Aboveground, belowground, and total biomass and their biomass allocation
N addition significantly increased the total biomass of both P. tabuliformis and F. chinensis (Table S2). Compared to the no N groups, low N and high N addition enhanced Tbio by 32.8% and 45.3% for P. tabuliformis and 33.1% and 47.4% for F. chinensis, respectively (Fig. 1). Specifically, N addition increased the AGB and BGB of P. tabuliformis, while only increasing the BGB of F. chinensis. There was no significant variation in the AGB of F. chinensis.
Furthermore, consecutive N addition had a significant effect on aboveground and belowground biomass allocation. The R/S of both P. tabuliformis and F. chinensis increased with N increasing (Fig. 1; Table S2). As for P. tabuliformis, N addition increased R/S of 6.7% under low N treatment and 36.7% under high N treatment relative to no N treatment. While the R/S of F. chinensis increased by 28.6% and 62.0%. These variations indicated that the positive effect of N addition on belowground biomass allocation was more significant for the two target tree species.
Our results showed that there were positive relationships between AGB and BGB of both the two trees (Fig. 2). The scaling slopes for the ratio of AGB to BGB of P. tabuliformis were 0.40, 0.41, and 0.44 in the no, low, and high N groups, and the correlation coefficients were 0.82, 0.12, and 0.64, respectively. Despite there being no correlation in low N treatment, it was obvious that aboveground and belowground biomass allocation of P. tabuliformis showed an isometric relationship as N increased. For F. chinensis, the scaling slopes for the ratio of AGB to BGB were 1.64, 0.68, and 0.79, and the correlation coefficients were 0.60, 0.74, and 0.93 under no, low, and high N treatment, respectively. These results confirmed the biomass optimal partitioning hypothesis, which performed N addition significantly enhanced belowground biomass allocation of F. chinensis.
Aboveground and belowground traits
N addition had significantly affected the aboveground traits of P. tabuliformis, increasing the tree height, SLA, and LDMC. However, only high N increased the LDMC and LTD of F. chinensis, while there were no significant differences among other aboveground traits. (Fig. 3; Table S3). As for belowground traits, N addition had significant effects on the belowground traits of both P. tabuliformis and F. chinensis (Table S4). N increased the SRL, RA, and SRA of P. tabuliformis, while reducing its RTD. Meanwhile, there were also positive correlations between N and RL, SRL, RA, and SRA of F. chinensis, while the negative correlation between N and RD (Fig. 4).
Besides, we observed a synergy relationship between aboveground and belowground traits of P. tabuliformis in response to N addition (Fig. 5). Both tree height and SLA were positive with SRL and SRA, and N addition increased all of these functional traits. However, there was no obvious correlation between the aboveground and belowground traits of F. chinensis.
Relationship between tree biomass and traits
Our results of Pearson’s correlation analysis indicated that there were significant associations between tree biomass and aboveground and belowground traits of P. tabuliformis (Fig. S1a). We found that PL and SLA were positive with AGB, BGB, Tbio, and R/S, while LDMC and LTD were positive with AGB and Tbio. Likewise, SRL was positive with AGB, BGB, Tbio, and R/S, and SRA was positive with BGB, Tbio, and R/S. However, RTD was negatively correlated with AGB, BGB, and Tbio. As for F. chinensis, only belowground traits were significantly correlated with biomass (Fig. S1b). RL and RA were positively related to BGB, Tbio, and R/S, while RD was negative with AGB, BGB, and Tbio.
Nutrient elements traits of trees and soil
N addition increased the RCC and RNC of P. tabuliformis, while decreasing the LCC/LNC and RCC/RNC. Similarly, LNC and RNC of F. chinensis were increased and the LCC/LNC and RCC/RNC were decreased as N increased (Fig. 6; Table S5). There was no significant difference between N and LCC and RCC. As for soil traits, N increased the SNC, SPC, SNH, and SNO in the rhizosphere soil of both two tree species, but didn’t change the SCC (Table 1).
Table 1
Soil nutrients including carbon (C) nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations under different N treatments. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among N treatments at the same time at a significance level of p-value < 0.05.
Treatment | SCC (mg/g) | SNC (mg/g) | SNH (mg/kg) | SNO (mg/kg) | SPC (mg/g) |
Pinus tabuliformis | | | | | |
No N | 13.63 ± 1.93 | 1.12 ± 0.04 a | 6.52 ± 0.70 a | 14.92 ± 1.06 a | 7.84 ± 0.41a a |
Low N | 9.68 ± 0.88 | 1.18 ± 0.06 a | 7.88 ± 0.26 b | 15.68 ± 0.54 a | 11.01 ± 1.39 b |
High N | 13.47 ± 0.18 | 1.38 ± 0.07 b | 9.73 ± 2.36 c | 16.84 ± 0.11 b | 12.12 ± 0.69 b |
Fraxinus chinensis | | | | | |
No N | 8.07 ± 0.17 | 0.67 ± 0.04 a | 2.43 ± 0.15 a | 12.18 ± 1.63 a | 8.41 ± 0.27a a |
Low N | 8.33 ± 0.21 | 0.81 ± 0.02 b | 4.75 ± 1.08 b | 22.96 ± 1.45 b | 8.48 ± 0.60a a |
High N | 8.20 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.04 b | 4.20 ± 0.90 b | 20.52 ± 0.15 b | 10.06 ± 0.42 b |
The first structural equation model explained 94% of the variance in R/S of P. tabuliformis (Fig. 7a). The result showed that N addition changed the soil traits (SNC, SPC) and tree nutrient elements (LNC, RNC, and RCC) and had direct inhibiting and indirect promoting effects on R/S (Table 2). Specifically, N addition indirectly increased R/S through positive effects on RNC and SNC and also promotes R/S as a whole. Moreover, N increased RNC via a direct effect and indirectly altering SNC. SPC had negative effects on LNC and N had direct promoting and indirect inhibiting effects on it.
Table 2
Direct, indirect and total effects on root-shoot ratio (R/S) on standardized values of statistically significant SEM paths (p < 0.05). Direction of relationship indicated by + (positive relationship) or - (negative relationship). NS indicate no significant relationships.
Predictor | Pathway to R/S | Effect |
Pinus tabuliformis | | |
N | Direct | -0.37 |
| Indirect | 0.68 |
| Total | 0.31 |
SNC | Direct | 0.47 |
| Indirect | 0.27 |
| Total | 0.74 |
RNC | Direct | 0.60 |
| Indirect | NS |
| Total | 0.60 |
Fraxinus chinensis | | |
N | Direct | 0.35 |
| Indirect | 0.42 |
| Total | 0.77 |
RNC | Direct | 0.51 |
| Indirect | NS |
| Total | 0.51 |
The SEM2 explained 96% of the variance in R/S of F. chinensis (Fig. 7b). N addition was positive with soil traits (SNC, SPC) and tree nutrient elements (LNC, RNC). Meanwhile, N increased R/S through direct and indirect effects (Table 2). Specifically, N could promote RNC via a direct effect and indirect effects through increasing SNC and SPC, and finally indirectly increasing R/S.