DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-27905/v1
Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) combined with anterior monosegmental column reconstruction in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Methods: From January 2011 to August 2017, thirty-five patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent posterior PPSF combined surgery with delayed anterior monosegmental reconstruction utilizing titanium mesh cages. Clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and treatment-related complications were assessed.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 44.8 years. The mean operative time and blood loss were 205 min and 560 ml, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 25.2 months. The Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score was significantly improved postoperatively, and the improvement was maintained until the final follow-up. The mean sagittal kyphosis was corrected from 16.3 preoperatively to 1.5 postoperatively, which increased slightly to 2.6 at the final follow-up. In 24 patients with neurologic dysfunction, 21 (87.5 %) patients had improvement after surgery. None obvious subsidence of the titanium mesh cage and none dislodgement, loosening or breakage of the instrumentation was observed in any patient during the follow-up period. Solid bony fusion was achieved in all patients.
Conclusions: Combined posterior PPSF with delayed anterior monosegmental column reconstruction for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures can produce good clinical and radiological outcomes.
Combined posterior–anterior stabilization for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures has been advocated and successfully used [1–4]. The combined approach can provide the greatest stability, minimize the number of levels fused, and allow for a direct decompression of the spinal canal. There are numerous minimally invasive combined posterior–anterior techniques have attempted to decrease the associated morbidity. These have included combining vertebral augmentation with pedicle screw instrumentation [5, 6], transpedicular corpectomy with expandable cage combined with pedicle screw fixation [7], and minimally invasive corpectomy and posterior pedicle instrumentation [8, 9]. However, the optimal surgical treatment strategy for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial.
Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures are characterized by loss of height of the anterior vertebral body, failure of the posterior tension band or retropulsion of fracture fragments into the spinal canal. However, vertebral body comminution often with the inferior endplate intact or shows a simple split fracture line only. Recently, some studies introduced the technique of anterior monosegmental reconstruction and reported good clinical and radiological outcomes for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures [10, 11]. As opposed to bisegmental anterior column reconstruction, monosegmental reconstruction can spare one spinal motion segment and reduce the distance for osseous bridging to achieve bony fusion. Additionally, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has rapidly gained acceptance with expanding indications [9, 12, 13], and reported benefits include decreased muscle damage, less postoperative pain, and decreased blood loss [14]. However, there are no studies to date that have assessed the feasibility and outcomes of posterior PPSF combined with anterior monosegmental column reconstruction in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.
The aim of the present study, therefore, was to assess the feasibility as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior PPSF combined with anterior monosegmental column reconstruction in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients with traumatic unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures admitted to our institution from January 2011 to August 2017. The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (1) type B or type C according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System [15]; (2) a score greater than 6 according to the load-sharing classification score [16]; (3) unnecessary for a patient to have a posterior spinal decompression, such as vertical lamina fracture; (4) the inferior endplate and the caudal intervertebral disc were confirmed to be intact or features only a single simple split fracture line by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans. The exclusion criteria included two or more levels vertebral burst fractures, pathological or osteoporotic fracture, complete neurological injury, a history of previous spine surgery and severe multiple injuries.
All surgical procedures were performed by the same surgical group. The procedure of PPSF has been described in further detail in our previous study (Fig. 1) [17]. Using the percutaneous instruments, adequate distraction of the posterior column was performed and then instruments were locked. After that, we compressed the posterior column and distracted the anterior and central columns, and the screws were tightened. Posterior laminectomy and fusion were not performed in any patient. The anterior monosegmental column reconstruction was generally performed some time after the percutaneous posterior surgery. Details of the anterior monosegmental column reconstruction technique are well described in previous literature [10, 11]. Briefly, the patient was placed in the right decubitus position and intubated with one-lung ventilation. In general, a left-sided approach performed through a retroperitoneal or extrapleural approach. After the burst vertebral body exposure, the cephalic disc was resected, and partial corpectomy of the vertebral body was performed to achieve complete canal decompression, while the lower portion of the vertebral body and the caudal disc was preserved. Then, the titanium mesh cage filled with cancellous bone from the partial corpectomy was monosegmentally implanted between the inferior endplate of the fractured vertebra and the inferior endplate of the cephalad intact vertebra. Anterior instrumentation fixation was not used in any patient. All the patients were mobilized at 3–5 days after the anterior surgery, and encouraged to walk or move with hyperextension braces, which was usually worn for about 2 months.
