Combating the melioidosis pathogen using antibiotics in combination with silver nanoparticles

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-28231/v1

PDF

Research

Combating the melioidosis pathogen using antibiotics in combination with silver nanoparticles

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-28231/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted 28 May, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the Gram-negative bacillus bacterium, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Due to the emerging resistance of B. pseudomallei to antibiotics, including ceftazidime (CAZ), the development of novel antibiotics and alternative modes of treatment has become an urgent issue. Here, we demonstrate an ability to synergistically increase the efficiency of antibiotics through their combination with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs).

Method:

Combinations of four conventional antibiotics, including CAZ, imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MER), or gentamicin sulfate (GENT), with AgNPs were tested for their bactericidal effects against three isolates of B. pseudomallei, including 1026b, H777, and 316c, using the microdilution checkerboard method of antibiotic and AgNPs mixing. Morphological changes in the bacteria after treatment with the combined antibiotic-AgNPs was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Result

The combination of four antibiotics with AgNPs gave fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index values and fractional bactericidal concentration (FBC) index values ranging from 0.312 to 0.75 µg/mL and 0.252 to 0.625 µg/mL, respectively, against the three isolates of B. pseudomallei. SEM imaging revealed damage to the bacterial cell structure at the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and FIC levels, while extreme severe cellular damage was observed at the FBC level. Surprisingly, at the FBC level, the bacteria produced large amounts of fibers that are the components of biofilm.

Conclusion

The study clearly shows that most of the combinatorial treatments exhibited synergistic antimicrobial effects against all three isolates of B. pseudomallei. The highest enhancing effect was observed for GENT with AgNPs. We also found that the combination of these antibiotics with AgNPs restored their bactericidal potency in the bacterial strains previously shown to be resistant to the antibiotic. The observed synergistic activities of conventional antibiotics with AgNPs suggest that it might also be possible to achieve equivalent or higher levels of bacterial cell death with lower concentrations of antibiotics using the combined treatments. These results support the use of the antibiotic/AgNPs combination as an alternative design strategy for new therapeutics to more effectively combat melioidosis.

Infectious Diseases

General Microbiology

Melioidosis

Burkholderia pseudomallei

Silver nanoparticles

Ceftazidime

Synergism

Exopolysaccharide

Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by the Gram-negative bacillus bacterium, Burkholderia pseudomallei. This organism is an important causative agent of septicemia and is community acquired. It is believed to be vastly underreported, with ~ 165,000 cases worldwide and a fatality rate of approximately 89,000 per year (1). The incidence of melioidosis is highest in Southeast Asia and northern Australia, with a case fatality rate of 40% in northeast Thailand and 19% in Australia (2, 3). Currently, no licensed vaccine against melioidosis has been established in clinical use. Melioidosis has been dubbed “the great imitator” as it presents with great clinical diversity, and several of its symptoms are often confounded with those of other diseases, such as tuberculosis (4). Furthermore, melioidosis can also be asymptomatic sometimes. Altogether, these features make the disease difficult to diagnose.

The selection of antibiotics for the treatment of melioidosis is limited due to the bacteria’s resistance to several commonly prescribed antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolone compounds, and many β-lactam antibiotics (5, 6). Ceftazidime (CAZ), a third-generation antibiotic of the cephalosporin family, is recommended as a first-line therapy for the treatment of severe melioidosis (7–9). CAZ works by interfering with bacterial cell wall synthesis. Carbapenem antibiotics, such as imipenem and meropenem, have also shown potent activity against B. pseudomallei (10, 11). Although the resistance of B. pseudomallei to CAZ is rare, it has been demonstrated to exist both in vitro and in vivo (6, 12, 13). Moreover, as with any antibiotic, repeated exposure to the drug through increased use elevates the risk of developing bacterial resistance over time. The increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance has become a serious public health problem worldwide, and alternative therapies that can overcome resistance and prevent future resistance are urgently needed. One approach to controlling bacterial resistance is through using a combination of antibiotics with other agents that increase the efficacy of the antibiotic. These agents include other antibiotics (14–16), antimicrobial peptides (17, 18), plant extract (19, 20), and nanoparticles (21, 22).

Nanoparticles are of great interest for researchers as they have unique physical, chemical, and electrical properties that differ from bulk materials. Such properties are the result of the shape and size of the nanoparticles, which have a high surface-area-to-volume ratio due to their small size. Among the nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have attracted the most attention because they have broad-spectrum efficacy against several microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, with low cytotoxicity to mammalian cells (23, 24). AgNPs have multiple modes of action that lead to bacterial cell killing, including the rupture of the bacterial cell membrane through AgNP adherence and the penetration of the AgNPs into the cell and nucleus, resulting in binding interactions with proteins and DNA and leading to ROS production and subsequently cell death (25, 26). Due to the nonspecific nature of these mechanisms, AgNPs do not place selective pressure on the bacteria and have a much lower risk for the development of resistance compared to conventional antibiotics.

