In the present study, we scanned the palpebral lobe of lacrimal glands in healthy subjects and in patients with non-Sjögren dry eye syndrome or Sjögren dry eye syndrome using UBM, which is often used for imaging the anterior segment of the eye. We could observe the parenchyma of the palpebral lobe, lobule, excretory duct, blood vessels, and a cyst. As far as we know, this is the first study that scanned the lacrimal gland directly using a new UBM probe with soft cover. The purpose of the study is to introduce an UBM of human lacrimal gland using this new probe and suggest a potential usefulness of this technique. A larger series of subjects would be required to verify findings and repeatability in later study.
While OCT allows for imaging the fine structures of the lacrimal glands,[2] the penetration depth of OCT is too shallow. Therefore, we used ultrasound in attempt to overcome this disadvantage of OCT. Giovagnorio et al applied sonography to scan the lacrimal glands using the eyeball as a window in patients with Sjögren dry eye syndrome.[4] But, this technique has some disadvantages. First, it is technically difficult to obtain a good view. The lacrimal glands were visualized bilaterally in only 6 of 15 patients with Sjögren syndrome (12 of 30 glands). Second, because the eyeball was used as a window, the relatively long distance from the probe to the lacrimal gland resulted in poor resolution of the lacrimal gland. Third, the frequency of the sonographic signal is lower (7–13 MHz) than that of UBM (50 MHz), which also decreased the resolution relative to that obtained with UBM.
We attempted to scan the lacrimal glands directly by placing the sonography probe on the prolapsed lacrimal gland instead of using the eyeball as a window, but in standard sonography for the eye, the near field around the probe cannot be viewed. For these reasons, we selected UBM instead of sonography. In the past, however, a scleral shell was necessary for UBM scanning. We had to fill the scleral shell with saline, and then immerse the UBM probe in the saline to scan the anterior segment of eye. This is not problematic for corneal or anterior chamber imaging, but we could not use this technique for imaging a structure with an uneven surface such as the palpebral lobe. Recently, a new UBM probe with a soft cover (single-use conical-shaped probe cover) filled with normal saline was developed and thus the uneven surface of the lacrimal gland can be imaged. Firm contact between the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland can be achieved with the new probe.
In 1993, Molgat et al. reported UBM scanning for two abnormally prolapsed lacrimal glands and three lacrimal duct cysts.[5] Although they did not indicate that they used a scleral shell, they must not have used a UBM probe with a soft cover because the ClearScan type UBM was only recently developed. Molgat et al. reported the absence of a distinct capsule overlying the mass and the presence of multiple small cystic spaces in the prolapsed lacrimal gland. But, the presence of multiple small cystic spaces is not consistent with our results. And, the resolution of their system is lower than ours. We scanned not only the lacrimal gland of healthy subjects but also that of patients with non-Sjögren dry eye syndrome and Sjögren syndrome. Using UBM, we observed lobules, excretory ducts, blood vessels, and cysts.
UBM allowed us view the lacrimal gland from the surface to a depth of approximately 3000 µm (3 mm). The thickness of the palpebral gland is 3 mm,[6] so theoretically the entire thickness of the palpebral gland can be viewed. OCT allows a viewing depth of only about 300 µm, i.e., 10% of the thickness of the palpebral gland. With UBM, we could observe lobules that were 700–800 µm in diameter and a blood vessel located at a depth of 1500 µm. These structures could not be observed with OCT. The resolution of UBM, however, was much lower than that of OCT. In OCT, we could observe acini with diameter of 70 µm, but we could not observe them with UBM. This disadvantage of UBM is a trade-off for the increased penetration depth.
In this study, the parenchyma was somewhat homogeneous in the UBM scans of the two healthy subjects, but inhomogeneous in patients with Sjögren syndrome compared to the healthy subjects. In the two non-Sjögren dry eye syndrome patients, we could observe the lobules. In healthy young subjects without focal or lobular atrophy and fibrosis, B-scan sonography images may be homogeneous. In contrast, fibrosis may be present in older subjects or in patients with dry eye syndrome with focal or lobular atrophy,[7] and in these cases, B-scan sonography images may appear inhomogeneous. In a previous report in which sonography was used to view the lacrimal glands in patients with Sjögren syndrome, an irregular hyperechoic patch was visible centrally in 3 of 6 patients (6 of 30 glands), probably indicating fat deposition.[4] In 2 of 15 patients, the presence of a particularly irregular echotexture with multiple small cystlike lesions was considered an indication for biopsy, revealing lymphoma. Histology of the lacrimal glands of patients with Sjögren syndrome reveals extensive lymphocyte infiltration.[8] We believe that this might be the reason for the inhomogeneous echogenecity of the lacrimal glands in Sjögren patients. Further investigation with a larger sample is required, however, to test this hypothesis. In a previous OCT study[2], we were unable to identify focal, lobular atrophy and fibrosis, but in the present study using UBM, we were able to observe these structures. The shallow scan depth of OCT might prevent the observation of homogenous and inhomogeneous signals.
In some subjects, we observed lobules in the parenchyma of the lacrimal gland with a diameter was 700–800 µm, a hyperechoic periphery, and an inhomogeneous and hypoechoic center compared to the periphery. Inside the lobules, we observed hyperechoic compartment lines. The hyperechoic periphery and compartment lines are thought to be interlobular and intralobular fibroconnective tissue, respectively.
In the OCT scan, the wall of excretory duct appeared thick and the signal intensity inside the lumen was very low.[2] In contrast, the blood vessel walls appeared thin and the signal intensity of the lumen was high compared to the excretory ducts. In UBM, however, we were unable to distinguish excretory ducts and blood vessels. Excretory ducts usually run in the superotemporal to inferonasal direction and run parallel to each other. Therefore, cross sections of tubes that run parallel to each other in a longitudinal scan are likely to be excretory ducts. In addition, the lumen was hypoechoic, the wall was not definite. It is difficult to confirm the observations of blood vessels because they do not travel in a specific direction. A tube running in the superonasal to inferotemporal direction, however, was considered to a blood vessel rather than an excretory duct. We observed a typical blood vessel in a subject. Because it was running in the superonasal to inferotemporal direction, we were able to observe a longitudinal section of the tube in the longitudinal B-scan. The blood vessel lumen was hypoechoic, which is the same as the excretory duct lumen. The blood vessel wall was hyperechoic compared to the excretory duct wall. Because blood vessel wall thickness varies with the blood vessel diameter, the wall thickness cannot be generalized. The use of Doppler UBM would allow us to definitely distinguish blood vessels from excretory ducts.
This technique has some disadvantages. First, because the probe contacts the conjunctiva on the lacrimal gland, patients may experience discomfort and there is a risk of infection. Second, because there is a space filled with saline between the probe and palpebral lobe, it is difficult to determine the exact location during scanning. The probe should be moved from the sclera to the lacrimal gland because it is very easy to detect the sclera in UBM. Longitudinal UBM scanning is easier than transverse scanning to detect lacrimal glands. During a transverse scan, the lid may be mistaken for a lacrimal gland. Third, this technique cannot be used to scan the orbital lobe. The pathology of the orbital lobe, however, would be assumed to be similar to that in the palpebral lobe.
In conclusion, we scanned the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland in healthy subjects as well as in patients with non-Sjögren dry eye syndrome or Sjögren dry eye syndrome using UBM, which is commonly used for imaging the anterior segment. We were able to observe the palpebral lobe parenchyma, lobules, excretory ducts, blood vessels, and cysts. Lacrimal gland imaging using UBM has both advantages of OCT and sonography, and could be useful for evaluating dry eye syndrome.