Clinical features and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in pediatric patients with tic disorders

Abstract

Background

Tic disorders are childhood-onset neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by multiple motor or vocal tics with frequent comorbidities and a broad spectrum of phenotypic presentations. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions in pediatric patients with tic disorders.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 119 pediatric patients (89 males, 30 females) who were diagnosed with tic disorders according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-Ⅴ) at Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Republic of Korea, between January 2012 and July 2019. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to conduct correlational analyses.

Results

The mean age of tic onset was 6.9 years (range, 1–14) and the mean age at diagnosis was 8 years (range, 1–17). The mean lag between tic onset and diagnosis was 13.3 months (range, 0.25–132). The most common, first-presenting tics were eye blinking (50.4%), followed by jaw or lip movement (29.4%) and throat clearing (29.4%). Thirty-seven (31.1%) patients had at least one co-occurring neuropsychiatric disorder at the time of tic diagnosis. Subtypes of tic disorders, types of first-presenting tics, and presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities were not associated with tic severity. Tic severity was associated with greater functional impairment and tic noticeability (P < 0.05). A relatively shorter time to diagnosis was associated with tic severity (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.147, P = 0.110).

Conclusions

The evolving nature of tic expression and severity, high prevalence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities, and associated functional impairments emphasize the importance of comprehensive assessment during the disease course for determining and prioritizing goals of treatment.

Background

Tics are involuntary, stereotyped, nonrhythmic movements or vocalizations that are usually sudden and rapid [1, 2]. A broad spectrum of phenotypes ranging from mild to severe and involving any muscle group characterizes the disorders [3]. Tics are categorized as either motor or vocal, and simple or complex, based on their quality and degree of complexity [4]. They can appear isolated or in combination and may coexist or occur in orchestrated sequences. The average age of onset for tic disorders is 4–6 years, peaking between 10–12 years, and declining throughout adolescence [5–7].

Tic disorders are usually associated with mental, behavioral, and developmental comorbidities, with previous studies demonstrating that approximately 80–90% of individuals with tic disorders also present other concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms [5, 8, 9]. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are the most commonly reported comorbidities, followed by depression [5, 10–12]. O’Hare et al. [13] noted that children with tic disorders and co-occurring neuropsychiatric comorbidities tend to have a lower global quality of life and more severe functional impairment. Considering the impact of associated psychopathology on the well-being of patients, an early diagnosis may allow prompt interventions that can improve quality of life, aid social skills, and facilitate academic achievement [14].

Tic disorders are clinically diagnosed on the basis of a detailed history and a neurological and psychiatric examination [4]. However, diagnostic difficulties can arise in certain circumstances because of the waxing and waning nature of tics and the variability of symptoms [15], which may impede initiating timely and appropriate interventions. The mean estimated interval between onset of tics and diagnosis is relatively long [16], with previous studies reporting a lag period ranging from 3 to 11.9 years [5, 17–19].

In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders in pediatric patients with tic disorders. In addition, we evaluated the effects of demographic and clinical factors on the timing of tic disorder diagnosis and on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of pediatric patients who were diagnosed with tic disorders according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-Ⅴ) at Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, Republic of Korea, between January 2012 and July 2019. Those who did not meet the diagnostic criteria or those who were lost to follow-up were excluded from this study.

Demographic and clinical data included gender, age of tic onset, age at diagnosis, types and duration of tic symptoms, tic severity at the initial clinical visit and at the most recent follow-up, and the presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities. The diagnosis of neuropsychiatric comorbidities such as ADHD, OCD, depression, and anxiety was documented by a pediatric neurologist or a psychiatrist based on a psychiatric interview, according to the DSM-Ⅴ criteria. The time to diagnosis of tic disorders was defined as the interval between the reported onset of tic symptoms and the timing of tic disorder diagnosis by a physician.

Severity of tics and tic-related impairment were assessed using the semi-structured interview Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and categorized as follows: absence of tics (0), minimal tics (1–9), mild tics (10–19), moderate tics (20–39), and severe tics (40–50). A high tic score was defined as moderate or severe tics (20–50).

