In this study phosphatase activity in both the normal and renal transplant patients is estimated and initially a standard phosphate curve is obtained where absorption is measured at 620nm spectrophotometer. Accordingly, from the linear fit of the graph obtained for Phosphate absorption, the amount of the Phosphate released is also calculated per concentration and is mentioned in the table below. For preparation of the Phosphate (PO₄³⁻) standard curve, the procedure provided with the assay kit has been followed.
Table 1: Different concentrations of Phosphate (PO₄³⁻) absorbed and released.
S. No
|
Con in nM
|
Phosphate released
|
Avg of A620
|
1
|
2
|
2.050847458
|
0.37
|
2
|
1
|
1.593220339
|
0.289
|
3
|
0.5
|
1.248587571
|
0.228
|
4
|
0.25
|
0.960451977
|
0.177
|
5
|
0.125
|
0.920903955
|
0.17
|
6
|
0.063
|
0.90960452
|
0.168
|
7
|
0.031
|
0.824858757
|
0.153
|
8
|
0
|
0.514124294
|
0.098
|
From the graph (1), a concentration dependent Phosphate release can be established. It is calculated by the formula, (A620-Yint)/Slope. This is used in the comparison of CaN activity in control group and renal transplant patients. The below table shows other parameters that are compared to establish a drug profile Tac as potential immunosuppressant.
Table 2
CaN activity from control group and transplant patients.
Transplant
|
Tac dose (mg/ml)
|
2.25
|
2.4
|
2.833
|
3.4
|
3.8
|
3.9
|
4.1
|
4.4
|
5.125
|
5.8
|
Tac level (ng/ml)
|
8.493
|
9.732
|
6.4
|
8.956
|
10.64
|
10.08
|
9.856
|
11.65
|
10.74
|
7.626
|
CaN activity (a.u)
|
0.76
|
0.147
|
0.142
|
0.11
|
0.33
|
0.66
|
0.44
|
0.26
|
0.11
|
0.42
|
Control (healthy)
|
1.88
|
1.56
|
1.76
|
1.68
|
1.64
|
1.86
|
1.65
|
1.72
|
1.76
|
1.73
|
The data points mentioned in Table.2 are an average mean of the measurements that are taken from respective patients. The whole blood from the patients is diluted for endpoint calculations.
Graph.1 explains the inhibition activity of the patient’s immune system post renal transplant; establishing a generic oral dosage of the drug is critical, nevertheless at individual level an effect in the immunosuppresion becomes poignant for personalised treatment. Pharmacological profiling of the drug, considering to group the sample pool into two – control (healthy) and transplant, has a the statistical significance between the groups has a p-value of 1.045E-12 (< 0.05).
Tac level from a blood draw at C0-trough, directs to the dependability of a drug dosage to pharmacokinetic parameters and the patients physical system that influences the absolute bioavailability of the drug. The half life of Tac is 16hrs for renal tranplant patients and it varies vividly if the grafting is with liver or lung or ocular organs; while in a healthy individual it takes upto 43hrs for the Tac to attain Cmax (max.plasma concentration). Therefore, in graph.2 absence of a linear pattern with respect to the increase in oral dosage form is entirely attributed to the time of blood draw for Tac level estimation. This is further confirmed with a negative coefficient of correlation (Pearson) [1], [2]