This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Hiroyuki Iwano
Hokkaido University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-8260
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: Because existence of high flow velocity at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) potentially causes an overestimation of effective orifice area (EOA) by continuity equation in aortic stenosis (AS), we tested the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method as an alternative tool for AS.
Methods: EOA was calculated using the continuity equation (EOACont) and PISA method (EOAPISA), respectively, in 114 patients with at least moderate AS. The geometric orifice area (GOA) was also measured in 51 patients who also underwent three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Patients were divided into two groups according to the median LVOT flow velocity.
Results: Feasibility of EOAPISA was 95% in the 114 patients. While there was a strong correlation between EOACont and EOAPISA, EOACont was greater than EOAPISA especially in patients with high LVOT velocity. In TOE cohort, both EOACont and EOAPISA similarly correlated with GOA. However, a fixed bias, which is supposed to exist in AS, was observed only between EOAPISA and GOA with smaller EOAPISA than GOA. The difference between EOACont and GOA was significantly greater with a larger EOACont relative to GOA in patients with high LVOT velocity than in those without (0.16±0.25 vs -0.07±0.10 cm2, P<0.001). In contrast, the difference between EOAPISA and GOA was consistent in both groups (-0.07±0.12 vs -0.07±0.15 cm2, P = 0.936).
Conclusion: The PISA method was applied to estimate EOA of AS. EOAPISA could be an alternative parameter for AS severity grading in patients with high LVOT velocity in whom EOACont would overestimate the orifice area.
Keywords
Doppler echocardiography, aortic stenosis, proximal isovelocity surface area method, valve orifice area
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 06 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #? received
Received 03 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 28 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned
On 28 Feb, 2021
First submitted
On 28 Feb, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Hiroyuki Iwano
Hokkaido University
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-8260
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 06 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Review #? received
Received 03 Mar, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 28 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned
On 28 Feb, 2021
First submitted
On 28 Feb, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: Because existence of high flow velocity at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) potentially causes an overestimation of effective orifice area (EOA) by continuity equation in aortic stenosis (AS), we tested the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method as an alternative tool for AS.
Methods: EOA was calculated using the continuity equation (EOACont) and PISA method (EOAPISA), respectively, in 114 patients with at least moderate AS. The geometric orifice area (GOA) was also measured in 51 patients who also underwent three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Patients were divided into two groups according to the median LVOT flow velocity.
Results: Feasibility of EOAPISA was 95% in the 114 patients. While there was a strong correlation between EOACont and EOAPISA, EOACont was greater than EOAPISA especially in patients with high LVOT velocity. In TOE cohort, both EOACont and EOAPISA similarly correlated with GOA. However, a fixed bias, which is supposed to exist in AS, was observed only between EOAPISA and GOA with smaller EOAPISA than GOA. The difference between EOACont and GOA was significantly greater with a larger EOACont relative to GOA in patients with high LVOT velocity than in those without (0.16±0.25 vs -0.07±0.10 cm2, P<0.001). In contrast, the difference between EOAPISA and GOA was consistent in both groups (-0.07±0.12 vs -0.07±0.15 cm2, P = 0.936).
Conclusion: The PISA method was applied to estimate EOA of AS. EOAPISA could be an alternative parameter for AS severity grading in patients with high LVOT velocity in whom EOACont would overestimate the orifice area.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Loading...