SFT is a mesenchymal tumor comprising less than 2% of soft tissue tumors [36]. About 65% of SFTs originate from the pleura [3]; however, they can also be found in extrapleural areas [6], with only 34 cases reported to date, including the present case (Table 1, 2). SFT of the pancreas is extremely rare. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for pancreatic tumors and SFT and found 34 cases. Of these, 14 (41.1%) were male, and 20 (58.9%) were female. The mean age was 54.17 ± 15.4, and the median age was 54; 17 patients had lesions in the pancreatic tumor head (three [17.6%] male and 13 [76.4%] female). Seventeen had tumors in the tail of the pancreatic body (ten [58.8%] male and seven [41.2%] female). The mean tumor diameter was 5.2 ± 3.8 cm. Of the 34 patients, 12 presented with pain (12/34), 12 were discovered on physical examination (12/34), four presented with jaundice (4/34), one presented with an abdominal mass (1/34), and five were detected by other means (5/34) (Table 1).
Table 1
Patient characteristics of pancreatic solitary fibrous tumors
NO.
|
First Author/Year
|
Age
|
Sex
|
Pancreatic site
|
Symptoms
|
Size (cm)
|
Pancreatic surgery
|
1.
|
Lüttges J /1999[1]
|
50
|
F
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
5.5
|
DP
|
2.
|
Chatti K /2006[8]
|
41
|
M
|
Body
|
Abdominal pain
|
13
|
DP
|
3.
|
Gardini A /2007[9]
|
62
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
3
|
PD
|
4.
|
Miyamoto H /2007[10]
|
41
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
1.8*1.5
|
Enucleation
|
5.
|
Kwon HJ /2008[11]
|
54
|
M
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
7.6*6
|
MS
|
6.
|
Srinivasan V /2008[12]
|
78
|
F
|
Body
|
Back pain weight loss
|
5
|
DP
|
7.
|
Chetty R /2009[13]
|
67
|
F
|
Head
|
Incidental
|
2.6
|
PD
|
8.
|
Ishiwatari H /2009[14]
|
58
|
F
|
Head
|
Incidental
|
3
|
PD
|
9.
|
Sugawara Y /2010[15]
|
55
|
F
|
Head
|
Incidental
|
6*4
|
PD
|
10.
|
Santos L /2012[16]
|
40
|
M
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
3
|
Enucleation
|
11.
|
Tasdemir A /2012[17]
|
24
|
F
|
Body
|
Epigastric pain
|
11
|
Enucleation
|
12.
|
van der Vorst JR /2012[18]
|
67
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
2.8*1.6
|
Enucleation
|
13.
|
Chen J /2013[19]
|
49
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
13
|
PD
|
14.
|
Hwang JD /2014[20]
|
53
|
F
|
Head
|
Incidental
|
5.2*4.5*4.0
|
PHR
|
15.
|
Baxter AR /2015[21]
|
58
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
3.5*3
|
LPD
|
16.
|
Estrella J /2015[22]
|
52
|
F
|
Head
|
Jaundice
|
15*10*10
|
LPD
|
17.
|
Han SH 2015[23]
|
77
|
F
|
Head
|
Jaundice
|
1.5*1.4
|
Biopsy
|
18.
|
Murakami K /2016[24]
|
82
|
M
|
Body
|
Hypokalemia hypertension, edema
|
6
|
DP
|
19.
|
Spasevska L /2016[3]
|
47
|
M
|
Head
|
jaundice
|
3.5*2*1.8
|
LPD
|
20.
|
Paramythiotis D /2016[7]
|
55
|
M
|
Body
|
Abdominal pain
|
3.1*2.8
|
DP
|
21.
|
D'Amico FE /2017[25]
|
52
|
M
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
1.2cm
|
DP
|
22.
|
Oana S /2017[26]
|
73
|
M
|
Head
|
Abdominal discomfort
|
6.5*5.5
|
Enucleation
|
23.
|
Sheng Q/ 2017[27]
|
1
|
M
|
Head
|
Jaundice
|
2.0
|
DP
|
24.
|
Geng H /2020[28]
|
48
|
M
|
Body
|
Hypoglycemia
|
6.5*5
|
DP
|
25.
|
Qian X /2020[29]
|
46
|
M
|
Body
|
Hypoglycemia
|
7.0*6.1
|
DP
|
26.
|
Rogers C /2020[30]
|
37
|
F
|
Head
|
Abdominal pain
|
2.3
|
PD
|
27.
|
Taguchi Y /2020[31]
|
60
|
M
|
Head
|
Palpable mass
|
9*7*7
|
PD
|
28.
|
Jariwalla NR /2021[32]
|
64
|
F
|
Body
|
Abdominal pain
|
1.9
|
DP
|
29.
