The present study systematically reviewed the existed evidences about the non-invasive therapies for cervical infection of hr-HPV, focused on the clearance of hr-HPV and regression of mild abnormal cytology related with hr-HPV, thus reported notable results. First, we reported polled outcomes of the largest amount (10424 women with cervical infection of hr-HPV and 1966 women with mild abnormal cytology related with hr-HPV) up to now, found there were significant different ratio of hr-HPV clearance and abnormal cytology regression. Second, there was no cue for persistent hr-HPV infections until now, which was the strongest risk factor for CIN and cervical cancer, we found non-invasive therapies was helpful for clearance of persistent hr-HPV infection, provided a new strategy and direction for clinical treatment of hr-HPV and prevention of cervical cancer. Third, subgroup analysis found systematic therapy, topical therapy and TCMs had consistent results, further verified the significance of non-invasive therapies, positive non-invasive treatment might be reasonable alternative strategy for passive frequent surveillance.
HPV was double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses belonging to the papillomavirus family, according to the carcinogenic ability, it was divided into low risk HPV(type of 6, 11, 42, 43, etc) and high risk HPV(type of 16,18, 31,33, etc)[71]. They were mainly transmitted by sexual behavior and particularly frequent in sexual active women. Mostly, the infection regressed autonomously within 2 years, left about 10% persistent infection might progress to dysplastic lesions from low to high grade intra‐epithelial neoplasia, a few might progress to cervical cancer. Therefore, effective therapies for clearance of hr-HPV might significantly decrease the risk of persistent infection of hr-HPV, precancerous neoplasia and cervical cancer.
Due to high ratio of auto-regression and uncertain effect of current intervention for hr-HPV, close surveillance was recommended for women with hr-HPV infection, even for those with mild abnormal cytology[72]. However, simply wait-and-watch approach caused serious psychological burden to hr-HPV positive women for a long time, large numbers of patients and medical staff sought effective treatment urgently. several non-invasive therapies such as CO2 laser[73], cryotherapy[74], photodynamic therapy[75], multiple medicines [76–78]and so on, were clinical tried for decades, the reported effects were variable and inconsistent, the significance of non-invasive therapies for hr-HPV infection was controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of reported non-invasive therapies by meta-analysis.
At first, we evaluated the effect of non-invasive therapy for clearance of cervical hr-HPV infection, after polling the results of existed 44 RCTs concerned the topic, we observed the clearance of hr-HPV in experimental group was significant higher than control group (OR:3.83 (95%CI:2.77 ~ 5.30), p < 0.0001), meant noninvasive therapy was helpful for clearance of cervical hr-HPV infection, sensitivity analysis found the cumulative result was stable and dependable. Several noninvasive therapies have been investigated for the treatment of HPV infection for decades. It had been reported that the oral use of probiotics might modify the microbiota of inferior reproductive tract and increase HPV clearance[79], interferon[80] and leukocyte extract[81] had been reported as immunomodulator to induce humoral and cellular immunity against HPV, several in vitro studies also suggested some TCMs and their extract including baofukang suppository[82], polyphenon E[83], curcumin[84], and myrtle[20] could inhibit the transcription of HPV E6/E7 oncogene and replication of HPV, several therapeutic vaccines had been reported favor of HPV clearance. However, the results based on RCTs was inconsistent, Bandit Chumworathayi.et al[43] compared the clearance rate of HPV infection among women aged older than 30 years with biopsy-confirmed LSIL after cryotherapy, found the difference in the HPV clearance rate between two groups was inconclusive (89.7% during cryotherapy group vs 90.3% during observed group), Yu-Che Ou.et al[48] and Veronique Verhoeven.et al[49] found oral probiotic did not influence genital hr-HPV clearance, Miriam Dellino.et al[42] found oral Lactobacillus crispatus did not influence genital hr-HPV clearance, Luis Serrano.et al compared efficacy of a Coriolus versicolor-Based Vaginal Gel (Papilocare) for hr-HPV infection, demonstrated a better clearance of hr-HPV (59.6% during Papilocare group vs 41.9% during observed group), Wenping Wang. et al [32] evaluated the efficacy of focused ultrasound (FU) for hr-HPV infection with LSIL, found FU might eliminate hr-HPV
infection with few adverse effects and good tolerance, with a clearance rate of 75.6% in FU group compared to 25.6% in during observed group. These contradict results made the significance of non-invasive therapy for cervical hr-HPV infection was not defined yet. Some researchers suggested that asymptomatic HPV infection should not be treated until complication with precancerous lesions, as a result, hundreds of un-treated HPV-positive patients lived in a state of anxiety and terror for years. Present meta-analysis showed the non-invasive treatments had a statistically significant improvement in HPV clearance rate compared with the controls. Active treatment with simple, economic, effective and non-invasive approaches to promote HPV clearance might be a reasonable alternative for surveillance.
