grouping for oral cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 102, 443–9 (2010).
- Kurokawa, H. et al. The high prognostic value of the histologic grade at the deep invasive front of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 34, 329–33 (2005).
- Tomioka, H., Yamagata, Y., Oikawa, Y., Ohsako, T. & Kugimoto, T. Risk factors for distant metastasis in locoregionally controlled oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 1–6 (2021). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84704-w
- Higashiyama, M. et al. Surgical treatment for metastatic lung tumors with incidentally coexisting lung cancer. Jpn. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 47, 185–9 (1999).
- Remmele, W. & Stegner, H. E. [Recommendation for uniform definition of an immunoreactive score (IRS) for immunohistochemical estrogen receptor detection (ER-ICA) in breast cancer tissue]. Pathologe 8, 138–140 (1987).
- Jones, A. S. et al. Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 75, 1343–53 (1995).
- Leong, P. P. et al. Distinguishing second primary tumors from lung metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90, 972–7 (1998).
- Lefor, A. T., Bredenberg, C. E., Kellman, R. M. & Aust, J. C. Multiple malignancies of the lung and head and neck. Second primary tumor or metastasis? Arch. Surg. 121, 265–70 (1986).
- Nakashiro, K.-I. et al. Identification of Akt1 as a potent therapeutic target for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 47, 1273–81 (2015).
- Oka, R. et al. Annexin A8 is a novel molecular marker for detecting lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 7, 4882–9 (2016).
- Kinouchi, M. et al. Determination of the origin of oral squamous cell carcinoma by microarray analysis: Squamous epithelium or minor salivary gland? Int. J. cancer 143, 2551–2560 (2018).
- Bloom, G. et al. Multi-platform, multi-site, microarray-based human tumor classification. Am. J. Pathol. 164, 9–16 (2004).
- Ramaswamy, S. et al. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 15149–54 (2001).
- Hayashi, H. et al. Site-Specific and Targeted Therapy Based on Molecular Profiling by Next-Generation Sequencing for Cancer of Unknown Primary Site: A Nonrandomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 6, 1931–1938 (2020).
- Handorf, C. R. et al. A multicenter study directly comparing the diagnostic accuracy of gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry for primary site identification in metastatic tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 37, 1067–75 (2013).
- Lallemant, B. et al. Clinical relevance of nine transcriptional molecular markers for the diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in tissue and saliva rinse. BMC Cancer 9, 370 (2009).
- Hartanto, F. K. et al. KRT13, FAIM2 and CYP2W1 mRNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients with risk habits. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 16, 953–8 (2015).
- Bloor, B. K., Seddon, S. V & Morgan, P. R. Gene expression of differentiation-specific keratins in oral epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 37, 251–61 (2001).
- Mikami, T. et al. Emergence of keratin 17 vs. loss of keratin 13: their reciprocal immunohistochemical profiles in oral carcinoma in situ. Oral Oncol. 47, 497–503 (2011).
- Zhan, C. et al. Identification of immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing lung adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma. J. Thorac. Dis. 7, 1398–405 (2015).
- Wu, X.-R., Kong, X.-P., Pellicer, A., Kreibich, G. & Sun, T.-T. Uroplakins in urothelial biology, function, and disease. Kidney Int. 75, 1153–1165 (2009).
- Wu, X. R., Manabe, M., Yu, J. & Sun, T. T. Large scale purification and immunolocalization of bovine uroplakins I, II, and III. Molecular markers of urothelial differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19170–9 (1990).
- Yu, J. et al. Uroplakin I: a 27-kD protein associated with the asymmetric unit membrane of mammalian urothelium. J. Cell Biol. 111, 1207–16 (1990).
- Wu, X. R. et al. Mammalian uroplakins. A group of highly conserved urothelial differentiation-related membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13716–24 (1994).
- Yu, J., Lin, J. H., Wu, X. R. & Sun, T. T. Uroplakins Ia and Ib, two major differentiation products of bladder epithelium, belong to a family of four transmembrane domain (4TM) proteins. J. Cell Biol. 125, 171–82 (1994).
- Deng, F.-M. et al. Uroplakin IIIb, a urothelial differentiation marker, dimerizes with uroplakin Ib as an early step of urothelial plaque assembly. J. Cell Biol. 159, 685–94 (2002).
- Pichler, R. et al. Increased accuracy of a novel mRNA-based urine test for bladder cancer surveillance. BJU Int. 121, 29–37 (2018).
- Dai, J. et al. Whole Genome Messenger RNA Profiling Identifies a Novel Signature to Predict Gastric Cancer Survival. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 10, e00004 (2019).
- Wang, F.-H., Ma, X.-J., Xu, D. & Luo, J. UPK1B promotes the invasion and metastasis of bladder cancer via regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 22, 5471–5480 (2018).
- Kukcinaviciute, E. et al. Significance of Notch and Wnt signaling for chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells HCT116. J. Cell. Biochem. 119, 5913–5920 (2018).
- Zhang, Y. et al. Identification of biomarkers predicting the chemotherapeutic outcomes of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with gastric cancer. Oncol. Lett. 20, 290 (2020).
- Reiswich, V. et al. Large-scale human tissue analysis identifies Uroplakin 1b as a putative diagnostic marker in surgical pathology. Hum. Pathol. 126, 108–120 (2022).
- Lennartz, M. et al. Cytokeratin 13 (CK13) expression in cancer: a tissue microarray study on 10,439 tumors. APMIS 131, 77–91 (2023).
No competing interests reported.