The present results indicated cost-savings in the palliative care unit setting compared to the non-palliative care unit setting for patients with advanced cancers. Overall, hospitalization of patients in the last days of life to the palliative care unit can lead to lower costs for both hospitals and patients. The average cost of care in the last five days of life was 3.15 times lower in the palliative care unit compared to the non-palliative care unit setting. The total cost of care for patients admitted to the palliative care unit was $909.63 versus $2,872.69 for patients admitted to other hospital wards.
The most significant difference in cancer costs was related to hoteling expenses (7). In the present study, 57% of patients in the non-palliative care unit setting were hospitalized in the ICU, and the cost of ICU stay was the highest. The implementation of palliative care unit in the last month of life was beneficial; however, this setting caused no significant difference when established in the early stages of the disease. According to a previous study, in the last six months of life, patients were hospitalized several times. Procedures, such as chemotherapy and surgery, were the least frequently used interventions for advanced ovarian cancer in the last six months of life (19). In the current study, people who received palliative care services spent less money on care services compared to those who received other services. In a systematic review of 46 studies, the results showed that palliative care units were less costly than other approaches (20).
This study was performed in a public hospital, and most patients had public insurance (they were mostly insured). There were no significant differences between different types of insurance. On the other hand, patients with public insurance tended to use more expensive services and had extended ICU stays for recovery. However, private insurance reduced the LOS from 9.5 days to 8.5 days compared to public insurance (21). The costs of medication, laboratory tests, and ICU admission significantly reduced when patients died in palliative care units, compared to the non-palliative care unit setting. Overall, a net saving of $4,908 in direct costs per admission (P = 0.003), along with a saving of $374 in direct daily costs (P = 0.001), was reported in this study. Significant cost savings can be achieved by setting clear care goals, which can lead to the selection of an effective treatment by the patient's family and help achieve these goals and avoid unnecessary interventions (22).
Medication order costs in the non- palliative care unit setting were nine times higher than the palliative care unit setting. The cost of medication orders in the non- palliative care unit setting indicated that the used medications were costly, while their benefits were questionable. In previous research, 75.0% of patients in hospitals received three or more potentially ineffective medications in their last three days of life, whereas this percentage was about 42.6% in hospice care (23, 24). Since imaging for advanced patients has no diagnostic value, it can be only justified by the management of acute symptoms, assessment of disease progression, and evaluation of the effects of treatment; the latter can be helpful in assessing whether treatment should be discontinued or changed. Although there are currently available guidelines, diagnostic imaging remains controversial. In a previous study, in the last month of life, most patients had received at least one imaging procedure without improving their survival (25).
In the current study, palliative care units had a higher frequency and cost of daily visits compared to the non-palliative care unit setting. We only registered the cost of daily visits in the patient’s file when the corresponding physician made a visit, not the resident. During daily visits to the palliative care unit, the corresponding physician managed the patient, met the patient's family, and communicated with the patient; these visits were crucial in the last days of a patient's life (26, 27).
Generally, palliative care consultation affects the quality of life of patients. The present results revealed that few patients benefited from palliative care consultation during their hospital stay. The greatest share of costs in the non- palliative care unit setting was ICU admission. If there is no palliative care unit, palliative consultation can reduce the cost of patient management (28). It is known that improvement of the patients’ quality of life and their dignity and comfort is the main goal of palliative care. Besides reducing hospital costs, palliative care protects patients and their families against financial difficulties due to disease and disability (29).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the economic benefits of palliative care unit implementation in Iran. This study, however, had some limitations. First, based on the inclusion criteria and the lack of palliative care units in Iran, the sample size was small. Second, only the cost of care for advanced cancer patients who died in the hospital was estimated, while the cost of care in the last five days of life in patients who died in their homes could not be calculated.