Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
We carried out ten in-depth interviews among mothers who underwent early removal of long-acting family planning methods. All study participants were married. The majority of participants, were protestant in religion. In terms of age, the participants were found between 25-32 years old, and the mean age was 29.10+ (3.01SD). The majority of the participants (8 out of 10) were government employees, 2 out of 10 were housewives. Half of all study participants were Diploma holder (5 out of 10)(Table 1).
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of women who underwent early removal of long-acting family planning methods in Bedesa town, Wolaita Zone,2020.
Code
|
Age
|
Religion
|
Ethnicity
|
Educational status
|
Marital status
|
Occupation
|
IDI1
|
25
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Health informatics technician
|
IDI2
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
government employee
|
IDI3
|
32
|
protestant
|
Wolaita
|
2 nd cycle
|
Married
|
Home manager
|
IDI4
|
25
|
protestant
|
Wolaita
|
BSC
|
Married
|
Teacher
|
IDI5
|
28
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Runner
|
IDI6
|
30
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
2nd cycle
|
Married
|
Merchant
|
IDI7
|
25
|
Orthodox
|
Wolaita
|
High school
|
Married
|
Home manager
|
IDI8
|
30
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Digree
|
Married
|
Midwives
|
IDI9
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Government
|
IDI10
|
32
|
Protestant
|
Wolaita
|
Diploma
|
Married
|
Government
|
Family planning from user perspectives
Majority of participants mentioned that different contraceptive methods were available in Bedesa health center. These were injectable, pills, condoms, Implanon, and IUDs. However, most of the participants had a various fear concerning family planning methods. Some participants had fear of procedures during insertion and removal of long-acting family planning. Delayed fertility after removal of long-acting was another frequently stated fear by the clients. Some of them perceived that, these contraceptive methods need eating special food and drinks. Some concerns of women on long-acting family planning methods were fear of death, paralysis, which causes medical illness and discomfort during sex.
“Family planning helps to prevent unplanned pregnancy … In using contraceptives inserted under the skin; there is no need of reminding daily. When we are using oral contraceptive pills there is a need to remember frequently.” (IDI4) \
“I feared to use loop because of the information that was circulating in the community… mothers who used loop as birth control developed paralysis…. which refrained me from using it (IDI 1)”.
“Implant can move in your body from arm to leg, it can stab you, and you ’can’t work while the implant is in your arm. It is painful on insertion and removal; and challenging to do hard works like cooking food and washing clothes. Health workers are not interested to remove within six months after insertion”. (IDI 10)
“IUD is not good during sex. It can be lost in the body and may cause foul smelling vaginal discharge”. (IDI 6)
Reasons for early removal of long-acting family planning
The majority of participants mentioned that the side effects of the method were the main reason of early removal. There are different side effects mentioned for early removal of which the frequently mentioned were heavy and irregular menses, weight loss, and dizziness. The other mentioned side effects were crampy abdominal pain, skin discoloration, itching, behavioral change, numbness, burning sensation on micturation, malaisma, headache, sleep disturbance, amenorrhea, delayed fertility, dysmenorrhea, frequent hunger, thirst, weakness , difficulty of walking, and activity intolerance.
“…I decided to discontinue early because of heavy and irregular menses and weight loss. The bleeding stayed for one to two month. I also had skin discoloration and itchy skin” (IDI10)
“…Implanon was inserted for 3 years, but it was kept only for 7 months. Because, I was not comfortable, my facial skin color was changed and black patches like melasma appeared on my face. In addition to this, there was a movement in my abdomen like baby kicking during pregnancy, persistent neck pain, and absence of menses.” (IDI1)
Almost all clients received counseling services by the health care provider. However, some of them mentioned the counseling service was not adequate.
“Health workers gave me a counseling service before inserting Implanon. However, they didn’t inform me in detail about the benefits and risks of Implanon.” (IDI3)
“The health care providers informed me that an implant is more advantageous than Injectable. Injectable do have effect on bone damage, cause weight gain and contains additives. Pills are also full of additives, which may lead to gastritis.” (IDI5).
Male’s involvement in contraceptive use and sharing responsibilities in reproductive life is essential. However, there was no consensus about the role of husbands in contraceptive decision making and use. Some women mentioned good support from their husbands for contraceptive use:
“…I stopped the injectable to get pregnant due to the influence made by my husband and few neighbors. Following the cessation of the injectable, I was on normal menstrual period for one year and half. Finally, I got pregnant and faced no problem during the whole pregnancy period until I gave birth at the health center.” (IDI7)
Another woman point out that husband’s disapproval was one of the reasons for the early removal of Implanon “… My intention is to use Implanon for 3 years; however, my husband was against my intention. He even fought with me and bitten my hands.” (IDI10)
Desired family size
Seeking more children was also found to be the other reason for the early removal of long-acting family planning methods. Majority of women desired two to three children. But some of them desired more than five children
“…. Even though I took Implanon according to my personal choice and voluntary base, I have removed it because of seeking more children.” (IDI2).
User’s experience during and after contraceptive use
The majority of participants sufficiently explained their lived experience of contraceptive use. The most commonly mentioned experiences were types of contraceptive methods used, duration of using contraceptives and decisions for changing from one family planning method to the other. They also said that long term use resulted in some problems with their health status.
“…Before I gave my first birth, I had been using depo. I used Jadelle after the second child. But Jadelle was removed because of side effects, and then I switched Jadelle to depo.” (IDI2)
Most women perceived that they regained their health immediately after removal of long acting contraceptive method.. Furthermore, most study participants diverted their attention to short-acting contraceptives, mainly Depo-Provera.
“…After removal of Implanon, I regained my health and peaceful life. I have changed to Depo Provera and I have been comfortable with depo. ” (IDI10)
“… After removal of Implanon, the bleeding was not improved and I went to health center and they removed it. But the bleeding kept without showing any improvement. ” (IDI7)
Participant suggestion and future plan
Most mothers identified different sorts of opinion regarding their future plan on family methods. The most frequently mentioned suggestion were to choice family planning methods without health professional’s influence and to delay contraceptive use till the first child-delivery.
“…information regarding family planning needs adequate counseling. However, Health professionals do not give adequate information. Most of the times mothers get information from the neighbours and get worried. ” (IDI10)
“…I visited health facility three months after Implanon insertion to take Implanon off, but the health professional did not agree to remove it before six months.” (IDI8)