|
Marotti JD /2021[33]
|
75
|
F
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
1.3
|
Enucleation
|
30.
|
Addeo P /2021[6]
|
59
|
M
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
4
|
DP
|
31.
|
Rodriguez AH /2021[2]
|
48
|
F
|
Body
|
Abdominal pain
|
13*10*9.5
|
TP
|
32.
|
Jones VM /2022[34]
|
61
|
F
|
Body
|
NA
|
2.7
|
DP
|
33.
|
Liu W /2022[35]
|
54
|
F
|
Head
|
Incidental
|
3.1*2.3
|
LDPPHRt
|
34.
|
Present case
|
54
|
M
|
Body
|
Incidental
|
3*2
|
DP
|
LDPPHRt: laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, Ms: median segmentectomy, PHR: pancreatic head resection, TP: Total pancreatectomy, PD: pancreaticoduodenectomy, DP: Distal pancreatectomy
Table 2
Histological features and outcomes of pancreatic solitary fibrous tumors
NO.
|
First Author/Year
|
Immunohistochemistry
|
Outcome
|
Follow-up
|
1.
|
Lüttges J /1999[1]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2, vimentin
|
Alive
|
20 mo
|
2.
|
Chatti K /2006[8]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2, vimentin
|
Death
|
3 d
|
3.
|
Gardini A /2007[9]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2, vimentin, SMA
|
Alive
|
16 mo
|
4.
|
Miyamoto H /2007[10]
|
CD34, Bcl-2
|
Alive
|
7 mo
|
5.
|
Kwon HJ /2008[11]
|
CD34, CD99, vimentin
|
NA
|
NA
|
6.
|
Srinivasan V /2008[12]
|
CD34, Bcl-2
|
Alive
|
7 mo
|
7.
|
Chetty R /2009[13]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2
|
42 mo
|
6 mo
|
8.
|
Ishiwatari H /2009[14]
|
CD34, Bcl-2
|
Alive
|
42 mo
|
9.
|
Sugawara Y /2010[15]
|
CD34
|
NA
|
NA
|
10.
|
Santos L /2012[16]
|
CD34, betacatenin
|
NA
|
NA
|
11.
|
Tasdemir A /2012[17]
|
CD34, Bcl-2, beta-catenin, vimentin, Ki67 < 2%
|
Alive
|
3 mo
|
12.
|
van der Vorst JR /2012[18]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2
|
NA
|
NA
|
13.
|
Chen J /2013[19]
|
CD34, Bcl-2, vimentin, CD68, muscle-specific actin
|
Alive
|
30 mo
|
14.
|
Hwang JD /2014[20]
|
CD34, Bcl-2, muscle-specific actin, CD10, ER, PR
|
Alive
|
30 mo
|
15.
|
Baxter AR /2015[21]
|
CD34, Bcl-2
|
NA
|
NA
|
16.
|
Estrella J /2015[22]
|
CD34, Bcl-2, keratin (rare), p16, p53
|
Alive
|
40 mo
|
17.
|
Han SH 2015[23]
|
CD34, CD99
|
No progression
|
10 mo
|
18.
|
Murakami K /2016[24]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, ACTH, POMC, NSE
|
Death
|
4 mo
|
19.
|
Spasevska L /2016[3]
|
CD34, vimentin, CD99, Bcl-2, nuclear betacatenin
|
Death
|
1 w
|
20.
|
Paramythiotis D /2016[7]
|
CD34, CD99, Bcl-2 vimentin, S-100
|
Alive
|
40 mo
|
21.
|
D'Amico FE /2017[25]
|
STAT6, CD34
|
Alive
|
24 mo
|
22.
|
Oana S /2017[26]
|
CD34, Bcl-2
|
Alive
|
36 mo
|
23.
|
Sheng Q/ 2017[27]
|
CD34, vimentin, SMA, Ki67 < 3%
|
Alive
|
12 mo
|
24.
|
Geng H /2020[28]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, CD31, PHH-3, D2-40, Ki67 > 10%
|
Alive
|
6 mo
|
25.
|
Qian X /2020[29]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, Ki67 10%
|
Alive
|
10 mo
|
26.
|
Rogers C /2020[30]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, CD99
|
Alive
|
4 mo
|
27.
|
Taguchi Y /2020[31]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, vimentin, cytokeratin AE1/AE3
|
Alive
|
12 mo
|
28.
|
Jariwalla NR /2021[32]
|
STAT6, CD34
|
NA
|
NA
|
29.
|
Marotti JD /2021[33]
|
STAT6, CD34
|
Alive
|
6 mo
|
30.
|
Addeo P /2021[6]
|
STAT6, CD34, Bcl-2, Ki67 7%
|
NA
|
NA
|
31.
