See the published version of this article at Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: Case-control study
Yongzeng Feng
Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published version at Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.
Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous cross screws internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation.
Methods: We reviewed 66 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation from June 2005 to December 2017. Percutaneous cross screws internal fixation was performed in 40 patients, and open reduction and internal fixation was performed in 26 patients. The patient characteristics, surgical complications, radiographic and clinical outcomes and were compared.
Results: There was no statistically difference on the mean time from injury to surgery between the two groups. The time of operation, the amount of blood loss, the length of incision and the hospital stay were significantly shorter in the percutaneous cross screws internal fixation Group. No significant difference on Matta scores and Majeed scores between the two groups. The open reduction and internal fixation Group resulted in a higher rate of intraoperative hemorrhage, nerve injury, discomfort and pain.
Conclusion: Percutaneous cross screws internal fixation for Day Ⅱ type pelvic crescent fracture-dislocation was safe and effective. Minimally invasive fixation had the advantages of short operation and hospitalization time, less intraoperative bleeding and surgical trauma.
Keywords
Day type-II crescent fracture-dislocation, Minimally invasive fixation, Cross -screw fixation, Percutaneous internal fixation
Figure 1
Figure 2
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
Version 2
Posted 30 Dec, 2020
Published
On 09 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 28 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 20 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Dec, 2020
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 Sep, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 20 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 08 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 03 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 02 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Editor assigned
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Revise before review
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 01 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 May, 2020
First submitted
On 12 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: Case-control study
Yongzeng Feng
Wenzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
Version 2
Posted 30 Dec, 2020
Published
On 09 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 28 Dec, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 20 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Dec, 2020
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 30 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 Sep, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 20 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 08 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 04 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 03 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 02 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Editor assigned
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Revise before review
On 02 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 01 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 May, 2020
First submitted
On 12 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published version at Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.
Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous cross screws internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation.
Methods: We reviewed 66 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation from June 2005 to December 2017. Percutaneous cross screws internal fixation was performed in 40 patients, and open reduction and internal fixation was performed in 26 patients. The patient characteristics, surgical complications, radiographic and clinical outcomes and were compared.
Results: There was no statistically difference on the mean time from injury to surgery between the two groups. The time of operation, the amount of blood loss, the length of incision and the hospital stay were significantly shorter in the percutaneous cross screws internal fixation Group. No significant difference on Matta scores and Majeed scores between the two groups. The open reduction and internal fixation Group resulted in a higher rate of intraoperative hemorrhage, nerve injury, discomfort and pain.
Conclusion: Percutaneous cross screws internal fixation for Day Ⅱ type pelvic crescent fracture-dislocation was safe and effective. Minimally invasive fixation had the advantages of short operation and hospitalization time, less intraoperative bleeding and surgical trauma.
Figure 1
Figure 2