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Fisher’s exact test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Student's t-test were used to compare the clinical outcomes by baseline demographics. In addition, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the relationship between the time to diagnosis of tic disorders and other variables. Statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05.

Ethical approval for this retrospective study was provided by the Institutional Review Board of Catholic Medical Center (IRB UC19RASI0149).

Results

Patient characteristics

We identified 119 pediatric patients (89 males, 30 females) who were diagnosed with tic disorders during the time frame of this study. The mean age of tic onset was 6.9 years (range, 1–14) and the mean age at the time of diagnosis of tic disorders was 8 years (range, 1–17). Of the 119 patients, ninety-two (77.3%) were diagnosed with provisional tic disorder and 19 (16%) with Tourette syndrome. The remaining 8 patients (6.7%) were diagnosed with chronic motor or vocal tic disorder.

The most common, first-presenting tics were eye blinking (50.4%), followed by jaw or lip movement (29.4%) and throat clearing (29.4%). In addition, head-turning or nodding (28.6%), eyeball rolling (26.9%), and arm movement (26.9%) were frequently observed (Table 1). Of the 119 patients, thirty-seven (31.1%) had at least one co-occurring neuropsychiatric disorder at the time of diagnosis of tic disorders. The most common comorbid neuropsychiatric condition was ADHD (10.9%), followed by anxiety disorder (7.6%), developmental delay or intellectual disability (6.7%), and epilepsy (6.7%) (Table 2). 

Tic severity and associated impairment

Seventy-six (63.9%) children in the sample were reported to have mild symptoms, thirty (25.2%) had moderate symptoms, and the remaining thirteen (10.9%) had severe symptoms. A comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with mild tics and those with moderate to severe tics is shown in Table 3. No significant differences were found between patients diagnosed with mild tics compared to moderate/severe tics with regard to age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis, or time between symptom onset and diagnosis. Subtypes of tic disorders, types of first-presenting tics, and presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities were not associated with tic severity. However, patients with moderate to severe tics were significantly more likely to have tics that were noticeable to strangers and that interfered with their daily functioning, compared to those with mild tics. 

Factors influencing time to diagnosis

The mean lag time from when tics were first noticed to diagnosis of tic disorders was 13.3 months (range, 0.25–132). Gender differences in lag time to diagnosis were observed, 10.0 months for females compared to 8.0 months for males (P = 0.050). No significant difference was found in the time to diagnosis between patients with the presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities, and those without (P = 0.914). In addition, age at symptom onset was not correlated with the time to diagnosis (Spearman’s ρ = –0.147, P = 0.110). The mean time to diagnosis was shorter in patients whose initial tics were motor tics only, compared to those with vocal tics only and combined motor and vocal tics, with a mean of 5.6 months (range, 0.25–24), 21.3 months (range, 0.25–96), and 18.9 months (range, 0.25–132), respectively (P <0.05). Tic severity was negatively correlated with diagnostic lag time (Spearman’s ρ = –0.185, P <0.05), that is, the more severe the tics, the less time that elapsed before a diagnosis.

Predictors of follow-up outcomes

The patients were followed up for an average of 20.2 months (range, 0.1–88.5) after the diagnosis of tic disorders. Of 119 patients, ninety-nine (83.2%) reported a greater than 50% reduction in tic severity, and twenty (16.8%) reported no changes in the tic symptoms at follow-up. To determine the factors related to favorable outcomes, we compared the characteristics of patients who achieved more than 50% reduction in symptoms with those who had no change in tic severity. Gender, age of onset, age at diagnosis, time interval between onset and diagnosis, subtype of tic disorder, initial symptoms, tic severity at diagnosis, presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities, and treatment utilization did not influence likelihood of favorable outcomes (Table 4).

Discussion

Isolated and transient tics are fairly common in childhood, ranging from 11–20% in different studies [20–22]. Diagnostic issues may arise in certain circumstances due to the waxing and waning nature and heterogeneity of tic symptom presentation [15]. Additionally, only a few studies have evaluated how many children with transient tics would become cases of Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder over time [23]. In this study, we tried to delineate the clinical features and follow-up outcomes in pediatric patients with tic disorders. We identified the complexities associated with tic disorders, including tic severity and related impairment, lag time to diagnosis, percentage of concomitant neuropsychiatric conditions, and predictors of clinical outcomes. The results of our study would help in better understanding of tic disorders.

