As illustrated inFig.1 (a), the FTIR spectra of ZnO/PVA/CHI composite were recorded from 4000 to 400 cm− 1.The absorption peak around 3415 cm− 1 in the spectrum belongs to the stretching vibrations of surface O-H bonds from PVA and N-H bonds from CHI[21–22].The bands located at 2926,1421, and 1116cm− 1 are respectively put down to the aliphatic C-H stretching vibration, the CH-OH stretching vibration, and the -CH2stretching vibration in the PVA[22–23].The stretching vibration absorption peak appeared at 1635 cm− 1 in the spectra can be attributed to the O-H bond in the CHI. Among the peak assigned to ZnO, the peak located at 437 cm− 1 is attributed to the O-Zn stretching vibrations on Zn atoms[24]. It is worth noting that the composite spectrum shows all the absorption bands of CHI (3415 and 1635 cm− 1), of PVA (2926, 1421, and 1116 cm− 1) and of ZnO (437cm− 1), confirming the existence of CHI, PVA and ZnO in the composite.
Owing to the surface coating treatment, the ZnO particles can be uniformly encapsulated and maintain good porosity and structural stability, which can be confirmed by the SEM images. As seen in Fig. 1(b),the surface of the composite electrode remains smooth, with a number of round holes in the size of 1 ~ 20 µm even after 80 cycles of charge and discharge process. There is no dense zinc oxide build-up. Moreover, Figs. 1(c) to (d) shows the internal morphology of the voids. The inside of the voids maintain good interfaces flatness. This observation indicates that the ZnO particles are uniformly embedded. Compared to smooth surface of the composite electrode (Fig. 1 (b-d), the surface of the pure ZnO electrode(Fig. 1(e))is rougher due to the coating of a large amount of ice-like dendrite clusters after 80 cycles under the same charge and discharge conditions. This may be attributed to the unique architecture and the close bonding between the PVA/CHI copolymer. On the one hand, the existence of PVA/CHI copolymer may retain ZnO in its initial position, which inhabits the dissolution of its discharge products and facilitates the homogeneous distribution of active material. On the other hand, the copolymer has good alkaline resistance and maintains well mechanical property, which provides reasonable space for zinc volume change during charge/discharge process. Additionally, a large number of voids inside the electrode provide an advantageous channel for ionic (OH−) transfer channels, thus making the composite electrode exhibit a longer cycle life and higher activity.
To estimate the electrochemical performance of the electrodes, polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements of the pure and the composite electrodes were performed. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the anode active dissolution areas of the pure electrode and the composite electrode are 0 ~ 0.2 V and 0 ~ 0.4 V after the first cycle respectively, showing that the ZnO/PVA/CHI electrode has higher activity than the pure ZnO electrode at the beginning of the cycle. Such a performance improvement may be attributed to a unique highly cross-linking and interpenetrating porous three-dimensional network structure, which facilitates the penetration of electrolyte, thus resulting in a higher electrode activity. Moreover, the unique structure of the composite electrode is beneficial to delaying the cathode passivation process. As expected, the active dissolution areas of the anode for the pure and composite electrode are 0 ~ 0.25 V and 0 ~ 0.53 V, respectively, even after 80 cycles. Satisfyingly, the composite electrode shows the maximum anode dissolution current of 0.34 A, which is 4.86 times higher than that of the pure ZnO electrode (0.07 A).This may lie in the fact that the porous network structure formed inside the composite is preferable for zinc electrode, because it is conductive to the migration of OH−, thus facilitating the utilization of interior surface of zinc electrode.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements were carried out to further investigated the effect of the porous network stricture made from the PVA/CHI copolymer on electrochemical properties. As seen in Fig. 2 (b), the impedance response of both the pure and composite electrodes after 80 cycles is characterized by the presence of a high-frequency semicircle region and a low-frequency sloped line region. The activity of the electrode can be reflected in the Rct, which is related to the charge transfer resistance and can be calculated from the diameter of the semicircle. As expected, the Rct of the composite electrode is much smaller than that of the pure electrode, attesting that the composite electrode posses a more favorable reaction rate. Moreover, the electric equivalent circuit diagrams for both of the pure and composite electrode are shown in Fig. 2(c) and (d), respectively, and the fitting parameters of the electric components are shown in Table 1.
As seen from Table 1, the Ra of the pure and composite electrodes, which is related to the total ohm resistance of the solution, is 0.2049 and 0.2887 Ω·cm2, respectively, indicating a lower internal resistance for the composite electrode after 80cycles.Moreover, the value of Rct is 1.01Ω·cm2for the composite electrode, which is much lower than that of pure ZnO electrode (2.805Ω·cm2).This can be ascribed to the unique porous network stricture formed inside the composite electrode, which facilitates the transfer of electrons.
Table 1
Fitting parameters of the electrical components with equivalent circuit for the pure and composite electrode after 80 cycles.
Electrode | L | Ra | CPE | Rct | Rw |
H·cm− 2 | Ω·cm2 | Y0/S·secn·cm− 2 | n | Ω·cm2 | Ω·cm2 |
Pure ZnO electrode | 1.268×10− 6 | 0.2887 | 0.06304 | 0.6167 | 2.805 | 9.392 |
Composite electrode | 9.827×10− 7 | 0.2049 | 0.03599 | 0.7282 | 1.010 | 13.18 |
The cell performance of electrodes was scrutinized by assembling Zn-air batteries, and their electrochemical properties are presented in Fig. 3. To be specific, Fig. 3 (a) depicts the typical galvanostatic charge-discharge curves of zinc-air batteries with pure ZnO and ZnO/PVA/CHI tested at the first circle. The pure and composite electrodes have nearly the same charge and discharge plateau at the beginning. However, as shown in Fig. 3 (b), the composite electrode exhibited a higher discharge plateau, which is about0.2 V higher than that of the pure ZnO electrode after 80 cycles. It also demonstrates a lower charge plateau than pure ZnO electrode. The charge/discharge process of zinc anode is accompanied with redox reaction, dissolution, and electrodepositing. For the charge process, zinc ions are more likely to deposit to the uneven parts of zinc electrode, which causes the shape change and dendrite formation and in turn increase the electrochemical polarization of the ZnO anode. When it comes to the composite electrode, the unique three-dimensional network structure inhibits the diffusion of discharge products. In addition, the complex action of zinc ion by CHI enables zinc ions to be reduced in situ, which maintains the internal stability of the electrode [15]. In this situation, the shape change and zinc dendrite formation can be restricted, making the charge voltage plateau more stable. What’s more, lower polarization can enhance the utilization of active material and thus increase the discharge voltage plateau.
For the practical applications of zinc-air battery, the charge/discharge efficiency is the key performance indicator. As shown in Fig. 4, the pure ZnO electrode exhibit a little higher efficiency at the initial5cycles compared with the ZnO/PVA/CHI composite electrode, which can be ascribed to the fact that the content of active material (ZnO) in the pure zinc electrode is higher than that composite electrode. In despite of its higher discharge efficiency at first several cycles, the current efficiency fades quickly in the subsequent cycles. In comparison with pure ZnO electrode, although the highest discharge efficiency is little lower, it remains over 80% of capacity retention even after 100 cycles, while that of pure electrode can only maintain this level less than 40 cycles. This is explained by the fact that the ZnO/PVA/CHI composite electrode has a large number of pores, and active materials are tightly wrapped, while the pure electrode produces distinct dendrites, which can also be seen from the SEM images mentioned above.