3.1. Analyses
The analyses describe morphological and topographic conducted on two materials: CuO nanomaterials and CsSnI2Cl perovskite. For CuO nanomaterials, Fig. 1(a), SEM analysis shows that the material has a great porous structure with pore diameter ranging from 150 to 250 nm. These pores can work as a trap for other materials, allowing the growth of additional material inside it. For CsSnI2Cl perovskite materials, Fig. 2(b), the morphological behavior appears like pyramid-shapes with large crystals that confirm their great behavior and compact surface. This behavior confirms the perovskite materials' ability for the light reaction and production of electrons under the light incidence[17]. The pyramid side is about 400 nm above the surface.
The theoretical modeling of CsSnI2Cl perovskite surface roughness is represented in Fig. 2(c), where a 3D pyramid structure appears for the perovskite materials. These particles are surrounded by other smaller particles that prevent the formation of pores. Finally, the TEM analyses for CsSnI2Cl perovskite material are shown in Fig. 2(d), where the 2D pyramid structure are confirmed again with a dark color, in which there ia additional small particles surrounding it.
The XRD pattern shown in Fig. 2(a) is related to CuO/Cu, it is evident that the peaks correspond to the formation of CuO monoclinic structure, which is indicated by the peaks located at 35° and 38.5° (JCPDS #41–0254) [18]. In addition, sharp peaks observed at 43°, 50°, and 62° indicate the presence of Cu-foil (JCPDS #02–1225) [19].
The XRD pattern of the CsSnI2Cl perovskite materials is presented in Fig. 2(b). The pattern shows several sharp peaks, which indicate the successful formation of the perovskite materials. The peaks correspond to the crystallographic planes (101), (240), (131), (240), (320), (301), (210), (112), (321), (004), (322), (430), (362), and (323), with diffraction angles of 21.5°, 24.9°, 26.4°, 27.6°, 28.5°, 30.9°, 35.4°, 41.8°, 43.9°, 48.8°, 50.0°, 57.9°, 62.3°, and 66.2°, respectively. The presence of a large number of peaks is consistent with the characteristics of inorganic perovskite tin halide materials [11].
The XPS analysis of CsSnI2Cl is presented in Fig. 2(c), which shows the survey of the perovskite material. All the elements are observed, confirming the formation of the perovskite material. The Cl and I spectra are observed at 201 and 635 eV, respectively, related to the 2p and 3d orbital spectra. N and O are detected at 404 and 534 eV, respectively, related to the 1s spectra for both. The Sn atom is observed at 490 eV for the 3D orbital spectra, while the Cs spectra are observed at 719 eV. Additionally, a very small peak related to the K spectra is observed at 297 eV.
Figure 2(d) shows the optical absorbance of CsSnI2Cl perovskite material, indicating its absorption band in the UV, Vis, and near-IR region up to 680 nm. The incorporation of Cl and I atoms in the perovskite material leads to this enhancement in optical behavior, covering most of the optical region. To evaluate the superiority of this material, its bandgap is calculated using Tauc's Eqs. 1 and 2 [20]. These equations utilize the density (d) and absorption coefficient of the material (α) to estimate the bandgap (Eg), which is found to be 1.75 eV.
$${{\alpha }\text{h}{\nu } = \text{A}(\text{h}{\nu }-{\text{E}}_{\text{g}})}^{1/2}$$
1
$${\alpha }=\left(\frac{\text{2,303}}{\text{d}}\right)\text{A}$$
2
3.2. Red Sea water as a source of hydrogen gas: electrochemical testing
This study used Red Sea water as a source of hydrogen gas. Table 1 provides the chemical composition of this water, which is a promising choice for generating hydrogen gas through electrochemical means. The heavy metals present in this water act as a sacrificing agent for the hydrogen gas production process, eliminating the need for an external electrolyte. This approach is cost-effective since the water is abundant and freely available. A three-electrode cell is used for their experiments, where the CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode was used as the working electrode, and the reference and auxiliary electrodes were connected to the cell to facilitate the electrochemical reactions. The researchers applied photon illumination to the cell using the CHI608E instrument and a metal halide lamp with a power of 400 W.
Figure 3(a) shows the photosensitivity of the prepared CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode under light illumination. This photoelectrode receives photons that excite the surface of the semiconductor materials (CsSnI2Cl and CuO) for electron transition, and the resulting electrons are collected on the surface of the photoelectrode. These electrons are then transferred to the neighboring electrolyte for the hydrogen generation process through the Jph value. The Jph value produced by this photoelectrode is 20 mA/cm2 in light, which indicates its high photosensitivity for the hydrogen generation reaction.