The combination of AgNPs with antibiotics (e.g., ampicillin, gentamicin [GENT], and vancomycin) has been reported to have synergistic antibacterial effects toward both nonresistant and resistant strains (27, 28). In addition, several studies examining the synergistic activity of AgNPs in combination with other antibiotics have been reported: a combination of AgNPs and cefotaxime or CAZ, MER, ciprofloxacin, or GENT strongly enhanced antibacterial activity against multi-drug resistant, β-lactamase, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (29). AgNPs with enoxacin, kanamycin, neomycin, or tetracycline showed greater bactericidal efficiency toward the drug-resistant bacteria Salmonella typhimurium (30). A combination of AgNPs with chloramphenicol or kanamycin resulted in synergistic bactericidal activity toward Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a virulent species sharing a common ancestry with B. pseudomallei (31, 32). In this study, we investigated the synergistic antimicrobial effects of antibiotics and AgNPs against B. pseudomallei, which has not been reported before. The AgNPs were combined with four types of antibiotics against B. pseudomallei from three clinical isolates. The synergistic antibacterial effects were evaluated by measuring the FIC indices and the FBC indices, which were obtained by plate counts from the microdilution checkerboard method. Moreover, we compared the changes in the bacterial cell morphology between the treatment with individual and combination therapies using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

The antibiotics were purchased from their respective manufacturers and dissolved according to the recommendations. The antibiotics tested were CAZ (Reyoung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), IMI (JW Pharmaceutical Corporation), MER (Siam Bheasach Co., Ltd.), and GENT (Sigma-Aldrich). The following isolates were used in this study: B. pseudomallei 1026b (CAZ non-resistant isolate), B. pseudomallei H777 (CAZ moderately resistant isolate), and B. pseudomallei 316c (CAZ highly resistant isolate). They were provided by the Melioidosis Research Center, Khon Kaen University. All the strains were isolated from the blood of a patient (33–35). These bacteria were stored at − 70 °C in 20% glycerol in microcentrifuge tubes until used. The bacteria were streaked on Ashdown’s medium (a selective culture medium for the isolation and characterization of B. pseudomallei) and then cultured at 37 °C for 48–72 h. The colonies were picked and inoculated in 5 mL of Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) at 37 °C overnight and then subcultured in 5 mL of the same medium at 37 °C in a 180 rpm shaker-incubator for 3 h to yield a mid-logarithmic growth phase culture (36).

Preparation And Characterization Of Silver Nanoparticles (agnps)

The AgNPs with diameters of 10–20 nm were obtained from Prime Nanotechnology, Bangkok, Thailand. The samples were resuspended in deionized water at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The UV-vis spectra of the AgNPs were recorded using a SpectraMax M5 fluorescence microplate reader. The dimensions of the AgNPs were confirmed using a transmission electron microscope (FEI/TECNAI G220) operating at 200 kV. The sizes of the silver nanoparticles were directly obtained from the TEM image using Image J software, a Java program developed by the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)

The MICs and MBCs of the antibiotics (CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT) and AgNPs were determined by the plate-counting method measured by serial dilutions, as previously described (37). Briefly, a range of concentrations of AgNPs (4–64 µg/mL) and antibiotics (0.25–1024 µg/mL) were prepared in a 96-well plate by serial dilution. The solutions were then added to an equal volume of bacterial suspension (100 µL) in each well of a 96-well plate with the final cell concentration ranging from 10⁶–10⁷ CFU/mL. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, 50 µL of each treated condition was collected for a serial tenfold dilution plate count with sterile water, and 10 µL of each dilution was dropped on Mueller Hinton agar in triplicate and incubated overnight at 37 °C to count the bacterial colonies formed. Bacteria with no treatment were used as a control. The MIC value was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibits 99% of bacterial growth, and the MBC value was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibits 100% of the bacterial growth. The percent inhibition was calculated using the formula [1-(CFU sample/CFU control)] × 100.

Determination Of Synergistic Antibacterial Effects

The synergistic antibacterial effects were evaluated using the FIC index and the FBC index, which were obtained by plate counting measured by the microdilution checkerboard method. Briefly, a range of concentrations of AgNPs (4–64 µg/mL) and antibiotics (0.5–1024 µg/mL) were prepared by serial dilution, and then 50 µL of each sample of AgNP and antibiotic concentration were transferred to each well of a 96-well plate (total 100 µL of AgNPs-antibiotic combination). After that, 100 µL of cell suspension of each bacterial isolate (final cell concentration range between 10⁶–10⁷ cells/mL) were added in each well of the 96-well plate containing the AgNPs-antibiotic mixture. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Due to the inherent absorbance of the silver solution, we needed to determine antimicrobial activity using a plate-counting method. After 24 h of incubation, 50 µL of each treated condition was collected for a serial 10-fold dilution plate count with sterile water in triplicate for the determination of MIC and MBC.

The FIC or FBC index was calculated to evaluate the combined antimicrobial effect of the antibiotics and the AgNPs:

FICI = MIC of drug A in the combination + MIC of drug B in the combination

MIC of drug A alone MIC of drug B alone

FBCI = MBC of drug A in the combination + MBC of drug B in the combination

MBC of drug A alone MBC of drug B alone

“Synergy, Antagonism, and Indifference were defined as FIC or FBC indices ≤ 0.5, > 4, and

> 0.5 – ≤ 4, respectively” (38).