We found that the mean age of 6.9 years for the onset of tics was higher than that reported in other studies, which ranged between 4 and 6 years for onset [5–7]. Mild tic symptoms may initially go unrecognized by caregivers and become noticeable only with increasing severity, which may account for the higher mean age at onset in this study. Consistent with previous studies by Robertson et al. [24], we found a higher proportion of tic disorders in males than females in our study. With regard to initial tic symptoms, eye blinking was observed most frequently, accounting for more than half of tic symptoms in patients (50.4%). Previous studies have also noted that tics usually begin in the head and face, with eye blinking being the first and the most common tic [25, 26].

Children with tic disorders have a higher likelihood of concomitant neuropsychiatric conditions [27]. Our results identified ADHD as the most commonly reported comorbid neuropsychiatric disorder, a finding consistent with previous research [28]. Tics are often not the most enduring or impairing problem in children with tic disorders; other coexisting neuropsychiatric conditions are often a greater source of impairment than the tics themselves [29]. Comorbid ADHD symptoms may have an undesirable impact on social, academic, and behavioral functions and can negatively impact quality of life and global psychosocial functioning [30–32]. Carter et al. [33] found that children with ADHD and tic disorders have more behavioral problems and poorer social adaptation compared to children with tic disorders only. Moreover, it has been postulated that the presence of ADHD in patients with tic disorders is correlated with higher rates of other neuropsychiatric comorbidities, such as OCD, anxiety disorders, anger control disorders, mood disorders, and personality disorders [5]. Our data noted a similar trend in that children with moderate to severe tics had more co-occurring neuropsychiatric disorders than those with mild tics, although the differences were not statistically significant. At a more general level, our results align with previous research showing that children with tic disorders may have increased healthcare needs and require supplemental mental health or educational services and support [34]. Therefore, clinical assessment of pediatric patients with tic disorders warrants a thorough evaluation for coexisting ADHD and other neuropsychiatric problems.

In our study, a relatively short lag time to diagnosis following the onset of tic symptoms was observed, with a mean duration of 13.3 months. This lag is significantly shorter than the 3 to 8 years delay reported in previous studies [5, 18]. The shorter time to diagnosis identified in our study is comparable to findings from more recent studies [16, 35]. In addition, time lag from when tics were first noticed to diagnosis was negatively correlated with tic severity. Growing awareness of tic symptoms among physicians and the availability of health information to patients and their families may be important factors in shortening the time to diagnosis [16]. Timely diagnosis of tic disorders may enable patients and their families to have access to optimized medical, psychological, and educational treatment and other support services [35].

We also found that patients with motor tics as the initial manifestation experienced less time to diagnosis than those with vocal tics. Patients with only vocal tics experienced relatively longer times to diagnosis compared to those with only motor tics or combined motor and vocal tics. Because throat clearing, sniffling, coughing, and grunting are the most common types of vocal tics, patients with vocal tics can often be misdiagnosed as having common pediatric conditions such as a cold, asthma, or allergy, which may contribute to diagnostic delay [4, 16].

With regard to follow-up outcomes, the vast majority of patients (83.2%) reported improvement in their tics over time in our study. Tics reach their apex early in the second decade of life and then usually improve during adolescence [26]. According to Bloch et al. [6], more than three-quarters of children with childhood tic symptoms had fewer tics or were completely tic-free at follow-up, while less than a quarter had moderate or greater tics at follow-up. Though questions regarding the clinical predictive factors of follow-up outcomes arise frequently in clinical practice, previous studies have not successfully identified reliable predictors of follow-up outcomes. Prognostic issues can be difficult to address clinically because tic disorders have a complex range of possible symptom combinations and comorbidities [36]. In our study, we attempted to delineate the demographic and clinical factors that could be used to predict the future course of tic disorders. There were, however, no associations between future tic severity and gender, age of tic onset or diagnosis, lag time to diagnosis, subtypes of tic disorders, types of initial tic symptoms, tic severity at diagnosis, presence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities, or treatment utilization. Although we did not uncover robust clinical predictors of the course of tic disorders, our findings may provide a useful platform for further long-term follow-up studies regarding this issue.

Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. Drawing our patient sample from a single referral center likely influenced the lack of statistical significance. Thus, larger prospective studies or collaborative trials are warranted to elucidate the complex interaction of tic severity, comorbidities, and tic-related impairment and reveal the predictors of long-term follow-up outcomes.

Conclusions

Tic disorders manifest a wide range of symptoms with heterogeneous presentations that have implications for the daily lives of patients, families, and communities. Despite the aforementioned limitations, this study provides better understanding and greater insight into the complexities of tic disorders. The evolving nature of tic expression and severity, high prevalence of neuropsychiatric comorbidities, and associated functional impairments reinforce the importance of comprehensive assessment during the disease course for determining and prioritizing goals of treatment. Furthermore, better recognition among parents, teachers, and health care providers of potential challenges related to either tic disorders or co-occurring conditions would help to best support the patient’s future health and well-being.

Abbreviations

DSM-Ⅴ: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5^th edition; ADHD: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder; YGTSS: Yale Global Tic Severity Scale

Declarations

Author details

¹ Department of Pediatrics, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 56, Dongsu-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea. ²Department of Pediatrics, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 271, Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu City, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this retrospective study was provided by the Institutional Review Board of Catholic Medical Center (IRB UC19RASI0149).

Consent to participate is not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable. 

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. 

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

The manuscript was written by Park EG and Kim YH. Data collection and analysis was conducted by Park EG. Kim YH supervised all aspects of the analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

References

1. Jankovic J. Tourette syndrome. Phenomenology and classification of tics. Neurol Clin. 1997;15:267–75.
2. Wolicki SB, Bitsko RH, Danielson ML, Holbrook JR, Zablotsky B, Walkup JT, Woods DW, Mink JW. Children with Tourette Syndrome in the United States: Parent-Reported Diagnosis, Co-Occurring Disorders, Severity, and Influence of Activities on Tics. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019;40:407–14.
3. Groth C, Debes NM, Skov L. Phenotype Development in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: A Large Clinical Longitudinal Study. J Child Neurol. 2017;32:1047–57.
4. Ludolph AG, Roessner V, Münchau A, Müller-Vahl K. Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders in childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:821–8.
5. Freeman RD, Fast DK, Burd L, Kerbeshian J, Robertson MM, Sandor P. An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3,500 individuals in 22 countries. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:436–47.
6. Bloch MH, Leckman JF. Clinical course of Tourette syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67:497–501.
7. Burd L, Kerbeshian PJ, Barth A, Klug MG, Avery PK, Benz B. Long-term follow-up of an epidemiologically defined cohort of patients with Tourette syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2001;16:431–7.
8. Bitsko RH, Holbrook JR, Visser SN, Mink JW, Zinner SH, Ghandour RM, Blumberg SJ. A national profile of Tourette syndrome, 2011–2012. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014;35:317–22.
9. Hirschtritt ME, Lee PC, Pauls DL, Dion Y, Grados MA, Illmann C, King RA, Sandor P, McMahon WM, Lyon GJ, Cath DC, Kurlan R, Robertson MM, Osiecki L, Scharf JM, Mathews CA. Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. Lifetime prevalence, age of risk, and genetic relationships of comorbid psychiatric disorders in Tourette syndrome. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:325–33.
10. Ganos C, Münchau A, Bhatia KP. The Semiology of Tics, Tourette’s, and Their Associations. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014;1:145–53.
11. Robertson MM. Tourette syndrome, associated conditions and the complexities of treatment. Brain. 2000;123 Pt 3:425–62.
12. Robertson MM. Mood disorders and Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: An update on prevalence, etiology, comorbidity, clinical associations, and implications. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61:349–58.
13. O'Hare D, Helmes E, Reece J, Eapen V, McBain K. The Differential Impact of Tourette’s Syndrome and Comorbid Diagnosis on the Quality of Life and Functioning of Diagnosed Children and Adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2016;29:30–6.
14. Peterson BS, Cohen DJ. The treatment of Tourette's syndrome: multimodal, developmental intervention. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 1):62–72.
15. Bruun RD, Budman CL. The course and prognosis of Tourette syndrome. Neurol Clin. 1997;15:291–8.
16. Shilon Y, Pollak Y, Benarroch F, Gross-Tsur V. Factors influencing diagnosis delay in children with Tourette syndrome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2008;12:398–400.
17. Shapiro AK, Shapiro E, Wayne HL. The symptomatology and diagnosis of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1973;12:702–23.
18. Wand R, Shady G, Broder R, Furer P, Staley D. Tourette syndrome: issues in diagnosis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1992;16:449–51.
19. Khalifa N, von Knorring AL. Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders in a total population of children: clinical assessment and background. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:1608–14.
20. Cubo E, Gabriel y Galán JM, Villaverde VA, Velasco SS, Benito VD, Macarrón JV, Guevara JC, Louis ED, Benito-León J. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren in central Spain: a population-based study. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;45:100–8.
21. Kurlan R, McDermott MP, Deeley C, Como PG, Brower C, Eapen S, Andresen EM, Miller B. Prevalence of tics in schoolchildren and association with placement in special education. Neurology. 2001;57:1383–8.
22. Linazasoro G, Van Blercom N, de Zárate CO. Prevalence of tic disorder in two schools in the Basque country: Results and methodological caveats. Mov Disord. 2006;21:2106–9.
23. Scahill L, Specht M, Page C. The Prevalence of Tic Disorders and Clinical Characteristics in Children. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2014;3:394–400.
24. Robertson MM. Annotation. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome–an update. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994;35:597–611.
25. Bruun RD. Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. An overview of clinical experience. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1984;23:126–33.
26. Leckman JF, Zhang H, Vitale A, Lahnin F, Lynch K, Bondi C, Kim YS, Peterson BS. Course of tic severity in Tourette syndrome: the first two decades. Pediatrics. 1998;102:14–9.
27. Leckman JF. Tourette's syndrome. Lancet. 2002;360:1577–86.
28. Khalifa N, von Knorring AL. Psychopathology in a Swedish population of school children with tic disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:1346–53.
29. Leckman JF, King RA, Bloch MH. Clinical Features of Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2014;3:372–9.
30. Cavanna AE, Servo S, Monaco F, Robertson MM. The behavioral spectrum of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;21:13–23.
31. Robertson MM. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, tics and Tourette's syndrome: the relationship and treatment implications. A commentary. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;15:1–11.
32. Sukhodolsky DG, Scahill L, Zhang H, Peterson BS, King RA, Lombroso PJ, Katsovich L, Findley D, Leckman JF. Disruptive behavior in children with Tourette's syndrome: association with ADHD comorbidity, tic severity, and functional impairment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;42:98–105.
33. Carter AS, O'Donnell DA, Schultz RT, Scahill L, Leckman JF, Pauls DL. Social and emotional adjustment in children affected with Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: associations with ADHD and family functioning. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000;41:215–23.
34. Claussen AH, Bitsko RH, Holbrook JR, Bloomfield J, Giordano K. Impact of Tourette Syndrome on School Measures in a Nationally Representative Sample. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2018;39:335–42.
35. Hollis C, Pennant M, Cuenca J, Glazebrook C, Kendall T, Whittington C, Stockton S, Larsson L, Bunton P, Dobson S, Groom M, Hedderly T, Heyman I, Jackson GM, Jackson S, Murphy T, Rickards H, Robertson M, Stern J. Clinical effectiveness and patient perspectives of different treatment strategies for tics in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20:1–450.
36. Groth C, Skov L, Lange T, Debes NM. Predictors of the Clinical Course of Tourette Syndrome: A Longitudinal Study. J Child Neurol. 2019;34:913–21.

tables

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Table 2 Comorbid neuropsychiatric disorders

Table 3 Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients based on tic severity

^aChi-square test was used.

^bIndependent t-test was used.

^cFisher’s exact test was used.

Table 4 Comparison of demographic and clinical features based on clinical outcomes

YGTSS, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale.

^aChi-square test was used.

^bIndependent t-test was used.