Broiler management
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chiba University (DOU27-131, DOU28-157, DOU30-331, DOU1-335) and carried out according to the guidelines of Chiba Prefectural Livestock Research Center46. Broiler chicks (chunky) were conventionally maintained with feed available ad libitum available feed (CP, 22%; ME, 3,100 kcal/kg) in a battery brooder (width 85 cm x depth 85 cm x height 25 cm) for 10 days and thereafter separated into 3 groups until day 21 after day 10. Randomly selected chicks were maintained (n = 3 per cage), wherein the chicks were selected to adjust for the restricted feeding area (width 22 cm x depth 44 cm x height 45 cm). From Day 21 until day 49, each chick was maintained in another restricted feeding area (n = 1 per cage) (width 44 cm x depth 56 cm x height 65 cm). All chicks were orally administered 50 mg/L of doxycycline KS (Kyouritsu Seiyaku Co., Ltd.), belonging to the tetracycline class, in their water as an antibiotic until 6 days after hatching in their water. W. coagulans SANK70258 (Lacris-10) (Mitsubishi Chemical Corp.) was administered in the drinking water at a concentration of at least 105 CFU/ml as a final concentration by ad libitum drinking for the first 10 days and thereafter at 0.005% concentration as a feed additive (at least 105 CFU/g).
Preparation of faecal samples for HPLC
All the faecal samples obtained were transported at − 20°C and thereafter stored at − 60°C - −80°C until analysis. The faecal samples were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocol47 with some modifications. In brief, chick faeces (200–400 mg) were mixed with a 9-fold volume of Milli-Q water for 10 min. After centrifugation at 15,000 rpm, the supernatant was filtated with a 0.45 µm Millex-HA filter (SLHA033SS) (Millipore, USA). Finally, the filtated solutions were prepared for HPLC analysis of the HPLC instrument. To determine the concentrations of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and lactate, the content of frozen fresh fecal samples was examined by using an HPLC Prominence instrument (Shimadzu, Japan), which was equipped on an ion-exclusion column (Shim-pack SCR-102H) with an electrical conductivity detector (CDD-10AVP) (Shimadzu, Japan).
The measurement conditions were adjusted as follows: mobile phase, 5 mM p-toluenesulfonic acid; buffer, 5 mM p-toluenesulfonic acid, 20 mM Bis-Tris, and 0.2 mM EDTA-4H; temperature, 40°C; flow rate, 0.8 ml/min.
Preparation of faecal samples for GC/MS/MS
To measure water-soluble metabolites, freeze-dried faecal samples were processed. A GC/MS/MS instrument and GCMS-TQ8030 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimazu, Japan) were used according to a previously described method48 with some modifications. Since chicken excrement tends to be indigestible, some pretreatment steps were applied. The freeze-dried faeces were disrupted with zirconia beads using Micro Smash MS-100 (Tomy Seiko, Japan). Then, 5 mg of the faecal sample was suspended in 150 µL of Milli-Q water containing 15 µL of an internal standard (1 mM 2-isopropyl maleric acid), and then 150 µL methanol and 60 µL chloroform were added. These solutions were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 30 min with shaking at 1200 rpm. After centrifugation at 16,000 g for 5 min at room temperature, 250 µL of the supernatant (aqueous layer) was transferred to a new tube, and 60 µL of chloroform was added. After mixing, the solutions were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with shaking at 1200 rpm. Each solutions was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, and 250 µL of the supernatants was transferred to a new tube, and 200 µL of Milli-Q water was added to the tube. The solutions were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 5 min at room temperature, and 125 µL of the supernatant was evaporated to dryness using a vacuum evaporator system (CentriVap Centrifugal Vacuum Concentrator, Labconco, USA) for 20 min at 40°C and lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Taitec, Japan). The dried extracts were stored at -80°C until the subsequent pretreatment was performed immediately before the measurement. The dried extracts were first methoxylated with 40 µL of 20 mg/mL methoxyamine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) dissolved in pyridine. The samples were incubated for 90 min at 30°C with shaking and were then sialylated with 20 µL of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) (GL Science, Japan) for 30 min at 37°C with shaking. After derivatization, the samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was transferred to a glass vial for GC–MS/MS measurement. GC–MS/MS analysis was carried out on a Shimadzu GCMS-TQ8030 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) with a capillary column (BPX5; SGE Analytical Science). The GC oven was programmed as follows: 60°C held for 2 min, increased to 330°C (15°C/min), and finally maintained at 330°C for 3.45 min. GC was performed in constant linear velocity mode at 39 cm/s. The detector and injector temperatures were 200°C and 250°C, respectively. The injection volume was set at 1 µL with a split ratio of 1:30. Data processing was performed using LabSolutions Insight (Shimadzu, Japan).