Evaluating The Morphological Changes Of The Bacterial Cells

The morphological changes of the treated bacterial cells were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The colonies of B. pseudomallei 1026b were grown in MHB for 24 h at 37 °C and then subcultured in 10 mL of the same medium for 3 h to yield a mid-logarithmic growth phase culture. Subsequently, the bacteria were washed three times with deionized water and resuspended in the same solution to a final concentration of 1 × 10⁷ CFU/mL. The cells were treated with AgNPs or antibiotics alone or AgNPs/antibiotic combinations at the MIC and FIC concentrations for 5 h and at the FBC level for 1 h, respectively. All the cells were washed two times with deionized water and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 h and dehydrated in a gradient of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%) for 10 min followed by rinsing in 100% ethanol twice. The cells were coated with gold and observed by scanning electron microscopy (LEO 1450VP) (39).

Characterization of silver nanoparticles

The colloid AgNPs used in this study were purchased from a commercial source at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The solution was diluted to 100 µg/mL in deionized water, resulting in a yellowish solution (Fig. 1a). The AgNPs were characterized by UV-vis spectroscopy and TEM to observe the size, shape, and homogeneity of the AgNPs. The absorbance spectra showed a single strong peak at 404 nm, which indicated the presence of spherical AgNPs (Fig. 1b). TEM micrographs confirmed that the particles had a spherical shape and demonstrated monodispersity (Fig. 1c). The AgNPs had an average size of 15.20 ± 9.08 nm in diameter as calculated using Image J software (Fig. 1d).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The individual antimicrobial activities of CAZ, IMI, MER, GENT, and AgNPs against B. pseudomallei were determined. The first three are conventional antibiotic used in melioidosis treatment, while B. pseudomallei is normally resistant to the GENT antibiotic. As shown in Table 1, the MICs of CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT were in the ranges of 4–128 µg/mL, 0.5–1 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL, and 16–64 µg/mL, respectively. As expected, B. pseudomallei 1026b and H777, but not B. pseudomallei 316c, were susceptible to CAZ. All three isolates were susceptible to IMI and MER but were all completely resistant to GENT. According to a previous report, the B. pseudomallei antibiotic breakpoint used for in vitro susceptibility testing of CAZ was 32 µg/mL, and that of IMI, MER, and GENT were 8 µg/mL (6). Of these, IMI and MER were most effective for treatment of the three isolates of B. pseudomallei.

Table 1

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of antibiotics and AgNPs against *B. pseudomallei* in three clinical isolates by the serial dilution plate-count method.
Bacteria (isolates)	MIC (µg/mL)					MBC (µg/mL)
Bacteria (isolates)	CAZ	IMI	MER	GENT	AgNPs	CAZ	IMI	MER	GENT	AgNPs
*1026b	4	1	2	32	8	64	2	4	512	16
**H777	8	1	2	16	16	32	2	4	256	32
***316c	128	0.5	2	64	16	512	1	4	512	32
The MIC value is the lowest concentration that inhibited ≥ 99% of bacterial growth, and the MBC value is the lowest concentration that inhibited 100% of the bacterial growth.
AgNPs: silver nanoparticles; CAZ: ceftazidime; IMI: imipenem; MER: meropenem; GENT: gentamicin.
*(CAZ non-resistant isolates)
**(CAZ moderately resistant isolates)
***(CAZ highly resistant isolates)

CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT had MBCs in the ranges of 64–512 µg/mL, 1–2 µg/mL, 4 µg/mL, and 256–512 µg/mL, respectively (Table 1). The MBCs of CAZ and GENT were much higher than the antibiotic breakpoints used for B. pseudomallei susceptibility testing. This indicates that all three isolates of B. pseudomallei are difficult to kill by CAZ and GENT, but not by IMI and MER.

The MICs and MBCs of the AgNPs against the three isolates of B. pseudomallei tested were in the ranges of 8–16 µg/mL and 16–32 µg/mL, respectively. We found that the MICs and MBCs of AgNPs were lower than those observed for B. pseudomallei in a previous study, which reported the MICs and MBCs of AgNPs against B. pseudomallei in these three isolates in the ranges of 32–48 µg/mL and 96–128 µg/mL, respectively (37). This was because some properties of the AgNPs, such as size and shape, were slightly different. The smaller size show more antimicrobial activity than the larger size. These differences can cause uncertainty in biological activity (40).

It can be seen that these antibiotics and AgNPs have different antimicrobial efficiencies against B. pseudomallei. The bacteria were susceptible to IMI, MER, and AgNPs but resisted CAZ and GENT. Therefore, CAZ and GENT could be combined with AgNPs to observe any improved antimicrobial efficiency of these antibiotics. To determine the combination effect of these agents, we combined the antibiotics and AgNPs to explore their synergistic effect in the following section.