All patients were evaluated on admission, and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and then annually thereafter. Patient demographics, the mechanism and location of injury, duration from the initial injury to the posterior surgery, duration from the posterior surgery to the anterior surgery, time of follow-up, operative time, blood loss, and complications (related to either the posterior or the anterior approach) were investigated by reviewing the medical records. The level of pain was assessed using a Visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain. Spinal cord injury was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment classification before surgery and at the final follow-up visit. The patients’ work ability was determined at each time point.
All imaging measurements were obtained with a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) v3.0 (RADinfo, Hangzhou, China). Two independent experienced observers reviewed the imaging findings and consensus was reached when the initial reading of the two observers differed. The local kyphosis angle (LKA) was measured using the sagittal Cobb angle on the lateral radiograph, which was defined as the angle between the cranial endplate of the superior vertebra and the caudal endplate of the inferior vertebra to the fractured vertebra. Subsidence of the titanium mesh cage was observed during the follow-up period. Bony fusion was evaluated using reconstructed CT scans and flexion–extension radiographs. A fusion was confirmed by a progressive increase in interspace bone density and blurring of the adjacent endplate, as well as by the presence of continuous bony bridge bone on flexion-extension radiographs and CT scans.
The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Metric scaled data are reported as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation and categorical data as absolute frequency and percentage distribution. Paired student’s t test was used to compare the difference between preoperative and postoperative results. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Thirty-five patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures underwent posterior PPSF with delayed anterior monosegmental column reconstruction surgery at the authors’ institution. Typical patient images were displayed in Figs. 2. As demonstrated in Table 1, the mean age of the patients was 44.8 ± 12.3 (range 31–58) years; the sample comprised 26 men and 9 women. The causes of injury were falling from a height in 22 patients, motor vehicle accident in 9 patients and a blunt contusion from a heavy falling object in 4 patients. Eight patients presented with other traumatic injuries. The burst fracture was at L2 in 16 patients, L1 in 12, T12 in 4, T11 in 1, and L3 in 2. According to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System, type B in 29 patients, and type C in 6 patients. Vertebral body fracture classified according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System was subtype A3 in 28 patients, and subtype A4 in 7 patients. The mean load sharing score was 8.1 ± 0.9 (range 7–9). The mean follow-up was 25.2 ± 14.1 (range 18–68) months.
