Vitamin D3 has been studied as an effective supplement to human health in many areas (Cantorna et al. 2004; Stoffels et al. 2006; Cannell and Hollis 2008; Huang et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2020). In our study a full log reduction was noticed on Gram positive, Gram negative pathogenic bacteria, and C. albicans after treatment with 216.6 µM (3300IU) of vitamin D3. At lower concentaration of vitamin D3, the log reduction decreased (1–2 log reduction) for the bacteria, while it showed no significant effect on C. albicans. These results are in agreement with a previous in vivo study that showed that vitamin D3 is effective to general human health and in limiting the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria and infection in the recommended daily doses used in ranges of 50µg/mL to 125µg/mL (130–325 µM) (Stroud et al. 2008; Mocanu et al. 2009; Pludowski et al. 2018; Waterhouse et al. 2019; Charoenngam et al. 2020). Moreover, in vitro studies suggested that vitamin D3 has inhibitory activity on Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli (Cannell and Hollis 2008; Kempker et al. 2012; Bekele et al. 2018). In the presence of high doses ranging from 50,000 to 90,000IU/mL (1250µg/mL-2250µg/mL) of vitamin D3, the microorganisms showed a significant growth inhibition (Kempker et al. 2012). In another in vivo study, Gram-positive bacteria, invasive pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, and group A streptococcal disease were more common when vitamin D3 levels were low, raising the possibility that pharmacological doses of vitamin D3 could be an effective adjuvant therapy (Cannell and Hollis 2008; Bekele et al. 2018).
Omega − 3 is a long chain-polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA), an essential type of nutrient to human body, that can exist in many forms of fatty acid chains like docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) (Saini and Keum 2018). Omega-3 has proven its efficacy as adjunctive therapy in autism and ADHD alongside cardiovascular diseases and gut microbiota dysbiosis (He 2009; Manson et al. 2012; Costantini et al. 2017; Robertson et al. 2017; Infante et al. 2020). In the current study, omega-3 had a minimum effect on both Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial log reductions. While E. coli and P. aeruginosa had low log reduction (0.4 and 0.3, respectively) when treated with 100mg/mL of omega-3 treatment, Gram positive bacteria S. aureus had insignificant effect. Meanwhile, C. albicans did not show any significant effect even when treated with the highest concentration of omega-3 (Fig. 4A). In a recent study, it was noted that the pure Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) separate preparation obtained for investigation use, promoted the complete killing of S. epidermidis and S. aureus in planktonic form by using the highest concertation 5 mg/mL. On the other hand, the fatty acids in the study mentioned above showed low activity against P. aeruginosa (Coraça-Huber et al. 2021). Furthermore, a study made by using the bio-converted EPA and DHA omega-3 components displaying antibacterial activities against Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacter aerogenes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis, S. typhimurium) (Shin et al. 2007; Kannan et al. 2021). The growth inhibition by both bio-converted EPA and DHA was similar against Gram-positive bacteria, but the bio-converted extract of DHA was more effective than EPA against Gram-negative bacteria (Shin et al. 2007). Another study investigated the antimicrobial activity of the short, medium and long-chain fatty acids for oral microorganisms especially C. albicans. Long chain fatty acids (LCFAs), including n-3(omega-3), n-6, n-7, and n-9 fatty acids have been reported to have anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities. The SCFAs and LCFAs showed limited bio-activity against the oral fungal species (Huang et al. 2011). To explain this different outcome than our study, it is suggested in a recent investigation made on components of omega-3 (Pal et al. 2020), stating that the intake of EPA and DHA together may cause competition of both molecules against each other through interposed mechanisms. First, EPA and DHA may compete for residency in membrane phospholipids of biomolecules surfaces like cell membranes. Moreover, EPA and DHA induce different effects onto plasma membrane structures, building an additional layer of competition between the fatty acids in successive signaling pathways. Third, DHA regulates membrane EPA levels by lowering its rate of conversion to EPA’s longer product n-3 docosapentaenoic acid DHA(Pal et al. 2020).
