In the present study, we examined the epidemiology of breast cancer among Jewish and Bedouin women based on data from SUMC between 2014–2021. Our study found an interesting pattern of IBC in Bedouin women, that is significantly different from IBC among the Jewish population. While the incidence is higher among the Jewish population, Bedouin women diagnosed with IBC presented at a younger age with a larger tumor, a more advanced stage, and more metastases. A greater incidence of PR was observed in Bedouin women but not for ER and HER2 subtypes. The mortality rates were higher among Jewish women, while no significant differences in OS and DFS were found.
First, our study showed a significant difference in the age at diagnosis. Bedouin women’s mean age at diagnosis was 11 years younger than Jewish patients. Previous studies in Israel, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and others have shown a similar young onset, around age 50, among Arab-origin women [17–19]. Possible reasons for this finding may be due to differences in disease biology between the two populations, rapid growth of the younger Bedouin population, and potential under-diagnosis or incomplete registration of IBC in the elderly, leading to the under-representation of IBC cases in this group. Health policy is equal for both populations, as they are entitled to the same health services under Israeli National Health Insurance Law[20]. Additionally, Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics reports no difference in mammography screening adherence between Jewish and Bedouin women since 2011 [21]. Previous studies have highlighted challenges in accessing healthcare for the Bedouin population due to transportation, language, and socio-cultural barriers[22, 23]. However, under-diagnosis or lack of registration is difficult to determine as healthcare accessibility has improved with linguistic adaptation of the healthcare system and increased availability of early cancer diagnosis and treatment in Bedouin settlements and surrounding areas.[9, 10].
Second, we found that Bedouin women are diagnosed at a more advanced stage than Jewish women. As described, the Bedouin population is a minority group in Israel that counts for approximately 4% of the population. Previous works showed a similar trend in the Bedouin population[1] and in different minority groups [24, 25]. Biologic and minority characteristics might explain such differences. The observed overexpression of PR in the Bedouin population's biology could provide a supporting factor for the disparity in the diagnosis stage. While studies did not find a connection between PR overexpression as a single risk factor for worse prognosis [26] and wide-genome analysis of PR have shown minor variable genes in ER- and ER + tumors[27], others found aggressive phenotypes that were associated with poor prognosis[28]. Since the SUMC labs did not analyze data for subtypes of PR receptors, we could not recheck it. Nevertheless, multiple studies still question the need for PR analysis since its minor effect as a single predictor on stage at diagnosis [29, 30]. Hence, further evaluation might be needed to determine whether other biological factors might explain this difference. As described, although the Bedouin population is a minority group experiencing challenges accessing health services, the screening programs didn’t show any difference in adherence and accessibility for IBC screening since 2011, making it a less plausible explanation.
Third, we found that more Bedouin women were treated with neoadjuvant and chemotherapy treatments than Jewish women. In contrast, no difference was found in surgery and radiation between the groups. The rates of disease stage at diagnosis can explain this difference. While in both groups, the rate of those diagnosed in Stages 1 and 2 was similar (82% Jewish women and 80% Bedouin women), a significant difference was found in Stages 3 and 4; 19% of Bedouin women were diagnosed at Stage 4 in the Bedouin group, only 12% were diagnosed at this stage in the Jewish group. Previous studies found similar treatment trends, while staging was dramatically different. Based on data from 2004–2012, Lazarev et al showed that 62% of Bedouin and 64% of Jewish women were diagnosed with stages 1 and 2. Bedouin women had a higher percentage of stage 3 diagnoses (39% vs. 19% for Jewish women), and a higher percentage of stage 4 diagnosis (8% vs. 7% for Jewish women) [1]. The main goals in treating nonmetastatic breast cancer are eliminating the tumor and preventing recurrence. Local therapy involves surgery and possibly radiation, while systemic treatment depends on the tumor subtype. Endocrine therapy is prescribed for all tumors with hormone receptor positivity (HR+), while HER2 + tumors receive trastuzumab-based antibody therapy and chemotherapy. Triple-negative breast cancer is treated with chemotherapy alone.[31, 32]. As described, no difference between groups regarding triple negative and HER2 + was found, so it is reasonable to assume there was no difference among groups based on this tumor characteristic. In metastatic breast cancer, therapy goals are to extend the life and alleviate symptoms. Hence, surgery and radiation are considered only in palliative settings. In most cases, the first line of therapy will be more radical, using chemotherapy and other treatments based on specific tumor characteristics[31, 32].
