Synthesis of PAPH and oxidation of pectin
The PSI was reacted with isopropylamine and hydrazine successively to prepare PAPH (Fig. 1a). The importation of the hydrazide groups was designed for cross-linking, while the isopropyl groups was aimed to regulate the hydrophilicity of the polymer to mimic the PNIPAM structure (Scheme S1) and expected to obtain thermo-sensitive poly(amino acid). The structure of PAPH at various stages was determined by FT-IR, there is a strong absorbance at 1718 cm− 1 and a shoulder at 1797 cm− 1 on the FT-IR spectrum of PSI, which are characteristic absorbances of the five-numbered PSI rings (Fig. 1b). When the PSI was reacted with 50% ratio of isopropylamine, the characteristic absorbance of PSI decreased and only a small shoulder left at 1797 cm− 1, at the same time, the 1H NMR spectra showed a new peak at 3.80 ppm proved the isopropylamine was imported onto the PSI (Fig. S1). The absorbance at 1718 cm− 1 and 1797 cm− 1 disappeared completely after reacted with the hydrazine and moved to 1650 cm− 1 indicated all PSI rings were consumed completely. At the same time, the peak represented PSI ring (5.0 ppm) disappeared from the 1H NMR spectrum also proved the complete consumption of the PSI and the hydrazide groups were imported. The resultant poly(aspartic acid) derivative did not show thermos-responsivity and the product PAPH with 50% hydrazide group ratios was used for following investigations.
The NaIO4 oxidation was used to transform vicinal diols on pectin into aldehyde groups [59] (Fig. 1c). The FT-IR spectra of the product (OPec) showed an increased absorbance at 1730 cm− 1, proved aldehyde groups were generated and ready to react with PAPH to fabricate biodegradable hydrogels.
Fabrication of the PAPH/OPec hydrogel and mechanical property investigation
The PAPH solution and the OPec solution with same concentrations were mixed together and put into the round molds or glass vials for gelation (Fig. 2a). It was observed the hydrogels formed pretty fast and the gelation time decreased with increasing concentration. However, all hydrogel from 7%-10% formed within 3 min, fast enough for injection applications. As a result, when the mixture solution was loaded in a syringe and injected into a petri dish, hydrogel formed shortly after the injection (Fig. S2).
The hydrogels were investigated by rheology study on TA AR2000ex rheometer with 25 mm plates. The hydrogels with concentration from 7–10% showed higher storage modulus (G′) compared to loss modulus (G″) (Fig. S3), and the mechanical strength (G′) decreased with decreasing concentration. The G′ of the hydrogels increased from ~ 350 Pa to ~ 2400 Pa with concentration increased from 7–10% because of increased cross-linking density (Fig. 2b), at the same time, the flexibility decreased accordingly. The G′ of 10% hydrogel with highest mechanical strength began to decrease around 20% strain and the G′′ exceeded G′ to show liquid characteristic at 109% strain (Fig. S3). The critical strain 9% and 8% hydrogels increased to 147% and 208% (Fig. 2c, d) and the 7% hydrogel showed an even higher critical strain of 260%.
Morphology and self-healing of the hydrogels
The hydrogels with microporous structure could supply spaces and channels for drug loading and diffusion. The SEM images of PAPH/OPec hydrogels exhibited interconnected microstructures with the pore diameters increased with deceasing gelator concentrations (Fig. 3a). All hydrogel showed microporous structure fit for drug loading and delivery, which endowed the PAPH/OPec hydrogel with potential application in biomedications. Based on moderate mechanical strength and good flexibility, the 8% hydrogel was selected for intensive studies as DOX release carrier in following experiments.
The alternate strain sweep can be used to determine the self-healing of PAPH/OPec hydrogel. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the G′ of the 8% hydrogel decreased when the strain increased from 5% to100%, but the G′ recovered to its original value right after the G′ was returned to 5%, indicated the formed cracks were repaired. The hydrogel could also heal the large cracks after the strain was regulated to 200% for 3 min. As a result, when the hydrogel halves were contacted for 24 h, the hydrogel integrated into a whole disc and could hold its weight by tweezers (Fig. 3c). The contact interface became almost invisible indicated the large cracks could be repaired slowly to show consistent property during its bioapplications.
Cytotoxicity of the PAPH/OPec hydrogel
The biocompatibility of PAPH/OPec hydrogel was evaluated through a variety of methods. The CCK-8 experiment showed over 90% cell viability when the LO-2 cells were incubated with PAPH/OPec hydrogel solutions for 24 h or 48 h and 72 h with the hydrogel solution up to 10 mg/mL (Fig. 4a). Moreover, the absorbance increased with increasing incubation time indicated the hydrogel did not influence the cell prefoliation (Fig. 4b). The good biocompatibility of PAPH proved the coupling of isopropylamine did not influence the application of PAsp in bioapplications. As a result, the PAPH/OPec hydrogel has good biocompatibility, which ensured biosafety as in vivo drug release vehicle in future biomedical applications.
Hemocompatibility of the PAPH/OPec hydrogel
The hydrogel used in vivo need to contact with blood and the hemolysis could cause serious consequences. The hemolysis test was used to evaluate the in vitro blood compatibility of PAPH/OPec hydrogel [60]. After the red blood cells (RBC) were incubated in the hydrogel solutions for 1 h and centrifuged for 15 min, the color of samples was observed and the absorbance of the up-layer solution was scanned by microreader. The RBC in all hydrogel groups aggregated at the bottom of the tube and the up layers were light yellow comparable to that of PBS rather than bright red color of the positive control (Fig. 5a). The quantitative determination showed the hemolysis ratio of all precursors and hydrogels were lower than 5%. The hemolysis ratio was below 2% for precursors and hydrogel no matter the concentration, which indicated good blood compatibility during blood contact.