Synergistic Antibacterial Effects

FIC and FBC indices are commonly used to define the synergistic effects of agents for the inhibition of bacterial growth (41). Synergism is defined as FIC or FBC index values ≤ 0.5, and indifference is defined as FIC or FBC index values > 0.5 – ≤ 4. The FIC indices of CAZ, MER, and GENT in combination with AgNPs against the three isolates of B. pseudomallei are shown in Fig. 2a. The blue and light blue bars on the graph represent combinations with a FIC index ≤ 0.5, while the black bars on the graph represent combinations with a FIC index > 0.5. The FIC indices of CAZ, MER, and GENT in combination with AgNPs indicate that these antibiotics have a synergistic effect (FIC index ≤ 0.5) with AgNPs against B. pseudomallei. The combination of IMI with AgNPs, however, showed no synergism against B. pseudomallei 1026b and 316c (black bar graph, FIC index > 0.5). This indicates that co-treatment with IMI and AgNPs does not improve the bactericidal efficacy against B. pseudomallei 1026b and 316c.

From these results, we found that the combinations of most of the antibiotics tested with AgNPs have strongly synergistic effects on inhibiting the growth and killing B. pseudomallei in the three isolates. Mixing together different combinations of antibiotics/AgNPs can kill bacteria with different mechanisms. Therefore, the synergistic effect can act as a powerful tool against resistant bacteria. The mechanisms of synergy are often not fully understood, but feasible explanations exist for some antibiotics.

For the β-lactam antibiotics (CAZ, IMI, and MER), the interaction of antibiotics with AgNPs was the purposed mechanism. A previous study indicated that the synergistic effect of amoxicillin (a β-lactam antibiotic) may be caused by a bonding reaction (van der Waals interaction and other weak bonds) between the antibiotic and the AgNPs. This suggests that the concentration of antimicrobial groups at particular points on the cell surface may increase the severity of damage to the bacterial cell. Another study demonstrated that the synergistic effect may be the action of the “AgNPs’s drug carrier.” Moreover, membrane phospholipids and glycoprotein have been targeted by hydrophobic AgNPs, with the amoxicillin being transported to the cell surface to damage the cell (42, 43). The combination of GENT with AgNPs against these bacteria has not been demonstrated in other studies, although one previous report suggested that Staphylococcus aureus can be killed through the interaction of GENT and AgNPs. Hydroxyl and amide groups of GENT easily react with AgNPs, and they can then deliver the drug to the cell. Thus, it is necessary to perform further investigations on the efficiency of antibiotics/AgNPs combinations against B. pseudomallei to illustrate the mechanism of this synergistic antibacterial effect.

However, among all the conditions tested, only one combination showed no synergistic effect: IMI in combination with AgNPs against B. pseudomallei 1026b and 316c. This result could imply that the action of antibiotics with AgNPs depends on the bacterial isolates because of the cell membrane component of each B. pseudomallei isolate (44, 45). In a similar study, a combination of antibiotics including ampicillin, chloramphenicol, or kanamycin with AgNPs showed differences in activity between the two isolates of Escherichia coli tested. The combination showed synergism and partial synergism in inhibiting and killing E. coli ATCC 43895 and E. coli ATCC 25922, respectively (31).

Tables 2 and 3 show the lowest antibiotic concentrations that have a synergistic effect with AgNPs. The MICs of antibiotics alone, AgNPs alone, or of the combinations of antibiotics with AgNPs are presented in Table 2. The concentrations of CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT in combination with AgNPs that inhibited bacterial growth were in the ranges of 1–16 µg/mL, 0.25–0.5 µg/mL, 0.5 µg/mL, and 2–16 µg/mL, respectively. We demonstrated that the combination of antibiotics and AgNPs allows the use of lower antibiotic concentrations to achieve equivalent antimicrobial efficiency. The MIC concentrations of CAZ decreased by up to 4–8 fold, IMI decreased up to 2–4 fold, MER decreased up to 4–fold, and GENT decreased up to 4–16 fold when compared with antibiotics alone.

Table 2

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; µg/mL) of antibiotic alone or in combination with AgNPs. Fold change in MIC combination compared to MIC alone of antibiotics.
Antibiotics	B. pseudomallei isolations	MIC (µg/mL)		Reduction in concentration (folds)	FICI	Type of interaction
Antibiotics	B. pseudomallei isolations	Alone	In combination	Reduction in concentration (folds)	FICI	Type of interaction
Ceftazidime	1026b H777 316c	4 8 128	1 2 16	4 4 8	0.5 0.375 0.375	S S S
Imipenem	1026b H777 316c	1 1 0.5	0.5 0.25 0.25	2 4 2	0.75 0.5 0.75	I S I
Meropenem	1026b H777 316c	2 2 2	0.5 0.5 0.5	4 4 4	0.5 0.375 0.375	S S S
Gentamicin	1026b H777 316c	32 16 64	2 4 16	16 4 4	0.312 0.5 0.375	S S S
Synergy (S) was defined as an FIC index ≤ 0.5; antagonism (A) was defined as an FIC index > 4; and indifference (I) was defined as an FIC index > 0.5 – ≤ 4. The FIC index is the fractional inhibitory concentration.