The small current density (Jo) observed in the dark indicates the semiconductive nature of the prepared material, which is significantly smaller than the Jph value produced under light illumination. This demonstrates the significant effect of incident photons on the photoelectrode for the hydrogen generation reaction. The curve is non-linear, indicating the generation of a Schottky barrier [21] during the electron transition from CuO to CsSnI2Cl. This is due to the difference in energy levels between the two materials. After the electrons are generated by the photoelectrode, they reach the surface of the perovskite material and combine with the electrons produced by the material itself. These electrons then move towards the seawater where they participate in the splitting reaction, leading to the production of hydrogen gas.
Figure 3(b) further supports this observation by testing the photoelectrode under both dark and light conditions. The significant increase in Jph value (by -2.5 mA.cm− 2) and the decrease in Jo value (by -0.93 mA.cm− 2) in light compared to dark confirm the high sensitivity of the prepared CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode to light.
Table 1
The concentration of metals in red sea water.
Material or element | Concentration (mg/L) |
Zn | 0.044 |
Pb | 0.008 |
Ni | 0.001 |
Mn | 0.009 |
Fe | 0.012 |
Cu | 0.10 |
Cr | 0.005 |
Cd | 0.001 |
Co | 0.032 |
B | 0.132 |
The response of the CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode to light is shown in Fig. 4(a) through the produced Jph values under different monochromatic lights. The Jph value at -0.8 V is shown in Fig. 4(b). As seen in Fig. 4(a), there are significant enhancements in the Jph values as the light wavelength decreases from 730 to 440 nm, with the Jph value decreasing from − 10.8 to -4.9 mA.cm− 2, respectively. This behavior is typical in the effect of light on a photoelectrode, where the high effect of light under low wavelength is due to the high frequency of light, which promotes electron transition from low to high energy levels[22, 23]. These electrons are collected on the upper level and transferred to the electrolyte solution for further reactions. In contrast, the Jph under low frequency (near IR) is related to bond vibrations that cause electron vibration. At V = 0, the high photocurrent value represents the efficiency of these materials for electron production, in this case, Jph = JSC.
The efficiency of the hydrogen generation reaction was estimated using Eq. 3 and is shown in Fig. 5(a). The CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode achieved a high and broad efficiency across most of the optical region, with an optimal value of 33% at 340 nm. The efficiency decreased to 13% at 730 nm, indicating that the optimal generation of electrons occurred under photon incidence at 340 nm. Figure 5(b) presents the calculation of the number of H2 moles produced from the CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode based on the Faraday law [7] and using the constant Faraday constant (F, 9.65×104 C mol-1). The estimated H2 mole is 30 µmole/h.cm2. This means that using a 10 cm2 surface of this photoelectrode would result in the production of 0.3 m.mol/h. Moreover, The efficiency of CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode in compared to the previous studies is mentioned in Table 2.
IPCE = 1240.\({J}_{ph}\)/λ. P .100 (3)
Table 2
The efficiency of CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu photoelectrode in compared to the previous studies.
Photoelectrode | Electrolyte | Jph (mA/cm2) | Applied Voltage (V) | IPCE% (390 nm) | Light Source |
CuO-C/TiO2 [24] | glycerol | 0.001 | −0.5 | - | 300 W xenon lamp |
g-C3N4-CuO [25] | NaOH | 0.01 | 1.6 | - | 300 W xenon lamp |
CuO thin films [26] | Na2SO4 | 2.5 | 0 | 3.1 | Solar simulator 1.5 global (AM 1.5G) |
TiO2/CdS/PbS [27] | Na2S/Na2S2O3 | 2 | 0.2 | 4 | AM 1.5G illumination |
CuO nanowire [28] | Na2SO4 | 1.5 | −0.5 | - | simulated AM1.5 illumination |
GaN [29] | HBr | 0.6 | + 1 | 8 | Sunlight |
CuO [30] | KOH | 1 | −1.2 | - | White light |
SnO2/TiO2 [31] | Na2S2O3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | - | 1 Sun (100 mW cm− 2) |
BiFeO3 [32] | NaOH | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.21 | 1 sun (AM 1.5G solar spec) |
PrFeO [33] | Na2SO4 | 0.130 | −0.6 | - | Simulated sunlight |
CuO nanocrystals [34] | Na2SO4 | 1.1 | −0.5 | 8.7 | Xenon lamp light |
Poly(3-aminobenzoic acid) frame [35] | H2SO4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | - | 150 W xenon lamp |
ZnO/TiO2/FeOOH [36] | Na2S2O3 | 1.59 | 0.8 | - | A 150 W xenon lamp |
TiN-TiO2 [22] | NaOH | 3.0 × 10− 4 | 0.2 | 0.03 | Solar simulator (150 mW cm− 2) |
ITO/VO2 [37] | Na2S2O3 | 1.5 | + 1 | 4 | 400 W metal halid |
Au/PbS/Ro-GO/PANI [38] | Na2S2O3 | 1.1 | + 1 | 10 | 400 W xenon lamp |
CsSnI2Cl/CuO/Cu (Present work) | Red sea water | 20 | -0.8 | 33 | Simulated sunlight |