We did not find a significant association between ethnicity and OS nor for DFS. Furthermore, in the Bedouin stage 4 group, the OS was better than the Jewish stage 4 group, while age-sub analysis of OS did not differ. Lazarev et al has previously shown that Bedouin women had worse OS and DFS rates than Jewish women[1]. The possible differences between the past study and ours, in the context of OS and DFS, could be explained by the improvement in primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of IBC[9, 33, 34]. Over the past decade, primary prevention efforts to raise awareness about the importance of Oncologic, and particularly IBC, screening have been successful in the Israeli population by implementing multilingual educational campaigns via television, newsletters, and other media outlets in Hebrew, Arab, Russian, English, and French languages[14, 35]. Moreover, a report published by the Israel Center for Disease Control, in 2008 described 51 women's and primary care clinics in the Bedouin community, which comprised at the time of approximately 184,000 residents[36, 37].
In addition, according to the 2013 State Comptroller's Report, the oncology department at Soroka had only 22 beds in 2012, responsible for more than a million residents, and was almost closed due to a lack of staff. However, the report stated that a governmental program to grant better access to healthcare in the southern periphery had been established and funded [38]. This historical lack of access to healthcare facilities and the cultural difference could have contributed to the lower survival rate in previous studies. A study examining a similar difference in the epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer between the Jewish and Bedouin populations on data from 1997–2013 showed a low response in the Bedouin population to screening tests and worse OS compared to the Jewish population [10]. It has been established that secondary prevention, leading to early diagnosis of breast cancer, is a crucial strategy for preventing its progression[9]. This is particularly important for populations that have limited access to healthcare facilities. In the case of Bedouin women in Israel, a report published by the Israeli government revealed that from 2008 to 2020, there was a rise of approximately 150% in the number of clinics operating in the Bedouin settlements. The report showed that over 70 clinics serving the Bedouin population, which at the time of the report consisted of approximately 270,000 residents [15]. To further improve access to IBC screenings, multiple interventions, such as a mobile mammography unit, started operating in the Israeli periphery in 2006. It aimed to increase adherence among women living in geographically and socially peripheral areas. Due to increased demand, another mobile unit was funded in 2011, making mammography examinations more accessible, causing a steady increase in compliance rates for IBC screenings among Bedouin women [14]. Previous works have shown that early treatment is crucial for improving the survival rate of breast cancer patients [38]. This highlights the importance of having access to healthcare facilities, particularly those with oncology departments, close to one's home to maintain tertiary prevention. In this context, opening the SUMC cancer center in 2018 might have significantly impacted the Bedouin population. It provides better access to oncologic and multidisciplinary care, including cancer screenings, diagnostic tests, and treatment options. SUMC cancer center allows patients to receive comprehensive care in one location rather than traveling long distances for different aspects of their treatment. This improves the patient's experience, prognosis, and quality of life[9]. In the study by Lazarev et al., the sample size was 265. However, we had a larger sample size (n = 1705), and no significant differences in OS and DFS were found between Bedouin and Jewish IBC patients. This discrepancy might reflect a non-accurate effect described. However, it is unlikely that Lazarev et al. work did not represent the larger population due to similar trends in other oncologic fields and the very significant p-value found.
While studying the epidemiology of breast cancer in Jewish and Bedouin women, we should consider the significant societal changes the Bedouin community are undergoing. Traditionally, Bedouin society has been a semi-tribal, isolated minority emphasizing family, community, and cultural and traditional beliefs [38,39]. However, in recent times, Bedouin society is becoming more modern and urbanized, driven by improved access to education and employment, modern technology, media exposure, and urbanization [11].
Limitations:
Our study is a single-site retrospective cohort study that may have limitations due to its time frame for patient selection. However, the large sample size and similarities in screening characteristics between papulations suggest that the trends found in this study may hold in the future. It is well-established that multiple factors influence breast cancer, including genetics, reproductive factors, and lifestyle [9]. Limitations in the data gathered on factors such as parity, BMI, diabetes, and family history of IBC, prevented us from comparing the prevalence of these factors and may have led to a confounding bias. Moreover, the lack of data regarding the Ki-67 marker precluded the ability to analyze luminal A and B IBC subtypes. Despite not finding differences in OS and DFS, it is essential to note that other factors, such as age and stage of diagnosis, do differ. Therefore, it is crucial to continue researching the epidemiology of breast cancer in Jewish and Bedouin women to better understand the differences and similarities. Furthermore, since a similar difference of prognosis was seen in the Bedouin population in other oncological diseases, such as colorectal cancer[10], it is worthwhile to examine whether intervention prevention programs showed a similar trend in other diseases and other populations.