Likewise, the MBCs of the antibiotics alone or AgNPs alone or antibiotic with AgNPs are presented in Table 3. The bactericidal concentrations of CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT in combination with AgNPs are in the ranges of 4–16 µg/mL, 0.25–0.5 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, and 1–16 µg/mL, respectively. The greatly reduced MBCs for the antibiotic/AgNP combinations demonstrate that we could use lower concentrations of antibiotic with the combined therapy in comparison to the antibiotic alone to achieve equivalent antimicrobial efficiency. The CAZ concentration reduced up to 4–32 fold, IMI up to 2–4 fold, MER up to 4–fold, and GENT up to 32–512 fold. As a result, the reduction amounts in the concentration of antibiotic needed to achieve the same inhibition activity in combination with AgNPs were in the following order: GENT > CAZ > MEM > IMI. Our results are similar to those previously reported for CAZ. In another study, the combination of CAZ and AgNPs also showed synergy in the inhibition of P. aeruginosa (23), a virulent bacterium that shares an ancestry with B. pseudomallei.

Table 3

Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs; µg/mL) of antibiotic alone or in combination with AgNPs. Fold change in MBC combination compared to MBC alone of antibiotics.
Antibiotics	B. pseudomallei isolations	MBC (µg/mL)		Reduction in concentration (folds)	FBCI	Type of interaction
Antibiotics	B. pseudomallei isolations	Alone	In combination	Reduction in concentration (folds)	FBCI	Type of interaction
Ceftazidime	1026b H777 316c	64 32 512	4 8 16	16 4 32	0.313 0.375 0.281	S S S
Imipenem	1026b H777 316c	2 2 1	0.5 0.5 0.25	4 4 2	0.5 0.5 0.625	S S I
Meropenem	1026b H777 316c	4 4 4	1 1 1	4 4 4	0.375 0.375 0.375	S S S
Gentamicin	1026b H777 316c	512 256 512	1 4 16	512 64 32	0.252 0.265 0.289	S S S
Synergy (S) was defined as an FBC index ≤ 0.5; antagonism (A) was defined as an FBC index > 4; and indifference (I) was defined as an FBC index > 0.5 – ≤ 4. The FBC index is the fractional bactericidal concentration.

The highest synergistic effect for antibiotic/AgNP combinations was observed with GENT. Because no previous reports have been made on the use of combinations of CAZ, IMI, MER, and GENT with AgNPs against B. pseudomallei, we can only compare the combinations with the results reported for other Gram-negative bacteria. In a previous report studying the effects of combining GENT with AgNPs against S. aureus, E. coli, and GENT-resistant E. coli, a dual role for GENT was found in which it increased the dissolution of the AgNPs and facilitated the attachment of AgNPs onto the surface of bacteria, thereby enhancing the antibacterial activity of the AgNPs (46).

In addition, the results obtained here are similar to those found in previous reports on the use of combinations of CAZ, IMI, MER, GENT, and AgNPs against other Gram-negative bacteria. Those results have shown strongly enhanced bactericidal activity and the restored bactericidal activity of inactive antibiotics against bacteria (29, 47). Our analysis presented here showed that the antibacterial activities of most of the antibiotics increased in the presence of AgNPs, indicating the effectiveness of the combinations against B. pseudomallei. Above all, we demonstrated that the concentrations of four antibiotics when combined with AgNPs were reduced to below the antibiotic breakpoints used for B. pseudomallei susceptibility testing of these antibiotics (6).

Cell Morphological Change

To evaluate the morphology of bacterial cells under different treatment conditions, we observed the morphological changes of B. pseudomallei 1026b treated with CAZ, IMI, MER, or GENT, alone or in combination with AgNPs using SEM (Fig. 3). The SEM images showed that the untreated control cells appeared intact, plump, and typically rod-shaped with a smooth exterior (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the bacterial cells exposed to antibiotics alone or in combination with AgNPs at the MIC and FIC levels showed losses of membrane integrity. The cell walls became loose and porous, distorted from their normal shape, or even ruptured (Fig. 3b to 3j). Furthermore, we noticed that the treatment of bacteria with the antibiotics alone and in combination with AgNPs resulted in more elongated cells compared to the control. The shape change was likely caused by CAZ, IMI, and MER interference with the cell wall synthesis. The inhibition of protein synthesis by GENT may have also led to the observed shape change. The mechanism of the AgNPs’ inhibition of bacterial growth is not clearly known, but several studies have suggested that they function through damaging the bacterial cell wall (26, 48–50).

We further observed the morphology of bacteria treated with combinations of antibiotics with AgNPs at the concentrations of FBC (Fig. 3k to 3n). The results clearly showed that the bacterial cells were more severely damaged in this combination than in those at MIC and FIC levels. At the FBC level, a microscopic analysis of the bacterial cells revealed gross leakage and holes on the outer surface, with a bulgy, disfigured, and fragmented shape. Surprisingly, under these conditions, the bacterial cells produced a substantial amount of fibers that appeared within 1 h.

