Identification of key genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis
Background: Breast cancer subtypes are statistically associated with prognosis. The search for markers of breast tumor heterogeneity and the development of precision medicine for patients are the current focuses of the field.
Methods: We used a bioinformatic approach to identify key disease-causing genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. First, we retrieved gene expression data for luminal A breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, and normal breast tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed genes unique to the 2 breast cancer subtypes were identified and subjected to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. We constructed protein–protein interaction networks of the differentially expressed genes. Finally, we analyzed the key modules of the networks, which we combined with survival data to identify the unique cancer genes associated with each breast cancer subtype.
Results: We identified 1,114 differentially expressed genes in luminal A breast cancer and 1,042 differentially expressed genes in basal-like breast cancer, of which the subtypes shared 500. We observed 614 and 542 differentially expressed genes unique to luminal A and basal-like breast cancer, respectively. Through enrichment analyses, protein–protein interaction network analysis, and module mining, we identified 8 key differentially expressed genes unique to each subtype. Analysis of the gene expression data in the context of the survival data revealed that high expression of NMUR1 and NCAM1 in luminal A breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis, whereas the low expression levels of CDC7, KIF18A, STIL, and CKS2 in basal-like breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis.
Conclusions: NMUR1 and NCAM1 are novel key disease-causing genes for luminal A breast cancer, and STIL is a novel key disease-causing gene for basal-like breast cancer. These genes are potential targets for clinical treatment.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Posted 22 Sep, 2020
On 16 Oct, 2020
On 28 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 26 Sep, 2020
On 26 Sep, 2020
On 26 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
Received 31 Aug, 2020
Received 21 Jul, 2020
Received 21 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 May, 2020
On 10 May, 2020
On 09 May, 2020
On 09 May, 2020
On 08 May, 2020
Identification of key genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis
Posted 22 Sep, 2020
On 16 Oct, 2020
On 28 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Received 27 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 26 Sep, 2020
On 26 Sep, 2020
On 26 Sep, 2020
On 22 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 21 Sep, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
Received 31 Aug, 2020
Received 21 Jul, 2020
Received 21 Jul, 2020
On 13 Jul, 2020
On 12 Jul, 2020
Invitations sent on 13 May, 2020
On 10 May, 2020
On 09 May, 2020
On 09 May, 2020
On 08 May, 2020
Background: Breast cancer subtypes are statistically associated with prognosis. The search for markers of breast tumor heterogeneity and the development of precision medicine for patients are the current focuses of the field.
Methods: We used a bioinformatic approach to identify key disease-causing genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. First, we retrieved gene expression data for luminal A breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, and normal breast tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed genes unique to the 2 breast cancer subtypes were identified and subjected to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. We constructed protein–protein interaction networks of the differentially expressed genes. Finally, we analyzed the key modules of the networks, which we combined with survival data to identify the unique cancer genes associated with each breast cancer subtype.
Results: We identified 1,114 differentially expressed genes in luminal A breast cancer and 1,042 differentially expressed genes in basal-like breast cancer, of which the subtypes shared 500. We observed 614 and 542 differentially expressed genes unique to luminal A and basal-like breast cancer, respectively. Through enrichment analyses, protein–protein interaction network analysis, and module mining, we identified 8 key differentially expressed genes unique to each subtype. Analysis of the gene expression data in the context of the survival data revealed that high expression of NMUR1 and NCAM1 in luminal A breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis, whereas the low expression levels of CDC7, KIF18A, STIL, and CKS2 in basal-like breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis.
Conclusions: NMUR1 and NCAM1 are novel key disease-causing genes for luminal A breast cancer, and STIL is a novel key disease-causing gene for basal-like breast cancer. These genes are potential targets for clinical treatment.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10