The tests of the air flow velocity profile on the surface of the door opening were carried out on a dedicated stand for assessing the characteristics of the air stream velocity profiles generated by mobile fans in an open flow. The stand is equipment of the Scientific and Research Center for Fire Protection - National Research Institute, Jozefów, Poland. An important aspect of the stand's operation is the fact that during the tests it allows for taking into account the geometric parameters related to fan positioning, i.e., setting the distance and impeller inclination angle. The measuring plane (enabling the probing of the surface of 2880x3070 mm) was combined with an obstacle imitating a door opening with dimensions of 2.03x0.91 m [16], and 50 measurement points were located on its surface. The points were distributed evenly over the entire surface of the opening - based on ISO 5221 [17] (a method of even surface traversing). The distribution of the measurement points in the door opening and the reference point consistent with the zero point of the adopted coordinate system are shown in Fig. 1. The measuring module is equipped with a TSI type 8455 thermocouple anemometer with a measuring range of 0.127 - 50 m/s and accuracy of approx. 1% of the reading. Stable mounting of the anemometer to the movable transport element allowed automatic and repeatable changes of the measurement points. The probe was transported with stepper motors (with positioning accuracy not less than 0.1 mm).
The research program was configured as follows: the acquisition frequency was 10 Hz and the duration of the measurement of one point was 300 s. During the tests, for the fan which was arranged in front of the test stand, the velocity profile was assessed. The surface of the fan rotor was directed to the measurement plane of the door opening. The velocity profile measurement was performed for variables distances, i.e. 1m, 3m, 4m, 5m and 7m (Fig 2a) and the rotor inclination angle in the range from 0 ° to 18 ° (Fig. 2b). The rotor inclination angles were set in accordance with the positions recommended by the manufacturers - the fan constructions have four-section position adjustment mechanisms. The values of the angles for the tested structures are presented in Table 1. During the tests, the volumetric air flow Q, blowing onto the surface of the door opening, was also estimated from the relationship of the average value of the air stream velocity V and the door opening surface S, in accordance with equation 1.
Where:
V – average value of the flow velocity of the air stream generated by the positive pressure ventilator,
S – measuring area of the door opening (measurement plane).
In the analysis of measurement error (for the air flow velocity tests at selected measuring points), the arithmetic mean was used as an estimator of the value. The standard deviation of the arithmetic mean was adopted as the error of the estimator. Whereas the main test results provided average values of air flow rate from 50 trials (N = 50), for which confidence intervals were determined at a confidence level of 95% (p = 0.05). Significant statistical differences were analyzed using Student’s t-test. The tests for the corresponding conditions were carried out in a 1500 m3 test hall, where it was possible to ensure stable environmental conditions (a constant temperature of 21 ± 2 °C, humidity 41 ± 3%).
Four positive pressure ventilators, popularly used in rescue operations, were used for the study (Fig. 3). Among other parameters, the fans are characterized by different ranges of drive power (from 0.6 kW to 6.3 kW). The description of the fan parameters is presented in Table 1.
The results of testing the characteristics of the flow velocity profile on the surface of the door opening for the tested fans (taking into account unit positioning parameters, i.e., the distance and impeller inclination angle) are shown in Fig. 4-7 for the positive pressure ventilator 1, Fig. 8-11 for fan 2, Fig. 12-15 for fan 3 and Fig. 16-19 for mobile fan 4. Due to a large amount of information in the drawings, information on the accuracy of the measurement was not marked on them, so, therefore, Tables 2-5, with the details of the average results of the flow velocity and errors from the measurements in the doorway. It can be seen from the flow rate characteristics in Fig. 4-19 that when the main flow is concentrated too close to the lower or upper edge of the door opening, it is less than the maximum obtainable value. The highest value of the flow velocity can be obtained when the airflow is aimed toward the center area of the door opening. When analyzing the positioning of the fan, it should be indicated that if the axis of the fan impeller is parallel with the ground or if the axis of the impeller is tilted to the other, extreme position (16 ° to 18 °), the air stream does not flow into the door opening entirely or loses momentum as a result of friction on the ground surface. The loss of mass value of the flowing air stream as a result of a collision with the outer surface of the wall around the inlet opening was also shown by Cimolino et al. (2012), who tested the "cone" ventilation technique - a method that directs the flow so that the stream covers the entire opening [18]. This technique was also described by Kaczmarzyk et. al. (2022) [6]. Analyzing the issues related to the velocity of the air stream measured in the door opening, it was noted that Alonso et al. 2022 showed that the air flow through the door opening without active ventilation is concentrated in the lower part of the door opening (air outlet) at a speed of about 0.8 m/s, while the air inlet is in the upper part [19]. Kerber & Walton (2003), during their tests with the use of a mobile fan positioned at a distance of 3.05 m, evenly in the axis of the door opening, obtained a maximum value of air velocity of 6 m/s [20]. On the other hand, the research of the authors of the article showed that the maximum flow velocity in the door opening during fan support may be equal to approximately 28 m/s. In further analysis, the results of the flow velocity were converted following equation 1, determining the volumetric air flow rate. The influence of the fan distance from the door opening and the impeller inclination angle are shown in Fig. 20. Due to the legibility of the drawing, no