This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Original Article
Xiang Peng
Zhejiang University of Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-2202
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The optimum conceptual scheme is mostly selected based on qualitative decision-making evaluation methods in conceptual design stage of engineering product, which lacks quantitative verification and evaluation. To solve this problem, quantitative selection method of product conceptual scheme based on bond graph is proposed. Through analyzing the correlation between function, effect and bond element, the bond graph model and corresponding AMESim simulation model of conceptual scheme are constructed to verify the feasibility of conceptual scheme, and the quantitative evaluation index of function-performance requirements is calculated. A conceptual scheme selection method considering quantitative evaluation index and qualitative evaluation by experts is proposed to obtain the optimum scheme. The conceptual scheme selection of transmission system of a shearer cutting unit is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Keywords
Conceptual design, Bond graph, AMESim, Conceptual scheme verification, Quantitative selection
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 14 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Original Article
Xiang Peng
Zhejiang University of Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-2202
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 14 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The optimum conceptual scheme is mostly selected based on qualitative decision-making evaluation methods in conceptual design stage of engineering product, which lacks quantitative verification and evaluation. To solve this problem, quantitative selection method of product conceptual scheme based on bond graph is proposed. Through analyzing the correlation between function, effect and bond element, the bond graph model and corresponding AMESim simulation model of conceptual scheme are constructed to verify the feasibility of conceptual scheme, and the quantitative evaluation index of function-performance requirements is calculated. A conceptual scheme selection method considering quantitative evaluation index and qualitative evaluation by experts is proposed to obtain the optimum scheme. The conceptual scheme selection of transmission system of a shearer cutting unit is taken as an example to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...