In this study, we observed a significant decrease in the SUVmean of the blood pool and a significant increase in FDG uptake in cardiac lesions during delayed scans, allowing even slight accumulation to be visualized as positive. The increase in CMV and CMA values was attributed to the increased accumulation of CS lesions and a decrease in the threshold value of the region of interest determined by the SUVmean of the blood pool. These findings are consistent with data from previous FDG PET/CT studies on atherosclerosis that have shown that delayed imaging decreases FDG uptake in the blood pool (9), suggesting that FDG PET/CT in the delayed phase may be more appropriate for screening CS compared to that in the early phase.
The diagnostic criteria for CS proposed by the JCS (13) and the Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement (1, 16) includes focal uptake on FDG PET and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as positive criteria. FDG PET plays an important role in the assessment of CS activity. A recent meta-analysis suggested that FDG PET/CT is less sensitive than MRI (17). Because of the relatively low resolution, FDG PET/CT may fail to identify some instances of CS, mainly in the early stages of the disease or when sarcoid granulomas are small and cannot be distinguished from blood pool accumulation. However, based on our investigation, we expect that the detection sensitivity for CS lesions can be improved by adding a delayed scan. Our research group reported a typical case indicating that delayed FDG PET/CT may be sensitive to small CS lesions (11, 12).
Semi-quantitative analyses using SUVmax, CMV, and CMA have been used for the diagnosis, assessment of treatment efficacy, and prognostic prediction of CS (18–20). Osborne et al. found that decreases in SUVmax and CMV, when comparing pre- and post-therapy values, were linked to an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), indicating that repeated PET scanning could potentially assist in adjusting immunosuppressive therapy to enhance LV function and prevent heart failure in CS (18). Ahmadian et al. demonstrated that patients with lower LVEF and a history of adverse clinical events, such as ventricular tachycardia (VT), sudden cardiac death, and heart block, had higher CMA (19). Furthermore, binary logistic regression analysis with CMA, SUVmax, and the total defect score of perfusion images demonstrated that CMA was the only independent predictor of events, including VT, sudden cardiac death, worsening atrioventricular block, cardiac hospitalization, and new or worsening heart failure. In this study, owing to the limited number of patients, it was difficult to determine which values obtained from the early and delayed images were useful for diagnosis or prognostic prediction. However, considering that the degree of FDG accumulation may vary depending on the time from administration to imaging, it may be necessary to standardize the time interval for evaluating these parameters for follow-up and research.
This study has several limitations. First, due to the retrospective nature of the study, the number of participants was relatively small. Second, obtaining pathological evidence for FDG-avid lesions is difficult; thus, we considered focal uptake as positive according to the JCS criteria, which are widely used in clinical sessions. Third, although the usefulness of delayed imaging was demonstrated, the optimal timing for image acquisition was not investigated. Recently, Adili et al. compared images obtained 1, 2, and 5 h after FDG administration using total-body PET/CT in patients with Takayasu arteritis, and reported comparable detection rates with images acquired 2 and 5 h after administration (21). However, conventional PET/CT may suffer from decreased image quality with longer time intervals between FDG administration and imaging owing to the influence of its half-life. Finally, in this study, patients without a confirmed diagnosis of CS and those with CS who had already received steroid treatment were excluded; therefore, it was not possible to evaluate the usefulness of delayed PET scans in the differential diagnosis or assessment of treatment effectiveness, necessitating further research in this area.