As for the combination treatment effect of vitamin D3 and omega-3 on bacterial and fungal growth, our study showed that for Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, 27 µM of vitamin D3 and 13.5 mM of omega-3 had a maximum effect of 0.5–0.6 log reductions. On the other hand, the same combination only had an approximately 0.4 log reduction for Gram positive bacteria, S. aureus, with no obvious effect on the highest concentration. While C. albicans had a different outcome, where 1.1 log reduction was noticed at a combination of 108.2 µM vitamin D3 and 55 mM of omega-3 and 0.6–0.7 log reduction was seen for concentrations from 54.1 µM and 27.5 mM till 0.8 µM and 0.3 mM of vitamin D3 and omega-3 combined. The “weaker” effect of the combination could be understood by a possible chemical interaction between vitamin D3 and omega- 3. There is alcohol groups in the chemical structure of vitamin D3 and carboxylic acid moieties in the chemical structure of omega-3 (Sebrell 1971; Valenzuela and Valenzuela 2013). Such interaction might result in the esterification of both structures producing a bulkier compound (Neises and Steglich 1978; Hughes et al. 1988), offering an obstacle in crossing through bacterial membranes. Considering that the esterification reaction needs special conditions like acidic media and heat (Neises and Steglich 1978). These conditions are present in the in vitro experiments as the heat source is supplied through incubation conditions and acidic moieties are mainly embedded in the Gram-positive bacteria cell wall (Gupta et al. 2021). Combination treatment had the lowest effect on log reductions of S. aureus (Gram-positive bacteria). S. aureus bacteria have many acid components on the surface of its cell wall, e.g., teichoic and lipoteichoic acids, in addition to multiple layers of peptidoglycan containing N-acetylmuramic acid (Gupta et al. 2021). Whereas combination treatment had a greater effect on the log reductions of Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, within recommended daily doses. This could possibly be due to Gram-negative bacteria having only a thin layer of peptidoglycan and limited acidic moieties on its cell wall surface (Beveridge 1999).
C. albicans demonstrated a different behavior in combination treatment since it prefers an acidic environment, thus, it can adjust the pH of its surroundings (Mayer et al. 2013). This way C. albicans encourages the formation of ester bonds, producing the bulky structure of the supplements used. Nevertheless, C. albicans can possibly degrade ester bonds through the secretion of enzymes and polymorphism to benefit from the carbon skeleton of supplements (Sorgo et al. 2013). Considering that C. albicans might secret enzymes and proteins as a form of nutritional acquisition (Gil-Bona et al. 2015), allowing the penetration of separated supplement structures and producing the log reduction effect on its growth curve.
Furhtermore, in our study, the high concentrations of vitamin D3 108.2 µM and omega-3 55 mM combination treatment was noticed to have lower inhibitory effects than combination with lower concentrations on both Gram positive and negative bacteria. It is proposed that both Gram positive and negative bacteria showed Eagle effect (Goldstein and Rosdahl 1981; Grandière-Pérez et al. 2005; Jarrad et al. 2018; Prasetyoputri et al. 2019), where bacteria exposed to drug concentrations higher than an optimal bactericidal concentration have paradoxically increased levels of survival than at the optimal bactericidal concentration due to a decreased rate of cell death (Goldstein and Rosdahl 1981; Prasetyoputri et al. 2019). This phenomenon has been explained by few mechanisms. The first mechanism is the aggregation of molecules in aqueous media. It is possible that the aggregation of both omega-3 and vitamin D3 in vitro occur at the surface of bacteria leading to a larger agglomerated bulky structure, as mentioned previously. The agglomerated form might be detected as bacterial colonies leading to higher growth readings(Jarrad et al. 2018). The second mechanism suggested is the reduced expression of binding receptors on the cell wall of bacteria, these receptors are used by drug treatment to enter and eradicate bacteria. The third mechanism might be bacteria self-antagonizing its own receptors as a form of resistance to high concentrations of drug exposure, halting down the effect of antimicrobial effect. Hence, detecting higher bacterial growth readings will be observed in such case too (Goldstein and Rosdahl 1981; Jarrad et al. 2018).
It is suggested based on our in vitro observation that taking vitamin D3 alone as adjunctive therapy in the recommended daily dose is advantageous in cases of pathogenic gut infections. It does not only potentiate immunity and gut microbiota abundance but also it has a log reduction effect onto the growth of Gram positive, negative, and fungal microorganism. On the other hand, it is not advised to consider omega-3 supplement as adjunctive therapy, depending on our observations, omega-3 had minimum log reduction effect on pathogenic bacteria.
On the other hand, in case of combination treatment of both vitamin D3 and omega-3, log reductions were lower than that of separated therapy and thus vitamin D3 lost its strong log reduction effect on pathogenic gut bacteria. The argument here is how much combination adjunctive treatment can help in reducing pathogenicity and slowing down the growth rate of gut pathogens. As mentioned previously that 1 log reduction is indicating that 90% of microorganism load is reduced (De Vries and Hamilton 1999), and so 0.5 log reduction indicate 66.6% of microorganism load is reduced. This may reduce the pathogenic microbial infectious dose and reduce the load on immune system to defeat the infection. By this, we highlight that the goal here is not to fully eradicate the infection rather than offering an adjunctive therapy for the immune system to attain hemostasis over pathogenic state again.
In conclusion, the combination of both supplements (vitamin D3 and Omega-3) resulted in decreased antimicrobial effect of vitamin D3 and omega-3 individually. Therefore, depending on our results, we suggest a similar in vivo study to evaluate if the combination should be taken together or not. Subsequently, a recommendation about taking both suplplements together or leaving a time-separation interval can be made. Further studies are required to elucidate any proposed chemical interaction between both supplement chemical structures, to understand the mechanism of bacterial eradication of separate and combined treatments, and to further orchestrate the best use either separate or combined treatment as antimicrobial supplement adjunctive option.