Cells, samples and Plasmids
293T cells (ATCC, Rockefeller, MD, USA) were grown in DMEM (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, USA) containing 2 mmol/L L-glutamine (Amresco, Solon, USA), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone, Logan, USA), and antibiotics (100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 mg/ml streptomycin). Peripheral blood samples were obtained from patients who came to Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University and volunteered for detection of SMN1 exon deletion. Plasmids pcDNA3.1-GBP1 and pcDNA3.1-SMN2 was synthesized by whole gene (Sangon Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). The use of data and medical record was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided their written informed consents.
Deletion of SMN1 exons 7/8
The copy number of exon 7/8 of SMN1 was detected by PCR-melting curve method (Tianlong Technology Co., Ltd. Xian, China). Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 95℃ for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 95℃ for 10 seconds and 60℃ for 15 seconds. This was followed by a dissolution profile at 95°C for 1 minute and 40°C for 1 minute. The data is normalized by the software, and the P value and R value are calculated. When the P value is zero, it is homozygous deletion, when R≤0.70, it is heterozygous deletion, and no deletion was defined when R≥0.74.
Detection of SMN2 copies by digital PCR
The copy numbers of SMN2 were measured in each DNA sample using the QX200 Droplet Analyzer (BIO-RAD, USA). The patient's peripheral blood DNA was extracted with DNA rapid extraction kit (Sangon Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) and its concentration was measured. Subsequent digital PCR assays, where droplets are first prepared, followed by PCR with probe: 5¢FAM-AAGGCAAGGCATTAC-3¢MGB, Thermal cycling conditions consisted of 95℃ for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 94℃ for 30 seconds and 60℃ for 1 minute, then heat inactivated at 98°C for 10 minutes. Finally, droplet analysis and detection13.
Transfection
Monolayer culture of 293T cells, grown overnight in a six-well dish, was transfected with different amounts of pcDNA3.1-GBP1 and pcDNA3.1-SMN2 by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Simultaneously blank group and mock group were set. The cells were incubated at 37℃ in a 5% CO2 incubator and harvested at different times for RT-qPCR and Protein quantification described later.
Quantitative real-time PCR
RT-qPCR was performed to determine SMN2 and GBP1 after transfecting 293T cells. Briefly, infected cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 1.5mg RNA samples were reverse transcribed with the primers of oligo dT and at 70℃ 5min, and the cDNA was further synthesized 5 min on ice, then 5 min at 20℃, 1 h at 42℃, and 15 min at 70℃ and then stored at 4℃. The qPCR was performed by using SYBR green probe (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. Beijing, China). The primers for the GBP1 gene were as follows: forward primer, 5¢- AGGAGTTCCTTCAAAGATGTGGA-3¢; reverse primer, 5¢- TTCTGAACAAAGAGACGATAGCC-3¢ and the SMN2 gene were as follows: forward primer, 5¢- CTATCATGCTGGCTGCCTCCATT-3¢; reverse primer, 5¢- TGTCTAAAACCCATATAATAGCC-3¢. Thermal cycling conditions included 15min at 95℃, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95℃ and 1min at 60℃. The specificity of the qPCR products was verified by melting point analysis from 45℃ to 95℃.
Protein quantification by BCA
The protein concentrations were measured by using BCA protein assay kit (Sangon Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) and generated standard curves using dilutions of bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). We normalized samples to 1gram total soluble protein from BCA-analysis. SMN2 protein levels in transfected cells were quantified using the standardized SMN2 ELISA (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) and expressed as nanogram per 1 gram of total protein14,15.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). The comparison was conducted using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.