The fibers produced under such harsh conditions at the FBC might be exopolysaccharides or EPS (also known as extracellular polysaccharides), which are part of the biofilm found in the extracellular medium surrounding the bacteria (51). Normally, B. pseudomallei can produce a biofilm to protect it from proximal unsuitable environments, but it can also produce large biofilms in severe condition (52, 53). The EPS in biofilms are a variety of macromolecules, including proteins, DNA, lipids, and polysaccharides (the main structural component). Polysaccharides are produced first during biofilm production to allow the bacterial cell to adhere to the surface. Subsequently, the bacteria will then proceed to create suitable conditions for survival that protect them against the dangerous environment (54, 55).

We demonstrated that the FBC is a severely stressful level that causes B. pseudomallei to produce large amounts of fibers to protect the cells. Previous studies have indicated that the biofilm of B. pseudomallei is not a virulence factor, but is associated with melioidosis relapse because of its facilitation of antibiotic resistance development (56, 57). Importantly, high levels of EPS in biofilms have been demonstrated to inversely correlate with the ability of antibiotics and nanoparticles to penetrate B. pseudomallei (58). It is possible that the fiber production observed at the level of FBC may be a relapsing factor that causes bacterial resistance to a combination of antibiotics and AgNPs. To confirm this, more elaborate experimental evidence will be required in future work.

Due to the increasing problem of antibiotic resistance, B. pseudomallei infections have become harder to treat. To address this problem, we offer alternative ways to potentially combat the bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the synergism of antibiotics with AgNPs against B. pseudomallei, which has not been previously reported on. B. pseudomallei was susceptible to IMI, MER, and AgNPs but was completely resistant to GENT. For CAZ, an antibiotic recommended as a first-line therapy for severe melioidosis, we found that only B. pseudomallei 316c was resistant to CAZ. We then combined CAZ, IMI, MER, or GENT with AgNPs and found that the combinations revealed synergistic or indifferent effects, but no antagonism was found against all three isolates of the B. pseudomallei tested. In correlation with the results provided in this work, we concluded that certain combinations of antibiotics with AgNPs are able to enhance the antimicrobial effect of antibiotics by reducing the antibiotic dose that is needed for bacterial growth inhibition. However, more experimental evidence will be required in future work to elucidate the mechanisms of action in the antibiotics/AgNPs combinations. Our research points to a way to fight antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These findings support the use of antibiotic/AgNP combinations as an alternative design strategy for new therapeutics to more effectively combat melioidosis.

B. pseudomallei: Burkholderia pseudomallei; CAZ: ceftazidime; IMI: imipenem; MER: meropenem; GENT: gentamicin; AgNPs: silver nanoparticles; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; FICI: the fractional inhibitory concentration index; FBCI; the fractional bactericidal concentration index, CFU: colony forming unit; EPS: exopolysaccharides or extracellular polysaccharides; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; MHB: Mueller Hinton broth; CFU: colony forming unit.

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Funding

Research by the authors was supported by a scholarship from the Research Grant For Thesis, Graduate School Khon Kaen University (fiscal year of 2017) and the Research and Academic Affairs Promotion Fund, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University (fiscal year 2018) (RAAPF).

Authors’ contributions

SM planned and conducted most of the experiments; ST analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; PS and SN contributed to the study design and data collection; SD and SK reviewed the study design and contributed to the interpretation of the data; PTW reviewed and revised the manuscript; RP directed the research, analyzed the results, and provided feedback on the experimental strategies. All the authors have accepted the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The instrument service in this work was supported by the Research Instrument Center, Khon Kaen University and Central Equipment, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University. B. pseudomallei clinical strains were kind gifts from the Melioidosis Research Center, Khon Kaen University.

Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott DM, Moyes CL, et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nature Microbiology. 2016;1(1).
White NJ. Melioidosis. Lancet (London, England). 2003;361(9370):1715–22.
Currie BJ, Fisher DA, Howard DM, Burrow JN, Lo D, Selva-Nayagam S, et al. Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature. Clinical infectious Diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2000;31(4):981–6.
Hemarajata P, Baghdadi JD, Hoffman R, Humphries RM. Burkholderia pseudomallei: Challenges for the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(12):2866–73.
Viktorov DV, Zakharova IB, Podshivalova MV, Kalinkina EV, Merinova OA, Ageeva NP, et al. High-level resistance to fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins in Burkholderia pseudomallei and closely related species. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;102 Suppl 1:S103–10.
Thibault FM, Hernandez E, Vidal DR, Girardet M, Cavallo JD. Antibiotic susceptibility of 65 isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei to 35 antimicrobial agents. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2004;54(6):1134–8.
Chantratita N, Rholl DA, Sim B, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, Amornchai P, et al. Antimicrobial resistance to ceftazidime involving loss of penicillin-binding protein 3 in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(41):17165–70.
Sarovich DS, Price EP, Von Schulze AT, Cook JM, Mayo M, Watson LM, et al. Characterization of ceftazidime resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Australia. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30789.
Sarovich DS, Price EP, Limmathurotsakul D, Cook JM, Von Schulze AT, Wolken SR, et al. Development of ceftazidime resistance in an acute Burkholderia pseudomallei infection. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:129–32.
Simpson AJ, Suputtamongkol Y, Smith MD, Angus BJ, Rajanuwong A, Wuthiekanun V, et al. Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1999;29(2):381–7.
Cheng AC, Fisher DA, Anstey NM, Stephens DP, Jacups SP, Currie BJ. Outcomes of patients with melioidosis treated with meropenem. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2004;48(5):1763–5.
Behera B, Prasad Babu TL, Kamalesh A, Reddy G. Ceftazidime resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei: first report from India. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2012;5(4):329–30.
Smith MD, Wuthiekanun V, Walsh AL, White NJ. In-vitro activity of carbapenem antibiotics against beta-lactam susceptible and resistant strains of Burkholderia pseudomallei. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1996;37(3):611–5.
Climo MW, Patron RL, Archer GL. Combinations of vancomycin and beta-lactams are synergistic against staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1999;43(7):1747–53.
Kanellakopoulou K, Sarafis P, Galani I, Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. In vitro synergism of beta-lactams with ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against genetically distinct multidrug-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2008;32(1):33–9.
Naghmouchi K, Le Lay C, Baah J, Drider D. Antibiotic and antimicrobial peptide combinations: synergistic inhibition of Pseudomonas fluorescens and antibiotic-resistant variants. Res Microbiol. 2012;163(2):101–8.
Amani J, Barjini KA, Moghaddam MM, Asadi A. In vitro synergistic effect of the CM11 antimicrobial peptide in combination with common antibiotics against clinical isolates of six species of multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Protein and Peptide Letters. 2015;22(10):940–51.
Almaaytah A, Alnaamneh A, Abualhaijaa A, Alshari’ N, Al-Balas QJIJoPR, Therapeutics. In vitro synergistic activities of the hybrid antimicrobial peptide melitap-27 in combination with conventional antibiotics against planktonic and biofilm forming bacteria. 2016;22(4):497–504.
Cho YS, Oh JJ, Oh KH. Synergistic anti-bacterial and proteomic effects of epigallocatechin gallate on clinical isolates of imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Phytomedicine: International Journal of Phytotherapy and Phytopharmacology. 2011;18(11):941–6.
Haroun MF, Al-Kayali RS. Synergistic effect of Thymbra spicata L. extracts with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016;19(11):1193–200.
Ma L, Wu J, Wang S, Yang H, Liang D, Lu Z. Synergistic antibacterial effect of Bi2S3 nanospheres combined with ineffective antibiotic gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2017;168:38–45.
Hemeg HA. Nanomaterials for alternative antibacterial therapy. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;12:8211–25.
Jain J, Arora S, Rajwade JM, Omray P, Khandelwal S, Paknikar KM. Silver nanoparticles in therapeutics: development of an antimicrobial gel formulation for topical use. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2009;6(5):1388–401.
Ivask A, Kurvet I, Kasemets K, Blinova I, Aruoja V, Suppi S, et al. Size-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles to bacteria, yeast, algae, crustaceans and mammalian cells in vitro. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102108.
Slavin YN, Asnis J, Häfeli UO, Bach H. Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2017;15(1):65.
Dakal TC, Kumar A, Majumdar RS, Yadav V. Mechanistic basis of antimicrobial actions of silver nanoparticles. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1831–.
Wang Y-W, Tang H, Wu D, Liu D, Liu Y, Cao A, et al. Enhanced bactericidal toxicity of silver nanoparticles by the antibiotic gentamicin. Environmental Science: Nano. 2016;3(4):788–98.
Morones-Ramirez JR, Winkler JA, Spina CS, Collins JJ. Silver enhances antibiotic activity against gram-negative bacteria. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(190).
Panacek A, Smekalova M, Vecerova R, Bogdanova K, Roderova M, Kolar M, et al. Silver nanoparticles strongly enhance and restore bactericidal activity of inactive antibiotics against multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae. Colloids and Surfaces B, Biointerfaces. 2016;142:392–9.
Deng H, McShan D, Zhang Y, Sinha SS, Arslan Z, Ray PC, et al. Mechanistic study of the synergistic antibacterial activity of combined silver nanoparticles and common antibiotics. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(16):8840–8.
Hwang IS, Hwang JH, Choi H, Kim KJ, Lee DG. Synergistic effects between silver nanoparticles and antibiotics and the mechanisms involved. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2012;61(Pt 12):1719–26.
