This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of UNIFESP - Federal University of São Paulo /Brazil, date 06/07/22 num. 5.453.749. It took place at the Genital Malformations Outpatient Clinic of the Gynecology Sector of the Escola Paulista de Medicina and Informed Consent Term was signed with the assignment of rights to use images for this study.
This is an intersex transsexual woman, 32 years old, white, in a stable relationship, with a complaint of excess skin and engorgement in the mount of Venus during sexual arousal, associated with a short vagina, dyspareunia and difficulty reaching orgasm, which brought impairment of her sexual activity.
She identified herself as trans in childhood and began the transition at age 13, undergoing reassignment surgery with skin vaginoplasty at age 20 in 2010 using the Cury YX technique. In the following year, she underwent correction of labia minora hypertrophy, followed by excision of excess skin and anteriorization of the vaginal introitus in 2013, enlargement of the neovagina introitus in 2016 and urethroplasty with removal of the right bulbocavernosus muscle in 2020.
During the post-operative period of neovaginoplasty in 2010, she used a vibrator for three months in order to not reduce the vaginal canal. She was instructed on dilatation, but she did not feel confident about the progression of the canal for fear of skin rupture and pain during dilatation.
During the first consultation at the Genital Malformations Outpatient Clinic of the Gynecology Sector of the Escola Paulista de Medicina, the sociodemographic data and a complete clinical history were collected. A gynecological examination was performed, assessing the patency and measurements of the vaginal cavity in length and diameter, as well as the presence of pain on palpation.
To measure sexual satisfaction, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-S) adapted for satisfaction[13] was used. It consists of a 10 cm long line, ranging in scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)[13] .
The FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index) questionnaire was applied, which aims to assess the female sexual response in relation to sexual desire, sexual arousal, vaginal lubrication, orgasm, sexual satisfaction and pain. For this, it presents 19 questions that assess sexual function in the last four weeks[15] scored from 0 to 5. The score is reversed only for pain-related questions[22].
For the functional evaluation of the pelvic floor (FEPF), the instrument described by Ortiz[16] was used. With the patient in the gynecological position, the examiner introduces the index and middle fingers into the vagina, or just the index finger, and asks the patient to contract the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and maintain this contraction for a few seconds. The FEPF graduation ranges from 0 to 4[16, 17].
The vaginal dilatation sessions followed the dilatation protocol for vaginal agenesis suggested by ACOG[18]. Initially, a thorough examination with a mirror was performed so that the patient could identify the clitoris, urethra, and distal vagina with the aim of understanding and demonstrating the appropriate location and angle for placement of the dilator.
For radiofrequency, an Energy Compact® Radiofrequency electrical transfer device, brand DGM Eletrônica Ltda, under ANVISA registration nº 80108300019 was used. The RF procedures were performed in the lithotomy position in the region of the vaginal mucosa and monopolar electrodes were introduced into the vaginal cavity. The application time was 5 minutes with a temperature of 39º degrees (measured by a digital thermometer) and the frequency was 1 Mhz. The speed of movement of the probe was a cycle of one round trip every two seconds marked through beep sound.
After these procedures, the vaginal introitus was evaluated for dilator eligibility, which varies in diameter and length. ®Absoloo brand vaginal dilators, numbers 4 (2.5 x 10.9cm), 5 (3.1 x 13.2cm) and 6 (3.5 x 14.5cm) were used.
For analgesia and proprioception of the perivaginal region, a ®Peridell 12.5 x 2.8cm perineal massager with a convex tip was used.
Dilatation using vibrocompression was performed for 20 minutes, alternating every two minutes in vibration and 2 minutes without vibration (2:2). At the end, the patient was reassessed for maintenance or progression to a major dilator to continue home therapy. Images were collected in the first and last session to record the therapeutic evolution.
According to the initial evaluation, a diagnosis of canal shortening, and vaginal stenosis was made. The patient's expectation was to obtain a functional vagina and, for that, a protocol of 6 sessions of radiofrequency intervention and vaginal dilatation was proposed, being carried out every 4 weeks.