measurement error has been marked on it, hence the results of average values and measurement errors are presented in Table 6. On the other hand, the maximum values of the flow rate, with the indication of the fan settings, are shown in Figure 21. The highest flow rates were achieved for the highest flow velocities. Depending on the power of the drive unit, the maximum flow rate ranged from approximately 18,304 ± 2,460 m3/h (for a 0.6 kW fan) to approximately 45,189 ± 4,619 m3/h (for a 6.3 kW fan). Lambert and Merci (2014) studied similar positive pressure ventilators, which are used in rescue operations. The indicated flow rates were respectively 30,800 m3/h for fans with a combustion engine and 30,000 m3/h for fans with an electric drive [21]. Garcia et al. (2006) also indicated that fans used for rescue operations should generate a volumetric flow in the range of 25,485 – 33,980 m3/h [22]. On the other hand, the mobile fan used by Kerber & Walton (2006) had a capacity of 23,900 m3/h, which is consistent with the authors' results [20,23]. The distances from the door opening and the angles of the impeller axis, at which the highest values of the flow rate were obtained, fall within the range of 3 to 5 m, while the angles of the impeller axis to the ground range from 5° to 12°. Most often, the third position of the impeller axis (from the ground) proved to be more favorable than the other positions from among the four recommended by the manufacturer (12°). One of the tested mobile fans obtained the best results in the second position (5°). On the other hand, the first position was not favorable in any of the attempts. Therefore, when pumping air into rooms with a ground surface parallel to the fan base, it is recommended to change the position of the fan impeller axis. So far, changes in the position of the fan impeller axis were mainly recommended during ventilation in staircases, where a change of the air stream direction minimizes the loss of air momentum on obstacles located inside the building – e.g., non-standard staircase structures [24]. When analyzing these results, it should be noted that the flow analysis is conducted through the door opening under conditions without back pressure (which may be present in the structure of the facility). The generated volume flow, pumped inside the object, is influenced by the pressure inside and the obstacles on the gas exchange path [6]. With regard to multi-storey buildings, Paninder et al. (2018) showed that the value of the flow rate is also influenced by the pressure difference at different levels of the staircase [25].
The effectiveness of a rescue operation may depend on correct fan settings, therefore the analysis of the influence of the percentage reduction of the flow rate depending on mobile fan settings was performed (Fig. 22). The analysis adopted the result of the highest value of flow rate efficiency as a reference value for the selected fan. Tests in the variable ranges of the distance from the door opening and the angle of inclination of the impeller axis have shown that improper fan settings may result in a maximum reduction of air flow through the door opening from 41% to 76%, depending on the fan type. Rejecting the results for the two most unfavorable distances and tilt angles of the impeller axis (i.e., extreme maximum and minimum positions) in the analysis, the greatest reduction of the flow rate ranges from 5% to 19% depending on the fan type. The differences in the volume of air flow are related to the change in the flow direction (the collision with an obstacle in the form of a door opening frame) and the quality of the generated air stream [7]. According to U. Cimolino et al. [18] changing the angle of the blown air can increase the flow rate by up to 30%. Positive pressure ventilators generating the air stream with a lower degree of turbulence (e.g., if an impeller has flow straighteners), thanks to the reduction of deceleration, are capable of blowing a steadily directed stream over longer distances. On the other hand, fans characterized by greater flow turbulence will work with lower efficiency - the stream that the fan creates will start to lose speed as a result of inducing additional air from the surrounding area. Such a stream can also change the direction of the flow.
According to the results of the research by Kaczmarzyk et al. in 2022, it follows that mobile positive pressure ventilators run at maximum power [8]. By comparing the results of the maximum power of the drive units (Table 1) and the values of the maximum air flow rate generated by the mobile fan (Fig. 20), it is possible to determine the amount of energy consumed by the fan, expressed in Watt-hours (W·h), per 1 m3 of air blown through the door opening. The value of energy consumed per 1 m3 is shown in Fig. 23. It can be noted that the electric mobile fan is characterized by the lowest power (0.6 kW), the lowest maximum flow rate (18304 ± 2460 m3/h) and the lowest energy consumption 0.03 W·h. The remaining positive pressure ventilators (driven by combustion engines) were characterized by average energy consumption of about 0.13 ± 0.02 W·h for the purpose of blowing 1 m3 of air through the door opening. It can be observed that mobile fans with combustion drives are characterized by 76% higher energy consumption. The efficiency of the combustion engine does not affect the value of this result because the value of the assumed power corresponds to the power on the drive shaft (output) [8,26]. The design of the fan impellers was also similar and of the same type. This can be influenced by the rotational speed of the fan impeller. Combustion engines, where fan impellers are mounted on the drive shaft, operate at a speed of about 3500 rpm [8]. The rotational speed of the electric motor shaft was 2790 rpm [31]. However, the analysis of this issue and its confirmation requires further research.
Based on the conducted research, it can be observed that the determination of the general guidelines for the setting of fans may be imprecise and unfavorable for their effective operation. Positive pressure ventilators, used for the tests, did not have information plates indicating the optimal settings of the mobile unit. The implementation of such instructions could contribute to increasing the effectiveness of the ventilation provided.