DOX loading and sustained release the PAPH/OPec hydrogel
The biocompatible hydrogel was expected to be used as DOX release vehicle for antitumor therapy. The DOX released fast in first a few hours and the release rate decreased after 24 h (Fig. 5b). In pH 7.4 buffer, the DOX released 46.4% in 24 h, but the release ratio increased to 54.5% in pH 6.5 buffer and 63.9% in 5.4 buffer. It is well known the DOX released fast in acidic conditions because the DOX dissolves better in low pH since it contains amine group. Furthermore, the acid could catalyze the reversible reaction of the dynamic covalent hydrazone bond. As a result, the DOX would be more released to the tumor site based on low pH caused by fast metabolization of the tumors.
In vitro biodegradation of PAPH/OPec hydrogel
The PAPH has biodegradable PAsp backbone and the pectin is a biobased polymer, as a result, the PAPH/OPec hydrogel could be degraded by enzymes. Although the PAsp backbone could also be degraded under natural conditions, the hydrogel was still solid in 7 days. On the other hand, the pectinase degraded the PAPH/OPec hydrogel into viscous solution by 7th days because the pectinase could cleave the pectin backbone (Fig. 6a).
In situ PAPH/OPec hydrogel formation and in vivo biodegradation
The PAPH/OPec mixture solutions turned into hydrogels fast, which facilitates location of the loaded drugs to the injection position. When the PAPH solution and OPec solution were mixed in the mixing needle and injected into the back of Kunming mice, a hump appeared on each mouse. The hydrogel under the skin could be observed and could be peeled off. The size of the hydrogel became smaller and smaller by degradation and the size decreased ~ 50% after 5 days (Fig. 6b). At this time, the color of the hydrogel changed because of the fluid exchange, which is an important process for drug release. After 9 days, the hydrogel disappeared completely with no residue figured out. Moreover, there is no inflammation observed around the hydrogel during the whole in vivo degradation process based on excellent biocompatibility. The H&E images was observed to further confirm this point, and the tissues around the hydrogel showed same morphology compared to normal tissues (Fig. 6c).
In vivo colon cancer treatment of PAPH/OPec hydrogel loaded DOX
The PAPH/OPec hydrogel was used to load DOX for colon cancer therapy to evaluate the performance of hydrogel in improving antitumor efficacy and reducing in vivo toxicity. The process of the antitumor investigation is shown in Fig. 7(a), the DOX loaded hydrogel was injected into the tumor position and the tumor size was measured regularly. The tumors grew fast in the hydrogel group comparable to the control group. On the contrary, the DOX group showed significant antitumor efficacy, which is consistent with antitumor property of the DOX. The hydrogel loaded DOX showed comparable antitumor performance with direct DOX injection, proved the PAPH/OPec hydrogel could take full advantage of the DOX, as show in Fig. 7(b). The tumor volume in the control group increased about 10 times at the end of the experiment, while the tumor in the DOX/hydrogel group only increased ~ 25%. However, the DOX also showed serious in vivo toxicity and the mice in this group died successively. All mice in DOX group died within 15 days, while all mice in other groups survived to the end indicated the PAPH/OPec hydrogel could reduce the in vivo toxicity of DOX (Fig. S4). However, the body weight of the mice in the DOX/hydrogel group also decreased with treating times. At the end of the experiment, the average body weight of the mice in the control group and the hydrogel group increased ~ 40%, but the body weight of the mice in the DOX/hydrogel group decreased ~ 25% (Fig. 7c). Above result showed although the adverse effect of the DOX was still existed, the hydrogel could reduce the toxicity of the drug to the living body.
After the last time tumor size and body weight measurement, the tumors and organs of the mice were collected. As shown in Fig. 7(d), compared to large tumors in the control group and the hydrogel group, the tumors in the DOX/hydrogel group were much smaller. All the mice dead in DOX group and no tumor illustrated as a result. Combined with the biocompatibility experiment, the PAPH/OPec hydrogel loaded DOX could preserve good antitumor efficacy of the DOX and at the same time reduce the toxicity of the drug.
H&E staining observation of the tumors and other tissues
The H&E images are always used to determine the adverse effect of the antitumor drugs. As shown in Fig. 8, The tumor in the hydrogel group did not show significant difference compared to control group, however, the tumor in DOX/hydrogel group showed large part of the cell death similar to DOX group and consisted with the antitumor performance of the DOX. The DOX group also showed obvious spleen and lung toxicity, along with the well-known heart and kidney harm. As for the DOX/hydrogel group, the adverse effect decreased since the release of the DOX from the PAPH/OPec hydrogel reduced the drug concentration in these tissues. However, there were still toxicity to the tissues and resulted body weight decrease possibly because the DOX doses were still too high for this poor targeted drug. To further confirm the localization performance of the PAPH/OPec hydrogel in cancer therapy, tumor targeting drug delivery is under investigation. As a result, the DOX/hydrogel system could reduce the toxicity of loaded drug and could be used as antitumor drug carrier for tumor treatment applications.