2.1. Experimental animals
Experiments involving animals were given previous approval by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, under the approval number #IACUC-20211220-14.
A total of 18 male Sprague-Dawley rats (6–8 weeks old and approximately 260–290 g of body weight;Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co.,Ltd) were reared in cages in a temperature-controlled room under a 12-h shift of light-dark cycle. Animals had access to food and water ad libitum, and were subjected to the experimental procedures described below after one week of adaptive feeding.
2.2. Model establishment
Rats were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 6 per group): i) control group; ii) IBS model group; and iii) nNOS inhibition group.
As previously described[23], a 14-day colorectal distention (CRD) combined with five days of subsequently treatment with restraint stress (RS) was used to establish a rat model of IBS visceral hypersensitivity in both the IBS model group and nNOS inhibition group. Briefly, an 8F balloon catheter was inserted into the rectum to make the balloon site about 2 cm away from the anus, and the catheter was fixed to the rat tail using figure-of-eight fixation. The rats then underwent CRD twice at a pressure of 60 mmHg for 1 min with a 30-min between each distension for 14 days. After CRD, the rats were placed in a specific restraint device, and their limb activities were restricted without affecting their breathing. RS was induced by 2 hours of immobilization for five consecutive days. These experiments were performed between 12:00 p.m. and 14:00 p.m. daily; rats in the control group did not undergo CRD combined with RS.
2.3. Administration of nNOS inhibition
After modeling, rats in the nNOS inhibition group were administered L-NAME (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) (100 mg/Kg) intraperitoneally at a dose of 1 mL/Kg dissolved in distilled water 1 hour prior to the CRD; rats in the control group and the IBS model group were administrated intraperitoneally with equal volume distilled water instead of L-NAME.
2.4. Visceral sensitivity measurement
Visceral sensitivity of rats was assessed by the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) test[24, 25]: 0, no behavioral response to CRD; 1, brief head movement only; 2, contraction of abdominal muscles; 3, lifting of the abdomen; 4, arching of the body and lifting of the pelvis. The balloon pressure to which each rat responded by lifting the abdomen (AWR score = 3) was recorded as the pain threshold intensity of CRD. During the measurements, CRD was conducted three times in each rat by two independent evaluators for 30 s and separated by 5 min. The average AWR value was obtained to filter out discrepancies, and considered for downstream statistical analyses.
2.5. Sample collection
Rats were sacrificed by CO2 gas inhalation; the distal colon was dissected, and the tissue and its contents were immediately collected and frozen at − 80°C for subsequent analysis.
2.6. Determination of NO and nitrite contents
NO and nitrite contents in the distal colon of rats were determined using colorimetric methods. Frozen samples of the distal colon were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline, and the supernatants were collected after centrifugation. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, NO and nitrite contents in the distal colon of rats were determined using colorimetric assays which were applied by the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Jiangsu, China). The absorbance of samples was measured at 550 nm using a Thermo Scientific Varioskan Flash (Thermo Fisher, USA).
2.7. Determination of protein and mRNA expression levels of nNOS
Western blotting and real-time PCR were used to evaluate changes in protein and mRNA expression levels of nNOS in the three experimental groups.
After grinding in liquid nitrogen, 1ml of total protein extraction reagent containing protease inhibitors was added, and proteins were extracted from frozen distal colon tissue after homogenization. Protein content was determined using the BCA protein Quantification kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primary antibodies included nNOS (cat. no. 4234S, 1:40; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc, USA) and β‑actin (cat. no. ET1601-4, 1:1,000; Shanghai Ruiyuan Biotechnology, China). The secondary antibodies were included in the Simple Wes Kit (Protein Simple, USA).The Simple Western 12–230 kDa Size-based Assay was employed using a Wes™ system (Protein Simple, USA).
Total RNA was extracted from frozen samples of distal colon tissues following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using a TaKaRa reverse transcription kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Japan) and primers shown in Table 1. Real-time PCR amplifications were carried out in an ABI real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA).
2.8. Quantitative detection of gut microbiota
Quantitative PCR was used to detect target bacteria in rat fecal samples. Total bacterial DNA was isolated from rat fecal samples, and concentration of DNA samples was determined using micronucleic acid quantification instrument. Primers used in qPCR amplifications are reported in Table 1. Plasmids containing target genes were 10-fold diluted to be used as standards for establishing the qPCR standard curve; plasmids were manufactured by Zhejiang Tianke Biotechnology (Zhejiang, China). PCR mixtures (20 µL final volume) contained 10 µL of SYBR Green qPCR Super-Mix-UDG with Rox (Invitrogen, USA), 0.4 µL of each primer (10 µm), 8.2 µL of DNA-free water, and 10 ng of standard plasmid or DNA template. Thermal cycling steps for qPCR amplifications were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions in an ABI real-time PCR system 7500 (Applied Biosystems). Primer specificity was confirmed by melting curves and gel electrophoresis. Each gene was surveyed in triplicate for each sample, and its mRNA expression level was compared against the standard curve and a negative control. The efficiency of qPCR amplifications was within the range of 90.3–97.5%.
Table 1
Primer pairs used in the present study.
Target
|
Nucleotide sequence (5'→ 3')
|
nNOS
|
F: AATGGTGGAGGTGCTGGAGGAG
|
R: GTCTGGAGAGGAGCTGATGGAGTAG
|
GAPDH
|
F: GGCACAGTCAAGGCTGAGAATG
|
R: ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCAGTA
|
Total bacteria
|
F: TCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT
|
R: GGACTACCAGGGTATCTATCCTGTT
|
Escherichia coli
|
F: GCGAAGTTAAACACCACGAC
|
R: ACCCGTACCAGCAGTAGATT
|
Butyrate-producing bacteria
|
F: GCIGAICATTTCACITGGAAYWSITGGCAYATG
|
R: CCTGCCTTTGCAATRTCIACRAANGC
|
2.9. Determination of butyrate content
Butyrate content in the colon and stool samples was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry tandem technique (LC-MS/MS). LC-MS/MS analyses were performed using a UPLC system coupled with an AB4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Chromatographic conditions were as follows: EC-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, 2.7 µm; Agilent Technologies, USA); column temperature, 30°C; flow rate, 0.3 mL/min; mobile phase A, 0.05% formic acid; mobile phase B, methanol; post-time, 15 min; injection volume, 10 µL; isometric elution, 80:20. Mass spectrometry conditions were as follows: ion source, positive ion mode; spray voltage, 4500; temperature, 450°C; ion source gas, 1:40 arb; ion source gas, 2:50 arb; curtain gas, 35 arb; collision gas pressure, 7 arb.
2.10. Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.3 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was performed for comparison between multiple groups, Spearman's correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis, and differences were considered significant when p values were < 0.05.