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 44.8 ± 12.3 | 31–58 |
| Sex (male) | 26 | - |
| Mechanism of injury | ||
| Fall from height | 22 | - |
| Motor vehicle accident Other | 9 4 | - - |
| Level of fracture T11 T12 L1 L2 L3 | 1 4 12 16 2 | - - - - - |
| AOSpine type Type B Type C AOSpine VB A3 A4 Load sharing score | 29 6 28 7 8.1 ± 0.9 | 7–9 |
| Follow-up time (months) | 25.2 ± 14.1 | 18–68 |
| Time from the initial injury to the first surgery(days) Time from the first surgery to the second surgery(days) Length of hospitalization(days) Posterior operative time(min) Posterior blood loss(ml) Anterior operative time(min) Anterior blood loss(ml) Complications Transient pulmonary complications Transient paralytic ileus Dysesthesia | 3.8 ± 2.4 6.3 ± 2.9 20.5 ± 11.7 85 ± 15 50 ± 25 124 ± 28 510 ± 185 3 2 2 | 2–8 4–10 14–32 60–120 30–80 90–160 300–800 - - - |
| AOSpine type, injury type according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar | ||
| Spine Injury Classification System; AOSpine VB vertebral body (VB) fracture classified according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System | ||
| Parameter | Preoperation | Postoperation Final follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| VAS pain score | 8.9 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.5 |
| ODI score | 91.6 ± 8.5 | 28.5 ± 9.3 22.7 ± 7.8 |
| LKA | 17.6 ± 12.3 | 3.2 ± 1.8 4.7 ± 2.1 |
| Values are presented as the mean ± SD; VAS, Visual analog scale; ODI, Oswestry disability index; LKA, Local kyphosis angle. | ||
The mean posterior operative time and blood loss were 85 ± 15 (range 60–120) min and 50 ± 25 (range 30–80) ml, respectively. The mean anterior operative time and blood loss were 124 ± 28 (range 90–160) min and 510 ± 185 (range 300–800) ml, respectively. The mean duration from the initial injury to the first surgery was 3.8 ± 2.4 (range 2–8) days; the mean duration from the first surgery to the second surgery was 6.3 ± 2.9 (range 4–10) days. The mean length of hospitalization was 20.5 ± 11.7 (range, 14–32) days. Complications occurred in 7 patients. There were three cases of transient pulmonary complications, two cases of transient paralytic ileus, and two of dysesthesia that all cases could be treated conservatively. No patients experienced wound infection, intraoperative neurovascular injury, or cage-related complications requiring revision surgery.
The mean VAS pain score was improved from 8.6 ± 1.2 points preoperatively to 3.1 ± 0.4 points postoperatively (P = 0.028). At the final follow-up visit, the mean VAS pain score was 2.5 ± 0.4 points, which demonstrated no significant variation compared with the postoperative VAS pain score (P = 0.093).
According to the ASIA impairment classification, the preoperative neurological function was graded as B in 2 patients, C in 6 patients, D in 16 patients, and E in 11 patients. At the final follow-up visit, the neurological function was recorded as follows: B in 1 patient, C in 2 patients, D in 6 patients, and E in 26 patients. In 24 patients with preoperative neurologic dysfunction, 21 (87.5%) patients showed improvement after surgery.
Eighteen patients returned to work within 6 months and a further 12 returned to work subsequently. At the time of the final follow-up, 20 of 30 patients had returned to a similar job, and 10 patients changed to a less physically demanding job.
Preoperatively, the mean LKA was 16.3 ± 12.7 (range, -3.4 to 28.2) degrees. Through surgical treatment, the mean LKA was reached to 1.5 ± 7.3 (range, -10.5 to 10.3) degrees, which has a significant correction (P < 0.001). At the final follow-up, the mean LKA was 2.6 ± 5.2 (range, -5.8 to 13.8) degrees. No significant differences were found between postoperatively and at the final follow-up visit (P = 0.082). Bony fusion of the titanium mesh cage was eventually achieved in all patients at mean 10.5 ± 2.7 months postoperatively. None obvious subsidence of the titanium mesh cage and none dislodgement, loosening or breakage of the instrumentation requiring revision surgery was observed in any patient during the follow-up period.
Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures are common spinal injury frequent results severe spinal canal compromise, collapse of anterior and middle spinal columns, a significant posterior element lesion, severe neurological injury and local kyphosis deformity. Regardless of the management strategy, the conventional major goals of treatment are typically early fracture stabilization, reduction of neurologic deficit and correction of kyphotic deformity. However, recently, some update goals of treatment have been recognized including minimally invasive surgery and limiting the motion segments fused. Following this principle, several studies have reported favorable outcomes with PPSF or monosegmental anterior reconstruction for selected thoracolumbar fractures [10–12, 27, 28]. However, there are no studies on combined posterior PPSF with anterior monosegmental column reconstruction in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. This study is the first report systematically evaluating the feasibility and outcome of posterior PPSF with delayed anterior monosegmental column reconstruction for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Our study found that the clinical and radiographical outcomes were significantly improved postoperatively and maintained well at the final follow-up. Especially no major complications requiring revision surgery during follow-up, indicating that this technique is a valuable surgical option for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Currently, most authors prefer an anterior-only or posterior-only approach surgical technique to treat unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures and good results had been reported [17–20]. Hitchon et al. [21] reported that a 5% (2/38) failure rate treated by anterior instrumentation alone and a repeated surgery that involved posterior instrumentation-augmented with fusion was required, and a rate of 8% (2/25) with posterior instrumentation complications necessitating repeated operation in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. In the study about anterior decompression and stabilization reported by Kaneda et al. [22], the failure rate was 7% (10/150) with pseudarthrosis necessitating posterior instrumentation and fusion. McAfee et al. [23] reported the failure rate was 6% (2/35) when the Kaneda dual rod–screw construct was used. Sasso et al. [24] reported a statistical significance loss (averaged 8.1 degrees) of the sagittal LKA in posterior-only short-segment group at follow-up. Though a posterior long segmental fixation and fusion can provide more rigid support, it reduces the range of motion and leads to troubles in the activities of daily living [25, 26].
To overcome the disadvantages of anterior-only and posterior-only approach, many authors have reported satisfactory results with a combined anterior–posterior approach [8–11]. However, it was generally believed that the conventional combined anterior–posterior approach has more surgical invasiveness and morbidity than those of an anterior-only or posterior-only approach. Recently, a few studies [27, 28] have combined posterior pedicle instrumentation with percutaneous augmented stabilization of the anterior column, yielding encouraging preliminary results in osteoporotic and younger patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures, however, some certain concerns arise from this technique include the long-term outcomes was unclear, the cement-related complications, the concern pertains to the use of cement in younger patients. This study presents another potential surgical technique with less morbidity, blood loss, paraspinal muscle damage and pain. PPSF is increasingly widespread in the spine surgery and gains rapid acceptance with expanding indications [12, 29]. PPSF was performed by sparing the paravertebral musculature and avoiding damage to the zygapophysial joint. Some studies have demonstrated that percutaneous procedures were superior in terms of iatrogenic soft-tissue injury, incision size, blood loss, postoperative pain, and the length of hospitalization compared open procedures, which make rehabilitation easier and faster [30–32]. Previous studies have quantified the amount of muscle injury during surgical exposure of the spine with measurements of serum creatine kinase [33, 34]. Percutaneous procedures were found to result in significantly lower levels of serum creatine kinase than open lumbar fusions. Disadvantages of this technique include exposed the spine surgeon, staff, and patient to significantly greater radiation levels, as well as an initially longer operative time during the learning curve compared open procedures [35]. In addition, because of corpectomy, an anterior column reconstruction performed within the first few days after the traumatic event, generally results in significant blood loss [18, 34]. In study by McDonough et al. [18], an average blood loss of 1750 ml was reported for patients who underwent surgery within 24 hours after admission. In study by Carl et al. [36], an average blood loss of 2300 ml and an average of a 4-day delay until surgery after the accident were reported. However, Tofuku et al. [37] reported an average blood loss of 545 ml in combined delayed staged anterior surgery. In the present study, the average blood loss was 516 ml in combined delayed staged anterior surgery, which was more favorable and less invasive than the conventional one-stage combined procedure, and also comparable with that of Tofuku et al. [37].
