The results showed that the caregivers were mainly married mothers in their lower 30s, active in child feeding and therefore with sufficient maturity and experience for the study. They were slightly older than those for a similar study in Pakistan, 29 years [17], and younger compared to another one in Tanzania, 40.75 years [22]
The cut–off score of 40% for low knowledge used in this study and also by Kigaru et al. [21] to categorize knowledge levels, was higher (stricter) than 25% used by Alzaben et al. [23]. Categorization of knowledge scores into low, moderate and/or high is a common approach as shown in [24] although some studies such as Liu et al. [25] do not explicitly do so. This study investigated VA-related knowledge which is more specific than the general nutrition knowledge commonly investigated using the cut-off. Most caregivers, nonetheless, had low knowledge levels, similar to other studies which are rather few and almost outdated [16, 17].
The low aggregate VA knowledge score obtained in this study (M = 18.91%, SD = 24.71), the great majority of caregivers in the low category and the low mean total scores for those who knew at least one aspect of VA, VA itself (40.6%), all revealed that VANK among caregivers was not only very low but also shallow. This study agreed with some studies [17, 16] but differed a little with another [22] which showed higher levels but targeted urban rather than rural households.
The lack of comprehensive VA knowledge among caregivers reflects their limited cognitive exposure to the vitamin. Therefore, despite existence of decades-long VA–related programs, caregivers have not been empowered with VA knowledge. This shortcoming suggests a need for more inclusive and participatory approaches to fighting VAD, especially in rural communities.
Knowledge of different aspects of vitamin A
Less than 20% of caregivers could identify any particular VA-rich fruit, vegetable or root/tuber despite having some VA knowledge (Table 4). Some of the foods mentioned were true sources of VA but others were not. The green vegetables, kale and Amaranthus, are excellent pro-vitamin A (β-carotene) sources [16, 26]. Animal-based foods, liver, eggs (egg yolk) and milk, provide preformed VA (retinol) and are great sources of VA. In addition, whereas passion (Passiflora edulis) and citrus fruits generally, are poor VA sources, they were nonetheless mentioned by the caregivers ahead of established fruit sources such as ripe mangoes and papaya [27]. In the roots/tubers group, non-orange/yellow root crops including potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) predominated the others such as carrots and orange-fleshed sweet-potatoes which are true VA (pro-VA) sources. The poor knowledge of VA sources contributed to the low overall VANK scores.
Knowledge of Vitamin A Deficiency, signs/symptoms, causes and prevention
Knowledge of VAD can be considered as contingent on that of VA itself although this may not always be true. The substantial proportion that knew VAD (66.1%) showed a correlation between knowledge of VAD and that of VA; however, this represented less than one third of all the caregivers. Therefore, knowledge of VAD was generally poor. Other studies have also found little knowledge of VAD [16, 17]. The limitation of this finding is that it did not cater for caregivers who knew VAD irrespective of the vitamin itself.
Majority of the caregivers (62%) attributed VAD to consumption of a poor variety of food, one among many non-specific causes mentioned. Inadequate dietary intake of VA, a more direct cause, was identified by only 6.6%, although this was expected to be easily derived from the description of VAD which inevitably spells VA. A more cogent assessment of caregiver knowledge of VAD causes could therefore be obtained from the evaluation of their knowledge of VA-rich foods.
Ability of caregivers to recognize signs/symptoms of VAD in children is essential in VAD control. Eye problems are the classic manifestations of VAD including several stages of xerophthalmia that involve physical (Bitot’s spots, corneal scars) and functional (forms of blindness) defects [16, 28]. Non-specific indicators include frequent infections and variable skin conditions [29]. Infections have a vicious relationship with VA [30, 27]. Very few caregivers were able to tell the correct signs associated with VAD including only 13% who knew the cardinal VAD signs. These findings are consistent with those for a study in Ghana [31]. Together, these studies underscore the danger of sub-clinical VAD because of the high implausibility of recognition or detection despite persistent prevalence [6, 2]. Hence, caregivers of children in rural areas of LICs still need greater sensitization on shielding against the threat of latent VAD and avoiding complacency.
The demonstrated knowledge of preventive measures against VAD among caregivers as per their correct identification of increased consumption of VA-rich foods (Figure 2) is commendable but is undercut by their limited knowledge of such foods and the generally minority status of those who knew VAD as highlighted in Table 3. This calls for mechanisms that widen knowledge of VA-rich foods. Other measures cited such as VA supplements and nutritious diet are effective but problematic because while supplements are non-food items and also unaffordable [32, 33], caregiver conception of a nutritious or balanced diet with respect to VA needs further scrutiny.
Similar studies in Kenya [34] and Ethiopia [35] showed higher levels of knowledge of VA and its sources, and signs of VAD than this study did. The variance was probably because the Kenyan and Ethiopian studies were concerned mainly with VAS and conducted after major interventions, in each case unlike this study, and the former involved urban caregivers who are usually more informed than rural dwellers, the main participants in this study. Consistent with this study, however, Hadzi et al. [31] found that very few caregivers knew the sources of VA and signs of VAD.
One aspect of VA-related attitude, perceived severity of VAD in children, was significantly associated with VANK. Compared to other constructs of the Health Belief Model (HBM), perceived severity represents a stronger feeling of threat to health and life which may be a strong intrinsic motivator to taking action [36]. The perceived magnitude of threat posed by VAD probably drove caregivers to adopt survival strategies which may include learning more about VAD and thereby increasing their VA knowledge. Elucidating on the adverse effects of VAD could be an effective way to promote VANK in VAD control.
Predictors of Vitamin A-related nutrition knowledge
There were positive correlations between VANK and caregiver age and level of formal education in agreement with reviews in [14] and [24]. Spronk et al. [14] attributed high nutrition knowledge at middle age to high education levels at that age. However, this study observed that age was independent of education because at 31 (mean age), educational cycles for most caregivers would have long been completed, and proposes that age relates to VANK through experience by caregivers. According to the 2016 UDHS [2], the mean age of first birth in Uganda is just below 20 years, and fertility rate is 5.9 implying that at 31, many married mothers, as were majority of caregivers in this study, would have had more than one cycle of child birth and care. These cycles expose them to knowledge through various avenues including antenatal health-care visits and participation in health promotion activities. Hence, the older the caregiver, the greater the experience and knowledge as well.
Concerning education, levels were correlated with those of VANK, similar to findings in [25]. These studies suggest that VANK is obtained, directly or indirectly (through availability of opportunities and enhancement of means of acquisition), during formal education. Generally, greater maternal education is linked to higher child survival due to better health care practices [37] which can be associated with greater knowledge.
Other characteristics including marital status, income and occupation were not significantly associated with VANK. Caregiver income was shown in [14] to be significantly related to nutrition knowledge but this study used household income instead and shows that it may not be as strong a predictor of knowledge as individual income. Nevertheless, this study estimated household income through interviews of the caregiver alone who was seldom the household head therefore possibly limiting the accuracy of the estimates as Fisher et al. [38] argue.