Germination percentage = (number ofgerminated seeds / total number of seeds) × 100 (1)[20]
Seedling growth bioassay. Fifteen healthy rice and E. crus-galli seedlings were grown in pots (volume = 9 × 9 cm) with 100 g of garden soil (content of organic matter ≤ 3%, pH = 5.42) of pearlite / manure (200 g L-1) mixture. Different concentrations of SAEO (E. crus-galli: 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 g, rice: 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1 g essential oil into 0.5 mL of DMF, and into 10 mL of 6 / 1000 Tween 80 aqueous solution, pH = 5.0, essentially nonvolatile) were sprayed (10 mL) evenly on the barnyard grass (2 - leaf stage) and rice seedlings (2 - leaf stage) and kept in the greenhouse. The plants were used in experiments when they were at the 2 - leaf stage. In all bioassay experiments spraying was applied to the foliage. Plant samples were harvested after seven days and their fresh weights recorded. Inhibition ratios of the essential oil were calculated based on the fresh weight data. The experiment was repeated three times. The seedlings inhibition ratio was calculated using the formula:
(Control-test sample) / Control × 100% (2)[21].
Collection and isolation of essential oil by vacuum fractional distillation. The active substance in SAEO was obtained by isolation using vacuum fractional distillation[22] (fraction Ⅰ temperature: 165 ℃, 170 ℃, 180 ℃; fraction Ⅱ temperature: 164 ℃, 169 ℃ and 175 ℃; presstion: − 95 kPa).
Bioassays were then conducted with different concentrations (100, 300, 500 mg essential oil into 0.5 mL of DMF, and into 10 mL of 6 / 1000 Tween 80 aqueous solution) of the collected condensed SAEO (at 165 ℃, 170 ℃ and 180 ℃). They were sprayed evenly on barnyard grass seedlings (2 - leaf stage). Grass samples were harvested after seven days and their fresh weights recorded. Inhibition ratios of the SAEO were calculated based on the fresh weight data. The experiment was repeated three times. The experimental group with the highest inhibition ratio was selected for a further secondary distillation at 164 ℃, 169 ℃ and 175 ℃. Bioassay experiments were then conducted as described before and the distillate collected. The experimental group which exhibited the highest inhibition ratio, was selected for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The chemical constituents of SAEO were identified using GC-MS. The data were acquired on a Shimazu GC-MS-QP2010 gas chromatograph (Shimazu, Japan). The chromatographic column conditions were as follows: the chromatographic column was RTX-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mmID × 0.25 µm df) and the carrier gas was highly pure helium, which had a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1, a diversion ratio of 3.0 and vaporization temperature of 300 ℃. The temperature program was a starting temperature of 100 ℃, maintained at 0.0 min, a heating rate of 20.0 ℃ min-1 to 180 ℃, maintained at 1.0 min, a heating rate of 5.0 ℃ min-1 to 200 ℃, maintained at 1.0 min, and a heating rate of 20.0 ℃ min-1 to 280 ℃, maintained at 4.0 min. The injection rate volume was 1 µL and the delay time of solvent was 3.15 min. Ion source: EI source, electron energy: 70 eV, ion source temperature: 240 ℃, interface temperature: 280 ℃, and scanning mass range: m / z 33–600. The nist05, nist05s and wiley7 libraries were used for identification of compounds. The relative amount of extract was determined using the peak area of the total ion chromatograms (TIC).
Bioassay with major compounds. Toxicity tests were carried out using three major compounds identified in SAEO from the GC-MS (eugenol, β-caryophyllene and α-caryophyllene). Eugenol was purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). β-caryophyllene and α-caryophyllene were purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China). Different concentrations of the three compounds were prepared (10, 50, 100, 300, 500 mg added to the mixture of 0.5 mL of DMF, and into 10 ml of 6 / 1000 Tween 80 aqueous solution) and each sprayed on E. crusgalli seedlings at the 2 - leaf stage. Grass samples were harvested after seven days and their fresh weight recorded. Inhibition ratios for each concentration were calculated based on the fresh weight data. The experiment was repeated three times.
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The eugenol content in SAEO collected at 165 ℃ (SAEO − 165) was determined using HPLC, which was performed on a Shimazu LC-10AD pump and an SPD-10A UV detector, with a C18 column (4.6 mm × 200 mm, packing: Hypersil, particle size: 5 µm) from Dalian Elite Analytical Instruments. The acetonitrile and methanol used for the HPLC were chromatographic pure and the water was also aseptic. The chromatographic condition was (mobile phase: methanol and water (65 : 35), flow rate: 1 mL min-1, detection wavelength: 280 nm, column temperature: 25, injection volume: 20 µL). The eugenol standard used was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (99% purity).
Preparation of standard: 20 mg of eugenol was weighed and added to the mobile phase, which was shaken and diluted to a concentration of 100 mg L-1. Preparation of test solution: SAEO − 165 was dissolved in sterile water and diluted to a ratio of 1: 100, 000. A volume of 20 µl each of the reference and test solutions was injected into the liquid chromatograph and ran according to the above chromatographic conditions. The chromatogram and peak area were recorded and the content was calculated based on the peak area.
Defense enzyme activities. Standard SAEO (0.5 g) was mixed with 0.5 mL of DMF and 10 ml of 6 / 1000 Tween 80 aqueous solution and sprayed on E. crusgalli and rice seedlings at the 2 - leaf stage. Grass sample were collected at 1, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h after spraying SAEO, and stored at − 70 ℃ until the measurement of defense enzymes activities and plant total proteins. The activities of the antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) were determined with kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total protein (TP) was determined using the Coomassie bright blue method. All kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute. The data were expressed as relative activity (%).
Statistical analyses. The data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and treatment values were compared at P ≤ 0.05. Data variance was determined using the data processing system (DPS) software and error analysis was carried out in MS Excel 2019. Graphs were produced using Origin 2017. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).