Enrichment analysis
Pathway analysis and enrichment analysis for the detected characteristic metabolites (p < 0.1; 1.5-fold change vs. the data of the heat-stress control group) were performed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca)49–51.
DNA preparation from faecal samples
Total DNA was prepared from the faeces as previously reported52 with some modifications. Approximately 100 mg of lyophilized faeces was disrupted with zirconia beads using Micro Smash MS-100 (Tomy Seiko, Tokyo, Japan), and suspended in 600 µL of a solution containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM EDTA (TE). We transferred 475 µL of faecal suspension into a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube. This suspension was incubated with 15 mg/mL lysozyme for 1 h at 37°C. Netxt, achromopeptidase (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan) was added at a final concentration of 2,000 units/mL, and the sample was further incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Then, 25.7 µL of proteinase K and sodium dodecyl sulfate were added at a final concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 1%, respectively, and then the mixed solution was incubated at 55°C for 1 h. These enzymatic treatments were carried out with shaking (1,000 rpm). The resulting lysate was treated with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, and DNA was precipitated with ethanol. The DNA pellet was rinsed with 70% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in 300 µL of TE. Then, RNase was added at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL, and the solution was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Then, an equal volume of a 20% polyethylene glycol 6,000 solution containing 2.5 M NaCl was added. After incubation for 30 min on ice, DNA was pelleted by centrifugation, rinsed, and then dissolved in TE.
16S rRNA sequencing analysis
16S rRNA gene analysis was carried out by PCR amplification with the barcoded forwards primer 27F-mod (5′-AGRGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3′) and reverse primer 338R (5′TGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT-3′) primers targeting the hypervariable regions (V1-V2) of the 16S rRNA gene according to a previous report52. The PCR reaction mix comprised 4 µL of DNA template, 0.5 µL of ExTaq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan), 5 µL of ExTaq buffer, 5 µL of dNTPs, and 10 pmol each of the forwards and reverse primers and brought to a total volume of 50 µL with DNA-free water. Amplicons were generated with 30 cycles of 98 ℃ for 30 s, 55 ℃ for 45 s, and 72 ℃ for 2 min were purified using AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). Multiplexed amplicon sequencing was performed under the conditions described below. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the samples were sequenced using a 454 GS FLX/Junior. Reads with an average quality value < 25 or inexact matches to both universal primers were filtered out. Finally, filtered reads were used for further analysis. These reads were then sorted according to average quality value and grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UCLUST (http://www.drive5.com/). The sequence identity threshold was 96% for the 454 data. The representative sequences of the generated OTUs were subjected to a homology search against the databases mentioned above using the GLSEARCH program for taxonomic assignments. For an assignment at the phylum, genus, and species levels, sequence similarity thresholds of 70%, 94%, and 97% were applied, respectively. Indices for α-diversity, namely community richness (Chao1) and diversity (Shannon and Simpson), were calculated, and indices for β-diversity were also estimated using UniFrac analysis with weighted and unweighted principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Alla16S rRNA gene data sets were deposited in the GenBank Sequence Read Archive database.
Correlation analyses
The relative values of dominant and/or characteristic faecal metabolites were visualized by constructing a correlation heatmap after the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated among the fecal metabolites by the R software as previously described 29,53,54.
Machine learning
Feature factors of metabolome data were extracted by supervised ML, Randomforest 55, one of ML with bagging (bootstrap aggregating) 56, and XGBoost 57, one of ML with extreme gradient boosting 56, respectively. Even with a small number of observations, a fixed subsample can be generated by random sampling using the bootstrap method, and the selected explanatory variables can be used to calculate the best classifying factors and their threshold values. In this study, the advantage of this ML characteristic was utilized to extract one characteristic group of bacteria and metabolites under the limited experimental conditions. The characteristic components were selected using the R software packages "randomForest" (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/index.html) and “xgboost” (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xgboost/index.html). Finally, these extracted feature factors were visualized as a bubble chart using the python modules “numpy” and “matplotlib” (https://matplotlib.org/stable/index.html).
Estimation of causal inference and structural equation across the animal species
To assess structural universality across the animal species, Direct LiNGAM, which is a linear non-Gaussian acyclic model and a non-Gaussian independent component analysis for estimating causal relationships58, was performed as statistical causal inference for a group of factors selected by machine learning. DirectLiNGAM was established with Python code on the website (https://github.com/cdt15/lingam) as previously described 53,59. In this study, the following packages were used on Python version 3.11.2: Cartopy 0.21.1, graphviz 0.20.1, libarchive 0.4.7, lingam 1.7.1, numpy 1.23.4, pandas 1.5.3, and pygam0.8.0. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) based on data calculated by Direct LiNGAM were visualized (Force Atlas with Noverlap) by Gephi (version 0.9.2)(https://gephi.org). The modularity class was automatically discerned by Gephi.
