Acquisition and identification of transgenic cotton plants with the SikCOR431PM1 gene
To investigate the influence of the SikCOR431PM1 gene on the cold and drought tolerance of cotton, we integrated the SikCOR431PM1 gene into cotton using the pollen tube channel method to obtain SikCOR431PM1 transgenic cotton. Ten transgenic cotton lines were screened and analyzed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 1A). The relative expression levels of OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 were found to be higher and were further analyzed by RT-PCR. The results were consistent with those of qRT-PCR(Fig. 1B). Therefore, OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 were selected to conduct further gene function research.
Growth of cotton seedlings overexpressing SikCOR413PM1 gene under low-temperature and drought stress conditions
Cotton seedlings were exposed to low temperature and 20% PEG6000 stress. Under normal conditions (25°C), the WT and transgenic lines grew well without treatment. However, after exposure to 4°C, the leaves of WT cotton seedlings showed severe wilting, and most of them became necrotic and damaged due to the low temperature. In contrast, the leaves of transgenic lines showed much less severe wilting and still had certain vitality (Fig. 2A). After treatment with 20% PEG6000, the leaves of some WT lines exhibited noticeable wilting and curling, while those of transgenic cotton showed only weak wilting. This pattern persisted for 15 days, during which time the WT lines exhibited more significant wilting and withering than the transgenic lines. After 20 days of treatment, some WT lines exhibited even more severe growth retardation and leaf wilting, whereas the transgenic lines showed less severe leaf wilting (Fig. 2B).
To further clarify whether overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene can improve cell protection mediated by low-temperature and drought stress in cotton seedlings, we measured the survival rates of WT and transgenic lines (OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7) under low-temperature and 20% PEG6000 stress to evaluate their survival under these conditions. Under normal conditions, the survival rate of each cotton line was 100%. However, after exposure to 4°C, the survival rates of the WT and transgenic lines decreased to 23.3% (WT), 65.6% (OE-4), 73.3% (OE-5), and 80% (OE-7), respectively. After treatment with 20% PEG6000, the survival rates of the WT and transgenic lines were reduced to 33.3% (WT), 61.1% (OE-4), 53.3% (OE-5), and 68.9% (OE-7), respectively. Compared to the WT, the transgenic lines exhibited higher viability (Fig. 2C).
Under normal conditions, there was no significant difference in average fresh weight and dry weight between the WT and transgenic lines. However, after exposure to low temperatures, the wet weight of transgenic lines OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 was 23.6%, 36.6%, and 41.3% higher than that of the WT, respectively (Fig. 2D), while the dry weight was 23.7%, 24.1%, and 28.1% higher (Fig. 2E). Under 20% PEG6000 stress, the fresh weight and dry weight were lower than in the untreated control group. Nevertheless, the OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 lines exhibited 56.0%, 50.9%, and 72.5% higher fresh weight than the WT, and 56.5%, 44.7%, and 63.5% higher dry weight than the WT. These results demonstrate that overexpression of SikCOR413PM1 enhances the tolerance of transgenic cotton to low temperatures and drought at the seedling stage.
Overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene enhanced the cold and drought tolerance of cotton seedlings.
The WT and transgenic cotton plants grown for 70 days exhibited robust growth at room temperature (25°C) without treatment. However, after 24 h of exposure to 4°C, the leaves at the top of the WT plants showed wilting, whereas there was no significant change in the transgenic plants. After 48 h of exposure to 4°C, the WT plants exhibited severe wilting at the top growth point, while the transgenic plants showed only slight leaf wilting and drooping (Fig. 3A). After 14 days of drought treatment, the WT plants showed obvious signs of wilting, and the leaves near the base became loose and yellow. In contrast, the leaves of transgenic cotton showed less server wilting. After 21 days of drought treatment, compared to the transgenic plants, the WT plants exhibited more severe growth retardation and leaf wilting and shedding, while the leaves of transgenic plants did not fall off, and the stems of all transgenic plants remained full throughout the treatment process (Fig. 3B).