Cytology combined with hr-HPV testing remained the the mainstay of cervical cancer prevention, especially in developing countries, abnormal cytology was a sign that required close attention and positive treatment[85]. The multisteps progression from ASCUS to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), further to cervical cancer represented loss of control of HPV duplication and atypical transformation of cervical epithelial cells. High-grade CIN was commonly treated by surgical excisional procedures such as cold knife conisation and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), the excised cervical tissue required further pathological evaluation to rule out incomplete excision and complicating cervical cancer. However, surgery carried the risk for pregnancy associated complications, meanwhile, might not effective clear HPV and carry a higher risk of recurrence. Usually, mild abnormal cytology related with HPV did not need excisional procedures because of high ratio of spontaneous regression rate and lower risk of cervical cancer, however, about 7% of CIN 1 lesions might progress to high-grade CIN within 1 year and required surgical treatment[86]. Effective non-surgical therapies were needed urgently for these patients to reduce the rate of progression. Present meta-analysis showed the non-invasive treatments had a statistically benefit for regression of mild abnormal cytology related with hr-HPV compared with the controls, non-invasive therapy might be a suitable treatment for these patients.
Several treatment strategies had been reported for hr-HPV, including ablation, cytotoxic agents, photodynamic therapy, and medical immunomodulators. Multiple medicines were reported in clinical trials, such as AV2[87], 5-Fluorouracil[88], imiquimod[89], cidofovir[90], retinoic acid[91], beta and alpha-Interferon[92], probiotics and so on, with different outcomes. During present meta-analysis, we also found significant heterogeneity among individual studies, might affect the reliability of the polled results. So, a meta-regression based on types of treatment was adopted to verify the results, types of treatment was divided into systematic therapy, topical therapy and traditional chinese medicines, subgroup analysis also reached consistent results, meanwhile the heterogeneity was obviously reduced, further confirmed the effectiveness of the non-invasive therapies.
Hr- HPV could integrate their oncogenic DNA into the host genome and
persist in the cervical epithelium for years or even decades, most hr-HPV infections were spontaneous cleared within 6–18 months without interventions, however, about 10% of women might suffer from persistent hr-HPV infections, which was the strongest risk factor for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.There was currently no standard therapy for persistent hr-HPV infections yet. To evaluate whether noninvasive therapy was helpful for clearance of cervical presistent hr-HPV infection, further subgroup analysis was implemented, we identified 5 RCTs with no heterogeneity(I2 = 0%), enrolled 430 patients, compared the effect of non-invasive therapy to placebo/surveillance, found the ratio of presistent hr-HPV clearance in experimental group was 9.66 times higher than control group, suggested non-invasive therapy was effective for persistent hr-HPV infections.
The main purpose of performing a meta-analysis was to try to provide more convincing evidence to answer the key clinical issue than single primary study, the key clinical issue we focused was whether noninvasive therapy was related with clearance of cervical hr-HPV infection and regression of mild abnormal cytology related with hr-HPV. Present meta-analysis enrolled well designed RCTs to provide high-level evidence. However, there were various therapies were studied, the reported effects were variable, our polled results suggested non-invasive therapy was effective, which therapy was more effective than others could not be concluded, because we enrolled only RCTs compared to placebo or no treatment. This was the the major limit of present meta-analysis. Further meta-analysis compared the effect between various therapies will provide better reference for clinical treatment. Second, the duration of follow up was too short, less than one years in vast majority of RCTs, shorter than the reported most common spontaneous clearance period by previous literature, the insufficient observation time might affect the judgment of therapeutic effect. Third, we tried to compared the adverse events between experimental group and control group to evaluate the safety of non-invasive therapies, unfortunately, only a few RCTs detailedly reported the adverse events, however, the reported types, severity, incidence and statistical methods of adverse events lacked standardized statistics, we could not quantitatively synthesize and compare the adverse events between experimental group and control group, we could not draw conclusive conclusion about the safety, according to the description during these trials, no serious adverse events had been reported, we could speculate the non-invasive therapies were well tolerated. At last, we must state briefly, although sensitivity analysis found the cumulative results were stable and dependable, there were significant heterogeneity among individual studies, even during meta-regression based on types of treatment, meanwhile the funnel plot for enrolled studies was asymmetrical, significant publication bias could not be excluded, due to these limitation, cautions must be
paid when interpreting such results.
The main strengths of our review and meta-analysis were scientifically incorporating the results of existed RCTs, the collection of the largest amount of HPV positive women until now, comprehensive assessment all of available treatments and focusing on both the clearance of HPV and the regression of abnormal cytology related with HPV. In addition, despite the diversity of regimens used in different trials, this study reported not only the overall group results but also subgroup analysis by grouping regimens into systematic therapy, topical therapy and TCMs, such analysis would be more interpretable and could potentially facilitate the development of novel medications with similar mechanisms.