In addition, structural equation modeling (SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was mainly performed for a group of components with a large number of DAGs. SEM was conducted using the package “lavaan”60,61 of R software as previously described 53,59. The analysis codes were referred to the website (https://lavaan.ugent.be). Since CFA needs a hypothesis, the groups selected by association analysis were utilized as factors for a latent construct of metabolites and microbiota. The models as hypotheses were statistically estimated using maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimation with bootstrapping (n = 1000) by the functions ‘lavaan’ and ‘sem’. Model fit was assessed by the chi-squared p value (p > 0.05, nonsignificant), comparative fit index (CFI/cfi) (> 0.9), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI/tli) (> 0.9), goodness-of-fit index (GFI/gfi) (> 0.95), adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI/agfi) (> 0.90), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA/rmsea) (< 0.05), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR/srmr) (< 0.08) as indices of good model fit 62. In selecting the optimal structural equation, when the above conditions were met, an equation with little difference between the values of GFI and AGFI was adopted. Next, the model with a low value of Akaike information criterion (AIC) was adopted in the case with many candidate models. The path diagrams of the good model were visualized using the package “semPlot” of R software 63. In addition, the visualization of the degree of influence for each animal species was performed by Chord diagram using the package “circlize” of R software. To avoid the effects of experimental conditions on the difference, all data were calculated based on the median value (M) of data for the same component and sorted to 0 (< M) and 1 (> M).
Immunoblots
50 mg of tissue was transferred in 150 µL of ice-cold PBS-T containing protease inhibitor: 10µL/mL of PMSF (SigmaP7626) (Sigma, USA), 10µL/mLsodium orthovanadate (Sigma S6508) (Sigma, USA), and 20µL/mL of protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific Halt Protease Inhibitor Singl-Use Cocktail #78430) (Thermo Scientific, USA). The samples were homogenized on ice using using sonicator Ultrasonic processor XL2020 (MISONIX, USA), and centrifuged at 4°C, 10,000 × g for 5 minutes and to collect the supernatant. The protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined using Thermo Scientific Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit #23227 (Thermo Scientific, USA).
The crude protein solution were separated by electrophoresis on 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare Life science, Sweden). The membranes were blocked with PVDF Blocking Reagent (TOYOBO, Japan) at room temperature for 1 hour. The primary antibodies were rabbit polyclonal TRPA1 antibody (19124-1-AP)(proteintech group, Japan) diluted 1:1500 or rabbit polyclonal HIF-1 alpha antibody (bs-20399R)(Bioss andibodies, USA) diluted 1:1500 and the secondary antibody was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies diluted 1:12000 (Cell Signaling Technology, USA). GAPHDH was detected using rabbit polyclonal GAPDH antibody (10494-1-AP) (proteintech group, Japan) diluted 1:10000. Immunoblots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour. The protein signals were detected using Western Lightning TM ECL Pro (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, USA). The chemiluminescence scanner C-DiGiT (Scrum, Japan) and Image Studio was used to measure the protein signals.
Analysis of malondialdehyde concentration
The concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the liver and white adipocyte tissues were determined using an MDA assay kit, Bioxytech MDA-586 (Percipio Bioscience, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol as previously described 41. In brief,
50 mg of tissue was homogenised in BHT-containing PBS-T (containing 0.05% tween 20) using sonicator Ultrasonic processor XL2020 (MISONIX, USA), incubated at 45°C for 60 minutes, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes. Then the supernatant was measured at 586 nm.
Statistical analyses
Data for colon faecal bacterial flora and metabolites concentrations were analyzed as follows: the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the Gaussian distribution. In addition, the Bartlett’s test was also used to evaluate equal variances and to select parametric and non-parametric analyses. Appropriate methods dependent upon data sets were selected as follows: for parametric analysis, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used; as non-parametric analysis, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was performed, followed by the Steel-Dwass test was performed. These calculation data were prepared by using the R software (version 3.6.2, 4.0.5, and 4.2.2) and GraphPad Prism software (version 9.1.2 and 9.2.0) (GraphPad Software, USA), and Microsoft Office (version 16.66.1). Data in pathway analysis were calculated and visualized using MetaboAnalyst 5.049–51. Significance was declared when p < 0.05, and a tendency was assumed at 0.05 ≤ p < 0. 20. Data are presented as the means ± SEs.