Under normal conditions, there was no significant difference in average fresh weight and dry weight between the WT and transgenic plants. However, after exposure to low temperatures, the wet weights of transgenic plants OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 were 19.4%, 24.2%, and 25.5% heavier than those of WT plants (Fig. 3C), and dry weights were 28.3%, 36.9%, and 41.1% heavier (Fig. 3D). Under drought stress, the fresh weight and dry weight were lower than in the untreated control group. Nevertheless, the fresh weight of transgenic plants OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 was 30.1%, 37.2%, and 42.6% heavier than that of the WT, and the dry weight was 40.6%, 50.6%, and 60.4% heavier than that of the WT. These findings demonstrate that overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene enhances the cold and drought resistance of transgenic cotton seedlings.
Figure 3 Phenotype analysis of WT and SikCOR413PM1 -expressing cotton plants under cold and drought stress.(A) Analysis of phenotype 70-d-old WT and transgenic plants OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 under 4°C for 24 h and 48 h, respectively; (B) Analysis of phenotype 70-d-old WT and transgenic plants OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 after drought treatment 14 and 21 days, respectively; (C) Fresh weight ; (D) Dry weight. The data represent the average of three independent biological replicates. Bars represent SDs. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 indicate significant differences relative to WT cotton plants.
Overexpression of SikCOR413PM1 alleviated cell membrane damage and accumulated more osmoregulatory substances.
To further elucidate the possible physiological mechanism through which SikCOR413PM1 overexpression improves cell protection under low-temperature and drought stress in cotton, we assessed the malondialdehyde (MDA) content and relative conductivity of WT and transgenic plants (OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7) to evaluate their physiological response to low-temperature and drought stress conditions. Compared to that of the WT plants, the MDA content in the leaves of transgenic plants was significantly reduced (Fig. 4A). Under 4°C stress treatment, the MDA content of transgenic cotton was 31.7% (OE-4), 31.6% (OE-5), and 36.9% (OE-7) lower than that of WT cotton, respectively. Under drought treatment, the MDA content of transgenic cotton was 26.3% (OE-4), 27.5% (OE-5), and 35.8% (OE-7) lower than that of WT cotton, respectively (Fig. 4B). There was no significant difference in relative conductivity between transgenic lines and WT under normal conditions. However, after exposure to 4°C, the relative electrolyte leakage (REL) of the WT and transgenic plants increased by 49.9% (WT), 36.3% (OE-4), 33.9% (OE-5), and 39.4% (OE-7), respectively. After drought treatment, the REL of the WT and transgenic plants increased by 46.6% (WT), 33.2% (OE-4), 29.5% (OE-5), and 36.8% (OE-7), respectively.
Figures 4C and D(Fig. 4) show that before stress, the contents of proline and soluble sugar were low in both WT and SikCOR413PM1 transgenic plants, and there was no significant difference between them. However, the contents of these two osmolytes significantly increased after exposure to low temperature and drought stress. Under 4°C stress, the proline and soluble sugar contents of transgenic lines were 43.1% and 32.0% (OE-4), 40.8% and 38.6% (OE-5), and 55.1% and 42.9% (OE-7) higher than those of WT lines, respectively. After drought treatment, the proline and soluble sugar contents of transgenic lines were 41.8% and 36.9% (OE-4), 42.7% and 45.8% (OE-5), and 47.2% and 47.9% (OE-7) higher than those of the WT, respectively. In summary, overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene in cotton can maintain the integrity of the cell membrane and promote the accumulation of osmotic protective agents under stress conditions.
Overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene maintained high antioxidant enzyme activity and expression analysis of related genes.
In this study, we detected the contents of O2− and H2O2, which can reflect the response of plants to stress in both WT and transgenic lines. The results showed that there was no significant difference among all lines under normal conditions. However, after exposure to low temperature and drought stress, there were significant differences between these lines. Compared to those in the WT lines, the contents of O2− and H2O2 in transgenic lines were significantly reduced (Fig. 5A and B).
We also measured the activity levels of the antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD, CAT, and GST. Under normal conditions, there was no significant difference between the transgenic lines and the WT. However, under low-temperature and drought stress conditions, each stress treatment enhanced the antioxidant enzyme activity of all plants, and the transgenic lines had higher antioxidant enzyme activities than the WT lines. Consistently, the expression levels of the GhSOD, GhPOD, GhCAT, and GhGST coding genes in the transgenic lines were also significantly higher than those in the WT lines after stress treatment (Fig. 5C-J). In summary, overexpression of the SikCOR413PM1 gene increased the expression of antioxidant enzyme genes and enhanced the activity of corresponding antioxidant enzymes, thereby regulating the amount of ROS to minimize the effect of oxidative stress.