In contrast to the conventional anterior reconstruction, the lower portion of the injured vertebral body and the caudal disc was preserved during anterior monosegmental reconstruction in our patients. Monosegmental reconstruction can spare one spinal motion segment and reduce the distance of osseous bridging to achieve bony fusion. Lindtner et al. [10] reported satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes of monosegmental reconstruction with a mean correction of − 15.6 ± 7.7° and postoperative loss of correction averaged 2.7 ± 2.7°. Lai et al. [11] reported the mean sagittal LKA was corrected from 21.2 preoperatively to 2.5 postoperatively, and increased slightly to 4.3 at the final follow-up. In our case series, LKA correction was also effectively improved postoperatively and maintained during 25.2 months of follow-up. Lai et al. [11] reported that the mean operative time and blood loss were 230 min and 645 ml, respectively, with the monosegmental anterior reconstruction combined with conventional open posterior surgery, whereas the mean operative time and blood loss were 205 min and 560 ml, respectively, in our series. Posterior instrumentation removal after monosegmental anterior reconstruction, however, is essential to restore mobility in the nonfused segment and to provide the patients with the potentially beneficial effects of sparing one motion segment, although this was not evaluated in this study. We routinely recommended implant removal to our patients after monosegmental anterior reconstruction, however, half of the patients refused removal. Another some patients have not come back for posterior implant removal during our follow-up. Further studies needed to be carried out to investigate the value of monosegmental anterior reconstruction and the potential additional risks of posterior implant removal.
One of the concerns regarding the anterior monosegmental reconstruction technique was titanium mesh cage subsidence since the loading surface of the residual vertebral body was cancellous bone. Lindtner et al. [10] analyzed the incidence of subsidence treated by combined posterior–anterior stabilization and either anterior monosegmental (18 patients) or bisegmental (19 patients) reconstruction using the expandable vertebral body replacement device. Subsidence were observed in 5 patients after anterior monosegmental but none after bisegmental reconstruction and two risk factors for subsidence with anterior monosegmental reconstruction were proposed: positioning the titanium mesh cage onto the weak cancellous bone as not close enough to the inferior endplate and onto a sort of “free floating” inferior endplate fragment created by the presence of multiple fracture lines. We have initially realized these pitfalls, thus the titanium mesh cage was monosegmentally implanted close enough to the inferior endplate of the cephalad intact vertebra and one of the inclusion criteria was the inferior endplate and the caudal intervertebral disc were confirmed to be intact or features only a single simple split fracture line by MRI and CT scans. In present study, however, bony fusion was achieved in all patients, and none obvious subsidence of the titanium mesh cage. In addition, because of the anterior monosegmental reconstruction, lumbar motion would be theoretically improved after posterior instrumentation removal, although this was not evaluated in this study.
This study had several potential limitations. The study was retrospective by design. In addition, the study group was relatively small, limiting its statistical power. Furthermore, these findings are based on a retrospective chart review, which lacks a comparison group. Further randomized studies with a larger group and a comparison group would be helpful in terms of evaluating this issue.
Combined posterior PPSF with delayed anterior monosegmental column reconstruction for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures can produce good clinical and radiological outcomes. As long as the indications were correctly chosen, this minimally invasive procedure could be a valuable surgical option for the surgical treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.
ASIA- American Spinal Injury Association
CT - Computed tomography
LKA-Local kyphosis angle
MRI - Magnetic resonance imaging
PPSF- Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
VAS - Visual analog scale
Acknowledgements
No
Ethical review committee statement
Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of our hospital. Additionally, all patients gave written informed consent for their information to be stored in the hospital’s database and used for research.
Authors’ contributions
All authors were involved in conception and design. CL, WYY, FJL, and DWH contributed to study design. ZZC, KTJ, and JWG contributed to study conduct. WYY, FJL, and BP contributed to data collection and analysis. CL, FJL, and DWH contributed to data interpretation. CL, WYY, and DWH contributed to drafting of the manuscript. All authors take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was partially supported by the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation of China (LY17C100002), the Zhejiang Experimental Animal and Technology Program Foundation of China (2018C37099), the Zhejiang Province Scientifc Project of Health and Medicine of China (2018KY936).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board and the ethics committee of our institution. Patients or their family members agreed to our study, and signed the informed consents.
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests