PNI is a common issue that affects more than 1 million people every year worldwide and causes significant motor disabilities and chronic pain, with potentially devastating impacts on social and economic conditions (3, 41). Currently, PNI with no nerve tissue loss or a short nerve gap is commonly treated through a surgical nerve coaptation, while for longer nerve gaps there is no consent yet on a recognized resolutive therapy (1). Therefore, an innovative therapy respecting the human-translatable regulations is needed and, in this context, ASCs are emerging as a promising strategy to promote tissue regeneration (12–15). According to the GMP guidelines, the use of FBS for ASCs culture should be abandoned in favor of xeno-free alternatives, such as HPL that presents less safety and ethical limitations (5, 29).
It has already been proven that ASCs showed a potential neurotrophic support when differentiated into SC-ASCs both in vitro and in vivo (16, 21, 42). However, after the removal of the induction factors, SC-ASCs very rapidly underwent reversion of their phenotype, indicating a dedifferentiation process and suggesting a fragile differentiation method (21, 43, 44). In addition, the differentiation protocol is time consuming with limited clinical translation potential and high-costly (12). Considering also that the resulting benefits are not clear, the in vitro differentiation of ASCs is an uncompleted topic and SC-ASCs should be overcome in future therapies (18). A promising alternative could be represented by culturing ASCs in the presence of HPL. Indeed, we have already demonstrated the important role of HPL in enhancing the neurotrophic properties of ASCs compared to undifferentiated FBS-cultured ASCs (14). With this in mind, we wanted to analyze if neurotrophic properties of HPL-cultured ASCs could be even better than SC-ASCs differentiated by growth factors enhancement in the presence of FBS.
Among the different neurotrophic factors physiologically released by SCs after a nerve injury, NGF in particular has a robust neuroprotective effect (44). Indeed, since its discovery by Rita Levi Montalcini in 1954 it was clear that NGF exerted a trophic effect essential in neural development, function and during peripheral nerve repair, stimulating neuronal survival and promoting axonal growth and elongation (45, 46). Remarkably, we found out that the expression at transcriptional level of NGF was higher in HPL-ASCs compared to SC-ASCs, suggesting that HPL could enhance the ASCs neurotrophic properties and in turn, their neuroprotective action during nerve repair processes.
Together with the increasing of NGF, also nestin is essential for renewal, survival, and proliferation of neural progenitor cells. The enhancing of this protein in HPL-ASCs further supports the stimulation of neurotrophic properties compared to SC-ASCs. Moreover, nestin is a known neuronal precursor cell marker and it is expressed only during early stages of the development in the differentiating neural crest stem cells and its expression decreases with the progress of differentiation (47–49). We supposed that HPL maintained ASCs at an early stage of neuroinduction compared to completely differentiated SC-ASCs. Proteomic analysis not only confirmed the increase of nestin but also of other cytoskeletal proteins, including alpha-actinin-4 (ACTN4), responsible for filopodia formation and highly expressed in neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs), and filamin A (FLNA), involved in neural progenitor migration and proliferation (50, 51).
The neuronal progenitors undergo a series of fine cytoskeletal-driven morphological changes during differentiation processes (i.e. neuritogenesis, axonogenesis and dendritogenesis) and the cytoskeletal reorganization itself is controlled by the interaction with the ECM, which in turn modulates proliferation, self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells, regulating the shape of axons and dendrites and neurite extension (52–55). Among ECM proteins increased in HPL-ASCs, fibronectin is particularly interesting since it promotes neurite outgrowth and axonal regeneration, improving neurotrophic capabilities of ASCs cultured in the presence of HPL (5, 55–57). Moreover, ALDH1L2 and ALDH have a role as ROS scavenger and are considered as markers for stem cells. The overexpression of ALDH1L2 in HPL-ASCs confirmed the hypothesis of an initial neuroinduction phase which keep unaltered the stem properties of ASCs (58, 59).
SCs have various developmental stages, each characterized by distinct specific markers (60). During embryonic development, SCs originate from neural crest cells, which differentiate into SCs precursors, immature SCs and subsequently in pro-myelin SCs. Afterwards, two types of matured SCs are formed, that is myelinating SCs and the non-myelinating SCs (59). Among the different expressed proteins, S100B is widely used as specific SCs marker even though its expression is closely related to the maturation of SCs and may not be expressed in SCs precursors (61, 62). Indeed, SCs precursors lack the expression of S100B and immunofluorescence staining data showed that in the early stage of culture, they do not totally express S100B (61). In agreement with these results, we did not detect the expression of both mRNA and protein of S100B, supporting the hypothesis of an immature state of HPL-ASCs. Together with S100B, NGFR is considered a SCs specific marker, which was higher expressed in SC-ASCs, indicating the effective differentiation into SCs (63). Conversely, immature SCs fail to express this marker and immunofluorescence data showed that in the early stage of culture SCs do not express NGFR and similarly to S100B its expression increases throughout the passages (61, 64). Consistently with the expression of S100B, NGFR was less expressed in HPL-ASCs compared to SC-ASCs, further supporting the immature stage of ASCs induced by HPL without promoting their complete differentiation.
The secretome from stem cells is a critical component of how they regulate their proliferation and self-renewal (65). Stemness is regulated by protein homeostasis (proteostasis) with a proper balance between protein biosynthesis and clearance (66, 67). This is highlighted in the secretome from HPL-ASCs, that showed higher levels of ribosomal proteins, translation and elongation factors, as well as tRNA charging proteins. Components of the ATP-dependent chaperonin-containing T-complex (TRiC), TCP1, CCT2, CCT7, CCT3 and CCT6A, promoting protein folding or clearance to maintain proteostasis also increased, as for NSPCs (67). α2-Macroglobulin (A2M) is a clearance factor involved in the degradation of extracellular misfolded proteins and promotes the regeneration of stem cells and also influences ECM remodeling by inhibiting the protease activity of MMP-2, actually decreased in HPL-ASCs (68–70). Proteins involved in proteasome ubiquitin system were upregulated in HPL-ASCs, thus promoting self-renewal. Phagocytosis of dying neurons or exuberant neuronal branches by microglia resulted to be increased (71). Proteins inhibiting oligodendroglial differentiation such as metalloendopeptidase BMP1 and tenascin C were down regulated in HPL-ASCs (72–74). These data strongly support our theory that HPL maintained the stem properties of ASCs, while being in an initial neuroinduction phase that gives them more neurotrophic properties.
The development grade of SCs is evaluated also through their myelinating activity. MBP is a myelination-associated marker localized at the membrane level in active myelinating cells and with an expression rate increasing during the maturation of SCs (75, 76). MBP is absent in SCs precursors and it is present at low levels in immature SCs and higher in mature and active myelinating SCs (61). Consistently, we saw that MBP signal in HPL-ASCs was weak and distributed in the cytosol, while in the SC-ASCs the signal was dotted, compatible with active membrane proteins, indicating an early stage neuro-commitment of HPL-ASCs compared to completely differentiated SC-ASCs.
The increasing of the neuroregenerative properties of HPL-ASCs was evident also in an in vitro functional model in the presence of DRG. Indeed, we detected a higher number of DRG survived until the end of the assay and a longer total neurite length in the presence of HPL-ASCs compared to SC-ASCs, suggesting that culturing ASCs with HPL might be synergistic and more beneficial rather than differentiate them in SC-ASCs. Although HPL presents a high concentration of trophic molecules, it did not sustain nerve regeneration on its own, as demonstrated also by a previous published paper (5). With the support also of our results, we can assert that HPL exerts an indirect effect on DRG enhancing ASCs neuroregenerative properties.
The neurotrophic effect of HPL-ASCs was particularly evident on DRG cultured with the conditioned medium, further indicating the importance of ASC-released neurotrophic factors induced by HPL, including NGF, which is considered fundamental in promoting axonal growth (77, 78). Prautsch et al., demonstrated that DRG exhibited a significant and dense axonal outgrowth in response not only to direct NGF stimulation but also to the secretome resulting from NGF-stimulated ASCs, indicating the fundamental function of NGF and the all ASCs secretome as well (78). Similarly, we found that HPL stimulated the expression of NGF and, in turn, the neurite outgrowth, further supporting the use of HPL-stimulated ASCs instead of differentiated SC-ASCs. Curiously, we are in contrast with a previous published paper evaluating the same functional assay where the authors observed an axonal outgrowth significantly higher in direct co-cultures compared to indirect co-cultures (5). This discrepancy could be explained by the different systems used in the experimental set up. In fact, while the DRG used for the experiments described in this paper were purchased as single cells, the DRG used by Guiotto et al. were freshly isolated from explants and directly seeded with ASCs.
The great neurotrophic potential of HPL-ASCs secretome was confirmed by proteomic analysis, with the upregulation of proteins involved in axon development and guidance, as well as in neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis. Among these proteins, we highligth early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1), which is highly expressed in the postsynaptic neurons and it is involved in synaptic plasticity, and semaphorin 7A (SEMA7A), promoting axon outgrowth through integrins and MAPKs and mediating the action of dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 3 (DPYSL3) (79–81). Consistently, reticulon-4 (RTN4), known as a potent neurite growth inhibitor, was decreased (52). Proteins involved in neuronal differentiation often regulate cytoskeletal organization (i.e. vinculin (VCL), vimentin (VIM), capping actin protein of muscle z-line subunit beta (CAPZB), and coactosin like f-actin binding protein 1 (COTL1) or ECM remodeling, confirming the relevance of these structural compartments as active players of cell fate determination, crucial in neurogenesis to ensure the development of the correct shape and function. Laminins are key components of ECM and have been associated with promoting neurite outgrowth (82). Coiled-coil domain containing 80 (CCDC80), increased in HPL-ASCs, has been proposed to be a component of the ECM able to bind various ECM proteins and promoting cell adhesion (82, 83).