Figure 5 Analysis of ROS and antioxidant enzyme activity and expression of related genes in WT and transgenic SikCOR413PM1 plants under cold and drought stress.(A) O2− contents; (B) H2O2 contents; (C) SOD activity; (D) Expression level of GhSOD; (E) POD activity; (F) Expression level of GhPOD; (G) CAT activity; (H) Expression level of GhCAT; (I) GST activity; (J) Expression level of GhGST. Data for the WT are means of three replicates, whereas data for SikCOR413PM1 transgenic plants are means of three different lines. Bars represent SDs. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 indicate significant differences relative to WT cotton plants.
Analysis of stress-related gene expression in SikCOR413PM1 overexpressing plants
We analyzed the expression levels of several stress-related genes, including GhDREB1A, GhDREB1B, GhDREB1C, GhERF2, GhNAC3, and GhRD22. Under normal conditions, there was no significant difference in the expression levels of GhDREB1A, GhDREB1B, and GhDREB1C between the WT and transgenic lines. However, after low-temperature and drought stress treatment, the expression levels of these genes in transgenic lines were significantly higher than those in the WT lines. Under low-temperature stress, the expression of GhDREB1A, GhDREB1B, and GhDREB1C genes in transgenic lines was 16.7, 9.9, and 8.6 times (OE-4), 16.7, 9.5, and 9.1 times (OE-5), and 18.7, 13.1, and 10.2 times (OE-7) higher than those in the WT, respectively. Under drought stress, the expression of these genes in transgenic lines was 9.6, 17.7, and 5.5 times (OE-4), 9.1, 19.3, and 4.9 times (OE-5), and 11.0, 21.7, and 6.6 times (OE-7) higher than those in the WT, respectively (Fig. 6A-C). Under low-temperature stress, there was no significant difference in GhRD22 expression between transgenic and WT cotton. Under drought stress, the expression of GhRD22 was significantly upregulated and was 11.2-fold (OE-4), 13.1-fold (OE-5), and 15.1-fold (OE-7) higher than that of the WT, respectively (Fig. 6D). Additionally, the expression of the GhERF2 gene in WT and transgenic plants was significantly different under stress treatment. The expression of the GhERF2 gene in transgenic plants was 9.1 and 11.7 times (OE-4), 8.1 and 13.4 times (OE-5), and 13.8 and 15.9 times (OE-7) higher than that in the WT under low-temperature and drought stress, respectively (Fig. 6E). Under drought stress, there was no significant difference in the expression of the GhNAC3 gene between transgenic and WT cotton, but after cold stress treatment, the expression levels increased in each plant. The expression levels of transgenic lines OE-4, OE-5, and OE-7 were 10.7, 12.9, and 14.5 times higher than those of the WT (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that overexpression of SikCOR413PM1 helps increase the expression level of stress response genes and enhances the low-temperature and drought tolerance of cotton.
Agronomic traits of SikCOR413PM1 overexpressing cotton in the field
The plant height of transgenic cotton overexpressing SikCOR413PM1 increased slightly but not significantly, and the number of fruit branches per plant and bolls per plant increased compared with that of the WT (Table.S1). The SikCOR413PM1 transgenic lines had eight to nine fruit branches per plant, and the WT plants had only seven fruit branches. In addition, compared with WT plants, SikCOR413PM1 transgenic lines had an average of one or two bolls per plant. Although there was no significant difference in boll weight and lint weight between SikCOR413PM1 transgenic lines and WT plants, the fiber yield of SikCOR413PM1 transgenic cotton lines was moderately increased. The seed cotton yield and lint yield of SikCOR413PM1 cotton were significantly increased. This may result from multiple tolerance activities of SikCOR413PM1, which effectively reduce the yield loss caused by abiotic stresses such as low temperature and drought.
In addition to the greenhouse experiments for low-temperature and drought resistance, we also evaluated the drought resistance of cotton plants overexpressing SikCOR413PM1 in the field (Fig. 7). The single boll weight, single boll lint weight, and lint percentage did not significantly differ between OE-4 and OE-7 lines, but the plant height, fruit branch number per plant, boll number per plant, and seed cotton yield of transgenic OE-4 and OE-7 lines were significantly higher than those of the WT. Our results indicate that overexpression of SikCOR413PM1 can improve drought tolerance and yield of cotton under both normal and drought stress conditions in the field.