Holden MTG, Titball RW, Peacock SJ, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Atkins T, Crossman LC, et al. Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(39):14240.
DeShazer D. Genomic diversity of Burkholderia pseudomallei clinical isolates: subtractive hybridization reveals a Burkholderia mallei-specific prophage in B. pseudomallei 1026b. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186(12):3938–50.
Madhongsa K, Pasan S, Phophetleb O, Nasompag S, Thammasirirak S, Daduang S, et al. Antimicrobial action of the cyclic peptide bactenecin on Burkholderia pseudomallei correlates with efficient membrane permeabilization. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013;7(6):e2267.
Kanthawong S, Nazmi K, Wongratanacheewin S, Bolscher JG, Wuthiekanun V, Taweechaisupapong S. In vitro susceptibility of Burkholderia pseudomallei to antimicrobial peptides. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009;34(4):309–14.
Randall LB, Dobos K, Papp-Wallace KM, Bonomo RA, Schweizer HP. Membrane-Bound PenA β-lactamase of Burkholderia pseudomallei. 2016;60(3):1509–14.
Siritongsuk P, Hongsing N, Thammawithan S, Daduang S, Klaynongsruang S, Tuanyok A, et al. Two-phase bactericidal mechanism of silver nanoparticles against Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0168098.
Mackay ML, Milne K, Gould IM. Comparison of methods for assessing synergic antibiotic interactions. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2000;15(2):125–9.
Hwan S, Lee H-S, Ryu D-S, Choi S-J, Lee D-S. Antibacterial activity of silver-nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Korean Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;39(1):77– 85.
Kim DH, Park JC, Jeon GE, Kim CS, Seo JH. Effect of the size and shape of silver nanoparticles on bacterial growth and metabolism by monitoring optical density and fluorescence intensity. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2017;22(2):210–7.
Methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Terminology. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1998;4(5):291.
Fayaz AM, Balaji K, Girilal M, Yadav R, Kalaichelvan PT, Venketesan R. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their synergistic effect with antibiotics: a study against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomedicine. 2010;6(1):103–9.
Li P, Li J, Wu C, Wu Q, Li J. Synergistic antibacterial effects of β-lactam antibiotic combined with silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(9):1912–7.
Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, Woods DE. Molecular and physical characterization of Burkholderia mallei O antigens. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(3):849–52.
Tuanyok A, Stone JK, Mayo M, Kaestli M, Gruendike J, Georgia S, et al. The genetic and molecular basis of O-antigenic diversity in Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(1):e1453.
Wang Y, Tang H, Wu D, Liu D, Liu Y, Cao A, et al. Enhanced bactericidal toxicity of silver nanoparticles by antibiotic gentamicin. Environmental Science: Nano. 2016;4:695-695.
Abdel-Aziz MM, Yosri M, Amin BH. Control of imipenem resistant-Klebsiella pneumoniae pulmonary infection by oral treatment using a combination of mycosynthesized Ag-nanoparticles and imipenem. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2017;10(4):353–60.
Yan X, He B, Liu L, Qu G, Shi J, Hu L, et al. Antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: proteomics approach. Metallomics: Integrated Biometal Science. 2018;10(4):557–64.
Li WR, Xie XB, Shi QS, Zeng HY, Ou-Yang YS, Chen YB. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2010;85(4):1115–22.
Williamson R, Collatz E, Gutmann L. [Mechanisms of action of beta-lactam antibiotics and mechanisms of non-enzymatic resistance]. Presse medicale (Paris, France: 1983). 1986;15(46):2282–9.
Cloutier M, Muru K, Ravicoularamin G, Gauthier C. Polysaccharides from Burkholderia species as targets for vaccine development, immunomodulation and chemical synthesis. Natural Product Reports. 2018;35(12):1251–93.
Faiz M, Nurema S, Wan Mohd Noor WSA, Msarah M, Prabhakaran P, Ibrahim I. Extreme environment: Biofilms and Microbial Diversity. 2018;435–43.
Aka ST, Haji SH. Sub-MIC of antibiotics induced biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of chlorhexidine. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology: [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. 2015;46(1):149–54.
Limoli DH, Jones CJ, Wozniak DJ. Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides in biofilm formation and function. Microbiology Spectrum. 2015;3(3):10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0011–2014.
Nadell CD, Xavier JB, Levin SA, Foster KR. The evolution of quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms. PLOS Biology. 2008;6(1):e14.
Limmathurotsakul D, Paeyao A, Wongratanacheewin S, Saiprom N, Takpho N, Thaipadungpanit J, et al. Role of Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation and lipopolysaccharide in relapse of melioidosis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2014;20(11):O854–6.
Taweechaisupapong S, Kaewpa C, Arunyanart C, Kanla P, Homchampa P, Sirisinha S, et al. Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei does not correlate with biofilm formation. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2005;39(3):77–85.
Mongkolrob R, Taweechaisupapong S, Tungpradabkul S. Correlation between biofilm production, antibiotic susceptibility and exopolysaccharide composition in Burkholderia pseudomallei bpsI, ppk, and rpoS mutant strains. Microbiology and Immunology. 2015;59(11):653–63.

Suggestedreviewers.pdf

PDF

Version 1

posted 28 May, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

Combating the melioidosis pathogen using antibiotics in combination with silver nanoparticles

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Method:

Result

Conclusion

Figures

Background

Materials And Cell Culture

Preparation And Characterization Of Silver Nanoparticles (agnps)

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)

Determination Of Synergistic Antibacterial Effects

Evaluating The Morphological Changes Of The Bacterial Cells

Results And Discussion

Characterization of silver nanoparticles

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

Synergistic Antibacterial Effects

Cell Morphological Change

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Funding

Authors’ contributions

Acknowledgements

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1