|
Rodriguez AH /2021[2]
|
STAT6
|
Alive
|
12 mo
|
32.
|
Jones VM /2022[34]
|
STAT6, CD34
|
Alive
|
1 mo
|
33.
|
Liu W /2022[35]
|
CD34, STAT6, CD99
|
Alive
|
6 mo
|
34.
|
Present case
|
TAT6, CD34, Bc1-2, Vimentin, CD99, Ki67 40%
|
Alive
|
3 mo
|
CD cluster of differentiation, Bcl-2 B cell CLL/lymphoma-2, STAT6 signal transducer and activator of transcription 6, ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, SMA smooth muscle actin, NA not applicable
Most SFTs of the pancreas are detected by physical examination; clinical signs and symptoms include abdominal pain and jaundice. Because these are not typical symptoms, it is challenging to differentiate SFT from other pancreatic diseases. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry are the gold standards for diagnosis. We recommend ultrasound endoscopic aspiration biopsy for space-occupying pancreatic lesions that cannot be diagnosed on imaging.
Our preoperative diagnosis relied on ultrasound endoscopic puncture biopsy in the present case. The preoperative and postoperative pathological histological examination and immunohistochemistry were consistent with SFT of the pancreas with no tumor involvement in the peripheral lymph nodes, no tumor involvement in the incised margin of the pancreas, and no tumor involvement in the spleen.
The immunohistochemical differential diagnosis of SFT of the pancreas should include spindle cell tumors such as Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), smooth muscle sarcoma, nerve sheath tumor, fibrous mucinous sarcoma, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, and vascular tumors [3, 16, 20, 37]. The immunomarkers of SFT of the pancreas include STAT6, CD34, bc1-2, vimentin, and CD99 [34]. These features help to distinguish SFT from other mesenchymal tumors [34, 37]. SFT expresses CD34 and vimentin in 80–90% of cases and CD99 and bcl-2 in 70%. SFTs are usually negative for c-kit (CD117), smooth muscle actin, junctional protein, S-100 protein, and cytokeratin (markers for GIST, smooth muscle sarcoma, nerve sheath tumor, and fibrous mucinous sarcoma, respectively) are negative [3]. NAB2-STAT6 fusion is a driver mutation in SFT, where transcriptional repressors of the cytokinesis pathway are converted into transcriptional activators [31, 38, 39]. STAT6 has a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 85% for SFT and is therefore considered the most characteristic SFT marker [40, 41]. In our case, the tumor was positive for STAT6, while CD34, bc1-2, vimentin, and CD99 were positive.
In this case, CT showed no enhancement in the arterial phase and heterogeneous enhancement in the venous area. We believe that it should be distinguished from neuroendocrine tumors, which show enhanced CT from the arterial phase to the portal venous phase [13, 37], which makes it difficult for us to distinguish the disease, so many scholars before us also misdiagnosed it before surgery [1, 10, 11, 13, 26]. At the same time, we believe that it should also be differentiated from pancreatic cancer and solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. The imaging features of this tumor have been described in detail in our previous work on pancreatic tumors [42].
Most SFTs are benign [43], and malignant SFTs account for 10–15% [30] [39, 44, 45]. The histopathological features of malignant SFT are (i) hypercellularity, (ii) more than four mitotic figures per ten high-power fields, (iii) nuclear pleomorphism, (iv) hemorrhage and necrosis, (v) tumor diameter ≥ 10 cm, and (vi) positive margins [15, 21, 46]. Ki-67 can also differentiate benign from malignant tumors, with a cutoff value of 0–5% (indeterminate in 5–10%) for benign tumors and > 10% for malignant SFTs [40, 47]. In our case, our patient had a Ki-67 proliferation index of 40%; therefore, the tumor was possibly malignant. Because SFT of the pancreas is rare, there are no uniform treatment criteria; nevertheless, complete resection is the treatment of choice for intra-abdominal SFTs [1, 7, 10–12, 15], and post-surgical follow-up is critical because SFTs have a high recurrence rate. Due to the increasing number of reported cases of SFT, I believe there will be a complete system of treatment.
In conclusion, because of the non-specific clinical symptoms and radiological features of SFT of the pancreas, the diagnosis is challenging with preoperative radiological and laboratory examinations alone. A definitive diagnosis relies on histopathology and immunohistochemistry. In cases where the tumor is found in the pancreas, and the diagnosis cannot be confirmed, it is recommended to obtain histopathology with ultrasound aspiration. As this presentation is rarely reported, there is a lack of uniform treatment criteria, and surgery is effective. However, the tumor may lead to potential recurrence or metastasis; therefore, long-term follow-up is recommended.